Author Topic: Historical: Reunification War  (Read 30906 times)

Øystein

  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3053
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #60 on: 26 July 2011, 11:31:18 »
Page 106
On the map Schirmack is misspelled Schirmeck.  I assume the spelling with the "a" is correct because that is what is used everywhere else in the book.

Schirmeck is the correct spelling. Schirmack is a typo.

00Dawg

  • CamoSpecs
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1193
  • CamoSpecs Coordinator
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #61 on: 26 July 2011, 11:52:20 »
Historical: Reunification War (PDF)
Pg 34, Military Regions and Army Groups
Passage:

This led to more than a century of battling among the Capellan
colonels for their own pieces of the pie, watched carefully by the
Maskirovka and their Chancellor to ensure of no disloyalty.

Issue:
Misworded.

Suggested Correction:
This led to more than a century of battling among the Capellan
colonels for their own pieces of the pie, watched carefully by the
Maskirovka and their Chancellor to ensure there was no disloyalty.

CDT Special Agent #343

lrose

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #62 on: 30 July 2011, 07:01:26 »
Page 221
New Syrtis Carrier Stat Block
In both the FR/FL and AR/AL arcs the Barracuda Launchers have the number 4 listed in the class column and the class of capital missile is wrapped around to the next line


FR/FL (126 heat)
2 NAC/10 60 20 20 20 — Capital AC (40 rounds)
2 Barracuda (40 rounds) 20 4 4 4 4
Capital Missile

3 LRM 20 18 4 (36) 4 (36) 4 (36) — LRM
(60 rounds)
2 Large Lasers 28 4 (36) 2 (16) — — Laser
4 Medium Lasers
4 Machine Guns 0 1 (8) — — — Point Defense (200 rounds)

Remove the extra 4 and put the value Capital Missile in the class column.

lrose

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #63 on: 30 July 2011, 07:50:08 »
Page 103
Early Dawn, Lockton, Hastur, Zatharas and Krimari were occupied by the suddenly-buoyant SLDF, with Joyz and
Brixtana seized in the first six weeks of 2584.

Correct spelling is Zathras

lrose

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 261
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #64 on: 30 July 2011, 09:25:17 »
Not sure if this is actually an errata or an intentional in universe error but I thought I would report it just in case

Page 102
All inhabited worlds within thirty light years of the capital were in SLDF hands, and while the border remained porous to JumpShip traffic, it was a grave psychological blow.


At this time it does not appear that Mangor was captured.  From my measurements Mangor is within 30 light years of Canopus IV so the statement on Page 102 is incorrect.  If this not intended as an in universe error then either Mangor should be captured at this point or the statement should be changed to:

Almost all inhabited worlds within thirty light years of the capital were in SLDF hands, and while the border remained porous to JumpShip traffic, it was a grave psychological blow.

ArcaneRaven

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 972
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #65 on: 09 August 2011, 09:49:12 »
Quote from: H:RW, page 16, left side-bar
[...] settling on Canopus where she established the Magistracy Free State in 2531.

Correction:

[...] settling on Canopus where she established the Magistracy of Canopus in 2530.

=================================================================

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, page 16, left side-bar
[...] and by 2548, seventeen years after landing on Canopus, [...]

Correction:

[...] and by 2548, eighteen years after landing on Canopus, [...]

=================================================================

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, page 13
[...] the Taurian Concordat emerged in 2335 (though it
had existed as the Calderon Protectorship for 80 years), the Rim Worlds Republic in 2250,
the Outworlds Alliance in 2417 and the Magistracy of Canopus in 2531.

Correction:

[...] the Taurian Concordat emerged in 2335 (though it
had existed as the Calderon Protectorship for 80 years), the Rim Worlds Republic in 2250,
the Outworlds Alliance in 2417 and the Magistracy of Canopus in 2530.

Moonsword

  • Acutus Gladius
  • Global Moderator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16580
  • You interrupted me reading TROs for this?
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #66 on: 21 August 2011, 10:20:55 »
Initial PDF Release

Page 206, Hipparch

Technology Base should be "Inner Sphere (Intro)".

Page 207, Dragonfly

Technology Base should be "Inner Sphere (Intro)".

Page 209, Talos

Technology Base should be "Inner Sphere (Intro)".

Page 212, Tiger Medium Tank

Technology Base should be "Inner Sphere (Intro)".

Granite

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #67 on: 29 August 2011, 13:43:33 »
Continuity error
p112: Bryceland planetary capital named Golden Bay
Royalty and Rogues p.9 Bryceland capital named Harland´s Port

00Dawg

  • CamoSpecs
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1193
  • CamoSpecs Coordinator
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #68 on: 14 September 2011, 12:44:59 »
(Missing word here, probably 'ambush', but that would make the 'unsuccessful' somewhat redundant.)

Suggested correction:
... captured by Cassandra Varnay’s after springing an ambush that backfired; Gordon and his men ...
Page 211, Notable Crews
Further Suggested Correction:
... captured by Cassandra Varnay’s forces after springing an ambush that backfired; Gordon and his men ...

CDT Special Agent #343

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #69 on: 12 October 2011, 07:54:45 »
Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy,  p. 141, Outworlds Alliance Front, Deployment table, V Corps (continued)

Issue:

In the entry for 2581, the 43rd Brigade and 45th Brigade of the 15th Division are shown as being on Wiesau. The correct spelling of the planet's name is Weisau. Weisau is spelt correctly elsewhere, and only appears to be in error on this table.

Suggested Correction:

Change the entries on P. 141 to Weisau.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

Blackjack Jones

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 853
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #70 on: 28 October 2011, 21:56:33 »
Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, pg. 67, Malagrotta, Taurian Order of Battle

"4 Jumbo-class DropShips (2 escaped, 3 destroyed)"

Issue: Total count doesn't add up.

Suggested Correction:

Given that the Taurian fleet had a total of 10 dropship collars and 6 of them were taken up by Manatees, 4 total Jumbos seems correct.
Reduce either the count of escaped or destroyed Jumbos by one, whichever the writers/TPTB feel is correct.

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #71 on: 31 October 2011, 08:39:16 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 42, "Alliance Borderers"
Formed alongside the Alliance Grenadiers in late 2582, the Borderers received their baptism of fire on Cerberus, facing the SLDF’s Fourth and Fifth Divisions. They fought a guerrilla campaign against the Star League divisions for well over a year, preventing the complete loss of the important world.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 123, "Cerberus and the Baby Killers"
Chairman Nordd had placed two full BattleMech battalions of the newly formed Alliance Grenadiers there, supported by a regiment of armor.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 141, "Outworlds Alliance Militia & Pitcairn Legion"
Alliance Borderers: Alpheratz/Lushann (2583), Lushann (2584), Lushann (2585)
Alliance Grenadiers: Alpheratz/Cerberus (2583), Cerberus (2584), Cerberus (2585)

Issue: Page 42 indicates that the Alliance Borderers fought on Cerberus, but the unit deployment tables on P. 141 indicate that the Alliance Borderers fought on Lushann, and that the Alliance Grenadiers fought on Cerberus. Page 123 also indicates that the Alliance Grenadiers fought on Cerberus; no mention is made of the Borderers.

Suggested Correction: Change the mention of the Alliance Borderers on page 42 to Alliance Grenadiers.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #72 on: 11 January 2012, 03:49:18 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 103, "Thurrock (July 2583)"
Most of the MAF navy was employed in the operation, protecting two regiments of mercenaries (Kincani's Dragoons, veterans of Meadowvale, and Force Majoris) as well as the Second Canopian Grenadiers.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 103, "Thurrock (July 2583)"
In a two-day running battle, almost the entire MAF navy was wiped out and three regiments of troops were taken prisoner.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 104, "Canopus (March-April 2584)"
Facing them were six MAF and mercenary units - the Magestrix' Guard, the First and Third Canopian Fusiliers, the First Grenadiers, the Canopian Cuirassiers and The Red Hand.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 104, "Canopus (March-April 2584)"
Elsewhere the MAF came off significantly less well - the First Grenadiers found themselves with their backs against the Thetis River and were systematically reduced by their opponents in the Fifty-eigth Brigade. Only two companies were able to force a crossing and were later absorbed into the Second Grenadiers to make good that unit's losses against the Sixtieth Brigade.

Issue: Page 104 indicates that the survivors of the 1st Canopian Grenadiers on Canopus were folded into the 2nd Canopian Grenadiers to replace losses in the latter unit, but page 103 indicates that the 2nd Canopian Grenadiers were captured at Thurrock and were never on Canopus, while the deployment table on page 151 also shows the 2nd Grenadiers as being wiped out at Thurrock, and not present on Canopus.

Suggested Correction: Given that page 104 states that the 3rd Fusiliers fought the 3rd Marik Militia and the 35th Royal CAAN Regiments and The Red Hand fought the 5th Marik Militia, either the 1st Canopian Fusiliers or the Canopian Cuirassiers must have been fighting the 60th Brigade on the first day. Change the mention of the 2nd Grenadiers to either the 1st Fusiliers or the Cuirassiers.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #73 on: 16 January 2012, 06:25:00 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 94, "The Canopian Campaign"
We're up against whores and deserters. How much trouble do you think they can be? - General William Denning, Commanding SLDF 335th BattleMech Division, 2577

Issue: The quote given is from the officer commanding the 335th BattleMech Division in 2577. The 335th BattleMech Division doesn't seem to exist in 2577, though; the SLDF divisions are in a numerical order within the initial Corps as detailed in the various deployment tables in Historical: Reunification War. The numerically highest Division recorded elsewhere within any of the tables is the 32nd Division (although as a seperate problem, there appear to be two 32nd Divisions). Added to this, although p. 27 details the planned organization and nomenclature of Divisions within the SLDF, none of the Divisions listed in Historical: Reunification War appear to use a designation that includes terms like BattleMech Division, Mechanized Division, etc.

Where the 335th BattleMech Division does exist is within the VII Corps unit roster given in the Star League sourcebook on page 141, but that's set 200 years later. This makes me think that sources got a little confused.

Suggested Correction: Change the title "Commanding SLDF 335th BattleMech Division" to Commanding either the 19th Division, 20th Division or 21st Royal Division, as those are the three divisions within VII Corps that fought the Magistracy Campaign. None of the Division COs are listed anywhere within the chapter covering the Magistracy campaign, so there's no risk of contradictions. Given the fairly arrogant tone taken, the 21st Royal Division and General William Denning might be a perfect match!

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #74 on: 16 January 2012, 13:56:34 »
Issue: The entry on page 102 headed "Afarsin, Adherlwin, Megarez and Nobel (March-April 2583)" states that that all four worlds were captured within a few weeks in 2583, completing the encirclement of Canopus IV. The deployment tables on pages 148-149 show that Afarsin, Nobel and Megarez were all attacked in 2583, but not Adherlwin; instead, it shows Adherlwin was attacked in 2582 by the 60th Brigade and the 403rd Independent Regiment, and while the 403rd isn't shown as being active in 2583, the 60th Brigade is shown to be attacking Early Dawn. That makes the deployment tables inconsistent with the text, or vice versa.

Suggested Correction: Amend the deployment table to show Adherlwin being attacked in 2583, and as the text on page 105 doesn't specify which units attacked the four worlds, change which brigade led the attack.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #75 on: 23 January 2012, 09:26:27 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 38, "First Marik Militia"
Their bravery in the assault on Tetski, where they served as bait for the MAF forces in advance of the 316th Division's landings, earned the First a unit citation which they carry proudly on their regimental standard

Issue: According to the roster for the invasion of the Magistracy on page 148 and the description of the campaign for Tetski on pages 101-102, the SLDF unit that followed up on the First Marik Militia decoy run on Tetski was the 58th Brigade, part of the 20th Division, not the 316th Division. The 316th Division isn't listed anywhere in Historical: Reunification War. The 316th Division is listed in the Star League sourcebook as a VII Corps unit, but that unit roster for VII Corps is set in 2765.

Suggested Correction: Change the mention of the 316th Division to the 58th Brigade on page 38.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

Bad_Syntax

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 918
    • Battletech Engineer
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #76 on: 15 March 2012, 18:32:40 »
The ages old New Vandenberg/New Vandenburg naming raises its ugly head again, either the system name is wrong, or the other dozens of spellings of "New Vandenberg" are incorrect.  I think the latter is correct, and the TDF maps on p159 and p64 are incorrect, as well as the first paragraph under David Santos, p63, all of which should say "New Vandenberg".

These are all from the tables on P140-156, some of which may not be errata as much as inconsistencies, feel free to remove them if they don't apply
Page 141, 3rd Pitcairn Legion has location as "Lushann/" - I don't know what this should be, the units whereabouts were not described during this period (Perhaps Kennard, Budingen, Bad News, and/or Tellman IV)
Page 142, 16th SLDF Divsiion has location as "Malagrotta/", I think it should be "Malagrotta/Estuan" based on last 2 paragraphs of Page 71.  It also should have "Estuan" removed from the 2584 column.
Page 144, 111st Concordat Chasseurs should be "111th Concordat Chasseurs"
Page 145, Add [D] to end of Illiushin in 2589 for 4th Taurian Guard
Page 145, 1st Hyades Special Services, its location in 2592 is just "Cluster", I think it should be "Hyades Cluster"
Page 146, Remove Sartu from 3rd Taurian guard in 2585 (it was already there)
Page 146, Remove Verdigreis from 3rd Concordat Velites in 2582 (it was already there)
Page 146, Remove Carmichael from Charmichael Volunteer Guard in 2582-2584 (it was already there)
Page 146, Remove Hanseta from Hanseta Volunteer Guard in 2585 (it was already there)
Page 147, Add [D] to end of Hyalite in 2587 for Hyalite Vol. Guard
Page 147, Add [D] to end of Illiushin in 2589 for Illiushin Vol. Guard
Page 147, Add [D] to end of Renfield in 2587 for Renfield Vol. Guard
Page 149, 3rd Brigade Fusiliers of Oriente in 2584, should be "New Abilene" (spelling was wrong)
Page 154/155, change "Jump-Off" in title to "Loyalty" or something else, and perhaps the 2581 column changed to "2581/Jump-Off" for consistency
Page 155, Remove Gotterdamerung from 5th Amaris Legionnaries in 2591 (it was already there)
Page 155, Remove Taran's World from 2nd Amaris Legionnaires (it aws already there)
Page 183, Kossandra's Volunteers have no unit listed on the deployment tables (like other planets do), is this another planet or just assumed for any non-listed militia on planet?
Page 183, Carabineers and Lancers.  The units were deployed in 2582, but the description says they have to reroll equipment available in 2584 or later, 2 years after the unit was formed and got its equipment.  Recommend changing to 2582.
Page 184.  Calderon Guard.  This unit is referred to as Calderon Red Hand everywhere else (except unit list on p65), recommend changing these 2 entries to Calderon Red Hand instead.

And the CCAF Red Lancers are listed on page 34, and page 182, making it a significant unit.  However, that unit isn't mentioned *anywhere* else in the text.
« Last Edit: 16 March 2012, 10:05:48 by Bad_Syntax »
Battletech Engineer
Disclaimer:  Anything I post here, or anywhere else, can freely be used by anybody, anywhere, for any purposes without any compenstation to or recognition of myself.

Øystein

  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3053
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #77 on: 16 March 2012, 02:00:45 »
New Vandenburg is the correct spelling.

With regards,
Øystein

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #78 on: 17 March 2012, 01:57:02 »
PDF, p. 169, Forced Withdrawal, first sentence.

In the time period covered by these rules, each side will be subject to Forced Withdrawal rules (see p. 256, TW) under differing situations.
Change to:
In the time period covered by these rules, each side will be subject to Forced Withdrawal rules (see p. 258, TW) under differing situations.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

milesteg

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #79 on: 28 May 2012, 22:11:10 »
PDF and print version, p176, "Assigning Pilots".

Problem: The text seems to state that the descriptions of the various military units on p181-184 provide experience levels (elite, veteran, regular, green) which will modify random experience level and random skill rating rolls:

Quote
If playing elements from a specific unit, consult the rules provided for that unit (see Reunification War Militaries, p. 181); each unit (and sub-unit) is given a rating of Elite, Veteran, Regular or Green. If playing an Elite unit, the controlling player should add a +4 modifier to the Random Experience Level roll and a +2 modifier to the Random Skill Rating roll. If playing a Veteran unit, add +2 to the Experience roll and +1 to the Skill roll. If playing a Regular unit, apply no modifiers, and if playing a Green unit, apply a –2 to the Experience roll and –1 to the Skill roll.

I cannot find any such descriptions under the title "Reunification War Militaries".  There are rules which provide separate modifiers, but these rules do not specify the experience level of the units or subunits in question.

Solution: Either delete the references on p176 regarding the modifiers based on the experience level of the described units, or insert the descriptions on p181-184.

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #80 on: 04 July 2012, 02:09:50 »
PDF, p. 218

Jumbo DropShip is 111 tons overweight.

Soltuion: Reduce Bay 2 Cargo to 1,220 tons.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #81 on: 19 June 2013, 13:39:53 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 136, "Barcelona (April-September 2591"
When the Lyran and Marik corps landed on Barcelona in April 2591 they found the world held by the Fifth Amaris Legionnaires, commanded by Franchetta Wong, a distant cousin of First Consul Amaris.

Issue: According to the map showing the various Rim Worlds Republic deployments in 2581 on page 128 and the unit rosters on pages 153-154, the 5th Amaris Legionnaires were on Gotterdammerung at this point in time as well as in 2581. However, the description of the attack on Barcelona on page 136 has them on Barcelona (it also has the 32nd Armor Division on Barcelona, which contradicts with the deployment table on page 152).

Suggested Correction: According to Mr Hartford's post in this thread: http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,30530.0.html he believes the 5th Amaris Legionnaires deployment to be Barcelona, not Gotterdammerung. It would therefore seem best to amend the map on p. 128 and the deployment tables on pages 153-154 to read Barcelona as the deployment for the 5th Legionnaires, not Gotterdammerung.

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 129, "Second Draconis Auxiliary Brigade"
Constituent Units: Second Sword of Light, Seventh Sword of Light, Fourth Prosperina Hussars, First Arkab Legion

Issue: The Fourth Hussars are described various as the Fourth Prosperina Hussars (pages 129, 152 and 153) and the Fourth Proserpina Hussars (page 36, 60). Based on the detail available in Field Manual: Draconis Combine and Field Manual: Updates, Proserpina looks to be the correct spelling.

Suggested Correction: Replace the instqances of Prosperina on pages 129, 152 and 153 with Proserpina.
« Last Edit: 04 July 2013, 02:57:29 by BrokenMnemonic »

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #82 on: 12 August 2014, 04:42:09 »
Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 95, "First Marik Auxiliary Corps"
Marik Militia (4 Regiments), Fusiliers of Oriente (2 regiments), Oriente Hussars (1 regiment), Stewart Dragoons (1 regiment), Orloff Grenadiers (2 Regiments), Regulan Hussars
(1 regiment), Defenders of Andurien (1 regiment)

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 148, "Magistracy of Canopus Front (Jump-off-2582)"
Orloff Grenadiers/2nd Orloff Grenadiers/3rd Orloff Grenadiers

Quote from: Historical: Reunification War, PDF copy, p. 149, "Magistracy of Canopus Front (2583-2588)"
Orloff Grenadiers/2nd Orloff Grenadiers/3rd Orloff Grenadiers

Issue: As indicated in Field Report 2765: FWLM, the Duchy of Orloff wasn't founded until 2691 and the Orloff Grenadiers were founded immediately afterwards by the Duchy. The Orloff Grenadiers therefore can't have been deployed in the Reunification War a hundred years prior to their formation..

Suggested Correction: These three pages within Historical: Reunification War are the only pages that specifically mention the Orloff Grenadiers. Two Free Worlds League federal military formations, the Atrean Dragoons and the Free Worlds Guards, are unrepresented in either Marik Auxiliary Corps - given the large size of the Atrean Dragoons in 2650 (ca. 14 regiments, with two more planned) and their history of federal service from 2528 onwards, the Second and Third Atrean Dragoons could be reasonable substitutions, particularly as I can't find any reference to either regiment prior to the publication of Field Report 2765: FWLM suggesting little chance of their presence clashing with other published materiel.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

rabindranath72

  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 57
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #83 on: 18 October 2016, 09:48:28 »
This one made me chuckle (being a mathematician myself):

p. 83, side bar: there's NO Nobel Prize in Mathematics, at least now.
Although it's possible a case could be made in the future (after all, a sixth prize for Economics was added in 1969) it seems quite unlikely, as mathematics was already a well-established discipline when the prize was instituted in 1895.
The closest thing to a Nobel Prize in Mathematics is the Fields Medal.

Adrian Gideon

  • BattleTech Developer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6820
  • BattleTech Line Developer
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #84 on: 07 March 2017, 17:05:47 »
pp. 57 & 187
"Selvin Kelswa II" should be "Selvin Kelswa"
If you appreciate how I’m doing, send me a tip: ko-fi.com/rayarrastia
fb.com/battletechgame
@CGL_BattleTech

Revanche

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 567
  • Fanah’s Fangs (formerly of the Talitha Division)
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #85 on: 13 August 2017, 12:19:43 »
* VERSION: hardcopy/pdf
* LOCATION: p. 216
* THE ERROR: massive run-on sentence and differing tenses- "Moreover, there are no dedicated vehicular maintenance bays, while quarters for vehicle crews and mechanics are little more than tightly packed infantry bunk cubicles set into the sides of the cargo bays, while their recreation, mess and common areas for these personnel were whatever space they can clear."
* THE CORRECTION: "Moreover, there are no dedicated vehicular maintenance bays, while quarters for vehicle crews and mechanics are little more than tightly packed infantry bunk cubicles set into the sides of the cargo bays. The recreation, mess and common areas for these personnel are whatever space they can clear."

ShroudedSciuridae

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 477
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #86 on: 21 January 2022, 14:46:01 »
PDF, 1st Ed.

Page 34, "CCAF Stats"
"Prewar Strength (2575)-WarShips: 45...Postwar Strength (2600)-WarShips: 45"

Issue:  In 2582 First Lord Ian Cameron took 100-106 Aegis Is out of mothballs from 2531. Seventy were upgraded and sent to the SLDF, the remaining were given to the Member States. These ships to each House were likely were left off other Houses' stat boxes as well but combat losses disguised them. [TRO 2750 & 3057/3057R. TRO 2750 contains a math error (106-70=30) that 3057 either carried over or retconned the 106 to 100. Assuming 100 is correct, otherwise things get messier.]

Correction: Add in ships as required.  By Field Report 2765 time the Great Houses all appear to reflect those five gifted ships with few variations.  AFFS shows seven Aegis, but they already had at least four prior to the 2577 Battle For Tentativa [H:RW p. 69] so combat losses likely account for the missing especially given how disastrous Tentativa was for them. LCAF shows three Aegis on hand, also easily explainable as combat losses with RWR or DCMS backed "pirates" from the Hidden War.
« Last Edit: 22 January 2022, 08:10:53 by ShroudedSciuridae »
"Assassinating" the Clan commander's goldfish is hardly the stuff of legend.

csdavis715

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #87 on: 28 April 2023, 22:50:21 »
* VERSION: PDF edition
* LOCATION: Page 36, "Notable Units - Second Sword of Light"

* THE ERROR: The entry states they are known for their bloody actions against the Second Amaris Dragoons on Timbuktu.

* THE CORRECTION: The location is Nightwish. The error is likely the result of the Second Sword of Light being a part of "Battlegroup Timbuktu" in the section that describes their atrocities on Nightwish (page 134).


ShroudedSciuridae

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 477
Re: Historical: Reunification War
« Reply #88 on: 11 December 2023, 07:58:26 »
PDF, p. 169 Map

Elgin
Issue: Until 2878 this world was Chisholm
Correction: Change to Chisholm
"Assassinating" the Clan commander's goldfish is hardly the stuff of legend.

 

Register