That's what it feels like.
Sometimes I feel as though I am hunting for rules that don't exist. For example, weapon specialization that grants you a +1 is mentioned on p. 172 in the example, but not in the actual skill entry for small arms on p. 153.
And with the Total Warfare conversion, the inclusion of a single word, in this case, "... only..." would have been a big help. Except in AToW, you would include links with BattleMech combat; ergo, why not the conversion?
I need to go looking through the errata. I just grabbed it.