Author Topic: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)  (Read 41340 times)

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #60 on: 20 November 2015, 23:06:27 »
C-Bills aren't really worth much anymore in the dark age.
So yes, the C-Bill cost might stay the same, but everything else would be more expensive.
That'd be splitting some pretty fine hairs.
How many munchies you could have bought depends on if they were on offer.
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

GreekFire

  • Aeternus Ignis
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #61 on: 20 November 2015, 23:43:40 »
So the Savage Wolf will probably retain that cost. But on the bright side one super expensive mech takes less pilots, less food, less water, less clothing and less dropship space.

And I think this hits the nail on the head.
Dropships and jumpships are the limiting factor for most in-universe military forces. Not because they cost a lot (even if they do), but because they're produced in low quantities from a limited number of facilities.

Sure, you can buy more 'Mechs with the kind of money needed for the Mk IV. Problem is, it'll be harder to move them. If you ever plan for any sort of offensive campaign you'll eventually hit a wall where you simply won't be able to find any more dropships or jumpships for sale. And at that point you're better off upgrading the 'Mechs you have.

Enter the Savage Wolf.
Tu habites au Québec? Tu veux jouer au BattleTech? Envoie-moi un message!

cavingjan

  • Spelunca Custos
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4470
    • warrenborn
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #62 on: 21 November 2015, 08:01:47 »
Is there a unit that only has to deal with offensive operations and never has to deal with defensive operations?

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #63 on: 21 November 2015, 08:10:56 »
I suppose special forces and raiders, unless caught off guard. They would benefit from a durable cavalry mech. Still, unless your funding is unlimited (in which case, build a new dropship factory), at the projected price there'd be enough space left in the ships to use more, and thus, cheaper, units. Though most seem to choose not to believe the price anyways, so that may be a moot point.
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

Arkansas Warrior

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9203
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #64 on: 21 November 2015, 09:50:52 »
The bay limitation also only applies if you need to combat drop, repair in transit, etc.  if you're a unit that usually does garrison work, or comes in in the second or third wave after someone else has established the beachhead, you can probably get by most of the time shipping many if not all of your mechs in cargo.  Even the lowly Mule can fit 80 Atlases, and regiments of light mechs.  Of course then it takes longer to offload, but that's why you send that ship in once the foothold has been established.
Sunrise is Coming.

All Hail First Prince Melissa Davion, the Patron Saint of the Regimental Combat Team, who cowed Dainmar Liao, created the Model Army, and rescued Robinson!  May her light ever guide the sons of the Suns, May our daughters ever endeavour to emulate her!

GreekFire

  • Aeternus Ignis
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #65 on: 21 November 2015, 10:56:26 »
The bay limitation also only applies if you need to combat drop, repair in transit, etc.  if you're a unit that usually does garrison work, or comes in in the second or third wave after someone else has established the beachhead, you can probably get by most of the time shipping many if not all of your mechs in cargo.  Even the lowly Mule can fit 80 Atlases, and regiments of light mechs.  Of course then it takes longer to offload, but that's why you send that ship in once the foothold has been established.

Yep, and I'm not advocating it for garrison or secondary units. I'm advocating it for front-line regiments that will be on the move more often than not, the regiments that *will* be establishing the beachheads. The fact that it's Clan Omni alone should reserve it for only the best out there.

Is there a unit that only has to deal with offensive operations and never has to deal with defensive operations?

Of course not. But IMO an upgraded regiment that can quickly deploy top-of-the-line firepower no matter the situation is more valuable than two regiments unable to rapidly launch offensives.
Tu habites au Québec? Tu veux jouer au BattleTech? Envoie-moi un message!

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #66 on: 21 November 2015, 11:11:23 »
Well, the problem with establishing a beachhead under fire, aka when the enemy expects you, is that you will take losses.
You don't use your best equipment as shocktroopers.
The planetary milita might just be "Ok, our work here is done! Ordered retreat, see you at the next planet. 2 more till bankruptcy". Again, I don't believe the projected prices for a second.
Whatever you try to do, it's not worth the listed money; change a lance of those for LFE-Mechs and you can buy a second dropship. As for the actual mech, say, with BV balance, it is beautiful.
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #67 on: 21 November 2015, 11:25:16 »
CGL's position has pretty much been explicitly stated on the forums here, hasn't it?

Monetary cost is no longer any sort of a game-balancing factor.  That makes things awkward for the roleplaying side of the house, but for the game design on the board-game side it's got to be liberating to have one less thing to balance.

Arkansas Warrior

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9203
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #68 on: 21 November 2015, 16:30:21 »
Yep, and I'm not advocating it for garrison or secondary units. I'm advocating it for front-line regiments that will be on the move more often than not, the regiments that *will* be establishing the beachheads. The fact that it's Clan Omni alone should reserve it for only the best out there.

Of course not. But IMO an upgraded regiment that can quickly deploy top-of-the-line firepower no matter the situation is more valuable than two regiments unable to rapidly launch offensives.
Even a lot of frontline regiments will be landing in the second wave.  Hell, one battalion of a given regiment may do the initial drop, and the other two land later.  There are a lot of ways that a Savage Wolf could find itself operating somewhere behind the point of the sword.
Sunrise is Coming.

All Hail First Prince Melissa Davion, the Patron Saint of the Regimental Combat Team, who cowed Dainmar Liao, created the Model Army, and rescued Robinson!  May her light ever guide the sons of the Suns, May our daughters ever endeavour to emulate her!

GreekFire

  • Aeternus Ignis
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #69 on: 21 November 2015, 17:28:49 »
Well, the problem with establishing a beachhead under fire, aka when the enemy expects you, is that you will take losses.
You don't use your best equipment as shocktroopers.
The planetary milita might just be "Ok, our work here is done! Ordered retreat, see you at the next planet. 2 more till bankruptcy". Again, I don't believe the projected prices for a second.

I'm...not sure I agree with this. But I'm not sure, I could definitely be wrong.
What would the regiments throw out first? Their lesser equipment? And that lesser stuff has to hold the line while the most advanced 'Mechs come out of cargo bays? Ehh...

Even a lot of frontline regiments will be landing in the second wave.  Hell, one battalion of a given regiment may do the initial drop, and the other two land later.  There are a lot of ways that a Savage Wolf could find itself operating somewhere behind the point of the sword.

Yep, perfectly true. It will happen.
I'm still saying that it's a lot easier to transport and deploy it and 'Mechs like it as part of an invasion than trying to deal with a hoard of cheaper 'Mechs.

I guess this boils down to:
a) is it better to upgrade units within existing regiments, at the cost of slowing down the rate of growth of your military, or
b) is it better to build up more regiments, at the cost of reduced quality overall and a having a larger transportation/logistical footprint.

I believe option A is better, you might think option B is better. I don't think one is righter than the other, they're just two different sides of a coin that make for two different military doctrines.
Tu habites au Québec? Tu veux jouer au BattleTech? Envoie-moi un message!

glitterboy2098

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11991
    • The Temple Grounds - My Roleplaying and History website
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #70 on: 21 November 2015, 17:54:52 »
on the other hand, a design like this created to just soak up enemy fire and outlast the enemy.. these are the sorts of designs that you might want in the beach-head creating unit.

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #71 on: 21 November 2015, 19:46:17 »
Well, it's XXL Engine certainly plays into that.
By the time it drops, it's soaked considerable damage, and there will be more pressing targets, so it's salvageable.
I'd deploy it either in the second wave of the first assault, or give it to special forces that might well be on planet already.
It might also be the first unit out the first dropship, depending entirely on the defenses.
If the planets large and doesn't have anti-orbital defenses, you may well drop in a quiet enough spot that the durability this mech and others like it provide is sufficient to establish a beachhead.
And should the enemy have concentrations of artillery, it may want to drop first so you can press the assault before they shoot themselves in on your dropzone.
If you don't know where the fighting will be hot, they should be withheld until enemy contact, so you can deploy them where needed.
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

Nahuris

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2103
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #72 on: 22 November 2015, 11:39:50 »
It would also vary by commander -- if you have a real aggressive commander, then yeah, this is in the frontlines.
If you have a bean counter commander, he is shrieking about the price and risk, this is his personal ride, and it probably won't get scuffed.
If you have a commander that leads from the front, yep, this is there ---- leads by delegation, maybe not......

By far, the bean counter is the worst, though, he would have his entire force trying to hold a position with Stingers, if he thought it would mean less requisition forms, and having to ask for new supplies. He'd rather kill people, than risk damage to equipment... you can always blame the dead guy for getting killed......
We also call then Corporate Commanders, or CEO Officers.........Bottom line is far more important than the butcher's bill.

Nahuris
"A friend will calm you down when you are angry, but a BEST friend will skip along beside you with a baseball bat singing "someone's gonna get it."

"If we are ever in a situation, where I am the voice of reason, we are in a very bad situation."

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 28960
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #73 on: 23 November 2015, 18:02:32 »
Well, if its mercs . . . since they are self-insured that does not work too well.  For House forces there is the bit of political pay.

I like the mech, the way it is arranged seems ok and the few times I have played it the XXL heat was not really a problem.  You factor it like anything else.

The mini . . . I think the arms are too thin and the connection point for the arms has caused me fits.  Had to drill both holes though one is still a problem.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

chanman

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3903
  • Architect of suffering
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #74 on: 02 January 2016, 14:01:28 »
Can anyone confirm whether Mad Cat Mk IV is the IS code name or whether both names are in use by the clans?

DarkISI

  • Praedonum Dominus
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7177
  • https://amzn.to/3Dm3bvj
    • My Author Website
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #75 on: 02 January 2016, 17:30:22 »
Can anyone confirm whether Mad Cat Mk IV is the IS code name or whether both names are in use by the clans?

It's the name under which the Sea Foxes sell it to the IS. For the Clans they use the name Savage Wolf.
German novelist and part time Battletech writer.


HPG Station - German Battletech News

"if they didn't want to be stomped to death by a psychotic gang of battlemechs, they shouldn't have fallen down" - Liam's Ghost

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #76 on: 02 January 2016, 18:33:29 »
It's the name under which the Sea Foxes sell it to the IS. For the Clans they use the name Savage Wolf.

Source?

GreekFire

  • Aeternus Ignis
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #77 on: 02 January 2016, 18:59:57 »
Can anyone confirm whether Mad Cat Mk IV is the IS code name or whether both names are in use by the clans?

The only piece of fiction I remember seeing the Mad Cat Mk IV in is A Bonfire of Worlds. The passages written from Anastasia or Alaric's perspective use Savage Wolf, while the single passage involving Thaddeus Marik has him using Mad Cat IV instead. So that suggests the Clans use Savage Wolf more than anything else.

Then again, the same passages have the Wolves using Vulture instead of Mad Dog, so who knows.
Tu habites au Québec? Tu veux jouer au BattleTech? Envoie-moi un message!

DarkISI

  • Praedonum Dominus
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7177
  • https://amzn.to/3Dm3bvj
    • My Author Website
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #78 on: 03 January 2016, 06:17:07 »
Source?

Aside from Bonfire of Worlds (which is the first fiction, but not only, source that comes to mind), all internal discussion and the fact how it's name is arranged in the MUL and all other official sources.
German novelist and part time Battletech writer.


HPG Station - German Battletech News

"if they didn't want to be stomped to death by a psychotic gang of battlemechs, they shouldn't have fallen down" - Liam's Ghost

DarthRads

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Trust me...I'm the Doctor...
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #79 on: 03 January 2016, 23:39:31 »
I drove one against a mixed Kurita lance. Thing was brutal and survived a PPC head hit thanks to the FL armour.

Phobos

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 664
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #80 on: 05 January 2016, 13:53:38 »
Not sure why surviving a regular PPC hit to the face would be anything special?

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 28960
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #81 on: 05 January 2016, 14:10:26 »
Its not the hit, its that there would still be 2 points of armor on the head instead of the pilot getting a breezy view of the battlefield.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

DarthRads

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Trust me...I'm the Doctor...
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #82 on: 05 January 2016, 22:36:18 »
Its not the hit, its that there would still be 2 points of armor on the head instead of the pilot getting a breezy view of the battlefield.

Yep...kept it in the fight that little bit longer...

The_Caveman

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1246
  • A Living Fossil
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #83 on: 06 January 2016, 03:12:28 »
CGL's position has pretty much been explicitly stated on the forums here, hasn't it?

Monetary cost is no longer any sort of a game-balancing factor.  That makes things awkward for the roleplaying side of the house, but for the game design on the board-game side it's got to be liberating to have one less thing to balance.

Which is fine with me, C-Bills are busted as a balance mechanism before the 3rd SW or after about 3055, but if they're dumping them as a balance factor then something needs to conclusively take their place for those of us who take an RP perspective.

Come to think of it, ComStar isn't even so much a thing in the Dark Age is it? No HPGs, no Com Guards, no tech decline to make them the guardians of information again, so it'd be really strange if their currency was still driving the economy.
Half the fun of BattleTech is the mental gymnastics required to scientifically rationalize design choices made decades ago entirely based on the Rule of Cool.

The other half is a first-turn AC/2 shot TAC to your gyro that causes your Atlas to fall and smash its own cockpit... wait, I said fun didn't I?

Maelwys

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4872
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #84 on: 06 January 2016, 03:59:33 »
They're a good default choice that's been around for centuries. People and economies are used to it, and its a neutral choice. Do you think the Capellans are going to agree to using Republic currency as means of Inner Sphere-wide commerce?

Not only that, but until the disruption of the HPG network, the C-bill was actually based on something tangible, something I'm not sure we can say for any of the House currencies.

So the c-bill has been around, its universal, its mostly neutral. Its not too likely that its going to suddenly change. It obviously lost quite a bit of value, but its not going to get replaced right away, especially with all the issues involved.

Scotty

  • Alpha Strike Guru by appointment to the FWLM
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13687
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #85 on: 06 January 2016, 22:50:23 »
It's a terrible balancing mechanism and has been terrible for literally decades of real time.  If you're concerned about the RP aspect of things, the Warchest system and the associated costs and resources is a better way to handle it.  That doesn't mean that the idea of a balancing mechanism using in-universe currency is a terrible one, it's that the way c-bill costs are static across literally 700 years of setting history is utterly non-sensical.  An XL engine in 2750 shouldn't cost the exact same as an XL engine in 3000.  Or in 3145.  An XXL engine in 3067 (or whenever it was first produced) should not cost the same as an XXL engine in 3145.
Catalyst Demo Agent #679

Kansas City players, or people who are just passing through the area, come join us at the Geekery just off Shawnee Mission Parkway for BattleTech!  Current days are Tuesdays in the afternoon and evening.  I can't make every single week, but odds are pretty good that somebody will be there.

The_Caveman

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1246
  • A Living Fossil
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #86 on: 07 January 2016, 07:56:36 »
It's a terrible balancing mechanism and has been terrible for literally decades of real time.  If you're concerned about the RP aspect of things, the Warchest system and the associated costs and resources is a better way to handle it.  That doesn't mean that the idea of a balancing mechanism using in-universe currency is a terrible one, it's that the way c-bill costs are static across literally 700 years of setting history is utterly non-sensical.  An XL engine in 2750 shouldn't cost the exact same as an XL engine in 3000.  Or in 3145.  An XXL engine in 3067 (or whenever it was first produced) should not cost the same as an XXL engine in 3145.

To be fair I don't think that was ever FASA's intent for C-Bills either. The FASA-verse only ran from 3002 to 3068. I don't think there were ever official rules for playing outside that time period and certainly not for price adjustments, earlier eras just existed as fluff.

The money rules just never got updated for some reason when FanPro and Catalyst expanded the playable portion of the timeline. (Probably because not enough people really cared about costs anyway.)
Half the fun of BattleTech is the mental gymnastics required to scientifically rationalize design choices made decades ago entirely based on the Rule of Cool.

The other half is a first-turn AC/2 shot TAC to your gyro that causes your Atlas to fall and smash its own cockpit... wait, I said fun didn't I?

Scotty

  • Alpha Strike Guru by appointment to the FWLM
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13687
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #87 on: 07 January 2016, 18:20:32 »
The FASA verse included the Star League and XL engines available in that era, too, with TRO:2750, and also included a number of Clan second line units that had been in use for hundreds of years.  "Official rules" for playing in any era is and has always been the same set of rules with different pieces of equipment involved (an era that exists 'as fluff' is 100% playable in BattleTech).

C-Bills have been terrible for a lot longer than since 2001.
Catalyst Demo Agent #679

Kansas City players, or people who are just passing through the area, come join us at the Geekery just off Shawnee Mission Parkway for BattleTech!  Current days are Tuesdays in the afternoon and evening.  I can't make every single week, but odds are pretty good that somebody will be there.

The_Caveman

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1246
  • A Living Fossil
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #88 on: 07 January 2016, 18:36:09 »
The FASA verse included the Star League and XL engines available in that era, too, with TRO:2750, and also included a number of Clan second line units that had been in use for hundreds of years.  "Official rules" for playing in any era is and has always been the same set of rules with different pieces of equipment involved (an era that exists 'as fluff' is 100% playable in BattleTech).

C-Bills have been terrible for a lot longer than since 2001.

Yes, but the purpose of including those units in TROs was to have them available for use within the "core" timeline. There were no scenario packs (that I'm aware of) set outside the 31st century, only a couple of sourcebooks, and no MW adventures. If you wanted to play outside the core era, you could in theory, but you were mostly on your own. One of the things I actually like about Cattytech is the fairly strong support for alternate eras.

FFS, C-bills didn't even exist during the Star League era, so pricing Star League 'Mechs in them only makes sense WRT finding one in a lostech cache.
Half the fun of BattleTech is the mental gymnastics required to scientifically rationalize design choices made decades ago entirely based on the Rule of Cool.

The other half is a first-turn AC/2 shot TAC to your gyro that causes your Atlas to fall and smash its own cockpit... wait, I said fun didn't I?

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 24877
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: 'Mech of the Week: Mad Cat Mk IV (Savage Wolf)
« Reply #89 on: 07 January 2016, 19:15:41 »
I think the cost of the Mk IV's XXL engine maybe a problem for some merc units.  Specially if they need do repairs depending on campaign rules for a merc unit.  If their using abstract repair system like say Warchest System, it may not be not a problem.  Older rules, i think it be bit more difficult especially when you may play it you need go to the Sea Foxes to get your engine parts from, never mind destroyed weapons.

Funny thing reading the fluff in the FM3145, it sounded like C-bill is gone and international money doesn't have much value depending on where your guys are
at some points that mercs are bartering with ammunition as form of money.
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

 

Register