It already has a SVSP for anti-infantry. Other weapons are an HPPC as primary ranged, and a battery of MMLs for all ranges.
Hrmm, just go with the MPL's then. You need some consistant damage to back up the HPPC to keep getting the PSR's,
as the MML's may bottom out on the Cluster Hits Table, and you need more padding in case you miss with the big gun anyhow.
They are better than direct fire weapons but they aren't as effective as plasma rifles or machine guns or fragmentation ammo.
In fact because of how standard pulse lasers work, medium pulse lasers trump VSPL mediums.
Only the Small VSPL is a clear winner over its alternative.
The VSPL Mediums are terrible and should always be swapped out for medium pulses. The only advantage VSPL mediums have is range and for the mass you pay to get that range bonus you are better off with standard medium lasers or even ER mediums and using the weight savings for anything else.
If you want close range defense against infantry at ranges they can't hit back and exceptional to hit mods at close range that keep jumpers and close range speedsters in check then medium pulse is always better. Period.
I misremembered how the AI function on VSPL's worked when I typed my first post, so yes the comparison of the Large VSPL to the Plasma Rifle was way off the mark. Still, there is still something nice about an AI weapon that has consistent levels damage instead of worrying about hitting snake eyes for damage.
Not sure what you mean in your last statement. If you are meaning the weight advantage for MPL's, I don't think that was ever in question. As for the rest, the Medium VSPL is a better
Direct Armor, Anti-Infantry, and Precision weapon across most of the range the MPL has (hex 6 goes to the MPL on all counts due to the VSPL's odd hit brackets), then goes out another
3 hexes, albeit at a reduced capacity. You get what you pay for.
But it's a moot point really. The Medium X-Pulse eats both of these for lunch across most of the board, if not all.