BattleTech - The Board Game of Armored Combat

Off Topic and Technical Support => Forum Technical Support => Topic started by: Tizona on 05 December 2012, 10:29:12

Title: (Resolved) BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Tizona on 05 December 2012, 10:29:12

Hi!

www.battletech.com is redirecting to www.mechjock.com
DNS or link problem?

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Paul on 05 December 2012, 11:00:58

Odd, we're looking in to that. Thanks for the heads up!

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Stormlion1 on 07 December 2012, 19:08:20

Maybe I'm missing it but I don't see a link to the Forums as well.

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Martius on 08 December 2012, 17:22:55

For me it still links to http://www.mechjock.com/.

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Paul on 09 December 2012, 00:06:02

I'll post in here once we believe the problem is solved.

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: ItsTehPope on 09 December 2012, 00:16:40

Resolving off 8.8.8.8 I I get the standard page but no link to the forums.

Title: Re: BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Paul on 10 December 2012, 12:31:41

Issue appears to be resolved. Thanks for the patience, everyone!

Title: Re: (Resolved) BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: scatcat on 10 December 2012, 12:37:07

I'm not sure about that.

I was just redirected to mechjock.

Title: Re: (Resolved) BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Paul on 10 December 2012, 12:39:23

Clear your cache. I replicated the problem before, but cannot reproduce at this point; it always resolves properly now.

Title: Re: (Resolved) BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: scatcat on 10 December 2012, 15:21:12

problem solved  ;D

Title: Re: (Resolved) BatteTech main site loading mechjock.com
Post by: Paul on 10 December 2012, 15:22:08

Quote from: scatcat on 10 December 2012, 15:21:12

problem solved  ;D

Sweet. Trust me, my initial assumption was continued failure on my end, so it was worth a check... =)