Author Topic: Field Report: DCMS  (Read 4696 times)

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11643
  • Professor of Errata
Field Report: DCMS
« on: 31 May 2011, 19:39:44 »
This thread is for all issues and problems with Field Report: DCMS.

Product Link: http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=field-report-dcms

Please remember to follow the errata report template when reporting issues.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: 20 June 2012, 01:55:32 by Xotl »
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7127
Re: Field Report: DCMS
« Reply #1 on: 07 July 2013, 05:04:10 »
PDF, page 18

'Alternate Paths Brigade', Morale section

"The First Proserpina Hussars were stricken from the DCMS roles in late 3077 for their actions in the Xinyang Prefecture."

should read

"The First Proserpina Hussars were stricken from the DCMS rolls in late 3077 for their actions in the Xinyang Prefecture."

Page 20, Mercenaries section
"The abandonment of key worlds by the Northwind Highlanders followed by similar actions of the Wolf’s Dragoons (compounded by the latter’s failure to defend
Buckminster) has only reinforced to many within the DCMS High Command that mercenaries are simply a disloyal and unreliable force in even the best of times.
Nevertheless, the reality remains that the DCMS needs the services of some mercenary forces to supplement key defenses and strategic targets, such as the Yamato, her sister ship the Ryū, and the large network of JumpShip yards at Dover."

The DCMS doesn't have a role in the defense of spaceborn assets.  Suggest replacing DCMS High Command with Bureau of the Military, and the second instance of DCMS with DCA.

 

Register