Author Topic: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III  (Read 239770 times)

Kidd

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3535
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #600 on: 16 August 2017, 05:31:54 »
compared to the MRAPs and APCs of today, they ALL look like they've been flattened with a giant rolling pin ;D

Fat Guy

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5003
  • I make beer disappear. What's your superpower?
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #601 on: 16 August 2017, 09:58:32 »
Most claustrophobic troop compartment of any vehicle today: the BMT-72. 



The BMT-72 uses a more compact, yet more powerful engine that the original T-72. Vehicle has an extended hull with an extra road wheel added on each side. The new troop compartment is located between the turret and engine compartment. Troops enter and leave the vehicle via three separate hatches. Depending on the situation soldiers can dismount and fight on foot or deliver fire from the opened hatches.  ::)


I'll walk thanks.   ;)
I have spoken.


DoctorMonkey

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2583
  • user briefly known as Khan of Clan Sex Panther
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #602 on: 16 August 2017, 10:20:46 »
Most claustrophobic troop compartment of any vehicle today: the BMT-72. 

The BMT-72 uses a more compact, yet more powerful engine that the original T-72. Vehicle has an extended hull with an extra road wheel added on each side. The new troop compartment is located between the turret and engine compartment. Troops enter and leave the vehicle via three separate hatches. Depending on the situation soldiers can dismount and fight on foot or deliver fire from the opened hatches.  ::)


I'll walk thanks.   ;)


If you need me, I'll be in the foxhole over there. Hell, I'd prefer a Mk5* or whatever the WW1 British tank with a troop compartment was called
Avatar stollen from spacebattles.com motivational posters thread

ChanMan: "Capellan Ingenuity: The ability to lose battles to Davion forces in new and implausible ways"

Fat Guy

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5003
  • I make beer disappear. What's your superpower?
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #603 on: 16 August 2017, 10:40:50 »
Close up of the troop compartment (which holds five!):



I like the rubber bladed fans in a vain attempt to combat heat from the adjacent engine.

I don't know what they were smoking at the Kharkiv Morozov Machine Building Design Bureau, but at least no one was stupid enough to place a production order.
I have spoken.


I am Belch II

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10158
  • It's a gator with a nuke, whats the problem.
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #604 on: 16 August 2017, 11:21:37 »
Russian designs never really cared about comfort for the crew and people to use the equipment.
Walking the fine line between sarcasm and being a smart-ass

kato

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2417
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #605 on: 16 August 2017, 11:42:25 »
It's not that small.

I mean, i've done an extraction exercise on a Fuchs APC. One guy going through the crawl space around the running engine fighting off the "shocked" guy in the commander's seat until he could get around him to open the hatch above. Of course the vehicle driven halfway down a hill standing at a cant so that a) the access to that crawl space within the troop compartment was at two feet height and b) when going through the crawl space head first you had to crawl upwards through it. And because that wasn't fun enough they got the great idea of simulating the engine being on fire by setting off smoke pots.

DoctorMonkey

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2583
  • user briefly known as Khan of Clan Sex Panther
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #606 on: 17 August 2017, 04:50:04 »
Russian designs never really cared about comfort for the crew and people to use the equipment.


Food shortages lead to shorter troop means smaller tanks are possible means less resources spent building tanks = win for everyone (except peasants growing up hungry)
Avatar stollen from spacebattles.com motivational posters thread

ChanMan: "Capellan Ingenuity: The ability to lose battles to Davion forces in new and implausible ways"

Matti

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5085
  • In Rory we trust
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #607 on: 17 August 2017, 11:10:48 »
Food shortages lead to shorter troop
Isn't that just a myth?
You know what they say, don't you? About how us MechWarriors are the modern knights errant, how warfare has become civilized now that we have to abide by conventions and rules of war. Don't believe it.

ColBosch

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8705
  • Legends Never Die
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #608 on: 17 August 2017, 11:17:14 »
BattleTech is a huge house, it's not any one fan's or "type" of fans.  If you need to relieve yourself, use the bathroom not another BattleTech fan. - nckestrel
1st and 2nd Succession Wars are not happy times. - klarg1
Check my Ogre Flickr page! https://flic.kr/s/aHsmcLnb7v and https://flic.kr/s/aHsksV83ZP

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25816
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #609 on: 17 August 2017, 11:57:44 »
Isn't that just a myth?

It was actually observed along the North Korean border following the massive famine that struck the country in the 90s.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

worktroll

  • Ombudsman
  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25637
  • 504th "Gateway" Division
    • There are Monsters in my Sky!
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #610 on: 17 August 2017, 15:21:38 »
APCs for the more mature figure ...



Israeli Namer, under evaluation in the US. Converted from Merkavas being withdrawn from service. I reckon nine of me could fit in that.
* No, FASA wasn't big on errata - ColBosch
* The Housebook series is from the 80's and is the foundation of Btech, the 80's heart wrapped in heavy metal that beats to this day - Sigma
* To sum it up: FASAnomics: By Cthulhu, for Cthulhu - Moonsword
* Because Battletech is a conspiracy by Habsburg & Bourbon pretenders - MadCapellan
* The Hellbringer is cool, either way. It's not cool because it's bad, it's cool because it's bad with balls - Nightsky
* It was a glorious time for people who felt that we didn't have enough Marauder variants - HABeas2, re "Empires Aflame"

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40828
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #611 on: 17 August 2017, 15:30:28 »
And for us Battletechers, they make perfect Korvins right out of the box! :)
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

HobbesHurlbut

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3092
  • Live Free or Die Hard
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #612 on: 17 August 2017, 17:09:15 »
Isn't that just a myth?
Malnutirion is a thing.  ::) It's there was a stereotype of people of Japan being "short" in early-mid 20th century, has to do with the available food for the people at large. Or that on average people are taller today than in past because we have better access to food.
Clan Blood Spirit - So Bad Ass as to require Orbital Bombardments to wipe us out....it is the only way to be sure!

Kidd

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3535
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #613 on: 18 August 2017, 00:51:33 »
The more developed Asian countries in particular are seeing a certain change in physique as diets change from the traditional carb-heavy standard to incorporate more protein. Of course its still bounded by genetics, but we're just seeing now the changes that Europeans experienced a couple centuries ago: I believe the "Napoleon was short" myth came from the fact that his stature was modest compared to the modern standard, but then so were most people back then.

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25816
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #614 on: 18 August 2017, 00:57:12 »
It's actually been quite conclusively linked to rumors that were spread about him by his enemies.  Calling him short was a way of mocking him.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Siden Pryde

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 531
  • Papermaster
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #615 on: 18 August 2017, 01:48:41 »
APCs for the more mature figure ...
Israeli Namer, under evaluation in the US. Converted from Merkavas being withdrawn from service. I reckon nine of me could fit in that.
A beautiful machine.  Too bad it is also sixty tons.  Good luck transporting that in a C-130 or A400. 

glitterboy2098

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12027
    • The Temple Grounds - My Roleplaying and History website
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #616 on: 18 August 2017, 02:25:53 »
Israeli Namer, under evaluation in the US. Converted from Merkavas being withdrawn from service. I reckon nine of me could fit in that.
actually they are building Namer's directly now.

and that one was just on Loan to the US army during 2012. the army wasn't considering buying it, just taking it through its paces alongside the CV-9035, the M2A3 Bradley, a turretless Bradley prototype, and the M1126 Infantry Carrier Vehicle. trying to decide what features to include in the "Ground Combat Vehicle" program designs.

basically so the Army could finalize the specifications for the two competitors in the program to start getting actual designs in place.

sadly it is starting to face design issues now.. meeting all the requirements has resulted in all of the offerings being heavier than the M1 Abrams, mainly due to heavy armor protection. the armor is modular so if they equip lighter armor they can come in under the weight.. but only by not meeting the protection requirement.

haven't heard if the requirements will change, or if the design teams will be able to pull a new generation of armor tech off in time.

currently the teamups are:
BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman, QinetiQ North America, Saft Group, and iRobot
vs
General Dynamics Land Systems, Lockheed Martin, and Raytheon

Arkansas Warrior

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9210
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #617 on: 18 August 2017, 09:25:27 »
It's actually been quite conclusively linked to rumors that were spread about him by his enemies.  Calling him short was a way of mocking him.
I've also heard that it has to do with the pre-Metric variance in units; a French inch was slightly longer than an English inch, so when the English were told he was 5'2", they took that as him being short, not realizing that if you translated the units that worked out to about 5'7".
Sunrise is Coming.

All Hail First Prince Melissa Davion, the Patron Saint of the Regimental Combat Team, who cowed Dainmar Liao, created the Model Army, and rescued Robinson!  May her light ever guide the sons of the Suns, May our daughters ever endeavour to emulate her!

ColBosch

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8705
  • Legends Never Die
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #618 on: 18 August 2017, 10:02:56 »
I've also heard that it has to do with the pre-Metric variance in units; a French inch was slightly longer than an English inch, so when the English were told he was 5'2", they took that as him being short, not realizing that if you translated the units that worked out to about 5'7".

This is the truth here.
BattleTech is a huge house, it's not any one fan's or "type" of fans.  If you need to relieve yourself, use the bathroom not another BattleTech fan. - nckestrel
1st and 2nd Succession Wars are not happy times. - klarg1
Check my Ogre Flickr page! https://flic.kr/s/aHsmcLnb7v and https://flic.kr/s/aHsksV83ZP

ANS Kamas P81

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13235
  • Reimu sees what you have done.
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #619 on: 18 August 2017, 12:30:32 »
Certainly explains the February 1812 decree from him!  "I am not short, and when we all use my measuring system, we will prove it unconditionally!"  ...I will refrain from punning on a man concerned over a measurement of five inches...
Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen,
Tod und Verzweiflung flammet um mich her!
Fühlt nicht durch dich Jadefalke Todesschmerzen,
So bist du meine Tochter nimmermehr!

HobbesHurlbut

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3092
  • Live Free or Die Hard
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #620 on: 18 August 2017, 17:18:14 »
It's actually been quite conclusively linked to rumors that were spread about him by his enemies.  Calling him short was a way of mocking him.
It was the Imperial - Metric conversion snafu. When they translated his height number into British system, it was done wrong and showed him being shorter than he actually was.
Clan Blood Spirit - So Bad Ass as to require Orbital Bombardments to wipe us out....it is the only way to be sure!

Vykromod

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 49
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #621 on: 18 August 2017, 17:25:34 »
On top of the French inch thing, Napoleon's bodyguard unit consisted of big guys. It made him look small in comparison despite him being pretty much the average height for the day.

qc mech3

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 873
  • Mon pays, ce n'est pas un pays. C'est l'hiver.
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #622 on: 18 August 2017, 17:27:11 »
The reason I learned long ago was the difference between a french foot (13 inches) and an English one (the now standard 12 inches), like AW said. It's also good propaganda to make your enemy an unstable dwarf.  #P

I think the introduction of the metric system came later when he decided to optimize the logistics of ''la grande armée''.

Arkansas Warrior

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9210
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #623 on: 18 August 2017, 18:02:32 »
Historically inaccurate as it would be, I would like to see Peter Dinklage cast as Napoleon in a movie, especially if it was a more comedic take.  That'd be pretty funny.
Sunrise is Coming.

All Hail First Prince Melissa Davion, the Patron Saint of the Regimental Combat Team, who cowed Dainmar Liao, created the Model Army, and rescued Robinson!  May her light ever guide the sons of the Suns, May our daughters ever endeavour to emulate her!

glitterboy2098

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12027
    • The Temple Grounds - My Roleplaying and History website
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #624 on: 18 August 2017, 18:21:18 »
Historically inaccurate as it would be, I would like to see Peter Dinklage cast as Napoleon in a movie, especially if it was a more comedic take.  That'd be pretty funny.
in the vein of timebandits? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Bandits

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #625 on: 19 August 2017, 10:36:07 »






Armored Light Infantry Light Tank and Supply Tank (UK) Apparently.  Never seen it before today.

More info about it here - http://weaponews.com/weapons/12396-armored-light-infantry-light-tank-and-supply-tank-uk.html

Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Sabelkatten

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6959
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #626 on: 19 August 2017, 14:59:24 »
Ugh, I wish the guy who wrote that article knew English grammar...

worktroll

  • Ombudsman
  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25637
  • 504th "Gateway" Division
    • There are Monsters in my Sky!
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #627 on: 19 August 2017, 15:58:16 »
There's a fine line between camoflauge, and ... something else.

* No, FASA wasn't big on errata - ColBosch
* The Housebook series is from the 80's and is the foundation of Btech, the 80's heart wrapped in heavy metal that beats to this day - Sigma
* To sum it up: FASAnomics: By Cthulhu, for Cthulhu - Moonsword
* Because Battletech is a conspiracy by Habsburg & Bourbon pretenders - MadCapellan
* The Hellbringer is cool, either way. It's not cool because it's bad, it's cool because it's bad with balls - Nightsky
* It was a glorious time for people who felt that we didn't have enough Marauder variants - HABeas2, re "Empires Aflame"

vidar

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 607
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #628 on: 19 August 2017, 18:59:49 »
I believe with hight that is the only way to get cam on that.  Burry it up to the top of the hull.

Fat Guy

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5003
  • I make beer disappear. What's your superpower?
Re: Armored Fightning Vehicles MK III
« Reply #629 on: 22 August 2017, 12:45:12 »
More stuck Ruskies:







I have spoken.