Nope, not three, just a single example.
Again: the Vengeance was introduced before Kerensky's Exodus, so that covers both Klondike and TRO2750, leaving only the SLSB p57 example, and TPTB have come up with a perfectly reasonable and viable answer for that.
Without a doubt, in just another example of FASA's poor fact checking, the writers for both TRO2750 and SLSB were thinking of the published Vengeance when the name was mentioned in those two publications, but the dates and answers we have allows all publications to stand without requiring any changes, whereas what you're suggesting would require changes. It's a no-brainer just to leave things as they are.
Stating that a 2750 era Star League document was in fact refering to 2800 era Fed Suns Frigates as being who was paired up w/ the Vengeance isn't "Perfectly reasonable", its stretching it a tad and you know it.
Having the Klondike example which is a
NEW Catalyst era document where fact checking is supposedly not the same as the FASA era then be chalked up to "well Kerensky got ahold of some of the 1st production run" isn't much of a stretch. Till we look at where the 2 Vengeance factories are in 3025 canon. So then we have to account for some added factory being in the TH post Amaris war destruction for a couple years before getting pasted by the Houses.
Finally, stating that its a "previous Vengeance" is just giving us one MORE unstated historical unit that people are going to want a canon RS for. (Like the above mentioned Union-CV)
A single # change would have been a much better fix, IMHO.
It would account for why factories are all over the IS (older SLDF design)
It would account for any mentions in 2750, SLSB, & Klondike.
And as mentioned, its already something they have done for units in DS&JS & 3025/26.
But its clear we have different opinions on what is or is not a good fix, and we are getting off topic so I'm dropping it here.