Author Topic: Have the clans failed as a society ?  (Read 9388 times)

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1820
Have the clans failed as a society ?
« on: 28 March 2017, 13:14:39 »
After re reading the Wars of Reaving and Dark Age materials - I ask the following:

Have the Clans failed?
Failed as a society?
Especially if we take into account the new background which seems to show Nick as power mad nut job who purged:  people, places and things he disliked not just to build a better society but when it was convenient to do so. So have they failed? I am not sure but the following  weighs in favor of that IMO:
1)   Most of the original clans have been kicked out or destroyed as “ failures or tainted”
2)   In their biggest joint clan effort since Klondike the Invasion they failed to achieve their objectives
3)   After the truce and great refusal they battered themselves silly
4)   After years of neglect/heavy handiness the scientist cast manage to attempt a wide ranging coup
a.   The after affects tainted the genepools and stunted technology progress even further
5)   After the word of blake wars some of the clans abandoned Zell and limited combat all together which would seem to make them no better than what they claimed to be fighting against…

So what do you all think? Have the Clans the descendants of the noble SLDF failed?

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #1 on: 28 March 2017, 15:10:09 »
Yes.
As a culture or society, they are Frankenstein's monster - a stillborn artificial construct that eventually collapsed.

But what's worse is that they never understood what that "Star League" thing is they're fighting for. A Clansman, or at least a Warrior, wouldn't understand, much less want to live in, a Star League society. It became an empty word for them when Nicholas purged their cultural roots.
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1820
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #2 on: 28 March 2017, 15:28:59 »
Harsh but I think true!

And this is from a Clan Fan. After reading Historical Liberation of Terra ( great read) it goes into depth of how much restraint the SLDF strove to maintain in the face of HORRIFIC atrocities from the Amaris regime. Course their well intentioned exile soon dissolved in the face of reality but I think the Great Father would have been appalled by some of the actions of his children 

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #3 on: 28 March 2017, 15:31:01 »
I agree with the OP and go further to say that the Clans are further removed from the (first) Star League than the denizens of the Inner Sphere are.  That irony is kind of the entire point to the flavor of the Clans, imo.

The Clans have become a warrior culture, and in that they're definitely successful at being conquerors and warmakers.

Whether or not these things mean they've failed as a society is a matter of opinion/perspective.  Additionally: whenever ilClan comes out, we'll have another new perspective on how to answer the OPs question.  Presumably, someone is going to become the ilClan and that's the pinnacle the entire Clan civilization has been building towards since Little Nicky's time.  How exactly that happens is going to be almost as important as if it *does* happen.  The Clans are the dog that's been chasing it's tail for 300 years.  What do they do if they finally catch it?
« Last Edit: 28 March 2017, 15:34:08 by Tai Dai Cultist »

Iron Mongoose

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1473
  • Don't you know, you're all my very best friends
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #4 on: 28 March 2017, 16:46:15 »
I think there are two questions here: have the Clans failed as any sort of society, and have they failed in their intent?

The first I think we can answer no.  Now, they're not particularly stable, but they were designed to be unstable, with rules written into place to formalize the instability.  Since all that has taken place has been above board, within their laws (abjuration, absorption, annihilation) then I don't think we can say they've failed.  There are still a hand full of 'official' Clans left, in addition to the ones in the Inner Sphere, after all, and each group thrives (or fails to) in its own way.

Now, have they done what Kerensky envisioned?  The truth is it's hard to know exactly what any given Kerensky envisioned, so its not necessarily possible to say precisely, but it is tempting to say no.  Alexander I think would definitely be saddened by what became of his poor SLDF, since I can scarcely imagine he'd have wanted them to be so horribly fractured.  Nicholas did seem to want to create a warrior society, in which different parts sharpened themselves against each other, which absolutely came to pass. 

The Clans themselves had two main theories about what he wanted: the Crusaders believed that he meant them to return to the Inner Sphere to 'save' them in more or less the same way they returned to the Pentagon worlds, which is to say as a conquering army, while the Wardens believed they were to protect and safeguard the Inner Sphere, which given that they're invasion was the second biggest upheaval of the century, and the greatest (the Jihad) took place on 'their watch' I think we can call that one a failure as well.  So by the Clans' own standards, they do seem to be failures.
"For my military knowledge, though I'm plucky and adventury,
Has only been brought down to the beginning of the century..."

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6126
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #5 on: 28 March 2017, 21:37:32 »
Yes.
As a culture or society, they are Frankenstein's monster - a stillborn artificial construct that eventually collapsed.

So just like every other culture or society?

I don't think any warrior is fighting for the Star League as a citizen of the Inner Sphere might imagine it. Remember Star League culture failed in the Sphere and in the Homeworlds. It is why Clan culture exists. It would be better to imagine them unifying humanity lile the Star League but without the flaws.

Orwell84

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 879
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #6 on: 29 March 2017, 03:47:54 »
Agree with Iron Mongoose and Tai Dai Cultist's points.

Addressing the OP, I think it depends on how you define 'failure'. Every culture must adapt or die and kudos to the BT writers for not keeping the Clans unbelievably static.

Of all of the 32nd century Clans, I'd say the Bears are the most successful and have the best long-term prospects as a society - they've won over their Spheroid subjects without losing their Clan identity and managed to avoid any major feuds or encumbrances. Clan Hell's Horses seems to have managed the former to some degree as well, but are now yoked to the Chiggis Khan. I can see Alaric taking the Wolf Empire down the Dominion route in the long-term, but the Falcons I think are destined either for a spectacular and fiery end or long-term death by a thousand Spheroid cuts.

Additionally: whenever ilClan comes out, we'll have another new perspective on how to answer the OPs question.  Presumably, someone is going to become the ilClan and that's the pinnacle the entire Clan civilization has been building towards since Little Nicky's time.  How exactly that happens is going to be almost as important as if it *does* happen.  The Clans are the dog that's been chasing it's tail for 300 years.  What do they do if they finally catch it?

Plus ca change... the other Clans will find some excuse to ignore the winners and continue fighting each other. They can always claim that Kerensky meant for the Clans to be competing variants on the same idea, not for one Clan to rule all.
All Clan totems are equal but some are more equal than others.

"The Succession Wars solved no problem. Their effects, both immediate and indirect, were either negative or disastrous. Morally subversive, economically destructive, socially degrading, confused in their causes, devious in their course, futile in their results, they are the outstanding example in Spheroid history of meaningless conflict."
The Third Star League's view of the Succession Wars, plagiarised from an ancient Terran historian's judgement of the Thirty Years War.

SCC

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8392
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #7 on: 29 March 2017, 04:13:04 »
I think people are making a mistake in assuming that when ilClan comes out there will be an ilClan, events in the book could well make it such that no Clan can ever be ilClan.

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #8 on: 29 March 2017, 04:51:31 »
Of all of the 32nd century Clans, I'd say the Bears are the most successful and have the best long-term prospects as a society - they've won over their Spheroid subjects without losing their Clan identity and managed to avoid any major feuds or encumbrances. Clan Hell's Horses seems to have managed the former to some degree as well, but are now yoked to the Chiggis Khan.
The same goes for the Snow Ravens, possibly the Goliath Scorpions, and to a degree even the now-nomadic Sea Foxes.
Incidentially, Ghost Bear and Snow Raven are the Clans I like most dislike the least, probably because they're more believable than the original "Yarr! We Clans!" antagonists. With the Ghost Bears we even get told about the kinks and wrinkles in their fused Rasalhague society - although it is by far the most successful combination of a Clan and a real IS faction, it's still not without discord. Same with the Snow Ravens, who however haven't carried the cultural integration quite as far as the Ghost Bears.
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

Orwell84

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 879
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #9 on: 29 March 2017, 06:48:06 »
The same goes for the Snow Ravens, possibly the Goliath Scorpions, and to a degree even the now-nomadic Sea Foxes.
Incidentially, Ghost Bear and Snow Raven are the Clans I like most dislike the least, probably because they're more believable than the original "Yarr! We Clans!" antagonists. With the Ghost Bears we even get told about the kinks and wrinkles in their fused Rasalhague society - although it is by far the most successful combination of a Clan and a real IS faction, it's still not without discord. Same with the Snow Ravens, who however haven't carried the cultural integration quite as far as the Ghost Bears.

Ah yes, how could I have forgotten the Foxes? You've touched on one of the key reasons I like the Bears most as well (along with the Wolves).

As to the Scorpions and Ravens, they've done OK, but the latest news on both indicates problems arising from typical warrior caste arrogance. IMHO it's a toss-up whether the Imperio implodes before the Aggressors begin field-testing their new Taint-Eradication(TM) toys. Which is a bit of a shame, because they're one of the more interesting factions now from a cultural standpoint.
All Clan totems are equal but some are more equal than others.

"The Succession Wars solved no problem. Their effects, both immediate and indirect, were either negative or disastrous. Morally subversive, economically destructive, socially degrading, confused in their causes, devious in their course, futile in their results, they are the outstanding example in Spheroid history of meaningless conflict."
The Third Star League's view of the Succession Wars, plagiarised from an ancient Terran historian's judgement of the Thirty Years War.

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #10 on: 29 March 2017, 07:17:06 »
As a society, no. As Nick intended them to be, probably. As Aleksandr hoped, diffidently.

If Nick intended them to reestablish the Star League then he totally messed up by removing anything IS.

As far as ilClan goes, never going to happen. The home clans won't do it now, the IS clans can't do it, and if they did the home clans would not recognize them as their tainted.
« Last Edit: 29 March 2017, 07:50:06 by Robroy »

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Achtung Minen!

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 109
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #11 on: 29 March 2017, 07:40:26 »
The Clans have evolved to meet every difficulty that they have encountered. An evolving society is not a failing society. It is ultimately pointless to hold them up to one singular mission or vision for several reasons:

1) That mission or vision is not particularly clear, even during Aleksandr Kerensky's lifetime. Exactly HOW was Aleksandr going to accomplish any of his plans?

2) Nicholas Kerensky really fundamentally changed that vision.

3) The facts of the invasion further changed that vision. Simple "takeover" was (and always had been) materialistically impossible, whether in Aleksandr's time or in Lincoln Osis' time. Given this impossibility, the "Inner Sphere" Clans needed to undergo a transformation.

Jellico is right. It is not unusual for societies to change with the needs of the time: in fact, it represents a thriving (not failing) society. The Hidden Hope doctrine represented one of those changes, applying religious significance to the Clan homecoming and a sudden urgency to return. The Warden philosophy paved the way for certain Clans to reintegrate into Inner Sphere life and politics. The Crusader doctrine provided the rationale to stay "true" to the Clan way, even in the midst of the barbarians that destroyed the Star League's vision of human unity across the stars. (Remember, separation from the corruption of the Inner Sphere had previously been a (the?) foundation of Clan society.) Both doctrines were actually unique evolutions in the lifepath of Clan society, NOT just a mere raison d'être for the continued existence of the Clans.

Claiming that the Clans didn't live up to some original vision fails to appreciate how that vision actually changed at each major turn in Clan history. This is really the function of the Remembrance... it records historical moments in verse, but the performance of the Remembrance by Clan warriors and Loremasters is a ritual of "re-remembering" history (i.e. "re-creating history") in ways that are uniquely appropriate for the present. If the Clans insisted on a "factual" account if history, they would probably be rather surprised at what they found.
« Last Edit: 29 March 2017, 07:54:35 by Achtung Minen! »

Nightgaun7

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 537
  • The ends justify the means.
    • Built for War - A BattleTech TRO by fans like you!
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #12 on: 29 March 2017, 08:42:43 »
Keresky was a fool, his son was mad, and all their followers were both.

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #13 on: 29 March 2017, 09:30:25 »
So have they failed? I am not sure but the following  weighs in favor of that IMO:
1)   Most of the original clans have been kicked out or destroyed as “ failures

Starting with the Wolverines under Nicky K.  Competitive evolution between the 20 original Clans was apparently part of his plan from the beginning (or shortly after).

Quote
or tainted”

"Taint" doesn't mean anything except in the Homeworlds.  It's not even clear that the Spheroid clans are aware that the Homeworld clans have labeled them as such.  It certainly doesn't mean that a Clan society is no longer Clan -- only in the eyes of certain Homeworlders.

Quote
2)   In their biggest joint clan effort since Klondike the Invasion they failed to achieve their objectives

From 3049-3052, yes, Operation Revival failed to achieve its objectives.

As of 3145-3150, no less than three Clans are knocking on the Republic's door within striking distance of Terra.  It appears that the Clans will achieve their ultimate objective, just not on the timetable of Operation Revival.
 
Quote
3)   After the truce and great refusal they battered themselves silly

The Jade Falcons and Wolves did, but now they're both at the Republic's doorstep, so the Refusal War didn't mean a whole lot in the long run.

Quote
4)   After years of neglect/heavy handiness the scientist cast manage to attempt a wide ranging coup
a.   The after affects tainted the genepools and stunted technology progress even further

The Society's revolt certainly changed the course of the Homeworld clans, but we don't know how that turns out yet so no judgment can be rendered.

But we do know that the Society had little impact on the Spheroid clans.  It's certainly not clear that technological progress or genepools were significantly stunted.  The Spheroid Clans are still arguably deploying the most advanced TRO designs circa 3145-3150 and testing the most advanced technology like interface cockpits.  And new bloodnames are appearing among the Bears while the Wolves have enough genetic abundance to let the Kerensky bloodline shrink.  Touman sizes are at all time highs, indicating no constraints from the trueborn genepool.

Quote
5)   After the word of blake wars some of the clans abandoned Zell and limited combat all together which would seem to make them no better than what they claimed to be fighting against…

Clan commanders reduced or abandoned zell long before the Jihad, during certain Operation Revival battles, in fact.  It's just the reality of warfare that it cannot all be conducted as a gladiatorial tournament within a Circle of Equals.  It has more to do with the nature of the Clans' opponents than the Clans themselves.  It's arguably a testament to the adaptability of Clan society that those changes were made.

Quote
So what do you all think? Have the Clans the descendants of the noble SLDF failed?

The Clans have certainly failed Alex K.'s purpose in removing and preserving the best of the Star League from the Succession Wars.  The Clans bear little resemblance to the SLDF by design.  They were purposefully developed and written as an alien twist on the SLDF to scare the crap out of the Inner Sphere.  They were a failure of Alex K.'s vision from the beginning.

But have the Clans failed Nicky K.'s vision?  Warden goals?  Crusader goals?  General goals of any society to survive, adapt, and thrive?

No, to all those.  The Clans meet Nicky K's vision of a competitive, martial society shorn of the old Inner Sphere associations that led to the collapse of the Star League, the Exodus, the Succession Wars and civil war in the Kerensky Cluster, and the Second Exodus.  During the Jihad, when the Inner Sphere most needed help, the Clans answered and were critical in removing the Blakist threat, arguably fulfilling the Wardens' promise.  It took about a century instead of decade, but the Clans now appear poised to win Terra and fulfill the Crusaders' promise.  Moreover, Clan society remains vibrant after a century in the Inner Sphere.  It has more planets, population, and resources under its control than at any point in its history.  The caste system and artificial breeding programs remain intact and central to Clan society.  And Clan culture is winning Spheroid adherents from Lyran tankers now serving in the Wolf touman to Bear trueborns descended from Rasalhagians.

Has Clan society failed?  No.  In fact, it's thriving more than ever in the current timeline.

Will Clan society be due for a big takedown sometime after the publication of ilClan?  Certainly.  But that's the nature of the BTech universe.

My 2 Kerenskies... YMMV.
« Last Edit: 30 March 2017, 14:22:24 by Natasha Kerensky »
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Mendrugo

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5906
  • Manei Tetatae
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #14 on: 29 March 2017, 10:49:32 »
There are some suggestions in the fiction dealing with Nicholas Kerensky and his wife (Jessica Cameron).  It appears that his plan may have been not just to have the Clans perennially at each other's throats, but for the strongest to continually absorb the weak or nonconforming ones - a process repeated over and over until only one Clan, the ilClan, remained. 

Nick and Jessica's statements can be read to suggest they intended this to happen over a fairly rapid timeframe, during their lifetimes, but this plan got derailed by Nick's death, leading to a slowdown in the culling process and the solidification of the modern Clan structures during the Golden Century.

Thus, you can presume that the Clans, as they existed in 3050, were not what Nicholas envisioned.  He probably hoped to lead one unified ilClan back to the Inner Sphere as conquerors/saviors somewhere around 2850, putting forth the best of the best of the best warriors, and backed by the unified resources of the Kerensky Cluster.
"We have made of New Avalon a towering funeral pyre and wiped the Davion scourge from the universe.  Tikonov, Chesterton and Andurien are ours once more, and the cheers of the Capellan people nearly drown out the gnashing of our foes' teeth as they throw down their weapons in despair.  Now I am made First Lord of the Star League, and all shall bow down to me and pay homa...oooooo! Shiny thing!" - Maximillian Liao, "My Triumph", audio dictation, 3030.  Unpublished.

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #15 on: 30 March 2017, 12:58:49 »
There are some suggestions in the fiction dealing with Nicholas Kerensky and his wife (Jessica Cameron).  It appears that his plan may have been not just to have the Clans perennially at each other's throats, but for the strongest to continually absorb the weak or nonconforming ones - a process repeated over and over until only one Clan, the ilClan, remained. 

Nick and Jessica's statements can be read to suggest they intended this to happen over a fairly rapid timeframe, during their lifetimes, but this plan got derailed by Nick's death, leading to a slowdown in the culling process and the solidification of the modern Clan structures during the Golden Century.

Thus, you can presume that the Clans, as they existed in 3050, were not what Nicholas envisioned.  He probably hoped to lead one unified ilClan back to the Inner Sphere as conquerors/saviors somewhere around 2850, putting forth the best of the best of the best warriors, and backed by the unified resources of the Kerensky Cluster.

I kind of thought Nick was going for something like that. But ending up with one clan to invade the IS in the timeframe you mention seems impracticable.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Mendrugo

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5906
  • Manei Tetatae
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #16 on: 30 March 2017, 13:21:26 »
He was born in 2764.  An average lifespan provided by Star League-era medtech would get him up to 2872 (age 108).  If he wanted to do something before he got too elderly to manage the demands, 2850 (age 86) is about the limit.  By the time of his death in 2834 (age 70), he'd already overseen the annihilation of the Wolverines and the beginnings of the Absorption of the Widowmakers in just the 12 years after KLONDIKE ended.  He'd also scared the Jade Falcons into culling their own ranks to avoid getting Annihilated.

Through manipulation of the various Khans (who were all complicit in the lie about Dehra Dun), he could have played a great game of "let's you and him fight" to facilitate the rapid narrowing of the multi-Clan structure.
"We have made of New Avalon a towering funeral pyre and wiped the Davion scourge from the universe.  Tikonov, Chesterton and Andurien are ours once more, and the cheers of the Capellan people nearly drown out the gnashing of our foes' teeth as they throw down their weapons in despair.  Now I am made First Lord of the Star League, and all shall bow down to me and pay homa...oooooo! Shiny thing!" - Maximillian Liao, "My Triumph", audio dictation, 3030.  Unpublished.

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10402
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #17 on: 30 March 2017, 13:37:37 »
I think people are making a mistake in assuming that when ilClan comes out there will be an ilClan, events in the book could well make it such that no Clan can ever be ilClan.

Or that the ilClan is one of Kerensky's Clans.
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Mendrugo

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5906
  • Manei Tetatae
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #18 on: 30 March 2017, 13:40:37 »
ilClan Brannigan of New St. Andrews?
"We have made of New Avalon a towering funeral pyre and wiped the Davion scourge from the universe.  Tikonov, Chesterton and Andurien are ours once more, and the cheers of the Capellan people nearly drown out the gnashing of our foes' teeth as they throw down their weapons in despair.  Now I am made First Lord of the Star League, and all shall bow down to me and pay homa...oooooo! Shiny thing!" - Maximillian Liao, "My Triumph", audio dictation, 3030.  Unpublished.

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10402
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #19 on: 30 March 2017, 13:47:05 »
ilClan Brannigan of New St. Andrews?

Nooooo....

Clan Snord.
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Mendrugo

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5906
  • Manei Tetatae
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #20 on: 30 March 2017, 13:52:20 »
But with my idea there's odds on potential for ilKhan Zap Brannigan.
"We have made of New Avalon a towering funeral pyre and wiped the Davion scourge from the universe.  Tikonov, Chesterton and Andurien are ours once more, and the cheers of the Capellan people nearly drown out the gnashing of our foes' teeth as they throw down their weapons in despair.  Now I am made First Lord of the Star League, and all shall bow down to me and pay homa...oooooo! Shiny thing!" - Maximillian Liao, "My Triumph", audio dictation, 3030.  Unpublished.

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #21 on: 30 March 2017, 15:09:02 »
I think people are making a mistake in assuming that when ilClan comes out there will be an ilClan, events in the book could well make it such that no Clan can ever be ilClan.

I really, *really* want there to be no ilClan.  I hope "ilClan" is an ironic name for an age, as if the Succession Wars were called "The Age of Amaris".  Amaris doesn't rule the Inner Sphere- it's just a wreck of Succession Wars that all spiralled out from his big coup back on Terra.  I want "ilClan" to be a new Succession Wars-like era where there absolutely is no faction to rule them all- it's just ironically called that because of the events that spiralled out of control from some Clanner's (or Clanners') efforts to make his or her Clan the ilClan.

Of course, I also recognize that what I want is probably not going to be the case.   So, I guess I'm girding myself to see Clan White Whale rule the Inner Sphere, even if only for the time being/until the next time warp.  And hope TPTB know enough of what the hell they're doing to not kill BattleTech by making someone 'win' once and for all.

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10402
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #22 on: 30 March 2017, 15:19:16 »
And hope TPTB know enough of what the hell they're doing to not kill BattleTech by making someone 'win' once and for all.

Hey, the Camerons won it for once and for all.
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #23 on: 30 March 2017, 18:05:27 »
Hey, the Camerons won it for once and for all.

That's fine for the backhistory.  Not so fine for the "living" history.

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #24 on: 30 March 2017, 19:41:38 »
Hey, the Camerons won it for once and for all.

If you want to look at things that way you can say the same for the usurper Stefan Amaris.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #25 on: 31 March 2017, 00:48:38 »
Yes.
As a culture or society, they are Frankenstein's monster - a stillborn artificial construct that eventually collapsed.
So just like every other culture or society?

I don't think any warrior is fighting for the Star League as a citizen of the Inner Sphere might imagine it. Remember Star League culture failed in the Sphere and in the Homeworlds. It is why Clan culture exists. It would be better to imagine them unifying humanity lile the Star League but without the flaws.
You would have a point here if the Clans were an actual culture that had organically evolved. But from the onset, they weren't - they were engineered as a sociological tool for a specific goal and after a specific vision (that was not entirely sane or humane), and measured by that goal, nebulous as it may be, they failed as a tool.

Mendrugo raised a good point in that Nicholas lost control of his project when he died, allowing the Clan project to become a freely evolving culture from that point on. But their entire groundwork was designed by Nicholas - a sociopath - and that came back to bite the "Clan culture" in the rear armor with a vengeance. And the development they took after his death certainly wasn't whatever warped vision for an ideal society Nicholas and his wife (see the hypocrisy? He's a sect leader for his own personality cult, not a visionary for a free culture) had. Until they broke down in the face of normal people in the IS roughly two centuries after I'd have them expected to.

And there's a second, separate killing stroke: While this isn't spelled out anywhere, in my head canon the reappearance of the SLS Manassas and her genuine Star Leage era crew with firsthand knowledge of the real Star League must have been a tremendous watershed for the breakdown of Clan culture, as the crew innocently unmasked Nicholas's lies and manipulations about what the Star League was and how it worked, and how different it was from the Clans.
The Clan warrior leaders would have kept that secret as best as they could; the scientists, probably not so much.
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10402
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #26 on: 31 March 2017, 06:23:09 »
If you want to look at things that way you can say the same for the usurper Stefan Amaris.

Exactly.
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

beachhead1985

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4076
  • 1st SOG; SLDF. "McKenna's Marauders"
    • Kilroy's Wall
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #27 on: 31 March 2017, 07:11:37 »
Yeah...

As they are in Canon; the Clans are an evolutionary dead end that just keeps getting worse.

As a player faction even the reasons for playing them going forward are fading; you've basically got some good fluff that's going bad as time goes on, but even their tech advantage had faded markedly, even as tech in the game overall has failed to advance organically.

This is why in writing the Clans in Der Tag I did a lot to make them, oh I dunno; REACT to the changes in themselves and the environment, instead of just going with it. This has led to increased factionalism in the AU vs a unified force, but Der Tag also lacks a single strong unified alliance to challenge them.
Epitaph on an Army of Mercenaries

These, in the day when heaven was falling,      Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
The hour when earth's foundations fled,         They stood, and earth's foundations stay;
Followed their mercenary calling,               What God abandoned, these defended,
And took their wages, and are dead.             And saved the sum of things for pay.
     
A.E. Housman

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6126
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #28 on: 31 March 2017, 08:47:24 »
The goal on Nicholas' society was to survive the next 5 minutes in the Pentagon Worlds without factionalism slitting each others throats. That is about where the artificiality ends and natural forces take over.

This in a universe where one of the major factions demands its citizens play samurai. It is hard to avoid the pots for the kettles.

However you lost me at humane. That is a word that you need to be really careful about. Some awful societies by modern western standards were very successful for a very long time. Heck human rights, rule of law, and democracy have been a ticket to failure  for most of history. It is no accident that those nations with a humane tradition exist far from cockpits of national competition like the Middle East and steppes of Asia.

The only real standard for the success of a society is its continued existence in the face of internal, external, and environmental threats. They can twist and evolve to so this. They can wipe out their own citizens with extreme suffering if they feel like it. As long as the society survives.

Is that bleak and horrible. Yep. But it is worth remembering that sweet and light Athens (yes I know) lost to brutish and nasty Sparta. History only rewards humame behavior if it leads to survival. Sometimes it dies. Sometimes it doesn't.

The Clans still exist and are exploring different survival models in different ecologically niches. Hardly a failure. Unless someone is saying the Clan can't evolve.

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #29 on: 31 March 2017, 09:14:05 »
The goal on Nicholas' society was to survive the next 5 minutes in the Pentagon Worlds without factionalism slitting each others throats. That is about where the artificiality ends and natural forces take over.
Disagree.

The Second Exodus participiants already had survived up until this point, and were in no immediate danger of being wiped out (or even attacked).

What Nicholas did was to artificially and brutally sever their connections to the past, specifically with the aim of rooting out factionalism for good. Going forward, they would be only one thing: Clans.
To be that, they abolished their natural cultural heritage and replaced it with a caste system, artificial design baby birth, an artificial or at least heavily language, inconsistent and even contradictory broad  and a bunch of contrived faux rituals and trials in lieu of proper laws, made up by Nicholas (broadly, and very much on the fly in specific instances).

Nicholas pretty much formed them into the ideal society for emotionally scarred sociopaths like himself. The Clans are not a healthy environment for, well, normal people. That's what I mean when I describe their culture as artificial.
And outside of the extreme niche of the Exodus Civil Wars, such a culture wouldn't be able to thrive - what's a warrior people without an enemy to fight?

Natural forces only took over once Nicholas bit the dust, freeing his creation from his reigns. Given the amount of care and control that went into the creation of the Clan society in the first place, and their declared reason for existing (vague as it may have been), the subsequent evolution of Clan culture cannot be described as anything but a failure in my eyes.
To survive isn't enough to mark it a success for me. Because "survival" ought to take into account the terrible price Nicholas made them pay in order go down this path that led them nowhere.
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

Karimancer

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 106
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #30 on: 31 March 2017, 09:22:35 »
Left to their own devices with no goal (reconquer the Pentagon, restore Star League, etc) the Clans would likely devour themselves and collapse.

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1820
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #31 on: 31 March 2017, 10:50:40 »
So storyline wise what besides conquering Terra or not Conquering Terra can they do as a plot device?

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #32 on: 31 March 2017, 11:13:46 »
So storyline wise what besides conquering Terra or not Conquering Terra can they do as a plot device?

Become absorbed by the Inner Sphere.  They are afterall, populationwise, a drop in the ocean.

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #33 on: 31 March 2017, 11:31:52 »
The Second Exodus participiants already had survived up until this point, and were in no immediate danger of being wiped out (or even attacked).

It's true that the Second Exodus was in no immediate danger after Operation Klondike.  But the survivors of Operation Klondike had endured the deprivations of two multi-year flights to unknown and alien worlds.  And they had endured the bloodshed and losses of four of the largest and most destructive military campaigns to date (Periphery uprising, Rim Worlds, retaking the Hegemony and Terra, and retaking the Pentagon Worlds).  And, to a large degree, all those decades of suffering were the result of old, Spheroid cultural and political associations.

I'm not saying that the Houses are all evil and that the Clans are all good.  They're not.

But in context, it's little wonder that the survivors of Operation Klondike wanted to rip out root and stem the Spheroid culture and associations among themselves and the remaining populations of the Pentagon Worlds.  The survivors of Operation Klondike did not want to have to go through a third time what they had already been going through for the past several decades.

Quote
The Clans are not a healthy environment for, well, normal people. That's what I mean when I describe their culture as artificial.

Who is to say what is "healthy", "normal", or "artificial"?

Norse (Viking) culture arose out of a societal collapse in Scandinavia where half of the population was lost.  Early in its history, Norse society lived alongside Carolingian empire, a state that conducted genocidal campaigns against the Saxons and other cousins of the Norse.  Not surprisingly, Norse culture literally worshipped warrior ideals, was stratified into castes, practiced slavery, was very violent and competitive by today's standards, and preyed heavily on the unarmed and defenseless.  But the Norse also reached North America, opened trade routes with Islamic and eastern empires, nursed the first democracy since the Greek city-states, created the first legal code since the Roman Empire, laid the foundations for the modern English, French, and Russian states, and stood for 300 years.

Anything in BattleTech has an artificiality to it because it's fictional.

But that doesn't mean that martial societies like the Clans have not arisen before from great suffering and tumult, nor does it mean that they are not normal or healthy by the standards of their time, nor does it mean that they do not have purpose and achievements.

There is cause and effect to how cultures develop, and the Clans reflect that.

Quote
And outside of the extreme niche of the Exodus Civil Wars, such a culture wouldn't be able to thrive - what's a warrior people without an enemy to fight?

Like any martial culture not outwardly focused, the Clans fought more limited battles amongst themselves.  That's what the Mongols did before and after Ghenghis, the Huns before Attila, any number of Native American cultures, etc., etc. 

It's BattleTech, not PeaceTech.  We should expect conflict great and small throughout the history of this universe.

Quote
To survive isn't enough to mark it a success for me. Because "survival" ought to take into account the terrible price Nicholas made them pay in order go down this path

Nicky K. may or may not have been a nutjob.

But the survivors of Operation Klondike and the Pentagon Worlds -- and the Second Exodus and the First Exodus and the Star League Civil War that came before -- had been paying a terrible price for decades that had little to nothing to do with Nicky K. 

Compared to what had come before, the order and security provided by Nicky K.'s societal reengineering was arguably no sacrifice at all to those survivors.

Quote
that led them nowhere.

Among many other accomplishments, three Clans stand at the doorstep of the Republic and Terra circa 3145-3150.  They are (probably) about to fulfill Nicky K.'s ultimate vision.  That doesn't sound like "nowhere".

My 2 Kerenskies... YMMV.

« Last Edit: 31 March 2017, 11:45:45 by Natasha Kerensky »
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #34 on: 31 March 2017, 11:42:27 »
So storyline wise what besides conquering Terra or not Conquering Terra can they do as a plot device?

If the Houses should or need to undergo some fundamental change(s), then the Clans are a vehicle for doing that.

To the extent that the Houses and Succession Wars ape Europe after the fall of the Roman Empire (Star League), then the Clans represent various foreign invaders (Huns, Norse, Mongols, etc.) that challenged and fundamentally forced the feudal states that succeeded the Roman Empire to evolve towards modern nation-states.

I have no good idea what the Successor States should evolve into, but the challenge posed by a powerful ilClan could force such evolution, whether or not the Clans survive their "ilClan" phase.

FWIW...

"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #35 on: 31 March 2017, 14:53:48 »
My 2 Kerenskies... YMMV.
My mileage does indeed vary... but despite remaining unconvinced myself, thank you for an argument well made.
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #36 on: 01 April 2017, 02:37:05 »
If anything I'd say that the Clans were  a HUGE success, all be it from a non-canon point.  Their culture, their society, their way of life is so very alien to us now and to the IS in 3050 that the Clans basically were alien and added aliens to the setting, without being an actual alien.

As a society though..hmmr...harder to define, its changed and grown, adjusted, contracted etc over the years.  Sure as an actual society it just wouldn't work, I showed the Sarna history of the Clans to a socio-political econimist friend of mine and he was practically shrieking on gmail about how it all would not work :p  But in the story it has worked, all be it in fits, starts and with a very steep learning curve that the Clans, only now seem to be getting on top of.
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Frabby

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4252
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #37 on: 01 April 2017, 05:37:05 »
I showed the Sarna history of the Clans to a socio-political econimist friend of mine and he was practically shrieking on gmail about how it all would not work :p 
Oooh... FASAsociologics!  :D
Seriously, the opinion of a socio-political econimist would be interesting to read, if you can bring your friend to produce a short essay (or rant, or whatever).
Sarna.net BattleTechWiki Admin
Author of the BattleCorps stories Feather vs. Mountain, Rise and Shine, Proprietary, Trial of Faith & scenario Twins

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #38 on: 01 April 2017, 07:24:50 »
It would mostly be swearing, yelling about how the collective groupthink mindset and intense socialism of the clans wouldn't work as well as the espousing of libritarian ideals and a decrying of the super-jocks in charge of the Clans.
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #39 on: 01 April 2017, 09:00:24 »
It would mostly be swearing, yelling about how the collective groupthink mindset and intense socialism of the clans wouldn't work as well as the espousing of libritarian ideals and a decrying of the super-jocks in charge of the Clans.

Yes, because that kind of society has never come about in our history. Granted they don't last long, either collapsing, overthrown, or as we see in the clans adapting.

Both the home clans and IS one's have changed in order to survive the times.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #40 on: 01 April 2017, 10:04:27 »

It would mostly be swearing, yelling about how the collective groupthink mindset and intense socialism of the clans wouldn't work as well as the espousing of libritarian ideals and a decrying of the super-jocks in charge of the Clans.

The Clans are certainly not libertarian nor democratic.  But I question the common interpretation of the Clans as collectivists and socialists.

Capitalism has been a strong theme running throughout descriptions of Clan society.  The early Jade Falcons made investments in other Clans that catapulted their Clan into the position of primary (central?) banker to the Homeworlds.  It's hard to reconcile merchant banking with collectivism or socialism.  The Diamond Sharks/Sea Foxes thrive on trade, have restructured their society around it, and are arguably run by their merchant caste -- they're practically a plutocracy.  The Ghost Bears are noted for allocating capital to development projects like asteroid mining and improving agricultural strains.  The fall of the Widowmaker Clan (and maybe the Wolverines) can be traced back to a revolt by their merchant caste.  Jaime and Joshua Wolf's mother was from Clan Wolf's merchant caste.  And on and on.

It's true that there is no personal currency, little personal property, nor much of a consumer market in Clan society.  But there are many references to what appears to be the use of free trade to efficiently allocate capital and grow wealth in the Clans.  I don't know what that makes the Clans economically or politically -- maybe merchant capitalism lashed to a meritocratic stratocracy -- but I don't think it should be as easily interpreted as collectivism or socialism as it often is.

Even more interesting is how the power of capital is separated from the power of arms in Clan society.  The Clan merchant caste and the Clan warrior caste are not one and the same.  This is actually closer to the division of power between the private and public spheres in modern liberal Western democracies than it is to the fusion of the two under communist elites in 20th- and 21st-century communist states.

It gets even more interesting when we consider that this division of power between castes was then artificially divided even further among what were originally 20 (now less) Clans that were/are almost like sports teams with tanks and fighter jets.  The degree of artificially-imposed competition and meritocracy in Clan society seems almost contrary to some collectivist and socialist ideals.  In fact, the high degree of federalism and lack of central Clan authority except in the case of war (the ilKhan) is remarkably unlike what socialist or communist states evolve towards and utterly alien to typical oligarchies and autocracies. 

Again, the Clans certainly have little regard for personal liberties or democratic values.  But their capitalistic economy, divisions of power, and competitive instincts may actually be closer in key ways to liberal democracies than to socialist/communist states or autocratic/oligarchic societies.

FWIW...

« Last Edit: 01 April 2017, 17:23:46 by Natasha Kerensky »
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #41 on: 01 April 2017, 12:14:57 »
Many people confuse the form of government with the form of the economy.

The clan government is an oligarchic/meritocratic, as the society is ruled by a small group of people who have proven themselves.

The clan economy? I could swear I have seen somewhere that it is a command and control economy. That the value of items are set by someone. Of course after that the trade of goods and materials takes on a more capitalist model.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Achtung Minen!

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 109
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #42 on: 01 April 2017, 16:36:09 »
It depends on which Clan, of course, but I'd describe it more as a technocracy. The Warrior caste effectively steers the society, but individual decisions seem to be left up to the leaders of each segment of society... scientists make science decisions, merchants make mercantile decisions and so on.

If it were really a true oligarchy, you would expect the warriors to have the nicest possessions. In reality, warriors get very humble, spartan accommodations... they get a high calorie food allowance, but so do labourers...

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #43 on: 01 April 2017, 18:42:26 »

I think Clan government is most accurately described as a confederation of democratic/meritocratic stratocracies.  There is no central or federal inter-Clan government beyond the occasional ilKhan, hence confederation.  Each Clan  (except maybe the Sharks/Foxes and other Clans like the Coyotes or Burrocks for short periods of time) is ultimately ruled by their military, hence stratocracies.  And their khans, loremasters, and other caste leaders are elected after years of intense competition and service, hence democratic/meritocratic.

The more I reread about Clan economics, the more I think it is a socialist/capitalist hybrid.

There is no personal wealth accumulation.  But Clanners do have a currency -- work credits -- determined by their caste and grade within caste.  And they can spend these credits as they see fit within limits also set by their caste and grade.  (A Grade 1 Laborer can't purchase Khan-grade housing, even if he magically has enough credits.)  And there are even further delineations within grades to accommodate the demands (physical, transportation, etc.) of different occupations and tasks.

While economic decision making is centralized in the merchant caste in support of each Clan's military, it's not clear whether supply is centrally planned or responsive to changes in work credit demand.  Given the large number of caste councils (caste, planetary, regional) and work teams and the degree of competition encouraged within and between these councils and work teams, I think supply is relatively responsive to demand in a pseudo-capitalistic fashion.  Initiative and performance by a council, work team, or individual -- including merchant conclaves and trading houses -- while not rewarded or punished by gain or loss of wealth, is rewarded or punished by changes in caste and grade status.

Laid over this is a clear layer of capitalistic high finance, including banking between Clans, inter-Clan loans and investments, futures markets, and the collateral and common currency (Kerensky) to make it possible.

Interestingly, despite a century of exposure to Spheroid consumer goods and amenities, no Clan or caste appears to have succumbed to the desire for Spheroid wealth accumulation.  Clanners seem to remain Clanners; they do not leave the Clan system for Spheroid amenities, at least not in any significant numbers.  In fact, even after the destruction of their Clan, Nova Cat survivors preferred to recreate Clan enclaves in Marik space instead of joining Marik (or other Spheroid) society.  And with Rasalhagian bloodnames appearing among the Bears and Lyran tankers joining the Wolves pre-ilClan, some Spheroids appear to be rejecting Spheroid society for Clan society.

Interesting times... FWIW...
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #44 on: 01 April 2017, 18:43:09 »

[double post, mod can delete]
« Last Edit: 01 April 2017, 18:56:05 by Natasha Kerensky »
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."

Orwell84

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 879
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #45 on: 02 April 2017, 05:07:22 »
...some Spheroids appear to be rejecting Spheroid society for Clan society.

Interestingly enough, this was happening as early as the 3060s. Both Blackjack and Graus had Spheroid-born denizens who preferred Clan life over Lyran society when the latter retook those worlds in '64. Not to mention Rasalhague's en masse conversion to Clan ways. Only the Kuritans seemed to utterly hate living under Clan rule, despite the Nova Cats actually being an upgrade from the Combine system.

Clanners are also described as being honest and honorable in general, and for most part Clan civilians do seem genuinely devoted to their civilization; the Society's revolt was a matter of the 'middle-class' trying to swap places with the rulers rather than overthrowing the system entirely. The fact that the Clans as a whole can inspire loyalty in citizens born of 'pampered' societies, adapt to their new homes, and while losing battles emerge victorious in the long run suggests that they haven't 'failed' as a society - quite the opposite.

Adding my own $0.02, the Clans are a morally bankrupt society in some areas but IMHO are no worse than Houses Kurita or Liao (truth be told, I'd prefer living in most Clans to either of those regimes, and the Dominion looks like a decent place to ride out the 32nd century). Their way of war is certainly more moral than how the Houses fought during the first two Succession Wars - using Turtle Bay to justify the Jaguar annihilation was astounding hypocrisy on their part - and might just appeal to Spheroid civilians who keep getting caught in the thick of fighting simply because it was convenient for whichever House armies were hashing it out over their home planet.
All Clan totems are equal but some are more equal than others.

"The Succession Wars solved no problem. Their effects, both immediate and indirect, were either negative or disastrous. Morally subversive, economically destructive, socially degrading, confused in their causes, devious in their course, futile in their results, they are the outstanding example in Spheroid history of meaningless conflict."
The Third Star League's view of the Succession Wars, plagiarised from an ancient Terran historian's judgement of the Thirty Years War.

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #46 on: 02 April 2017, 08:28:18 »
Honorable? I don't know, maybe some. They act like honor has a switch they can turn on and off, especially when they declare an opponent Dezgra.

I imagine there are some in the lower castes that think the IS culture is the best thing ever. The grass is always greener.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

Ruger

  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5574
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #47 on: 02 April 2017, 09:12:32 »
Honorable? I don't know, maybe some. They act like honor has a switch they can turn on and off, especially when they declare an opponent Dezgra.

To quote Worf when Klingon honor was questioned when he revealed that they would often have cloaked ships waiting to pounce on those coming to help a disabled ship:

"In war, there is no greater honor than victory."

(at least, that's as close to the quote as I can remember...)

Ruger
"If someone ever tries to kill you, you try to kill 'em right back." - Malcolm Reynolds, Firefly

"Who I am is where I stand. Where I stand is where I fall...Stand with me." - The Doctor, The Doctor Falls, Doctor Who

Robroy

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1064
  • Not named, but not gone. Maybe.
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #48 on: 02 April 2017, 09:26:54 »
To quote Worf when Klingon honor was questioned when he revealed that they would often have cloaked ships waiting to pounce on those coming to help a disabled ship:

"In war, there is no greater honor than victory."

(at least, that's as close to the quote as I can remember...)

Ruger

And that is a legitimate tactic and one they use against all their enemies. I am talking about the clans throwing out their own rules of engagement ( to various degree depending on the clan ) because they decide the opponent is dishonorable.

Warfare is the greatest affair of state, the basis of life and death, the Way (Tao) to survival or extinction. It must be thoroughly pondered and analyzed"-Sun Tzu

"Subjugating the enemy's army without fighting is the true pinnacle of excellence"-Sun Tzu

ColBosch

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8705
  • Legends Never Die
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #49 on: 02 April 2017, 09:36:24 »
Calling the Clans a "meritocracy" or "democracy" is to push those words to their breaking points. Even in the original Athenian-style democracy, a man, regardless of birth, could aspire to - and attain - voting rights through amassing wealth and acquiring land. In the Clans, if you're not a true-born warrior, then you have literally no rights beyond what the warriors grant you. That is not "democracy," even if sometimes voting is involved.

As for "meritocracy," don't make me laugh. The ruling caste is obsessed with war, and all aspects of the society are bent towards that task. While some Khans have been shown to have a decent view of the big picture, at any time they can be challenged and cast out by some violent sociopath, and to paraphrase what Ruger posted, victors determine what is honorable.

And that is a legitimate tactic and one they use against all their enemies. I am talking about the clans throwing out their own rules of engagement ( to various degree depending on the clan ) because they decide the opponent is dishonorable.

Heh. There used to be a somewhat tongue-in-cheek directive from Herb: "Clanner = hypocrite." We see this all the time in the fiction and source material. No successful Clan character has ever gotten ahead by purely "honorable" means.
BattleTech is a huge house, it's not any one fan's or "type" of fans.  If you need to relieve yourself, use the bathroom not another BattleTech fan. - nckestrel
1st and 2nd Succession Wars are not happy times. - klarg1
Check my Ogre Flickr page! https://flic.kr/s/aHsmcLnb7v and https://flic.kr/s/aHsksV83ZP

Natasha Kerensky

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3454
  • Queen of Spades, First Lady of Death, Black Widow
Re: Have the clans failed as a society ?
« Reply #50 on: 02 April 2017, 11:10:19 »

Calling the Clans a "meritocracy" or "democracy" is to push those words to their breaking points. Even in the original Athenian-style democracy, a man, regardless of birth, could aspire to - and attain - voting rights through amassing wealth and acquiring land.

That's actually not true.  To vote, an Athenian citizen had to serve in the military (military caste), both of their parents had to have been citizens (trueborn), and they had to be male.  In terms of who could participate, Athenian democracy was actually very much like the Clans.  Only 10-20% of the population of Attica voted.

The difference was that the Athenians voted to make decisions on everything, while the Clans vote for leaders who then make the decisions.

Quote
In the Clans, if you're not a true-born warrior, then you have literally no rights beyond what the warriors grant you. That is not "democracy," even if sometimes voting is involved.

This conflates democracy with liberty.  Dictators-for-life can grant their people lots of liberties.  And democracies (like Athens or Norse Iceland) can still peddle in slavery.  They're not the same thing, and one doesn't necessarily flow from the other.

Quote
As for "meritocracy," don't make me laugh. The ruling caste is obsessed with war, and all aspects of the society are bent towards that task.

We can question the goals and measuring sticks of Clan society, but that doesn't mean it's not a meritocracy.  To become a Khan, saKhan, or Loremaster, you have to have repeatedly proven yourself in tests and trials and battle since you were a sibkin.  For a trueborn, even the right to reproduce has to be earned on their codex.  The whole Clan system is a meritocracy geared around separating the wheat from the chaff and getting the cream to rise to the top. 

I could build a similar system of government around who can win pie eating contests.  It would be stupid as heck, but it would still be a meritocracy.

Quote
"Clanner = hypocrite."

(Practically) everyone in BattleTech or in any high-level politics is a hypocrite.  That doesn't change their system of government, though.

FWIW...
« Last Edit: 02 April 2017, 14:14:07 by Natasha Kerensky »
"Ah, yes.  The belle dame sans merci.  The sweet young thing who will blast your nuts off.  The kitten with a whip.  That mystique?"
"Slavish adherence to formal ritual is a sign that one has nothing better to think about."
"Variety is the spice of battle."
"I've fought in... what... a hundred battles, a thousand battles?  It could be a million as far as I know.  I've fought for anybody who offered a decent contract and a couple who didn't.  And the universe is not much different after all that.  I could go on fighting for another hundred years and it would still look the same."
"I'm in mourning for my life."
"Those who break faith with the Unity shall go down into darkness."