Strategic Operations p.49
I have been looking at the Battle and Raid tables for linked scenarios and I believe that they are incorrect. The only way to get a Base Attack scenario is for the attacker to have a campaign score of +5 or greater and the defender to have a campaign score of -5 or less. If the players had the scores during the order writing phase, the difference in scores is 10. This would be an automatic win for the attacker based on the third campaign victory condition of outperforming the opposition.
The +5/-5 error would actually apply to both tables. In any case where the players have scores of +5/-5 no battle would take place. I believe that both tables should end at scores of +4.5/-4.5 and have the scenarios readjusted accordingly. I am posting this both here and in the errata section. If I am incorrect could someone please explain where I am mistaken.
Thank you.