BattleTech - The Board Game of Armored Combat

BattleTech Game Systems => Aerospace Combat => Topic started by: JPArbiter on 16 February 2011, 00:08:32

Title: Canon Warship List
Post by: JPArbiter on 16 February 2011, 00:08:32
Where can I find it these days, and is it updated to JHS Terra and Field Reports?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 16 February 2011, 00:55:40
Someone needs to repost this link form the old forums.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cache on 17 February 2011, 17:32:29
I would really appreciate a repost of this list as well.  It was a great reference.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mikecj on 17 February 2011, 19:38:40
Ditto- I want to see the WarShips go the way of the Mazianni
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 17 February 2011, 19:50:36
For reference: Link to the archived thread (http://www.classicbattletech.com/forumarchive/index.php/topic,71193.0.html). No attached files, though...  :'(
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mikecj on 17 February 2011, 20:06:16
Last version I downloaded before the crash
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 17 February 2011, 20:10:41
Here's the most recent one I'm aware of.  You'll need to unzip it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cache on 17 February 2011, 23:42:11
Here's the most recent one I'm aware of.  You'll need to unzip it.
I'm getting a damaged file when I unzip.  Anyone else?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 18 February 2011, 07:32:13
I'll upload a new one I just tested (I deleted the zip file last night).  It's working fine for me.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cache on 18 February 2011, 09:35:14
Must be on my end.  I'm working out the bugs on a new computer.  Thank you!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 18 February 2011, 09:44:49
Are you using the built-in Windows zip functionality?  If you are, that may be the problem - it's sometimes buggy.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: snewsom2997 on 18 February 2011, 12:03:18
Are you using the built-in Windows zip functionality?  If you are, that may be the problem - it's sometimes buggy.


At the office we have compatibility issues between, wizip and the windows 7 Windows zip.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 18 February 2011, 13:18:48
I've run into some between any of the built-in zip functions and either WinZip or 7Zip in the past, as has one of my professors.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cache on 18 February 2011, 17:49:40
Are you using the built-in Windows zip functionality?  If you are, that may be the problem - it's sometimes buggy.
WinRAR archiver is what is installed.  I've never used it before.  I just upgraded from XP to 7 so I haven't taken the time to find the best free unzipper.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 18 February 2011, 18:36:32
That's interesting.  As I noted, the file is not doing that on this end.  I wouldn't zip it except it's going over the forum attachment limit.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cache on 18 February 2011, 19:18:17
Problem solved.  MicroSoft Works Spreadsheet is all I had loaded and it was giving me the bad file error.  Open Office took care of it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 18 February 2011, 19:20:51
Problem solved.  MicroSoft Works Spreadsheet is all I had loaded and it was giving me the bad file error.  Open Office took care of it.

Ah.  Yeah.  Works is a bit of an oxymoron sometimes.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 18 February 2011, 22:00:22
Lots of WoB Ships!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 19 February 2011, 14:05:02
Well it helps that they stole half there fleet.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 20 February 2011, 00:01:52
Well it helps that they stole half there fleet.

Why waste the effort building i a fleet yourselves...just 'help' the FWL build theirs, then gas...I mean deactivate life support...I mean ask the crews to leave quietly and take posession of the ships yourself.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Medron Pryde on 20 February 2011, 06:05:45
"Kind words and a two by four work so much better than kind words alone."

"Especially when they are surrounded by vacuum and can't hear me."

 8)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 20 February 2011, 16:53:41
"Kind words and a two by four work so much better than kind words alone."

"Especially when they are surrounded by vacuum and can't hear me."

 8)

Interesting
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 23 February 2011, 04:41:50
I'm sitting on the next version untill all the Field Reports are out.  ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Marwynn on 23 February 2011, 05:45:16
Well here's a short list I compiled from the fluff from FR:DCMS

Black Dragons
Galedon Explorer - Destroyed by Clan Snow Raven (July 3068)
Urizen II - Destroyed by Clan Nova Cat defenders over Avon
Winds of Heaven - Retaken by ISF (Guarding Yamato and Ryu)
Sabre Cat - MIA

Luthien - Destroyed (Benjamin, 3072)
Swiping Claw  - Destroyed (Benjamin, 3072)
Night of Agony  - Destroyed (Benjamin, 3072)

Siriwan - Destroyed (Algedi)

Takashi - Destroyed (Terra)
Victory at Wolcott - Destroyed (Terra)

Lair of Mighty Worms - Survived
Draconis Rift - Survived
Amber Lotus - Survived
Dieron Star - Survived

Togura Yards - Sabotaged (Unsalvageable)
Dieron Yards - Black Dragon/Clan Ghost Bear (Destroyed)
Midway Yards - Operational (Converting to JumpShip construction)
Chatham, Altair, and Schuyler still active
Dover - Yamato and Ryu operational


----

That leaves two Inazumas, two Kyushus, and one Tatsumaki to comprise the DCA WarShip "fleet". Too bad not a single Kirishima survived, I liked that class.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 24 February 2011, 05:19:55
I to liked the Kirishima class...oh well...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Istal_Devalis on 24 February 2011, 12:15:29
Anyone have a link to the archive posting, discussing how the Nova Cats recovered the Anna Rosse and True Vision?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 24 February 2011, 12:18:23
Are you looking for this? (http://www.classicbattletech.com/forumarchive/index.php?topic=69867.0)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Istal_Devalis on 24 February 2011, 14:19:05
That's the one.  Thanks. :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 24 February 2011, 21:34:01
"Kind words and a two by four work so much better than kind words alone."

"Especially when they are surrounded by vacuum and can't hear me."

 8)

Good use of a Babylon 5 Marcus quote.  O0
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 24 February 2011, 22:37:40
Good use of a Babylon 5 Marcus quote.  O0

Ah! That's why it looked familiar!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 24 February 2011, 23:27:55
The wit and wisdom of Marcus Cole still makes me laugh.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Medron Pryde on 24 February 2011, 23:30:23
I was WONDERING how long it would take someone to call me on that...

 8)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 25 February 2011, 16:30:54
One of the most heartbreaking deaths in scifi TV...

RIP Marcus...in Valen's name!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 25 February 2011, 17:02:48
for some reason the appropriation of the FWLN WoB makes me think of the theft of the ETERNAL in Gundam Seed...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 25 February 2011, 21:53:48
Figured the WoB had techs on board who either just gassed the crews or opened the ships to space with override codes or somesuch.Quick and painless, at least for the WoB techs.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 25 February 2011, 22:25:10
Figured the WoB had techs on board who either just gassed the crews or opened the ships to space with override codes or somesuch.Quick and painless, at least for the WoB techs.

Life Support...OFF
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 26 February 2011, 04:50:31
Life Support...OFF
"Open the pod bay doors, HAL!"
<HAL>"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that."</HAL>
  ;D
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 26 February 2011, 10:16:03
Well I really doubt the FWLN ships were stolen while sitting in drydock, thats for sure.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 26 February 2011, 15:57:59
Well I really doubt the FWLN ships were stolen while sitting in drydock, thats for sure.

Pilot: Ship is in position, we have deployed the sail, estimating 102 hours until drive is charged!
Captain: Excellet...does it seem cold in here to you ensign?
Pilot: yes...and I...seem to...be...short of...breath...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 26 February 2011, 23:23:44
Wow only 5 DCMS ships out their and about, they took a beating!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 27 February 2011, 00:32:01
Wow only 5 DCMS ships out their and about, they took a beating!

ALL the houses have taken a beating. The Cappies have just three ships left. The FS has only four ships left with three other foxes unaccounted for and I dread to think what the FWLN is going to look like!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 27 February 2011, 01:04:01
ALL the houses have taken a beating. The Cappies have just three ships left. The FS has only four ships left with three other foxes unaccounted for and I dread to think what the FWLN is going to look like!

Non-existant...what with its balkanisation...the various territorial state fleets on the other hand...are probably still pretty hammered
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 27 February 2011, 01:19:30
Now I wonder how many WoB ships will remain unaccounted for when the Jihad ends.  ::)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 27 February 2011, 02:23:38
Now I wonder how many WoB ships will remain unaccounted for when the Jihad ends.  ::)

Obviously I can't answer that, but I can tell you they have at least 22 warships whose fate we haven't heard of yet.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 27 February 2011, 02:39:29
Obviously I can't answer that, but I can tell you they have at least 22 warships whose fate we haven't heard of yet.

Twenty two??? Dude, we have some warshipie goodness to come...don't get to attached to the few vessels your faction still has then!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 27 February 2011, 12:12:05
If were lucky, maybe the WoB commanders all went to the Davion School of Ramming and Planetary Collision.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 27 February 2011, 13:02:55
If were lucky, maybe the WoB commanders all went to the Davion School of Ramming and Planetary Collision.

99% of all the graduates of the Davion School of Ramming and Planetary Collision have been personally shot by myself.

With regards
Øystein
Grand Admiral of the BattleTech Fleet.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 27 February 2011, 17:14:52
99% of all the graduates of the Davion School of Ramming and Planetary Collision have been personally shot by myself.

With regards
Øystein
Grand Admiral of the BattleTech Fleet.

Please tell me the other 1% have already died putting their theories into practice.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 27 February 2011, 18:01:53
Page 4, Field Report: AFFS
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 28 February 2011, 11:21:18
Page 4, Field Report: AFFS

I said WoB commanders, not Davion commanders.  ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Thoth on 01 March 2011, 14:52:08
LOL. I think it's funny that we are comparing WoB commanders with Davion commanders all of a sudden...

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 01 March 2011, 20:45:38
LOL. I think it's funny that we are comparing WoB commanders with Davion commanders all of a sudden...

I have two words for you: "Atomic Annie".
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: TalonZahn on 02 March 2011, 20:04:39
Is there a list of ships for each House prior to 3050 out there anywhere?

I'd love to build up some older fleets.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 02 March 2011, 20:23:32
A list of the classes they likely had access to or individual hulls?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: TalonZahn on 02 March 2011, 20:36:20
Classes they likely had access to I guess.

Individual ships of note can alway be hunted down in the TRO's I would think. If not Sarna.

I guess I'm looking for something like the files made by Worktroll, only for Aero/Naval/etc.

I used his stuff to build my House armies a couple years back. So now I'm wanting to build navies for them.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 02 March 2011, 21:14:45
Classes they likely had access to I guess.

Well, all Successor States had  a dozen+ of the older model Aegis-class Heavy Cruiser. Some, if not all, also used the Baron-class Destroyer, and apparently the Vigilant-class Corvette.

We know the Lyran Commonwealth had at least one Potemkin-class Troop Cruiser, in addition to their Mako-class Corvettes and Tharkad-class Battlecruisers.

The Federated Suns had access to the Congress-class Frigate, in addition to their Robinson-class Transports and Davion-class Destroyers (and a homegrown Battleship class IIRC).

The Capellan Confederation had the Du Shi Wang-class Battleship.

The Free Worlds League had the Atreus-class Battleship.

The Draconis Combine had the Samarkand-class Carrier.

The Taurian Concordant used Wagon Wheel-clas Frigates, Winchester-class Cruisers, and the Dart-class Light Cruiser, IIRC.

All the houses were likely to have additional classes of ships, but these are ones that are easily confirmed by a review of the House books and TRO's.

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 02 March 2011, 21:35:30
It has been confirmed that the Combine had a Baron and Samarkand at Hesperus as well as another class that I do not recall off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 02 March 2011, 22:35:05
The Federated Suns had a homegrown Battleship class? And we know nothing about it? Someone is slipping.  ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 02 March 2011, 22:58:27
The Federated Suns had a homegrown Battleship class? And we know nothing about it? Someone is slipping.  ;)
It's the FSS Golden Lion.  We've known about it since the House Davion Sourcebook came out.  Of course we know next to nothing else, but hey, we've got a name.

It's similar to the FWLS Rasalas.  We know it was a Star League Battlecruiser that the FWL bought.  That doesn't help us too much.  It could be a Cameron or it could be a Black Lion, we just don't know.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 02 March 2011, 23:09:55
I don't know if you're tracking ancient warships, but there is a complete list of the Combine warships destroyed by the Invincible at Hespersus.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: HavocTheWarDog on 02 March 2011, 23:37:06
What are the sources for the Hesperus II warship losses in battle? Can that info be shared?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 03 March 2011, 04:50:55
What are the sources for the Hesperus II warship losses in battle? Can that info be shared?
Scenarios for the battle and the ship profile for the DCS Galedon II, as published on BattleCorps.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: HavocTheWarDog on 03 March 2011, 06:20:08
Thankyou Frabby!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 11 March 2011, 18:01:46
Just a minor point but is the entry for the Arthur Steiner-Davion correct stating 3065?
Seems to me it was 3063, check "Jihad Secrets Blakes Documents" p. 66.

Status entry for the "Great Bear" is Lost, at least according to the info from the notes row.
Status entry for the "Fire Fang" is  Captured/Lost, at least according to the info from the notes row.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 11 March 2011, 20:49:21
I don't know if you're tracking ancient warships, but there is a complete list of the Combine warships destroyed by the Invincible at Hespersus.
  • Galedon II, Samarkand-class
  • Yedo, Baron-class
  • Georgia, Bonaventure-class
  • Tamura, Bonaventure-class
  • Pacheco, Vigilant-class
  • Wyrm, Vigilant-class

I see what the fluff meant about the Invincible being a whale among minows...she was atleast twice the size of anything in this list!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 19 March 2011, 05:37:34
Well, all Successor States had  a dozen+ of the older model Aegis-class Heavy Cruiser. Some, if not all, also used the Baron-class Destroyer, and apparently the Vigilant-class Corvette.

We know the Lyran Commonwealth had at least one Potemkin-class Troop Cruiser, in addition to their Mako-class Corvettes and Tharkad-class Battlecruisers.

The Federated Suns had access to the Congress-class Frigate, in addition to their Robinson-class Transports and Davion-class Destroyers (and a homegrown Battleship class IIRC).

The Capellan Confederation had the Du Shi Wang-class Battleship.

The Free Worlds League had the Atreus-class Battleship.

The Draconis Combine had the Samarkand-class Carrier.

The Taurian Concordant used Wagon Wheel-clas Frigates, Winchester-class Cruisers, and the Dart-class Light Cruiser, IIRC.

All the houses were likely to have additional classes of ships, but these are ones that are easily confirmed by a review of the House books and TRO's.

Ruger

Don't forget about the New Syrtis class mentioned in the Robinson's fluff for the Federated Suns. Canon stats not published but they are part of the warship universe.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 19 March 2011, 16:13:25
actually, based on number of hulls, how many were upgraded for the SLN, and assuming it was an equal division the houses would have had 6 AEGIS of the 2300s vintage...there wer two lefy over, which I tend to give of the RWRN as a reward for Amaris' loyalty during the Reunifacation War.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 19 March 2011, 16:24:44
actually, based on number of hulls, how many were upgraded for the SLN, and assuming it was an equal division the houses would have had 6 AEGIS of the 2300s vintage...there wer two lefy over, which I tend to give of the RWRN as a reward for Amaris' loyalty during the Reunifacation War.

Correct for the Aegis-class ships given to the great houses...don't know how my math came out like it did...  :-[

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 19 March 2011, 22:59:03
Correct for the Aegis-class ships given to the great houses...don't know how my math came out like it did...  :-[

Ruger

Happens to everyone :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 20 March 2011, 18:18:43
I don't have it but, does the MUL have the WarShips listed too?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Marwynn on 23 March 2011, 21:21:27
Nope, the MUL doesn't have Warships.

Do we have a partial list of all the mentioned classes for each Great House?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ds9guy on 23 March 2011, 21:33:23
Hey Gang,

Has anyone done a canon warship update for the DA time period?  Last time I read through the novels and online material I started doing one but I seem to have lost the file. 

Thanks,

ds9guy :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 24 March 2011, 06:35:15
We're still getting information on the immediate post-Dark Age status of various fleets through the Field Reports series.  The MUL, as the rest of it's released, may well have some other facts to consider.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: JAY241 on 27 March 2011, 13:34:55
The thing with a DA navy listings is that its only gonna be slightly longer than the pre clan era navy listings.I know its not that bad but darn near . Come on, the FSN from 15 hulls to 5(1 still in WOB hands,2 crips rebuilding) and even worse for almost everyone else.Cant wait to see whats left clanner wise.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 28 March 2011, 03:40:36
The thing with a DA navy listings is that its only gonna be slightly longer than the pre clan era navy listings.I know its not that bad but darn near . Come on, the FSN from 15 hulls to 5(1 still in WOB hands,2 crips rebuilding) and even worse for almost everyone else.Cant wait to see whats left clanner wise.

Well, I think the Snow Ravens have lost between 10-15 ships as of the Terra Campaign...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 28 March 2011, 03:43:40
Well, I think the Snow Ravens have lost between 10-15 ships as of the Terra Campaign...

<Quick Look at list> Ah, some were salvaged, still 8 are gone, thats close to 25% of the fleet!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 29 March 2011, 17:49:13
Hey, I just noticed a tidbit of information that I don't think is on the Master List.

Aerotech 2 Revised, in the Warship Fleet Color Schemes that start on page 32, says this about the Wolf's Dragoons warships.

Bringing six ships captured during the Absorption of Clan Widowmaker out of mothballs, Clan Wolf outfitted the Wolf's Dragoons for their fateful covert reconnaissance mission. The Warships use the classic Dragoon Black with red trim-which fortuitously matches the Widowmaker's colors.

I don't think we have those ships listed for Clan Widowmaker. Or their origins mentioned in the Wolf Dragoon section.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 29 March 2011, 22:32:04
But we can't be sure of their names.  Indeed, I would be suspicious that a ship named the Beowulf would be in the service of the Widowmakers.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 30 March 2011, 11:12:21
Perhaps it could be added with that notation in the notes section "Previous name as Clan Widowmaker warship unknown". Or something to that effect. Acknowledging that Clan Wolf probably changed their names, either after the absorption or before they joined Wolf's Dragoons as part of their cover story.

I think it would be useful information, I've seen numerous debates on these forums over where Wolf's Dragoons equipment came from. It also fills out the Clan Widowmaker section a little.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 30 March 2011, 12:10:21
Well I suppose thats an easy enough change to make. I'll append the Wolf Dragoons fleet list to the widowmaker collum and add brakets next to the names.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 30 March 2011, 13:07:27
Just because the Dragoons used the Widowmaker paint scheme tells us nothing about whether their ships kept the same names as the Widowmaker hulls. To my knowledge, the only known name-and-class Widowmaker ship is the Potemkin-class Egg Sac, seen in the Wolverine stories.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: jimdigris on 30 March 2011, 15:54:25
The Ravens only contributed two stars, and there were survivors.  Assuming no losses in the Homeworlds, that leaves 28 warships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 30 March 2011, 18:26:57
The Ravens only contributed two stars, and there were survivors.  Assuming no losses in the Homeworlds, that leaves 28 warships.

based on the few chatterweb snippets we've gotten, I think the Raven's were high-tailing it under fire, so there probably were losses. Still even if they were reduced to just 10 vessels, they would significantly out number anyone else in the DA era.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 31 March 2011, 05:58:46
Just because the Dragoons used the Widowmaker paint scheme tells us nothing about whether their ships kept the same names as the Widowmaker hulls. To my knowledge, the only known name-and-class Widowmaker ship is the Potemkin-class Egg Sac, seen in the Wolverine stories.

TBH, I highly doubt they did. But even if we don't know their SL or Widowmaker names, we do know they were Widowmaker vessels.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: The Hawk on 21 April 2011, 09:23:57
I see that the list asserts that SLS Michigan, which features prominently in Betrayal of Ideals, is a Texas-class.  However, after an extensive review, I can't find any reference in any of the parts of that story to support this assertion, or indeed to support that Michigan belongs to any other class or is even a battleship (certainly, other Clans have used cruisers as flagships).  The only thing that BoI appears to establish is that it's the Wolverine flagship and that it has capital missiles.

Can anyone provide more details, or fill in where the Texas suggestion comes from?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 21 April 2011, 18:09:56
I see that the list asserts that SLS Michigan, which features prominently in Betrayal of Ideals, is a Texas-class.  However, after an extensive review, I can't find any reference in any of the parts of that story to support this assertion, or indeed to support that Michigan belongs to any other class or is even a battleship (certainly, other Clans have used cruisers as flagships).  The only thing that BoI appears to establish is that it's the Wolverine flagship and that it has capital missiles.

Can anyone provide more details, or fill in where the Texas suggestion comes from?

Well, the Michigan first shows up in the Star League Sourcebook, on p. 74 as the ship that General Kerensky and Richard Cameron are observing in the wargame being conducted by League forces.  Later mentioned as 2nd winner of the Martial Olympiad, on p. 135.  None of it mentions what the ship's Class was though.  Historical: Operation Klondike fails to mention the ship as well.

All honestly as risk being criticized, i think it was generally assumed that it was Texas Class ship because it was generally believed that those ships were named after the US States and 52 ship were product somewhat supporting it.  It was possible that American gained few states before the Terra Alliance formed.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: The Hawk on 21 April 2011, 22:08:57
All honestly as risk being criticized, i think it was generally assumed that it was Texas Class ship because it was generally believed that those ships were named after the US States and 52 ship were product somewhat supporting it.  It was possible that American gained few states before the Terra Alliance formed.

Your assumption is not unreasonable, but of all the Texas-class ships we know of, none of them are named after U.S. states.  There is an SLS Nebraska that is a battleship, but its class is unknown.  Also, the only ship I know of that has both a state name and a known class is Iowa, a Smoke Jag Essex.

Sorry, I don't mean to be the one doing the criticizing.  I appreciate the clarification.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 21 April 2011, 22:50:09
I don't think the Texas class were named after US States but ocean going battleships. Look at the SLS Prinz Eugen and the SLS Bismark and if there ever was one, the SLS Texas as examples.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: The Hawk on 22 April 2011, 10:30:20
I don't think the Texas class were named after US States but ocean going battleships. Look at the SLS Prinz Eugen and the SLS Bismark and if there ever was one, the SLS Texas as examples.

Well, and that would support Michigan being among that class (as well as a huge number of other vessels.)  However, as far as I know there's never been a battleship named Mountbatten.

To date, the only thing that seems consistent about the Star League's ship naming conventions is that they completely lack consistency. ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 22 April 2011, 10:40:58
Mountbatten was the name of a class of commercial Hovercraft though that was built in the mid 1960's.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 23 April 2011, 00:16:28
Mountbatten was the name of a class of commercial Hovercraft though that was built in the mid 1960's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountbatten (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountbatten)
Prince Louis I, Lord Admiral Louis and Prince Philip all had serious naval connections in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Remembering that this is the history of the 1980s, his existance was conveniently pushed back into the spotlight in 1979 when the IRA blew him up.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 23 April 2011, 08:55:34
Never know, in the Battletech history the Brits may have named a cruiser after the guy. Then it would fit to have a Texas named after him.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Trace Coburn on 25 April 2011, 03:18:49
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountbatten (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mountbatten)
Prince Louis I, Lord Admiral Louis and Prince Philip all had serious naval connections in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Remembering that this is the history of the 1980s, his existance was conveniently pushed back into the spotlight in 1979 when the IRA Irish National Liberation Army blew him up.
  Fixed for historical accuracy.  And the way I hear it, if it hadn't been for the 'collateral damage' there are a fair few veterans of Dieppe who would've wanted to buy them a pint for it.  #P  Given how deeply rooted the Terran Hegemony was in McKenna's Canadian heritage, I can only ascribe that naming getting past Their Lordships without causing all those fallen Canadian lads to become subterranean dynamos to the anaesthesia caused by the passage of centuries.  ::)

Never know, in the Battletech history the Brits may have named a cruiser after the guy. Then it would fit to have a Texas named after him.
  By the time the Irish bombers nominated him for that honour, the RN was long out of the cruiser-building business (other than the 'through-deck' kind, and ain't no way one of those would've been tarred with that brush when there were other, long-honoured names going).   :-X
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: The Hawk on 25 April 2011, 08:52:05
Well, that's another point; the original supposition was that they were being named after historical blue-water battleships rather than just any ol' blue-water ship.  (Frankly, if your naming scheme is "we name our space vessels after any historical blue-water naval vessel", you don't really have a naming scheme.)  Battleships stopped being named when they stopped being built, in 1944, which was already historical fact when the BT universe diverged from our own in the mid-'80s.  (The BT universe certainly changes what is now our past, but I can't think of any examples of it changing the pre-1984 past.  There may be some.)

Anyway, I'm sticking with the belief that there is no consistent naming scheme of any kind, which seems to best reflect the evidence to date.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frank on 03 May 2011, 00:40:29
Is there any news as to what happened to these following missing AFFS warships.

1)  FSS Murmansk
2)  FSS Andrew Davion

Also How did the Wolf-in exile loss all but one warship.

Ulric Kerensky--lost over Skye
Implaccable --lost over Odessa/Gabriel
Werewolf--lost over Chara
2 unknown ships over Arc-royal
2 others lost to unknown causes when and where unknown also

Any one have any guesses or clues.


Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 03 May 2011, 07:56:02
FSS Murmansk was destroyed in drydock over Kathil in 3069.
FSS Andrew Davion went missing during the FCCW and has been written off as a loss after over a decade with no word.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: bronzite on 18 May 2011, 19:54:01
Does anybody have a feed on the class and disposition of the Touman?  She's referred to exactly once on page 66 of The Blake Documents, having gone down with the Ulric Kerensky, but she's not on any fleet inventory at least as far back as FM:U.  Context suggests she's Clan Wolf or Wolf-in-Exile, but her only known characteristic (exploding when hit with nuclear ordnance) is not particularly useful in identifying her.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 19 May 2011, 01:00:30
It's a typo, that I'm not 100% sure where originated.

Anyways, the CWS Touman is really the CWS Nicholas Kerensky (Texas-class).



Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 19 May 2011, 19:12:23
I don't have my books handy, but wasn't there a Texas Class ship that was redouced to a system defense ship due to its K-F Drive?  I thought it was Nicolas Kerensky or something like that...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 19 May 2011, 20:01:45
I don't have my books handy, but wasn't there a Texas Class ship that was redouced to a system defense ship due to its K-F Drive?  I thought it was Nicolas Kerensky or something like that...

That was Clan Coyote's Ancestral Home...

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 29 May 2011, 21:30:01
That was Clan Coyote's Ancestral Home...

Ruger

Wait, wheres that at?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 29 May 2011, 22:01:23
Wait, wheres that at?

Page 46 of FM: Warden Clans talks about the condition of the Ancestral Home...

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 30 May 2011, 09:41:46
Page 46 of FM: Warden Clans talks about the condition of the Ancestral Home...

Ruger

Man, I've had that book for ages, how could I have missed that!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 06 June 2011, 13:56:12
Did General Kerensky’s Exodus bring a Newgrange with them? I have a statement that says about forty-five or so survived the Armis Civil War, but get blown up later as prime targets in the SW-eras. Do we have a definate answer? Or should we always assume at least one of everything SL had is cached somewhere on or around Strana Mechty?

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 06 June 2011, 17:20:18
Did General Kerensky’s Exodus bring a Newgrange with them? I have a statement that says about forty-five or so survived the Armis Civil War, but get blown up later as prime targets in the SW-eras. Do we have a definate answer? Or should we always assume at least one of everything SL had is cached somewhere on or around Strana Mechty?

TT
Well, if these ships would be attached to Kerensky's fleet.  Original fluff from JHS:3076 suggests that they were part of the Exodus fleet.  It would properly highly important piece of mobile infrualstructure you could bring to establish a hightech world with space industry.  If survived the Exodus/Pentagon Wars is another story, the fighting didn't sound like it got into space way the H: OK read. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 06 June 2011, 19:23:39
Well, if these ships would be attached to Kerensky's fleet.  Original fluff from JHS:3076 suggests that they were part of the Exodus fleet.  It would properly highly important piece of mobile infrualstructure you could bring to establish a hightech world with space industry.  If survived the Exodus/Pentagon Wars is another story, the fighting didn't sound like it got into space way the H: OK read.

Quite a few orbital caches seem to have been destroyed though.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 11 June 2011, 21:36:53
My moneys on each Clan claiming one to maintain their fleets and many being used to be start ups for major Clan Shipyards, stripped and added onto to create stations and central nexus's of drydocks. Many were probably destroyed during the Pentagon Civil War as well, limiting their numbers so not every Clan may have been able to claim one.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Billy Boy Mark II on 27 June 2011, 09:52:41
Do we know what ships the WOB found at the Ruins of Gabriel? What ships of there fleet came from there I mean.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 27 June 2011, 10:00:27
I for one will always assume one of each Star Leaque Warship-class is in the hands, at one time or another, of the WoB.

That way, I can safely state, it's in there!

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 28 June 2011, 18:46:26
Well, the new Historical: Reunification War has alot of info, but not many names except for one...which we get more info on.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: JPArbiter on 12 July 2011, 08:35:28
well we know there were 7 dreadnoughts built (all those autocannons  [drool] )
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 12 July 2011, 16:48:26
well we know there were 7 dreadnoughts built (all those autocannons  [drool] )

Only thing that bothers me, ONLY SEV$EN?!? :(

I would hope that the survivors were refitted little bit. They were pretty nifty ships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 12 July 2011, 17:25:04
Yes, they were. They got all those auto cannon. AC5s and AC2s were not available in 2300.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 12 July 2011, 19:41:32
Only thing that bothers me, ONLY SEV$EN?!? :(

I submit to you that they didn't need more than seven.

First, consider the environment.  The first interstellar powers are barely coalescing.  The first known (I repeat, known) opposing heavy combatant was the Capellan Du Shi Wang, introduced in 2380, also the Confederation's first WarShip.  I don't have class sizes for the Lyran Commonwealth (2375), FWL League (2368), Davion Defender (2360), or Kuritan Narukami (2380), but as all of these are listed as the first WarShips built by the respective powers, the Dreadnoughts were functionally superweapons.

Now consider that we know the Darts had already entered service in 2305, quite powerful and tough for their day given the way Dreadnought basically defined the idea of the WarShip, and were probably the second most powerful class of WarShip for some decades.  Two classes of corvette are under construction - Bonaventure (2317) and Vigilant (2320).  Two more classes, the Lola I destroyers (2345) and Quixote frigates (2350), will be in service before the Houses get a single domestically-built WarShip.  The same year the League is introduced, the Monsoon comes off the slip and pushes the envelope of most powerful WarShip all over again; this may have been prompted by Davion's introduction of the Defenders in 2360.   Four years later, the Aegises burst onto the scene.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Blacknova on 12 July 2011, 20:43:00
Moonsword, do you by any chance have a list of class introduction dates?  If you do, would you be able to post it?  Most appreciated if you can.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 12 July 2011, 20:53:27
Soon as I'm home, I'll post a spreadsheet I made, that charts the introduction and lifespan of every pre-Amaris WarShip I've bothered to put on it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 12 July 2011, 20:54:47
Moonsword, do you by any chance have a list of class introduction dates?  If you do, would you be able to post it?  Most appreciated if you can.

I'll have to compile one from available sources.  All of that was done looking at StratOps, TRO3057R, Reunification War, and TRO3075.  Give me a little while to sort one out.

Soon as I'm home, I'll post a spreadsheet I made, that charts the introduction and lifespan of every pre-Amaris WarShip I've bothered to put on it.

Woohoo!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 12 July 2011, 21:06:28
...and here you go! If anyone's curious, the colors don't mean a thing except to improve contrast, and for some of the ships, it only represents their HAF/SLDF service, not their later service in House navies. Also, the second page is a very incomplete project I just started today to identify the planets that various HAF or SLDF ships were built over, to aid in assigning proper SLDF colors for them.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 12 July 2011, 22:03:55
 ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 12 July 2011, 22:28:31
And here's my list of ship class introductions.  Also provided are explanatory notes, name of the faction to first introduce it at the time it was built (i.e., Mjolnir is listed as LA, not LC), and tonnages for comparison purposes.

This was built using TRO3057R, TRO3075, TRO3085 Supplemental, Era Digest: Golden Century, Strategic Operations, and Reunification War.  Further information is probably available from the WarShip Master List but for this initial release, I decided to go with my own sources.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Blacknova on 13 July 2011, 00:10:37
Wow.  I have heard of ask and thou shall receive, but this is incredible.

Thanks very much  Moonsword, Jellico and Wierdo.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 13 July 2011, 05:11:37
Don't forget about McKenna's flagship, the Black Lion referred to as a Battlecruiser. Don't believe we've seen that class yet in canon.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 13 July 2011, 06:12:45
I have a spreadsheet that uses the information about what class replaced what and the production figures we have to try and work out service lives and in-class figures per decade. Will post it when I am not working from my phone.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 July 2011, 12:30:38
Don't forget about McKenna's flagship, the Black Lion referred to as a Battlecruiser. Don't believe we've seen that class yet in canon.

Assuming it's an unknown class, no, we haven't, but without more information, all we can do is speculate.  It may be an unknown class but I kind of doubt the Darts were originally referred to as light cruisers when they were very possibly the second most powerful ships in space on launch.  For that matter, the Dreadnoughts are in the same approximate bracket as the SLDF's high-end cruisers, so the author may have been classifying the design by more modern standards.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 13 July 2011, 13:23:35
The McKenna's Black Lion must appeared when his son was relieved of command if i remember correctly, when McKenna arrived to taken him back to Terra.

The ship could appear at time Monsoon came out as contemporary of the Battleship.  I hope the writers will consider highlighting such a ship and other "lost" Warships of the period.   I'm interested in seeing what the "early" pre-warships were suppose to be like.

Reunification war's rolling tables were showing ships that hadn't been introduced yet. We need early DropShip designs that aren't contemporaries.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 July 2011, 13:30:16
The McKenna's Black Lion must appeared when his son was relieved of command if i remember correctly, when McKenna arrived to taken him back to Terra.

And that doesn't change anything I just said.

The ship could appear at time Monsoon came out as contemporary of the Battleship.

The Monsoon was introduced in 2368.  McKenna stopped needing a flagship in 2338.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 13 July 2011, 15:03:09
Actually the SLSB (page 16) has the Director-General leading Campaigns of Persuasion from his battlecruiser the Black Lion. The time period indicated is 2316-2317.  The ship is quite specifically referred to as a battlecruiser and you would think if it was a Dreadnought it would have been mentioned. There are no Hegemony/League battlecruisers until the Cameron (2688). For these reasons I would contend there is a yet undetailed canon battlecruiser.

[I filled this niche, non-canon of course, with the Hegemony class Battlecruiser - see FM TR 2785 or TRO 2800 if your interested]
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 July 2011, 15:07:49
You'd think FASA would have error-checked a lot of their work, too, and they didn't.  This has created messes CGL is still cleaning up.  If it's a new class - and it could well be, as I said at the time - I'd love to see it.  But I don't think we can just assume it is with nothing but one reference in an early FASA sourcebook.  The best thing to do would be to ask the writers and see if they're willing to give us some information.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 13 July 2011, 15:10:05
My thought is that Black Lion is either a heavily up-gunned JumpShip, like a large Aquila, or it actually is a Dreadnought, and the term battlecruiser was used by historians as a generic term for a large WarShip, much like how there are many folks who will refer to any combat vessel as a battleship, even if they're talking about a cruiser or destroyer.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 13 July 2011, 16:32:16
I'd love to see the canon battlecruiser design for the original Black Lion. Be interesting to see some of those hybrid warship classes especially from the Houses. I mean it took them 60 years to develop a warship - quite an advantage for the Hegemony.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 July 2011, 16:43:58
I'd love to see the canon battlecruiser design for the original Black Lion. Be interesting to see some of those hybrid warship classes especially from the Houses. I mean it took them 60 years to develop a warship - quite an advantage for the Hegemony.

It took most of them more like 70 to 80.  The only two to get it done before 2365 were the Federated Suns and the Taurians.  (Now there's an odd couple...)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 13 July 2011, 17:28:10
TR2750 in the initial WarShip fluff refers to ALL such vessels as battlecruisers and on several occassions in the old House Books they use the term as a generic one for WarShips.

I  always got the impression that the Cameron was the first such 'hybrid' design.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 13 July 2011, 18:39:34
Actually, I think the Tharkad predates both SL BCs, with the Cameron built in response to the Tharkad, and the Black Lion built in response to...well, the Cameron's lack of response.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 July 2011, 19:11:03
Actually, I think the Tharkad predates both SL BCs, with the Cameron built in response to the Tharkad, and the Black Lion built in response to...well, the Cameron's lack of response.

*taps introduction list*  The Tharkad entered service two years after the Cameron's introduction in 2688.  Given that the Tharkad was designed in 2685 while the contract on the Camerons was issued in 2677, if there's a relationship between the two, it's likely to be the other way around if there was much influence.  Some statements indicate that it prompted the Black Lion's introduction in 2691, but given the close proximity of the introduction dates, I imagine the Black Lion program was actually started after someone realized exactly what a white elephant the Navy was about to receive with the Cameron.

The close proximity of all three, combined with the Tharkad and Black Lion both telling the heavy cruisers there was a new top dog short of the battleships, is probably what actually set off the arms race referred to in TRO3075.  One of the products of that arms race was likely the introduction of the Luxors in 2721 combined with an effort to bulk out the cruiser numbers that produced the massive number of Sovetskii Soyuzes that began entering service a couple of decades later.  (This is all assuming that TRO3057R's dates are correct, something I'm willing to accept for the sake of argument but will not assert as absolute truth.)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 15 July 2011, 19:11:56
I had a theory about the SovSoy and its mass production: The ship was designed, the design was then scaled back to minimum capabilities to maximise production rates. The resulting (lackluster) vessel would then be brought up to it's intended specs through its standard refit cycle. Result is 400 average ships produced REALLY fast, these would then be turned into powerful combatants later...unfortunatly thr 2nd Peripery Uprising and Coup scuttled these plans.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 16 July 2011, 14:38:58
And here I was thinking the SLDF got a platform with 2/3 the firepower of a New Syrtis Carrier, twice the combat persistance and better stand off capability at considerably less cost.

Don't underestimate the Sov Soy. Naval combat in 2700 is about showing the flag and what the army might call counter insurgency operations. You don't want a Black Lion for that.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 16 July 2011, 16:59:48
Yep. Given how few heavy WarShips are in non-SL hands during the SovSoy's service life, it was more than capable of handling 90% of the space-based situations it might encounter(short of a berserk Atreus or Tharkad), and also made a very good flagship for a ground detachment, able to provide support in terms of logistics, DropShip transport, air support, orbital fire, and anything else you can think of. I also see the vessel used as a destroyer leader, serving as a command ship for a patrol squadron of Lolas and Vincents. A handful of such vessels could easily secure a major system, or patrol a number of systems, with the SovSoy waiting in a central location, able to jump to any location if one of the subordinate vessels encountered trouble.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 16 July 2011, 17:14:30
Hey, don't look at me.  I just said it was a way to bulk out the numbers.  The Sovetskii Soyuz has a lot of virtues.  They're just not found in intense ship-to-ship combat.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 16 July 2011, 17:19:22
The Sovetskii Soyuz has a lot of virtues.  They're just not found in intense ship-to-ship combat.

Exactly! Remember, you're part of the SLDF, heir to the traditions of Terran Hegemony problem-solving: I kills it with my battleships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 16 July 2011, 17:52:33
Hmm.  Now I'm suddenly in the mood to make WarShip RATs for late SLN.  Balancing them would probably be a madhouse, though.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 16 July 2011, 18:05:59
Shouldn't be too hard. Put the destroyers in the 6-8 slots, the next common ones for Vincents and SovSoys, a slot each for a modern heavy cruiser or frigate, and save the BCs and BBs for the 2-3 or 11-12 slots. I'll admit the difficulty is choosing which ships to use, since the late SLN had more than eleven well-known classes. You could leave the Texas off, since it was supposed to be a rather rare vessel.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 16 July 2011, 18:09:28
I was thinking one RAT for corvettes, one for destroyers, one for cruisers, and one for battlecruisers and battleships, but I'm crazy.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 16 July 2011, 18:12:11
Late SLN didn't have that many corvettes, so I imagine a corvette-only chart would actually be rather monotonous. Maybe one RAT for small ships, one for heavy ships?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 16 July 2011, 18:16:03
Shouldn't be too hard. Put the destroyers in the 6-8 slots, the next common ones for Vincents and SovSoys, a slot each for a modern heavy cruiser or frigate, and save the BCs and BBs for the 2-3 or 11-12 slots. I'll admit the difficulty is choosing which ships to use, since the late SLN had more than eleven well-known classes. You could leave the Texas off, since it was supposed to be a rather rare vessel.

Why not a RAT for ship type (corvette, destroyer, cruiser, etc) and then secondary tables to determine class...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 16 July 2011, 18:19:29
Late SLN didn't have that many corvettes, so I imagine a corvette-only chart would actually be rather monotonous. Maybe one RAT for small ships, one for heavy ships?

Well, not completely 'late' but more representative of that period with a few dregs for spice.  Although you could fold it into the destroyer table.  There's so many cruisers that they really need their own table, plus there's two battleships and two battlecruisers.  Maybe include the old battleships at the extreme end of the table, weighted toward Farraguts with a freak chance for a Monsoon or Dreadnought. *shrugs*  Just an idea, really.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 17 July 2011, 17:20:51
mmm. Battleships outnumbered cruisers by a fair margin in the late SLDF. I have a doc somewhere covering it all, but its worth noting that only the heavy cruisers (bar Sov Soy) and McKennas had LF batteries giving these ships some unique capabilities.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 17 July 2011, 17:50:12
mmm. Battleships outnumbered cruisers by a fair margin in the late SLDF. I have a doc somewhere covering it all, but its worth noting that only the heavy cruisers (bar Sov Soy) and McKennas had LF batteries giving these ships some unique capabilities.

There are plenty of cruisers...400 SovSoys alone (compared to 330 Texas+Mckenna)...According to the SLSB (pg 132) the SL had 500 naval bases with 2 destroyers and later 1 cruiser permanently on station, so the SLN had at least 1000 Destroyers and 500 cruisers
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 17 July 2011, 21:59:18
My appologies. Late SLDF cruisers split into a variety of roles. The Sov Soys were almost like the previous generation's frigates. The battle cruisers replaced the old battleships while the LF battery cruisers were something new and superceeded by the McKennas. After about 2600 you could no longer consider a cruiser to be a cut price battleship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 18 July 2011, 14:28:36
Why not make a RAT with the most common warship, and have the rest with a second to-get number?

That way you could either get the ship that is common or one of the better ones.

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 19 July 2011, 20:46:26
My appologies. Late SLDF cruisers split into a variety of roles. The Sov Soys were almost like the previous generation's frigates. The battle cruisers replaced the old battleships while the LF battery cruisers were something new and superceeded by the McKennas. After about 2600 you could no longer consider a cruiser to be a cut price battleship.

Isn't reason the Sovetskii Soyuz is so like a Frigate was that folks who did TRO:3057 was basing their idea of Frigate on way the Pre-1975 US Navy's designation for their ships at time were all hosed up.  After 1975, ships that were considered "Frigates" became cruisers for example.   Those cruisers were not as well armed as traditional thought Gun cruisers of WW2 era.

That also explains why in TRO:3057 that Frigates are larger than destroyers, where present its the other way around.

If my theory is correct.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 20 July 2011, 03:16:02
Seems to have been.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 20 July 2011, 03:42:17
Don't base the ship system on the US Navy one. It's not the only navy in the world, after all. While the term "frigate" might not be used much in the US NAvy, it is used in other navies around the world.

Ship classifications are a very unscientific way of measuring things. The spanish F100 frigate turns into a Hobart-class destroyer when the australians use it. The german F-125 frigates has a displacement of 7500 tons, which is more than most other european destroyers.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 20 July 2011, 04:52:46
Most of the worlds modern definitions of a frigate have/had to do with role rather than size.
The pre-3075 USN definition was unusual in that it had to do with size.

TRO2750 describes frigates as cruiser sized ships with enhanced sensors in place of weapons.

Battlespace defines frigates as rarely massing under 700,000 tons and serve as pickets and escorts. Usually equipped with top-notch sensors, frigates often stay on the outskirts of a fleet to act as sentries though they also provide additional defense in the fleet's core. Unlike smaller ship classes, frigates can also operate as transports, allowing DropShips to dock at their hardpoints.

Notably Aerotech 2 avoids these clarifications and simply uses a tonnage system.

Size has seemed to be the defining feature of WarShips in CBT for a long time, something unique to the pre 1975 USN system which tends to suggest writers were thinking along similar lines in the mid 80s.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 20 July 2011, 06:29:16
I tend to use mass/roll to classify ships
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 24 July 2011, 18:16:15
Don't forget about McKenna's flagship, the Black Lion referred to as a Battlecruiser. Don't believe we've seen that class yet in canon.

Actually the SLSB (page 16) has the Director-General leading Campaigns of Persuasion from his battlecruiser the Black Lion. The time period indicated is 2316-2317.  The ship is quite specifically referred to as a battlecruiser and you would think if it was a Dreadnought it would have been mentioned. There are no Hegemony/League battlecruisers until the Cameron (2688). For these reasons I would contend there is a yet undetailed canon battlecruiser.

[I filled this niche, non-canon of course, with the Hegemony class Battlecruiser - see FM TR 2785 or TRO 2800 if your interested]

Just wanted to add some evidence for an early Hegemony Battlecruiser, one that predates the Cameron and the Black Lion, from the SLSB page 32.

Quote
Taking personal command of the Hegemony battlecruiser Kiev, Lord Theodore led a massive naval assault against the Free Worlds fleet anchored at the Oriente star system. In the largest fleet action yet taken , more than 20 major Free Worlds warships were destroyed, while the Hegemony lost only two.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 24 July 2011, 21:44:20
Would you like to provide a date for that reference?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 24 July 2011, 22:03:21
I still think Battlecruiser is an alternative to Warship in the SLSB and TR2750...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 24 July 2011, 22:17:23
Would you like to provide a date for that reference?

2470-2475
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: JPArbiter on 26 July 2011, 11:34:12
has anyone updated the actual spreadsheet since v [1][1].1.11??

I would like to download it and attatch it to the front of the thread
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 03 August 2011, 16:43:02
Looks like we have some more ships to add to the list.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 03 August 2011, 17:07:47
We do?

Clue for the clueless, please?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Minemech on 03 August 2011, 17:13:30
 Is the War of Reaving PDF out yet?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 03 August 2011, 17:25:27
Yes.  Lots of WarShip action.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Minemech on 03 August 2011, 17:29:24
 May I ask how long I will need to wait before I can buy it hardcover? Somthing like that needs to be on the shelf.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 03 August 2011, 17:55:13
May I ask how long I will need to wait before I can buy it hardcover? Somthing like that needs to be on the shelf.
If you're at Gen-con, tomorrow.  If not, whenever it's out.  Same with all things.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: sillybrit on 03 August 2011, 21:14:45
We do?

Clue for the clueless, please?

Yeah, the only clue one friend would give me is "Leviathan Prime". There's no stats for it yet apparently, but presumably there's a third Levi version now.

EDIT: added spoiler tags, for those who might prefer not to know before they get the PDF/book
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 03 August 2011, 21:27:18
We do?

Clue for the clueless, please?

Lots and lots of WarShips, including some new ones, and confirmation that at least two classes I hadn't previously thought went on the Exodus wound up there.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 04 August 2011, 01:04:28
So far only a third of the way through the book, the numbers of warships destroyed is heartbreaking.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 04 August 2011, 02:54:06
This is only about the Clans in the home worlds or?
Any thing directly related to us?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Peacemaker on 04 August 2011, 03:14:37
Yeah, the only clue one friend would give me is "Leviathan Prime". There's no stats for it yet apparently, but presumably there's a third Levi version now.

EDIT: added spoiler tags, for those who might prefer not to know before they get the PDF/book

[spoil]I believe the Leviathan Prime is actually the original design the Ravens cooked up before the project was abandoned and the Leviathans were turned int transports.[/spoil]
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 04 August 2011, 05:47:26
[spoil]I believe the Leviathan Prime is actually the original design the Ravens cooked up before the project was abandoned and the Leviathans were turned int transports.[/spoil]

Interesting...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 04 August 2011, 05:48:56
Lots and lots of WarShips, including some new ones, and confirmation that at least two classes I hadn't previously thought went on the Exodus wound up there.

Do tell...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 04 August 2011, 09:35:00
[spoil]I believe the Leviathan Prime is actually the original design the Ravens cooked up before the project was abandoned and the Leviathans were turned int transports.[/spoil]

[spoil]Then it's probably the same one the others were shifted to, which should put the destruction of at least one of them (maybe two?) during the Jihad in perspective.[/spoil]

Do tell...

We've got sightings of at least three Samarkands and a Baron, plus what may or may not be a Davion as opposed to a Whirlwind.

As to the context of those remarks... go read the book.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 04 August 2011, 10:34:44
Not to mention a Riga and Kimagure, as well as possible SLN names for many ships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 04 August 2011, 16:14:17
Peregrine
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 04 August 2011, 16:24:28
Peregrine

We don't really get anything new there other than seeing one in the 3070s.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 04 August 2011, 16:58:05

We've got sightings of at least three Samarkands and a Baron, plus what may or may not be a Davion as opposed to a Whirlwind.

As to the context of those remarks... go read the book.

In negotiations with my wife...I think she wants me to wait for DTF rather than get the Combo...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 04 August 2011, 18:25:11
Not to mention a Riga and Kimagure, as well as possible SLN names for many ships.

At least two Mako's are mentioned as well...

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 04 August 2011, 21:52:13
I thought I saw a mention of a bandit or Society modified Davion II.

The Wars of Reaving book is littered with warship references. Just pinning down the fate of all the Clan warships we already knew about will be a hefty task.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 04 August 2011, 22:05:05
The Tesla was only noted as a Davion.  It's possible it was refit back from one of the Whirlwinds or that it was one or the other of the two Davion classes; I lean toward the latter but we don't know which one.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 06 August 2011, 18:28:52
Picking through Klondike, I've found the following.  Someone might want to doublecheck against the Lists, make sure I didn't miss anything, and I very strongly insist that this is not at all an exhaustive combing through the book.  But it should be done, and that first entry does give an idea of what happened to a lot of the unlisted...

Rebels:
Wreckage of "scores" of WarShips and DropShips destroyed previously at Dagda cache
Five unspecified active ships (and unknown inactive) in the Arcadia cache engaged and captured by Clan units, p41
Texas-class: Perth surrendered to Clan ships over Arcadia p42
Riga-class: Admiral Schone sunk by Clan ships over Arcadia p42
Congress-class: Unnamed sunk at Circe cache p44
Quixote-class: Unnamed escaped Circe cache p44 then disappeared completely from System EC821-387D p47
McKenna-class: Unnamed apparently sunk at Circe cache p44
Sovietskii Soyuz-class: Unnamed apparently sunk at Circe cache p44
Potemkin-class: Unnamed escaped Circe cache p44 then captured System EC821-387D p47
Vincent-class: Unnamed captured or sunk at Circe cache p45, Unnamed captured or sunk at Circe cache p45

Unspecified Clan:
Cameron-class: Admiral Gerda Cameron, takes Circe cache p44
Black Lion-class: Thunderbolt, takes Circe cache p44
Avatar-class: Korat, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Sovietskii Soyuz-class, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Cameron-class, possibly Admiral Gerda Cameron, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Essex-class, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Whirlwind-class, takes Circe cache p44

Burrock:
Avatar-class: Constantineau, takes Dagda cache p46

Cloud Cobra:
Aegis-class: Inquisitor, crippled and mothballed for "decades" p43
McKenna-class: Second Coming, takes Babylon naval cache p43

Hell's Horses:
Aegis-class: Minotaur, provides fire support to ground forces p91

Snow Raven:
McKenna-class: James McKenna, takes Circe cache p44

Widowmaker:
Lola III-class: Black Venom, sunk in jump accident at Dagda cache p46
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 06 August 2011, 18:35:58
Korat is a Jaguar wessel...

By the way, if people want SLN names and have Wars of Reaving(or don't mind some spoilers), this question (http://www.classicbattletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,8791.0.html) I asked could give us quite a few, including some from classes that previously had no named hulls at all.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 06 August 2011, 22:35:08
Rebels had a Mckenna?  I know of the captured Second Coming.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 06 August 2011, 22:38:37
Captured Second Coming? I think you are thinking of the Wars of Reaving book, this is Operation Klondike.

Great job AMS Kanas P81.

One oddball stands out in my mind on that list. The Hell's Horses Aegis-class Minotaur.

I wonder what became of that ship, as of FM: CC, it's not listed.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 06 August 2011, 22:42:22
Captured Second Coming? I think you are thinking of the Wars of Reaving book, this is Operation Klondike.

Great job AMS Kanas P81.

One oddball stands out in my mind on that list. The Hell's Horses Aegis-class Minotaur.

I wonder what became of that ship, as of FM: CC, it's not listed.

oops, my bad.  :P
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 06 August 2011, 23:20:50
Captured Second Coming? I think you are thinking of the Wars of Reaving book, this is Operation Klondike.

Great job AMS Kanas P81.

One oddball stands out in my mind on that list. The Hell's Horses Aegis-class Minotaur.

I wonder what became of that ship, as of FM: CC, it's not listed.
Makes me think it ended up in Clan Moth Ball; it's not mentioned in Reaving either.  A pointless skim of FMU and M&M show nothing either, though rechecking Klondike the appearance of the Minotaur actually predates the Exodus, so strike that one as a possible - it could well have been among the "scores" of WarShips and DropShips that was sunk.  She's just a name on the list of ships that left, rather than dedicated anywhere.

 :-\  Mah bad.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 07 August 2011, 13:11:49
Makes me think it ended up in Clan Moth Ball; it's not mentioned in Reaving either.  A pointless skim of FMU and M&M show nothing either, though rechecking Klondike the appearance of the Minotaur actually predates the Exodus, so strike that one as a possible - it could well have been among the "scores" of WarShips and DropShips that was sunk.  She's just a name on the list of ships that left, rather than dedicated anywhere.

 :-\  Mah bad.

Well, the Stone Lions are indicated to be in the process of trying to reactivate two mothballed WarShips from the last Hell's Horses' WarShip cache...perhaps she was mothballed?

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 07 August 2011, 15:36:18
I'll grant that; I just originally thought it was a Horses' ship that survived the Exodus - not a random ship (that with that name could well be a Horse ride) that happened to be around beforehand, and may well have been destroyed among the infighting in the Pentagon.  There's a lot more possible futures...but not guaranteed.  Which reminds me, back to work.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 07 August 2011, 19:48:20
I was kinda surprised to find out that one of the Samarkand was named the Yorktown.  I would thought the Samarkand Class ships would been named after Kurita planets like the earlier ones mentioned in the TRO:3075.  Would be possible that SLDF ended up  renaming these ships that came coming under their control?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 07 August 2011, 20:45:34
It's entirely possible.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: CJvR on 07 August 2011, 20:52:44
I was kinda surprised to find out that one of the Samarkand was named the Yorktown.  I would thought the Samarkand Class ships would been named after Kurita planets like the earlier ones mentioned in the TRO:3075.  Would be possible that SLDF ended up  renaming these ships that came coming under their control?
Well they do have a world named Midway...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Baldur Mekorig on 07 August 2011, 21:42:20
Looks like there is a new Warship class.

Clan Scorpion Seekers find a Peregrine-class warship in the T-892 system, six jumps from Erewhon.

 Is there any other mention in other book about this warship class?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 07 August 2011, 22:02:32
We've known about that one since StratOps - it's the first Jade Falcon-built WarShip, launched in 2969.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Trace Coburn on 07 August 2011, 22:11:01
Looks like there is a new Warship class.

Clan Scorpion Seekers find a Peregrine-class warship in the T-892 system, six jumps from Erewhon.

 Is there any other mention in other book about this warship class?
  p.15 of Strategic Operations: Clan Jade Falcon's first WarShip (2969).  Presumably the commissioning date means that it's their first all-new hull, as opposed to all the reconditioned SLN vessels they run.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Peacemaker on 07 August 2011, 22:20:53
We've known about that one since StratOps - it's the first Jade Falcon-built WarShip, launched in 2969.

I guess the burning questions now are "How many were built?" and "How did one get all the way down to the Rim Worlds?". I'm going to go ahead and blame the Society and/or Bandit Caste rummaging around in Clan naval caches. My second guess is the Green Ghosts are somehow responsible.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 August 2011, 23:31:18
Judging by the number of Clans that have apparently built their own WarShips at one point but now only field SLN hulls or ships bought from the Ravens, I tihnk some of the other large Clans tried to build their own ships at some point, but abandoned the idea after one or two hulls, seeing the rarely-used ships as not worth the expense. It's also possible that ships like the Peregrine were somehow flawed, and so once their honor had been satisfied by trying, they decided to leave ship construction to more skilled folks.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Peacemaker on 07 August 2011, 23:39:36
I imagine at some point during the Golden or Political Centuries the Clans realized their massive fleets were an unnecessary drain on resources and mothballed a bunch of them. They clearly mothballed certain classes, like Peregrines, Makos, New Samarkands, etc. for some reason. Maybe those were more difficult to upkeep/less useful than the classes that remained active?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 08 August 2011, 01:10:08
Since we have modly people posting without kiboshing posts of data outside the spoiler thread, I'll drop this here.  Up to page 61 so far.

Code: [Select]
Blood Spirit:
Blood Fury, reported sunk ca. August 3064, p15

Cloud Cobra:
Protector, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39
Inquisitor, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39

Coyote:
Windrunner, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Diamond Shark:
Bloodletter, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Predator, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Swift Strike, escaped Strana Mechty 20 September 3070

Fire Mandrill:
Rancor, departed York 3067, p16
Reaver, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Goliath Scorpion:
*Bernlad, fought at Lum December 3068, p40
Sagitta, crippled at Roche March 3069, captured by Snow Ravens p42
Garlon, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Enceladus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Prometheus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42

Hell's Horses:
Blood Horse, stationed at Noveaux Paris 3 September 3070, p55

Jade Falcon:
Gauntlet, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Ironhold Provider, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Blue Aerie, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
White Aerie, escaped Lum February 3070, p48

Snow Raven:
Swift Wind Naval Star, all ships sunk at Ramora early 3069 p40
Avalanche, fought at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
White Cloud, sunk by Draconis Combine ca. 3068, p35
Snowflake, fought at Strana Mechty ca. 3068, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Bloody Talon, fought at Lum December 3068, p40, sunk at Lum December 3068 p40
Black Justice, fought at Roche March 3069 p42, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Nestling, fought at Galedon V ca. June 3069, p43, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Mountbatten, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Storm Crow, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Vision of Terra, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Rook, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Venture Star, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Black Beard, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Lord Death, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p54
Snow Raven, sunk at Dante 3081 p64

Star Adder:
Vritra, sunk 3067 at York, p16
Liberator-class Constantineau, sunk at Strana Mechty ca. 3068
*Cho Polu, sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
Stellar Serpent, stationed at York ca. 3070 p42
Trump, sunk in unlocated Trial 3070 p54
Pompeii, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54
Exodus Ranger, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54

Steel Viper:
Fredasa-class Pit Viper, sunk at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Pride of New Kent, severe damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Sanra Mercer severe,damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Dark Asp, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Zalman's Endeavor, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Steel Python, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake Pit, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake-in-the-Grass, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Martial Legacy, fought at Lum February 3070, p48
Leviathan Prime-class Perigard Zalman, fought at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070 p51, fought at Lum ca. October 3070 p52
Coiled Serpent, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53

Wolf:
Provider, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61
Relentless Pursuit, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61

Other:
Multiple unknown WarShips, possibly reactivated from Cache between CC, SA, SV ca. 3065, p22
Masters shipyard at New Kent ca 3065, p22
*Multiple naval engagements at Lum December 3068, multiple unnamed ships present on CSA and CSR sides
Unknown Peregine-class, seen at System T-892, p58
Texas-class Prinz Eugen, fought at Priori, Vinton, Paxon, and Marshall 3071, stationed at Tanis 3072, p61

By my count that's 26 sunk starting from Blood Fury through to 3071, and I have only gotten a fourth of the way through the book.  Looks like we get a lot of dead boats; hoping there'll be more hard data on the CC/SA/SV activations later that I missed.  Guess we'll need a new version of the chart soon.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 08 August 2011, 02:14:17
Since we have modly people posting without kiboshing posts of data outside the spoiler thread, I'll drop this here.  Up to page 61 so far.

Code: [Select]
Blood Spirit:
Blood Fury, reported sunk ca. August 3064, p15

Cloud Cobra:
Protector, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39
Inquisitor, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39

Coyote:
Windrunner, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Diamond Shark:
Bloodletter, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Predator, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Swift Strike, escaped Strana Mechty 20 September 3070

Fire Mandrill:
Rancor, departed York 3067, p16
Reaver, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Goliath Scorpion:
*Bernlad, fought at Lum December 3068, p40
Sagitta, crippled at Roche March 3069, captured by Snow Ravens p42
Garlon, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Enceladus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Prometheus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42

Hell's Horses:
Blood Horse, stationed at Noveaux Paris 3 September 3070, p55

Jade Falcon:
Gauntlet, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Ironhold Provider, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Blue Aerie, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
White Aerie, escaped Lum February 3070, p48

Snow Raven:
Swift Wind Naval Star, all ships sunk at Ramora early 3069 p40
Avalanche, fought at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
White Cloud, sunk by Draconis Combine ca. 3068, p35
Snowflake, fought at Strana Mechty ca. 3068, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Bloody Talon, fought at Lum December 3068, p40, sunk at Lum December 3068 p40
Black Justice, fought at Roche March 3069 p42, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Nestling, fought at Galedon V ca. June 3069, p43, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Mountbatten, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Storm Crow, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Vision of Terra, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Rook, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Venture Star, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Black Beard, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Lord Death, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p54
Snow Raven, sunk at Dante 3081 p64

Star Adder:
Vritra, sunk 3067 at York, p16
Liberator-class Constantineau, sunk at Strana Mechty ca. 3068
*Cho Polu, sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
Stellar Serpent, stationed at York ca. 3070 p42
Trump, sunk in unlocated Trial 3070 p54
Pompeii, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54
Exodus Ranger, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54

Steel Viper:
Fredasa-class Pit Viper, sunk at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Pride of New Kent, severe damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Sanra Mercer severe,damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Dark Asp, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Zalman's Endeavor, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Steel Python, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake Pit, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake-in-the-Grass, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Martial Legacy, fought at Lum February 3070, p48
Leviathan Prime-class Perigard Zalman, fought at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070 p51, fought at Lum ca. October 3070 p52
Coiled Serpent, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53

Wolf:
Provider, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61
Relentless Pursuit, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61

Other:
Multiple unknown WarShips, possibly reactivated from Cache between CC, SA, SV ca. 3065, p22
Masters shipyard at New Kent ca 3065, p22
*Multiple naval engagements at Lum December 3068, multiple unnamed ships present on CSA and CSR sides
Unknown Peregine-class, seen at System T-892, p58
Texas-class Prinz Eugen, fought at Priori, Vinton, Paxon, and Marshall 3071, stationed at Tanis 3072, p61

By my count that's 26 sunk starting from Blood Fury through to 3071, and I have only gotten a fourth of the way through the book.  Looks like we get a lot of dead boats; hoping there'll be more hard data on the CC/SA/SV activations later that I missed.  Guess we'll need a new version of the chart soon.

Poor Ravens...they are the Naval clan, but lose more than anyone!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 08 August 2011, 02:17:07
Quick look at Strat Ops...

Clans Wolf, Jade Falcon and Snow Raven all list WarShips we have never seen stats for as their first builds...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 08 August 2011, 10:14:29
Also the first generation of House ships with the exception of the Du Shi Wang as well as the intriguing Canopian Athena.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 08 August 2011, 17:34:05
So once this is finished, who should I send the data dump to?  Obviously it's going to include the fate of nearly every WarShip listed (errors and omissions aren't impossible) in the book, and while I'm not too concerned about posting spoilers for an early bit of the book at this point I'm still hesitant to just plain dump everything.  And I don't know who's maintaining the Naval Registry anyway, so I'm more looking to find out who gets the fruit of my loomlabor and updating things.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 08 August 2011, 17:50:31
BlackAce was the one who was doing it; he's evidently waiting on the Field Reports.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 09 August 2011, 07:25:23
  p.15 of Strategic Operations: Clan Jade Falcon's first WarShip (2969).  Presumably the commissioning date means that it's their first all-new hull, as opposed to all the reconditioned SLN vessels they run.

I mentioned it elsewhere, but some of these vessels could be radical refits/refurbishments of an older SLN hull. Think Davion/Whirlwind. The implication is that these classes are still "new," just not built entirely from scratch. I don't think this would apply to the Houses, but it could apply to the aforementioned clan ships. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 09 August 2011, 11:13:34
The York is/was based on a Riga class.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 09 August 2011, 12:02:59
By my count...
One hundred eighteen WarShips confirmed by name sunk, approximately twenty more apparently sunk, approximately twenty unaccounted for but probably sunk.  Sixty three recorded as surviving, including a captured DCMS ship in Bear hands.  Twenty one to twenty four ships (some may be the same) reactivated from Reserves, at least one newly produced, and a few others from preexisting Bandit forces, so the numbers may not add up evenly to what we know.

:o

Now, that's a bit of estimates - the first number's pretty solid, the second factors in things like "seven ships sunk" without specifying sides or names, "entire Stars lost," and "entire Clan naval assets destroyed" without specific mention of hulls involved, and most of the third number don't reappear again after their last engagement and weren't specified as being destroyed.  The third is mostly Bandit/Society forces, so one can assume it fairly likely that if they aren't dead by 3085, they might as well be.  And a lot of the rest are cripples or in yards for years...oh and those surviving numbers include the IS Clan fleets.

Slim pickin's indeed.  If anyone needs the hard data and will update the Registry, I'll throw it y'all's way.  PM me.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 09 August 2011, 12:13:09
Yeah, the discussions of ships captured, sunk, recovered and sunk again such as the Sagitta will put loops in these counts :P
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 09 August 2011, 12:14:14
BlackAce was the one who was doing it; he's evidently waiting on the Field Reports.

Yeah, lets give it time. I mean, no need to make a Warship list that requires spoilers :P Although I think everyone I know has bought this book :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 09 August 2011, 12:41:16
Yeah, the discussions of ships captured, sunk, recovered and sunk again such as the Sagitta will put loops in these counts :P
It was putting loops in my brain around page 110...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 09 August 2011, 12:56:16
It was putting loops in my brain around page 110...

Wait until the recursion kicks in.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 09 August 2011, 14:13:14
Wait until the recursion kicks in.
no, that was the necrosia.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 09 August 2011, 14:21:04
FYI, I probably won't post an update until Christmas. I usually wait until the Con season is over and try to give resonable time for products to sell before data mining them for the list!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 09 August 2011, 14:22:22
Understand that!  I just wanted to get an idea how crazy it'd get myself, and figured why not. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Hawkeye Jim on 09 August 2011, 15:00:02
Since we have modly people posting without kiboshing posts of data outside the spoiler thread, I'll drop this here.  Up to page 61 so far.

Code: [Select]
Blood Spirit:
Blood Fury, reported sunk ca. August 3064, p15

Cloud Cobra:
Protector, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39
Inquisitor, fought at Tanis 28 August 3069, p39

Coyote:
Windrunner, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Diamond Shark:
Bloodletter, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Predator, sunk at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Unnamed, sunk? at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070
Swift Strike, escaped Strana Mechty 20 September 3070

Fire Mandrill:
Rancor, departed York 3067, p16
Reaver, fought at Shadow late 3069, p39

Goliath Scorpion:
*Bernlad, fought at Lum December 3068, p40
Sagitta, crippled at Roche March 3069, captured by Snow Ravens p42
Garlon, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Enceladus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42
Prometheus, captured at Roche by Snow Ravens March 3069 p42

Hell's Horses:
Blood Horse, stationed at Noveaux Paris 3 September 3070, p55

Jade Falcon:
Gauntlet, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Ironhold Provider, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
Blue Aerie, sunk at Lum February 3070, p48
White Aerie, escaped Lum February 3070, p48

Snow Raven:
Swift Wind Naval Star, all ships sunk at Ramora early 3069 p40
Avalanche, fought at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
White Cloud, sunk by Draconis Combine ca. 3068, p35
Snowflake, fought at Strana Mechty ca. 3068, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Unnamed sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
*Bloody Talon, fought at Lum December 3068, p40, sunk at Lum December 3068 p40
Black Justice, fought at Roche March 3069 p42, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Nestling, fought at Galedon V ca. June 3069, p43, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Mountbatten, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Storm Crow, sunk one jump from Galedon V ca June 3069, p43
Vision of Terra, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Rook, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Venture Star, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Black Beard, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53
Lord Death, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p53, escaped Lum ca. October 3070 p54
Snow Raven, sunk at Dante 3081 p64

Star Adder:
Vritra, sunk 3067 at York, p16
Liberator-class Constantineau, sunk at Strana Mechty ca. 3068
*Cho Polu, sunk at Lum December 3068, p40
Stellar Serpent, stationed at York ca. 3070 p42
Trump, sunk in unlocated Trial 3070 p54
Pompeii, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54
Exodus Ranger, stationed at York ca. 3070 p54

Steel Viper:
Fredasa-class Pit Viper, sunk at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Pride of New Kent, severe damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Sanra Mercer severe,damage at Lum 12 October 3065, p21
Dark Asp, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Zalman's Endeavor, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Steel Python, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake Pit, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Snake-in-the-Grass, fought at Ironhold November 3069, p47
Martial Legacy, fought at Lum February 3070, p48
Leviathan Prime-class Perigard Zalman, fought at Strana Mechty 20 September 3070 p51, fought at Lum ca. October 3070 p52
Coiled Serpent, sunk at Lum ca. October 3070 p53

Wolf:
Provider, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61
Relentless Pursuit, traded to Coyotes ca Feb. 3071, p61

Other:
Multiple unknown WarShips, possibly reactivated from Cache between CC, SA, SV ca. 3065, p22
Masters shipyard at New Kent ca 3065, p22
*Multiple naval engagements at Lum December 3068, multiple unnamed ships present on CSA and CSR sides
Unknown Peregine-class, seen at System T-892, p58
Texas-class Prinz Eugen, fought at Priori, Vinton, Paxon, and Marshall 3071, stationed at Tanis 3072, p61

By my count that's 26 sunk starting from Blood Fury through to 3071, and I have only gotten a fourth of the way through the book.  Looks like we get a lot of dead boats; hoping there'll be more hard data on the CC/SA/SV activations later that I missed.  Guess we'll need a new version of the chart soon.

My Star Adder count shows 12 left out of 28 in the original fleet plus the one they took out of the cache.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 09 August 2011, 20:55:51
Adder was one of the HW clans so there is an exact tally in their warship section. :P
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 09 August 2011, 21:01:34
As I said earlier, the ravens have been hit HARD but should outnumber the Adders Fleet at the end of all this...if they don't, Ill be disapointed...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Hawkeye Jim on 11 August 2011, 12:31:46
According to the WoK, the Raven fleet started with 40, so they could lose half and still have the biggest fleet. The Vipers are listed for 39, so they must have lost the most overall.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Hawkeye Jim on 11 August 2011, 12:46:09
Picking through Klondike, I've found the following.  Someone might want to doublecheck against the Lists, make sure I didn't miss anything, and I very strongly insist that this is not at all an exhaustive combing through the book.  But it should be done, and that first entry does give an idea of what happened to a lot of the unlisted...

Rebels:
Wreckage of "scores" of WarShips and DropShips destroyed previously at Dagda cache
Five unspecified active ships (and unknown inactive) in the Arcadia cache engaged and captured by Clan units, p41
Texas-class: Perth surrendered to Clan ships over Arcadia p42
Riga-class: Admiral Schone sunk by Clan ships over Arcadia p42
Congress-class: Unnamed sunk at Circe cache p44
Quixote-class: Unnamed escaped Circe cache p44 then disappeared completely from System EC821-387D p47
McKenna-class: Unnamed apparently sunk at Circe cache p44
Sovietskii Soyuz-class: Unnamed apparently sunk at Circe cache p44
Potemkin-class: Unnamed escaped Circe cache p44 then captured System EC821-387D p47
Vincent-class: Unnamed captured or sunk at Circe cache p45, Unnamed captured or sunk at Circe cache p45

Unspecified Clan:
Cameron-class: Admiral Gerda Cameron, takes Circe cache p44
Black Lion-class: Thunderbolt, takes Circe cache p44
Avatar-class: Korat, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Sovietskii Soyuz-class, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Cameron-class, possibly Admiral Gerda Cameron, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Essex-class, takes Circe cache p44
Unnamed Whirlwind-class, takes Circe cache p44

Burrock:
Avatar-class: Constantineau, takes Dagda cache p46

Cloud Cobra:
Aegis-class: Inquisitor, crippled and mothballed for "decades" p43
McKenna-class: Second Coming, takes Babylon naval cache p43

Hell's Horses:
Aegis-class: Minotaur, provides fire support to ground forces p91

Snow Raven:
McKenna-class: James McKenna, takes Circe cache p44

Widowmaker:
Lola III-class: Black Venom, sunk in jump accident at Dagda cache p46

Note: The Admiral Gerda Cameron probably belonged to the Ravens. Their FM fleet shows 3 Cameron class, altho' none by that name. They have no Black Lions, so that might have belonged to the Mongoose, Nova cats or Wolverines, which means it's likely not in the Homeworlds later except under a different name.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ANS Kamas P81 on 13 August 2011, 01:39:11
Or could have been part of the unspecified mothball fleet; if they were reactivated on-site at Circe (I forget, don't feel like looking it up, sue me I'm lazy) that would make them Raven reserves.  Certainly one big bad bunch to keep lying around, but with the limits on Warriors the idea of having that many ships might just have been untenable.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 13 August 2011, 01:44:09
Or could have been part of the unspecified mothball fleet; if they were reactivated on-site at Circe (I forget, don't feel like looking it up, sue me I'm lazy) that would make them Raven reserves.  Certainly one big bad bunch to keep lying around, but with the limits on Warriors the idea of having that many ships might just have been untenable.

But most of the crew for a WarShip would be Technician Caste, not Warrior...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Moonsword on 13 August 2011, 10:04:02
That doesn't mean that finding, training, and maintaining competency of that many Warriors in a fairly specialized discipline isn't a problem.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 13 August 2011, 11:54:10
That doesn't mean that finding, training, and maintaining competency of that many Warriors in a fairly specialized discipline isn't a problem.
Agreed. Even if the only warriors (besides marines) on a ship are the officers and gunners, we are still talking about an absolute minimum of about 20 (Fredasa) to well over 120 (McKenna), including senior officers of Star Colonel rank for command. Active duty warriors have priority; this is going to leave holes in the command chain and gunner ranks of "lesser" ships, which will have to be filled by A) unqualified active personnel, B) recent promotions/graduating cadets, C) reactivated retired officers (i.e. solahma).

Some clans might not have too much of a problem with this (Diamond Sharks simply reactivate retired warriors who now command merchant vessels and Snow Ravens have a solid core of cadets to draw from), but others will have great difficulty staffing even one additional warship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 13 August 2011, 12:37:14
I think that this was the one place where Clan way hadn't been completely thought out, or maybe it had as a way to limit the Fleet sizes for each Clan.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 19 August 2011, 14:19:55
I think that this was the one place where Clan way hadn't been completely thought out, or maybe it had as a way to limit the Fleet sizes for each Clan.

Well the Horses explicitly asked for several decommissioned WarShips crews to be added to their ground Touman to help man their conventional stars, so the reduction in fleet sizes may have very well been a "part" of the Clan way. You can also add most (or all) of Wolf's Dragoon's ships to the list as WarShips taken from assets seized from the Widowmakers. I'm not sure how many were active/capture or just a part of their reserve when the clan folded.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 22 November 2011, 23:31:37
That link leads me to nothing.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: cawest on 02 December 2011, 17:17:23
so do you have an update coming out soon?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 March 2012, 10:54:25
I won't post a detailed list just yet, but a quick scan of LoT I gave me ten new class-and-names for the SLN, all of them heavyweights. One of them is Big E.  [rockon]
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Crimson Dynamo on 10 March 2012, 11:12:20
But aside from Blackshark One, not a single Rim Worlds vessels was named. :'(
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 March 2012, 11:34:27
Actually, we did get RWS Stephan Amaris, but no class. Also got a named RWR Invader, but the name escapes me right now.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 10 March 2012, 14:14:43
I won't post a detailed list just yet, but a quick scan of LoT I gave me ten new class-and-names for the SLN, all of them heavyweights. One of them is Big E.  [rockon]

Yes, congrats to the original Black Lion class Battlecruiser for which I campaigned for - oh and the Black Lion which we all know and love I guess gets the Block II now. Lots of naval goodness just packed into this one.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 March 2012, 14:33:10
...huh?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 10 March 2012, 15:29:37
Page 78 second paragraph under Last Stand of the Grand Old Queen about the last stand of the SLS Dreadnought.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: lexington476 on 11 March 2012, 16:20:35
Page 78 second paragraph under Last Stand of the Grand Old Queen about the last stand of the SLS Dreadnought.

Just read that... now if we can get that read in the voice of Lorne Greene, perfect O0!

I get the references to Battlestar Galactica, and the sinking of the Bismarck, but does Rear Admiral Martin Castillo have a reference somewhere?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 11 March 2012, 16:42:17
Just read that... now if we can get that read in the voice of Lorne Greene, perfect O0!

It did sound very 'galactica-ish'...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Crimson Dynamo on 11 March 2012, 16:49:23
Actually, we did get RWS Stephan Amaris, but no class. Also got a named RWR Invader, but the name escapes me right now.

Ah yes. RWS Apollo's Saddle was the JumpShip. Still, the lack of examples of names and classes for the unexpectedly large RWR Navy does make me a sad panda. I certainly can guess what classes they were, but it always makes me giddy to see a few specifics. ;)

Just read that... now if we can get that read in the voice of Lorne Greene, perfect O0!

That would have been pretty hard to do 20 years ago.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Trace Coburn on 11 March 2012, 18:48:20
Just read that... now if we can get that read in the voice of Lorne Greene, perfect O0!

I get the references to Battlestar Galactica, and the sinking of the Bismarck, but does Rear Admiral Martin Castillo have a reference somewhere?
  It might be an Actor Allusion - EJO's character on Miami Vice was Lt. Castillo.  ::)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: lexington476 on 11 March 2012, 18:53:24
  It might be an Actor Allusion - EJO's character on Miami Vice was Lt. Castillo.  ::)

Ah, someone reliving their 80s dreams, hair, and cop shops...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: RoninV3 on 12 March 2012, 02:58:52
Well I really doubt the FWLN ships were stolen while sitting in drydock, thats for sure.

Only Admiral Kirk can steal a ship from Spacedock.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 27 March 2012, 20:03:23
When is this list updated to?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 28 March 2012, 02:42:48
Ah yes. RWS Apollo's Saddle was the JumpShip. Still, the lack of examples of names and classes for the unexpectedly large RWR Navy does make me a sad panda. I certainly can guess what classes they were, but it always makes me giddy to see a few specifics. ;)
What do you think Lot Vol. 2 is going to be full off?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 28 March 2012, 07:34:29
Words. And awesomeness. And me. It is my dying with to be cremated, and to have my ashes dumped into the paper pulp. Sadly, this is unlikely, as I'm not dying.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: jimdigris on 28 March 2012, 15:12:08
You could make it a part of your will. ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 28 March 2012, 15:15:47
I would, but I choose to labor under the delusion of immortality.

My evidence? I haven't died yet.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 28 March 2012, 17:45:15
Do you suppose there will be possiblity those two Kurita Battleships that Kerensky "Borrowed" from the Combine will be original new/retro design verses another exHegemony ship?   I do hope for the former, I'm kinda tired of the latter.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 28 March 2012, 17:54:48
I'd settle for either, as long as they're actual battleships, as opposed to a historian calling them such simply because they're ships meant for battle.

Besides, a Monsoon would look gorgeous in DCA grey-and-red. I'm pretty sure such ex-Hegemony ships would not be Dreadnoughts, and the Farragut is WAY too advanced to be sold to the Houses. Why are we spoiler-tagging this again?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 28 March 2012, 19:02:36
I'd settle for either, as long as they're actual battleships, as opposed to a historian calling them such simply because they're ships meant for battle.

Besides, a Monsoon would look gorgeous in DCA grey-and-red. I'm pretty sure such ex-Hegemony ships would not be Dreadnoughts, and the Farragut is WAY too advanced to be sold to the Houses. Why are we spoiler-tagging this again?

I'm trying to respect folks who haven't read H:LoT V1.  The paper back version isn't out and i believe not everyone has the PDF.

I would hope they were original Kurita designs, there still early WarShips listed from the Strategic Ops that haven't been seen/stated yet which include the Combine's Narukami.  I hope it would be newer design since DC is more militant nation and having large Battleships or even Battlecruiers classes would be up their ally.  They did have the Davion War of Succession which they launched into the FedSuns prior to the War. They could been seen then.

 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Dark_Falcon on 10 June 2012, 12:19:42
One entry to be made from Era Report: 2750, page 55:

"Furthermore, the SLEB [Star League Expeditionary Brigade] was permanently assigned the SLS Pioneer, a heavily modified Avatar-class cruiser that devoted nearly half of its normal cargo capacity to extra crew quarters, laboratories, and augmented astronomic sensors."

No word on the Pioneer's final fate, though.  I sort of wish she ended up taken by Amaris's forces.  Converted, she'd be the ultimate SDS control ship.  >:D }:)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 14 June 2012, 20:43:10
I'm trying to respect folks who haven't read H:LoT V1.  The paper back version isn't out and i believe not everyone has the PDF.

Its funny I've been looking for that book all day through out my collection as I got Era Report: 2750 in the mail today. I could have sworn I had it in DTF though.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 15 June 2012, 06:20:59
Its funny I've been looking for that book all day through out my collection as I got Era Report: 2750 in the mail today. I could have sworn I had it in DTF though.

I'm still waiting for mine as well...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Freefall357 on 15 July 2012, 16:39:04
Just flipping through the list to see how the massive GhostBear fleet held up during my long hiatu ~ WTH?!!?
WHAT DID YOU DO?!?!?! GAH! THE HELL HAPPENED WHILE I WAS AWAY?!
 :o
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 15 July 2012, 17:41:18
Just flipping through the list to see how the massive GhostBear fleet held up during my long hiatu ~ WTH?!!?
WHAT DID YOU DO?!?!?! GAH! THE HELL HAPPENED WHILE I WAS AWAY?!
 :o

You should have seen the other guy.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Freefall357 on 15 July 2012, 18:16:59
You should have seen the other guy.

wait...there is enough left of the other guy to SEE?  :'(
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 15 July 2012, 20:17:36
They fought in the last battles of the Jihad, it wasn't nice for anyones fleets. The Ghost Bears brought all there toys to the party and teh WoB and their tech smashed a good hunk of it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 16 July 2012, 00:04:22
What year were you up to? Go to the CGB thread and ask for a general update.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 25 July 2012, 18:49:03
FM: 3085 didn't offer an update on the warships of the former Free Worlds League 'nations'. As of Field Report: FWLM, there were six I think left? in Oriente and Regulus control. Were they lost or did FM: 3085 just not cover that?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 25 July 2012, 19:55:21
FM 3085 was fairly circumscript on warships except for clans and FedSuns, as I recall.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 29 July 2012, 21:01:25
The Sarna article on the Battle of Mars lists two Wolfs Dargoons WarShips, was this the extent of the WD's fleet or what happen to the rest of it?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 29 July 2012, 21:16:24
I'm pretty certain the Dragoons had five warships total,with four destroyed early on in 3067 (over Mars and Outreach) and the last by 3070.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 30 July 2012, 06:16:09
I'm pretty certain the Dragoons had five warships total,with four destroyed early on in 3067 (over Mars and Outreach) and the last by 3070.

WDS Nelson and WDS Darius (Lola III class) destroyed over Outreach on or around 20 Dec 3067
WDS Alexander (Aegis class) damaged over Outreach, 20ish Dec 3067, destroyed over Outreach, 26 Dec 3067 during the Dragoon retreat
WDS Athena (Sovetskii Soyuz class) destroyed over Mars
WDS Beowulf (Congress class) destroyed over Mars (rammed by the WoBS Sheridan)
WDS Mars (Vincent Mk 42) destroyed over Buckminster between 24 Apr 3070 and 30 Apr 3070
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Belisarius on 30 July 2012, 08:14:11
I think I'm going to stop visiting this thread. It just gets sad seeing the long litany of ships that we don't have any more. Can somebody let me know when we start seeing fleets increase again?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 30 July 2012, 08:39:56
Star League-era sourcebooks?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 30 July 2012, 08:49:40
I think I'm going to stop visiting this thread. It just gets sad seeing the long litany of ships that we don't have any more. Can somebody let me know when we start seeing fleets increase again?

If you are wanting ships to increase in the present timeline, you're going to probably have a LONG wait.  While Warships are a huge part of BT history, they do make fiction about big walking robots more difficult due to their habit of blowing up dozens of them at a time before they can even make landfall.  From what we know of the Jihad, they continue to be vanishingly rare, and I doubt that they are going to get more common anytime soon.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 30 July 2012, 20:43:45
Belisarius is correct.  Battletech universe may hinted in world war II style size (16th Century size?) navies that once cruised through early Battletech history.  Unfortunately, this slowly changed to focus on ground combat.  Warships may not competely come back, due to balance issues. 

Maybe Beyond Dark Age will give hope something.   
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 30 July 2012, 22:14:23
If the Successor States and the RoTS even build warships in the future, it will be in singletons and will require more effort than before. The only real hope is for the various powers is not to build warships, but go into the salvage business.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 31 July 2012, 10:21:09
I don't think they are coming back anytime soon. I'm not holding my breath. Instead I'm going retro, I'm enjoying learning more about the warships of the Age of War/Reunification War/Star League/Amaris eras.

For me, its not enough to say "oh here are one or two warships, see they aren't gone". To me that isn't a true warship presence, no more than it would be to say "oh there are 2 mechs on this entire planet and that's a lot!". For all intents and purposes, to me, that's extinct. Out of the picture. And that's what I foresee as the status quo for at least a very long time.

Having a real warship presence for me, means at the minimum, what the Inner Sphere/Clans had in 3066, just pre-Jihad. The Great Houses had fleets, enough warships to form small multi-warship flotillas or Battle Groups if they really wanted to, especially in the case of the FWL and Comstar. That is the acceptable minimum in my mind. When I create "naval" characters in the 3050s+ era, that person usually gets set up to die or retire to other pursuits by the end of the Jihad. As a naval game, that's game over.

So like I said, as a warship fan I'm going retro, with new products like Liberation of Terra making that more and more possible. Honestly some of the most enjoyable naval action in my mind is in the Reunification War, there were some awesome naval clashes between the SLDF and the Taurians that Historical: Reunification War describe beautifully. Playing an underdog Taurian naval officer in that era (even though they lose) is incredibly fun.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Peacemaker on 31 July 2012, 13:37:44
Regarding the question of whether WarShips will ever come back in a big way, I think perhaps the real question is: Are Pocket-Warships an actual improvement over WarShips or are they a crude substitute? If it's the latter, the odds of WarShips coming back are good; if it's the former, they're not so good. Of course, that's assuming there are not any major changes in tech level in the Inner Sphere.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 31 July 2012, 16:10:15
Regarding the question of whether WarShips will ever come back in a big way, I think perhaps the real question is: Are Pocket-Warships an actual improvement over WarShips or are they a crude substitute? If it's the latter, the odds of WarShips coming back are good; if it's the former, they're not so good. Of course, that's assuming there are not any major changes in tech level in the Inner Sphere.
There is no question that they are but a crude substitute; even a SL era destroyer can wipe out a squadron of canon PWS in short order. Even positively deadly custom killer Super PWS will die quickly under warship fire.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Belisarius on 31 July 2012, 16:22:47
Agreed. PWSs can simulate having a WS onhand for certain purposes (notably orbital fire support), but they are incredibly flimsy by comparison.

One could argue effectively that they are a compliment to a WS fleet enabling smaller numbers of WSs to concentrate into more powerful flotillas (because ground forces can get orbital fire from PWSs), but in terms of fleet action, they are no substitute.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Blacknova on 31 July 2012, 17:06:22
Even though PW are tin cans compared to the full bruiser of a WarShip, when there are so few WarShips, it is really a moot point, as the PW's will be fighting each other 90% of the time.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 31 July 2012, 17:12:33
Even though PW are tin cans compared to the full bruiser of a WarShip, when there are so few WarShips, it is really a moot point, as the PW's will be fighting each other 90% of the time.

Yeah, but when the big boys come to play, the Piddy-WiddyS better run or they will die.

If you want to invade a world guarded by a big boy, bring your own or prepare for staggering losses.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 31 July 2012, 18:10:24
Yeah, but when the big boys come to play, the Piddy-WiddyS better run or they will die.

Unless said Piddy-Widdy has a couple of nuclear-tipped cap missiles handy...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 31 July 2012, 18:20:58
Need more than a couple to make sure the job gets done...

First you gotta get into missile range to fire.

Then you gotta get the missile past escorts likely to try and shoot it down.

Then you gotta survive the target's PD.

Then you gotta actually hit.

Then you gotta make the penetrating crit roll.

Unless you have enough nukes to fire a half-dozen at a time, I wouldn't assume the target's going to be toast.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 31 July 2012, 18:57:27
Unless said Piddy-Widdy has a couple of nuclear-tipped cap missiles handy...

If PWS start lobbing nukes against warships, warships can start packing AMS in significant numbers (easily added to most designs without even touching fire control tonnage). And STILL the PDS will die under the warship's extreme range capital guns.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 31 July 2012, 20:09:27
True.

I'm just sayin...PW or ASF-fired nukes seem to be a fairly common way to reduce those irreplaceable multi-hundred thousand ton WarShips to floating irradiated scrap.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Blacknova on 31 July 2012, 20:18:33
Yeah, but when the big boys come to play, the Piddy-WiddyS better run or they will die.

If you want to invade a world guarded by a big boy, bring your own or prepare for staggering losses.

I agree totally, however, that will be the exception, as most cobats will be PWS on PWS.  With so few large ships, only capitals/shipyards/Hesperus style worlds would likely harbour such large vessels, and you would send your own big ships anyway of you were attacking such a target.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 31 July 2012, 20:42:57
Thanks alot for all the updates to the fleet lists.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 31 July 2012, 20:55:23
Warships are part of an older love affair for big ships with big guns clobbering each other.
If Warships were mass-producted, they could be continuously fight more often be more enjoyable for players.
I've known folks who dropped the game entirely, because this fact of warships are rare and not-replaceable from universe stand point.

Way things are with Battletech universe, that sort fun is extinct and regulated to the past.

Least LotT Vol 2 will give us something (i hope), good show for Warship clashes.

First Succession War should have least one last hurrah for big fleet clashes.  I'd like see one last production batch (even limited numbers) of new lost designs.  One can be hopeful.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 01 August 2012, 03:52:21
One problem with WarShips is a lot of people complained when we actually used the WarShips in battles. No matter how we fought using them, it was wrong. Stand up fight - wrong. Nuclear missiles - wrong. WarShips are not giant bling to hang around your capital worlds, they are weapons of war, and will be used.

There are still some powerful ships out there, but they will be used by their owners when we see fit. Just like the LCS Invincible was still sent out on missions when it was the Lyran Commonwealths last WarShip during the Succession War, so will we keep sending them out until they are no more. They are expensive tools of war, to be used as long as possible and do no good just sitting at home.

With regards,
Øystein
Strategic Assistant
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 01 August 2012, 09:09:10
Well if you want to battle out major fleet engagements go for 1st SW, would be something that TPTB could take a look at and provide some material but I guess the focus is still on pre SW era.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 01 August 2012, 14:27:27
One problem with WarShips is a lot of people complained when we actually used the WarShips in battles. No matter how we fought using them, it was wrong. Stand up fight - wrong. Nuclear missiles - wrong.



Though writers did get better at it. Aerotech aerospace is hard for writers. And WarShip scale Aerotech is harder, if only because you have to start dealing with multi-solar system associated weirdness. Battletech is far simpler. Walk in a straight line and blast stuff. As its the red headed step child of an unpopular part of the universe it is understandable that so few spent the time to get their heads around the implications of naval combat.
They are up there with the best of them. Napoleon never understood why he couldn't just mass his fleets and blast his way across the Channel. Unlike armies sailing ships don't move in straight lines.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 01 August 2012, 18:27:47
Some truth to that. Space/naval/fleet writing is tough. I've tried to get people into it, to do some collaborative fiction, and they aren't too keen. They just aren't comfortable enough with the subject matter.

I'd LOVE to find a good Battletech RPG/collaborative writing group focused on the space side of things.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 29 August 2012, 16:04:30
Hey guys,

Just dropping as I've had a couple of email requests recently for the last version of the list I was working on. It may even be the last version I released.

Note that I haven't touched it in about 12 months, (sorry about that but I took the decision to quit posting here so it kinda made working on this further somewhat moot. I notice my post to that effect was subsequently deleted  ::) ).

If anyone wants to pick up the torch and carry on the updates by all means be my guest. I hope you guys do, I had fun.

All the best, Jay  O0
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Peacemaker on 29 August 2012, 16:18:14
Thanks for all your hard work BlackAce and good luck. This place is worse off without you.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Crimson Dynamo on 29 August 2012, 17:28:02
Thanks, BlackAce.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 01 September 2012, 12:28:43
Thanks BlackAce its a shame not to see you around anymore.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 04 December 2012, 17:55:28
Did anyone ever do a list for the Star League?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 04 December 2012, 18:00:28
LONG time back. I keep it updated and mixed in with the other factions. Downside is, mine only has name, class, mass, type, faction, and fate(if known), while other people have expressed desire for other info I never cared about. Also, I don't have sources listed, so people may not believe me. I assure you, they're all canon.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kwic on 05 December 2012, 22:07:47
And where does this mystical source of knowledge reside, Mr. Weirdo sir...?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 05 December 2012, 22:21:21
Main  problem about a SLDF fleet listing is there were so many warships, what we know is only a drop in the bucket. I would love to know what class the SLS New Jersey was, it won the Martial Olympiad but other than that I have no info of what class, when it served or its fate. And thats one ship out of thousands.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 05 December 2012, 23:25:10
And thats one ship out of thousands.
I guarantee you, thousands of SLDF ships have not been named.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 06 December 2012, 00:36:14
I guarantee you, thousands of SLDF ships have not been named.

Kind of my point.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 06 December 2012, 00:39:01
Was there any new ships named with class in ISP3??
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 06 December 2012, 01:21:10
One Vigilant, I forget the name. I'll update my list with it and post it tomorrow.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 06 December 2012, 10:21:13
Here we go. I'm not sure if I updated it per the most recent publications, so if you see any ships that are missing from this list, let me know.

An again, while I cannot remember the sources on most of these, you have my word of honor that every single one is from a canon source.

Name
Marlowe
Pioneer
Cochran
Beijing
Yorktown
Badger
Crowned Lion
Richmond
Davion's Heart
Elle
Weasel
Gettysburg
Iverson
Marseilles
Oslo
Peeples
Rondeau
Monitor
Beatrice
Muraca
Rex
Aegis
Allason
Bamborough
Boyle
E. Presley
General Stuart
Hutton
Impetuous
Knight
Manassas
Minotaur
Plunkitt
Spark
Admiral Schone
Dave Smith
Lee Smith
Linsenmayer
Long March
Marsala
Noble House
Rickover
Star Devil
Walker
Conklin
Huisman
Koga
Michael Norman
Nelson
Talitha Flyer
Theodor Logan
Tripitz
Unah
Williams
Budapest
Damascus
Karkhov
Oppelt
Raulfestone
Sovetskii Soyuz
Walterbeek
White Cloud
Kishimoto
Lakshmi
Morello
Trossen
Zimmerman
Electa
Franklin
Lady Shandra
Reinhard
Saint Joan
Rhodan
Van der Bergh
Van Gogh
Quicksilver Mongoose       
Barham
Cochran
Richelie
Thunderer
Beas Kness
Bills
Hermes
Mason
Riga
Snowflake
Bismark
Mountbatton
Nebraska
Perth
Prinz Eugen
Saunders
Wales
Doles
Enterprise
McKenna
McKenna's Pride
Sovereign Justice
Spicer
Star League
Zughoffer Weir
Class
Tracker
Vigilant
Bonaventure
Samarkand
Samarkand
Vincent
Vincent
Vincent
Davion
Whirlwind
Whirlwind
Essex
Essex
Essex
Essex
Essex
Essex
Essex I
Lola I
Lola III
Lola III
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Aegis
Riga
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Congress
Volga
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Black Lion
Sovetskii Soyuz       
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Sovetskii Soyuz
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Cameron
Luxor
Luxor
Luxor
Du Shi Wang
Monsoon
Monsoon
Monsoon
Monsoon
Potemkin
Potemkin
Potemkin
Potemkin
Potemkin
Potemkin
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
Texas
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
McKenna
Type
Surveillance
Corvette
Corvette
Carrier
Carrier
Corvette
Corvette
Corvette
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Destroyer
Heavy Cruiser       
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Frigate
Transport
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Cruiser
Cruiser
Cruiser
Cruiser
Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Battle Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Heavy Cruiser
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Troop Cruiser
Troop Cruiser
Troop Cruiser
Troop Cruiser
Troop Cruiser
Troop Cruiser
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Battleship
Current Status
Unknown
Abandoned - Paran
Destroyed
(Samarkand II) Unknown
(Samarkand II) Unknown
(Vincent Mk 39) Unknown (Clan Wolverine)
(Vincent Mk 39) Unknown
(Vincent Mk 39) Rechristened Liberty
Destroyed - Vakarel
Unknown
Unknown (Clan Wolverine)
Destroyed - Terra
Unknown
Unknown
Rechristened Raven
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Epsilon Eridani
Unknown
Unknown
Damaged - Star's End
Unknown
Destroyed - Epsilon Eridani
Unknown (Clan boneyard)
Destroyed - Epsilon Eridani
Rechristened Nueva Badajoz
Unknown
Destroyed - Time Warp
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Arcadia
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Exodus Civil War
Unknown
Destroyed - Exodus Civil War
Destroyed - Vakarel
Destroyed - Periphery
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Exodus Civil War
Rechristened Xanthos
Unknown
Destroyed - Terra
Destroyed - Periphery
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Rechristened Dire Wolf
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Terra
Unknown
Destroyed - Draconis Combine
Unknown
Destroyed - Flintoft
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Rechristened StarSword
Unknown
Rechristened Invisible Truth
Unknown
Destroyed - Periphery
Destroyed
Unknown
Destroyed - Terra
Clan Mongoose - Destroyed by Smoke Jaguars
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Rechristened Treachery
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Salvaged (Clan Wolverine)
Active (Clan Snow Raven)
Destroyed - Periphery
Unknown
Clan Prison Ship
Unknown
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Terra
Unknown
Active - Strana Mechty
Unknown
Unknown
Destroyed - Terra
Unknown (Clan Wolverine) (Rechristened Blake's Sword?)

While not confirmed, given the large number of ships that share the same name as their class, I consider it a safe assumption that this pattern can also be applied to other SL-built classes, which would give us ships such as SLS Kimagure or SLS Farragut. These are still unconfirmed though, and I think I pulled the unconfirmed ones off of my list.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 07 December 2012, 00:01:23
See "Ask The Writers" thread re: Pioneer. Apparently it was an Avatar.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 00:20:06
I saw that, yeah.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 07 December 2012, 13:58:11
I've modified the Master Warships List and plugged in my first round of data into it with regards to the Star League ships.  I have no doubts that I missed more than a few ships.  Here, though, are my notes for inclusion.

1: The ship must canonically have served in the Star League Navy.  The Terran Hegemony Navy is insufficient to warrant inclusion.

2: The name of the ship must emphatically be linked to its Star League service.  This is easy until 2801.  After that point the designations of ships become more suspicious.  In the case of the Wolverines, for example, we know they used the "SLS" prefix and stuck it with at least one canonical name.  That warranted inclusion of their ships.  However, the Michael Norman, Long March, and Noble House, all from the Battlespace Sourcebook, do not carry the SLS designation.  Given the Capellan theme of the two Congress-class ships I have to suspect that they were renamed.  While I have less suspicion for those ships mentioned in Operation Klondike, unless they carry the SLS designation, I didn't include any ships post-2801.

3: The class of ship must also be known.  The SLS Cairo was a battlecruiser.  However, we don't know what class, aside from it being a battlecruiser.  That's insufficient to warrant inclusion.  I know that eliminates many ships, especially from FM:SLDF, but the inclusion of just a name is not terribly useful, and is a precedent that has been followed since the original SLSB came out with the list of Martial Olympiad winners.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 14:10:27
Very nice list! I swear, mine must have been an older file because I SWEAR I added many of the FM:SLDF ships that you have but that my list omits.

However, your list appears to violate your own rule 3 in some places. For example, SLS Keckenburg. FM: SLDF puts it as the command ship of the 43rd Interdiction Squadron, based around a core of Black Lion BCs. However, it does not actually say that Keckenburg is one of those BCs. Therefore, we cannot assume it to be a Black Lion.

Also, it seems that many of the ships you've omitted are from the fleet roster art in FM:U, page 9. The full uncropped image was later posted by the artist, giving us many name-and-classes your list omits. While the lowest form of canon, art is still canon until it is superseded.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 07 December 2012, 15:27:34
Very nice list! I swear, mine must have been an older file because I SWEAR I added many of the FM:SLDF ships that you have but that my list omits.

However, your list appears to violate your own rule 3 in some places. For example, SLS Keckenburg. FM: SLDF puts it as the command ship of the 43rd Interdiction Squadron, based around a core of Black Lion BCs. However, it does not actually say that Keckenburg is one of those BCs. Therefore, we cannot assume it to be a Black Lion.

Also, it seems that many of the ships you've omitted are from the fleet roster art in FM:U, page 9. The full uncropped image was later posted by the artist, giving us many name-and-classes your list omits. While the lowest form of canon, art is still canon until it is superseded.

I've never seen the full image, do you have it?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 15:29:57
I wish. Now if SCUG shows up on the forums anymore, you could ask him - he's the artist, unless my unreliable memory is wrong(as usual).
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 07 December 2012, 15:56:19
Too bad, I would like to have seen it. Oh well.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Taron Storm on 07 December 2012, 16:25:45
I have a pdf copy of the page in question if I am allowed to put it up.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 16:29:12
Sorry, but that would definitely violate a forum rule or two.

Also, the picture in the book is cut off. The full list is BIG.

and the first canon mention of the Zughoffer Weir. ^-^
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Taron Storm on 07 December 2012, 16:33:44
OK, no problem.  Glad I asked first.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 16:44:00
Asking is good, and leads to enlightenment. 8)

And less work for mods. O0
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 07 December 2012, 16:59:57
For example, SLS Keckenburg. FM: SLDF puts it as the command ship of the 43rd Interdiction Squadron, based around a core of Black Lion BCs. However, it does not actually say that Keckenburg is one of those BCs. Therefore, we cannot assume it to be a Black Lion.
:-[
You caught me.  I thought the conclusion was safe to draw.  The Black Lions were mentioned as being the core.  With only eighteen ships in the squadron the Black Lions are a full sixth of that.  The description for an Interdiction Squadron puts an emphasis on non-warship elements.  I therefore concluded, perhaps hastily, that the mention of a trio of Black Lions, presumably one per division, meant that they were the centerpieces of the squadron and that the flagship would therefore be one of them.

Also, it seems that many of the ships you've omitted are from the fleet roster art in FM:U, page 9.
ACK!  I knew I forgot something big.  Now, to dig up that artwork.  It's out there on the internet somewhere...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 07 December 2012, 17:17:58
Good luck!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Terminax on 07 December 2012, 17:47:46
Even accounting for the new ships mentioned in WoR and WoRS, there's allot of missing hulls amongst the Clans. I guess the Pentagon Wars really did a number of the remaining SLDF ships. Is there any accounting the Newgrange ships or are they all unknown?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 07 December 2012, 23:49:56
Good luck!
Well I need more luck.  If you have some please share.

Betrayal of Ideals Book Four page 65 talks of the Aegis-class General Stuart sitting in the "Norfolk Boneyard - Exodus Fleet Station Five."  That sounds to me like one of the warship caches that was never touched post-Exodus.  If that were the case, and the ship were never taken into service by a clan, it seems reasonable to assume that the name is the original Star League name.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 08 December 2012, 01:33:57
The question would really be did Kerensky parse out the boneyards into Clan hands after the Wolverines left. The Stuart could have ended up in one of the Clans caches rather than be sitting in a mothball fleet only a few years after that.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 19 December 2012, 10:47:56
Good luck!
Well I am no Liam Neeson.  I have not been able find the artwork.

The question would really be did Kerensky parse out the boneyards into Clan hands after the Wolverines left. The Stuart could have ended up in one of the Clans caches rather than be sitting in a mothball fleet only a few years after that.
It seems likely that they were parsed out.  The Wars of Reaving list numerous ships being brought out of naval caches by individual clans (Silver Snake from the Vipers, Damascus and Budapest  from the Cobras, and Deal Breaker and Marseilles from the Sharks) from their respective naval caches.  Additionally, it refers to "three Star League vessels" that were warships assigned to part of the Mongoose naval cache.  It also comments that the Adders caches are empty and that the Lions have two warships left.

All of this suggests that the remaining caches were divided up to each of the nineteen post-Wolverine clans.  Furthermore, given that the Betrayal of Ideals explicitly refers to it as an "Exodus Fleet" and not as any individual clan cache, I think it is safe to call the General Stuart a Star League name.

What that means for the ships in the clan caches, though, is less certain.  Indeed names like Damascus, Budapest, and Marseilles fit in more with the Star League patterns than they do with many clan names.  Those ships also appear to not have been brought out of reserve ever before, further indicating that they could be Star League names.

Unfortunately names like Silver Snake and Deal Breaker fit far too nicely with their assigned clan to be pure chance.  And on top of that, how did these warships all find their way to their individual clan caches?  Were they towed?  That would be inefficient when you have perfectly serviceable drive engines on each ship.  It is likely that each ship was reactivated, moved, possibly renamed, and then returned to mothball status by each clan when the boneyards were divided up.  In that case, no name from the post-Wolverine caches can be inferred to be a Star League name.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 19 December 2012, 11:01:41
That Star League has given "un-SL-ish" names to ships before. After all, we have the SLS Quicksilver Mongoose, Davion's Heart, Star Devil, White Cloud, Snowflake...I have no problem at all with calling Silver Snake and Deal Breaker original SLDF names.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 19 December 2012, 11:29:40
After all, we have the SLS Quicksilver Mongoose, Davion's Heart, Star Devil, White Cloud, Snowflake
Ah but many of those are themselves suspect names.  Davion's Heart was on loan to the SLDF from House Davion and crews, at least Inner Sphere crews, are not quick to change names of already christened vessels.

The Snowflake I can only find as being a Raven name, which the "snow" theme would fit in well with.  Indeed we know that the Ravens had no problems renaming Potemkin-class vessels as they did it with the Hermes becoming the Treachery.

The Star Devil and White Cloud aren't that odd of names, at least in my view.

The Quicksilver Mongoose, though, is a real doozy.  It is quite clear, based on the timeline in TRO:3075, that that is indeed the Star League name.  And in that case, yes, it is suspiciously convenient that a ship named the Quicksilver Mongoose winds up in the hands of Clan Mongoose.  That would lend credence to the idea that ships with specific names were given to clans related to those names.  Of course it is an absolutely ridiculous way to divide up ships, but the Clans have done stupider, or at least weirder, things before.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 19 December 2012, 11:42:45
That would lend credence to the idea that ships with specific names were given to clans related to those names.  Of course it is an absolutely ridiculous way to divide up ships, but the Clans have done stupider, or at least weirder, things before.

Going through life with the assumption that the Clans are ruled by 6-year-olds actually makes understanding the Battletech universe far easier. I have no problem with the Vipers going through a list of SL vessels, seeing one already named Silver Snake, and immediately claiming that ship on the basis of the name alone.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Atlan on 20 December 2012, 03:03:12
Now that the Jihad is over, we know the entire Warship roster of most factions. We know their names, and their classes.

Back during the 3025 era, the Successor States had their warships reduced to a tiny number- rather like the Post-Jihad era. But what information do we have on that? Did the Successor States have ANY warships? (and if so, do we have ANY information on them?)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 20 December 2012, 05:43:55
Additionally, it refers to "three Star League vessels" that were warships assigned to part of the Mongoose naval cache.  It also comments that the Adders caches are empty and that the Lions have two warships left.

All of this suggests that the remaining caches were divided up to each of the nineteen post-Wolverine clans.  Furthermore, given that the Betrayal of Ideals explicitly refers to it as an "Exodus Fleet" and not as any individual clan cache, I think it is safe to call the General Stuart a Star League name.
What you are saying here reminded me of something over on Sarna, not the best source, but if it's accurate it very interesting

Quote
The Grand Council would even allow them to trade land to certain Clans for the right to take an unspecified amount of WarShips (but not many) from naval caches in order to recoup losses to their shattered fleet.[11]
That reference is to Era Digest: Golden Century, p. 9 - "Warriors Above Politicians"

So the handing out of Warships possibly happened after Clan Mongoose or the Smoke Jaguars brought Warships from the other clans after destroying Clan Mongoose

Now that the Jihad is over, we know the entire Warship roster of most factions. We know their names, and their classes.

Back during the 3025 era, the Successor States had their warships reduced to a tiny number- rather like the Post-Jihad era. But what information do we have on that? Did the Successor States have ANY warships? (and if so, do we have ANY information on them?)
No, in 3025 NO Successor State had ANY Warships, in fact the only non-Clan power to posses Warships at the time was ComStar
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 20 December 2012, 11:56:57
So the handing out of Warships possibly happened after Clan Mongoose or the Smoke Jaguars brought Warships from the other clans after destroying Clan Mongoose
The actual text is even more clear.  The Jaguars had to buy votes on the GC with former Mongoose territory in order to gain access to the naval caches.  Why would they need that if they already had their own naval caches?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 20 December 2012, 19:55:29
There own caches probably didn't have anything usable or they already had plundered them for usable ships. Heck they could have traded there's off or didn't have a cache and kept all there ships in service and kept none for a rainy day. A good bet might be the Jags traded there warships to the Ravens for mechs after Klondike and the Snow Ravens were building up.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 20 December 2012, 21:14:20
From the Wars of Reving, supposely most of the Naval Cache's were pillage with couple left overs that were salvaged for remaining Home Clans.   Unless there some lost Cache, i believe book was trying wipe out all the doubt about having any left over Warships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 20 December 2012, 21:41:40
There own caches probably didn't have anything usable or they already had plundered them for usable ships. Heck they could have traded there's off or didn't have a cache and kept all there ships in service and kept none for a rainy day. A good bet might be the Jags traded there warships to the Ravens for mechs after Klondike and the Snow Ravens were building up.
Except that the text from Golden Century is unequivocal about the Jags needing Grand Council permission to rebuild their fleet from the caches.  It wasn't because they traded their ships away, it was because the Mongooses had savaged them in the absorption.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 20 December 2012, 22:00:53
It would seem odd that the Jags would need permission to make use of their own Naval Caches wouldn't it. Maybe there was some sort of agreement that the various Clans had come to in regards to Naval strength. A sort of Clan Washington Treaty.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: GreyWolfActual on 20 December 2012, 23:46:58
It would seem odd that the Jags would need permission to make use of their own Naval Caches wouldn't it.
Hence why SCC and I are saying that the caches were distributed after the Jaguars absorbed the Mongooses.

The idea of a naval treaty among the clans is pretty absurd.  Not only do you have the Snow Ravens easily with a two-power fleet, but the Ravens had received warships from the Blood Spirits in 2977.  If there was such a treaty, giving the most powerful fleet more warships would violate it.  It would also be an exceptionally out of character thing for the clans to do.  Such a treaty would not only be restricting combat it would be putting caps on a tool of a clan.  I can't imagine any other clan in that time frame, or any time frame before the Jihad, agreeing to limit the number of clusters or galaxies they have.  I don't see it happening with warships either.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 21 December 2012, 08:06:29
Actually it could be possible, but factors like shipyard availability or supply issues would play into it. Or a warship heavy clan pressuring other clans into smaller warship fleets could be another reason. But honestly your theory is better. Bet that was a political mashup in the Grand Council as each Clan tried to get certain warships for themselves.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 21 December 2012, 10:14:06
The Quicksilver Mongoose, though, is a real doozy.  It is quite clear, based on the timeline in TRO:3075, that that is indeed the Star League name.  And in that case, yes, it is suspiciously convenient that a ship named the Quicksilver Mongoose winds up in the hands of Clan Mongoose.  That would lend credence to the idea that ships with specific names were given to clans related to those names.  Of course it is an absolutely ridiculous way to divide up ships, but the Clans have done stupider, or at least weirder, things before.

Paul's just confirmed that  the Quicksilver Mongoose was renamed by the Clans (http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,25471.0.html) over in the Ask The Writers forum. That would suggest that having been captured by the Star League, the ship continued to serve under the original Capellan name, the Jasmine Liao.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 21 December 2012, 10:15:55
Works for me.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 06 April 2013, 00:08:49
Well, it looks like we need to add the Lucian Davion to the list of destroyed warships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 26 May 2013, 22:40:42
haha yeah I just read that about that ship.  To bad they labeled it the wrong ship class in 3145.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 06 June 2013, 10:18:18
Also another Fox according to TRO: FedSuns 3145, the New Syrtis finally got taken out.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 06 June 2013, 13:07:42
Can someone post a link to the most current version?

I figure with all this recent info on the old Star League Fleets, there should be some interesting Aerotech games that can be made :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 13 June 2013, 15:40:23
Well, since no one has mentioned any lists more current, I'll update my own list and as questions here :P I'm bad at citing info though. So far the only book I've been going thru is the WoR because it's easy to read. I've updated my list of Clan Snow Raven, Clan Coyote, and "Clan Burrock" which I am a little confused by. At some points it seems like the Adders attacked them, but I don't see any places where they actually stated where or if the Burrocks were wiped out. Still going thru the book though.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 15 June 2013, 13:43:27
The current list isn't being updated anymore. I think who was doing it dropped out of the game.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fatebringer on 18 June 2013, 10:35:40
I figured that out, I'm working on my list though. Moving stuff around so the notes are more inclusive AKA, comments as Excel Comments instead of linked events. Still, there are things I don't have reference to and will just keep trudging along to suit my own curiosity ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Aldous on 10 August 2013, 12:11:23
The Zhejiang was not destroyed by the Medusans. It was lost in a misjump.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 10 August 2013, 12:34:06
The Zhejiang was not destroyed by the Medusans. It was lost in a misjump.
Yes and no. According to Mercs: Supplemental Upgrade, p. 90:

"Although the Medusan fleet managed to deliver several telling blows in the exchange (ultimately contributing to the Zhejiang’s destruction during the fall back from New Syrtis months later), the mercenaries were forced to retreat to Firgrove."

The Medusans didn't destroy the Zhejiang in battle, but did contribute to her destruction.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Aldous on 10 August 2013, 14:39:06
Yes and no. According to Mercs: Supplemental Upgrade, p. 90:

"Although the Medusan fleet managed to deliver several telling blows in the exchange (ultimately contributing to the Zhejiang’s destruction during the fall back from New Syrtis months later), the mercenaries were forced to retreat to Firgrove."

The Medusans didn't destroy the Zhejiang in battle, but did contribute to her destruction.

The file says the Medusans destroyed her. She was destroyed by misjump. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 10 August 2013, 17:32:45
The file says the Medusans destroyed her. She was destroyed by misjump.

Actually, she was destroyed by a drive failure while trying to jump, a misjump is when you conduct a jump and end up in the wrong place (like inside a star).

With regards,
Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Taurianspy on 30 August 2013, 02:17:21
The current list isn't being updated anymore. I think who was doing it dropped out of the game.

Hey, who was that guy that put out a listing of references for warship actions that was like 87 pages long?

<wink> <wink>
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 04 September 2013, 21:58:38
Hey, who was that guy that put out a listing of references for warship actions that was like 87 pages long?

<wink> <wink>

One month and fifteen days. We have our new updater for all things Warshippy! Congrats Taurianspy for volunteering to update the warship list!  ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 10 September 2013, 07:04:14
Field Manual 3145 should have a complete list of all the naval assets of the forces described in the book, btw.

with regards,
Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 September 2013, 10:58:32
And we finally know the Fart! :D

Dante-class Flatus
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 10 September 2013, 12:00:58
Only a Dante?  As good of ships as they are, I was hoping for something. . . more?

Do we know which Dante she started her life as?  Any missing?  Is she purpose built?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 September 2013, 12:03:58
She's an older one, I'll let others find out.

And *only* a Dante? Those things are monsters, man! Easily my second-favorite post-SL class, aside from the Kirishima.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 10 September 2013, 12:22:12
Again, great ship (also one of my favorites), but from my read I always thought she was bigger.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 10 September 2013, 12:26:53
Doesn't need to be. As long as you're not trying to tangle with an SLDF-era powerhouse like an Aegis or Black Lion, a Dante is more than enough punch to get the job done. And against those big boys, you'll likely die, but you'll take enough of the other ship with you that it'll be in the yards for years, assuming they don't decide to scrap it anyway.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: roosterboy on 10 September 2013, 12:39:44
Again, great ship (also one of my favorites), but from my read I always thought she was bigger.

What did you read that suggested that? Literally everything we previously knew about it was that it existed and its name.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 10 September 2013, 12:46:24
Perceptions and expectations, nothing more.  There was nothing in text which suggested she was anything bigger than 100 kT, but I just expected something more akin to a Black Lion to be honest.

Oh well, I like that she now has a class, and I am glad to see the Dante's are still around!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: snewsom2997 on 10 September 2013, 13:39:43
Perceptions and expectations, nothing more.  There was nothing in text which suggested she was anything bigger than 100 kT, but I just expected something more akin to a Black Lion to be honest.

Oh well, I like that she now has a class, and I am glad to see the Dante's are still around!

The last one more than likely. How do you find spare parts for something like that?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 10 September 2013, 13:43:42
Well, the battle for Terra in '78 left three Dante's nonfunctional, I think - so there should be some salvage there, depending on how enthusiastic the two task forces were...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mrbooth on 10 September 2013, 21:03:31
No mention of the Regulan Fleet unless I missed it, also where did the Faslane-class YardShip come from? I know that there where three comstar vessels but where did the fourth one come from? Also what happened to the Mercy?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 11 September 2013, 02:19:36
An author did a mistake, the Delos is still in Regulan hands, and shouldn't be over Oriente. (The Santorini was over Oriente in 3085, but has since then been either destroyed or decomissioned)

Cheers,
Øystein


Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Sharpnel on 11 September 2013, 03:09:22
And we finally know the Fart! :D

Dante-class Flatus
Could have been the Osis or Streaking Mist
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 11 September 2013, 04:40:10
FM3145 clearly spells out which Dante it was.

With regards,
Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 11 September 2013, 04:47:20
Could have been the Osis or Streaking Mist
I thought from Wars of Reaving that the Osis was encountered by Ice Hellion forces retreating from their failed invasion of the Inner Sphere, with the remaining crew persuaded to join the Hellions, the Osis cannibalised for bits to repair the Hellion ship, and then pushed into orbit of the nearby star to burn up?

I think the Streaming Mist was also destroyed during the War with the Society?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 11 September 2013, 08:01:54
Yeah, the fates of both ex-Jag vessels are pretty clearly spelled out from what I recall.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 12 September 2013, 18:58:29
Yeah, the fates of both ex-Jag vessels are pretty clearly spelled out from what I recall.

I do wonder if that was original intent of the Mr. Pardoe.  Honestly, his book came out way before WoR came out and now FM:3145.  He was one creating the Fidelis out the burn out remains of the Smoke Jaguars.   I keep thinking alot things are falling through the cracks, it would been nice connection if Streaking Mist or the Osis would been the our mystery ship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 12 September 2013, 19:30:29
So, I see a few ships went missing between FM3085 and FM3145...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 12 September 2013, 19:31:56
So, I see a few ships went missing between FM3085 and FM3145...
I'm wondering where Aegis came from for the Republic.  It wasn't there before..
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 12 September 2013, 19:59:02
. . . will that class just DIE already!!!! :o
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: roosterboy on 12 September 2013, 19:59:25
I'm wondering where Aegis came from for the Republic.  It wasn't there before..

It's been there since FM3085, actually.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 12 September 2013, 20:01:58
Stealth ship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 13 September 2013, 03:34:59
I'm wondering where Aegis came from for the Republic.  It wasn't there before..
It and the Triumphus were the last two ships from the Nova Cat touaman at the end of the Jihad, and were passed over to the ROTS . (http://www.sarna.net/wiki/SLS_Blade)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 13 September 2013, 18:57:45
. . . will that class just DIE already!!!! :o

When the last warship dies in the galaxy, it will probably be a Aegis.

Honestly, I do wonder just how the Fidelus got themselves a former Comstar warship all to themselves? You would think the RoTS would have snapped up every warship they could lay claim to.
Wait, the. Fidelus have more warship support than the Federated Suns at this point?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 13 September 2013, 19:21:16
FedSuns support? Where?

The Fidelis are a Republic force, and their ship is a Republic ship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 13 September 2013, 21:00:02
The Fidelis are a Republic force, and their ship is a Republic ship.

I thought the Fidelis's ship was their ship, they happening owe the Republic a debt. *Mainly to Stone*
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 13 September 2013, 23:02:02
I thought the Fidelis's ship was their ship, they happening owe the Republic a debt. *Mainly to Stone*

Way I always read it. The RoTS wouldn't leave a warship in mothballs and it looked like when Redburn came for help he was asking for the ship as well. So my guess is the ship is under Fidelus control which begets the question just how the Fidelus, poor remnants of the Smoke Jaguars gained a former Comstar warship. And one I think the WoB didn't capture at some point.

Oh, and I think there is mention of at least one FedSuns warship still remaining above New Avalon and its not the Andrew Davion. (where the heck did they put that ship anyway?)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alexander Knight on 13 September 2013, 23:03:52
The last FSN Warship is the Admiral Braille (sp?), a Fox-class.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 13 September 2013, 23:05:00
The last FSN Warship is the Admiral Braille (sp?), a Fox-class.

Yeah, didn't want to come out and say it without a spoiler tag.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alexander Knight on 13 September 2013, 23:08:50
Really shoulda thought of that.  whups.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 14 September 2013, 04:59:46
and its not the Andrew Davion. (where the heck did they put that ship anyway?)
It's off fighting aliens. Either that or the navigator slipped in the shower and accidently jumped into a star.

Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 14 September 2013, 16:55:17
It's off fighting aliens. Either that or the navigator slipped in the shower and accidently jumped into a star.

Øystein

Seriously? Throwing that one at us? Lets just have the stupid thing show back up at the last minute. The Federated Suns needs there warship back.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 14 September 2013, 16:56:44
Seriously? Throwing that one at us? Lets just have the stupid thing show back up at the last minute. The Federated Suns needs there warship back.

The ship has been missing for 80 years. Draw your own conclusions.

With regards,
Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 14 September 2013, 17:07:58
The ship has been missing for 80 years. Draw your own conclusions.

With regards,
Øystein

Same thing that happened to a lot of warships. Abandoned by the crew and is now a derelict.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mikecj on 14 September 2013, 17:22:55
Caught just before it slips into a black hole...
The crew was turned into white powder as it orbits a strange new world...
Time jumped into the past to serve as a base in a desparate battle against evil...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 15 September 2013, 02:00:21
Caught just before it slips into a black hole...

Andromeda?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mikecj on 15 September 2013, 11:51:54
Andromeda?

Ejected the KF Core to blow up a planet.. ala Pax Magellanic
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 15 September 2013, 18:22:09
Well the Invincible was lost for hundreds of years, FSS Andrew Davion could be found someday.  Crew could had been killed by the Jump itself.  Leave it for another era to discover and le build new figgin ships if there way to do it.  God i hope so.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 16 September 2013, 17:15:28
So, the Sea Foxes have a few Warships kicking around:

6 Potemkin's (4 carrying the names of previous ships)
3 Carrack-class
15 Merchant Carrack-class
3 Volga-class
1 Lola III-class
1 Sovetskii Soyuz-class

We know that the Sov used to be the Nagasawa, but none of the other ships carry familiar names.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: roosterboy on 16 September 2013, 17:55:04
Some of them came from the deal they made with the Ravens. I don't have ER3145 handy right now and my memory is failing me on this topic, but I recall the Volga was one if them. You should be able to figure out their former names from that.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 17 September 2013, 16:47:02
So, the Sea Foxes have a few Warships kicking around:

6 Potemkin's (4 carrying the names of previous ships)
3 Carrack-class
15 Merchant Carrack-class
3 Volga-class
1 Lola III-class
1 Sovetskii Soyuz-class

We know that the Sov used to be the Nagasawa, but none of the other ships carry familiar names.

And nary a gun between them.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 17 September 2013, 18:46:15
FSS Andrew Davion is curently orbiting Kaetetôã.

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 17 September 2013, 23:42:21
FSS Andrew Davion is curently orbiting Kaetetôã.

TT

It took me seven seconds to remember what Kaetetôã is. And now I fear the coming of bird aliens with warship support.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 18 September 2013, 17:49:52
It's off fighting aliens.

Øystein

Told ya so!

TT :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 18 September 2013, 20:17:14
About the Andrew Davion it could very well suffer the same fate as SLS Manassas as show up one day completely intact and with a living crew ready to defend the Federated Suns

That or it ran into Dahak Hull Number 736,448,925
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BlackAce on 06 October 2013, 23:33:11
I'm actually liking the switch to pocket warships they seem to integrate into the lore much better than capital ships. Kinda glad there are still a few old warhorses guarding the Capitals though.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 06 October 2013, 23:50:20
The Sea Fox's have some good transport capabilities, maybe more now then they did before when they were called the Sharks?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 07 October 2013, 01:17:56
I'm actually liking the switch to pocket warships they seem to integrate into the lore much better than capital ships. Kinda glad there are still a few old warhorses guarding the Capitals though.

It does fit with the fluff is TRO3025 for the Overlord, that it was the last survivng relatives of the battlecruisers of the Srar League...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 07 October 2013, 05:55:38
It does fit with the fluff is TRO3025 for the Overlord, that it was the last survivng relatives of the battlecruisers of the Srar League...
If only the SL had made use of Pocket Warships but
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 13 October 2013, 06:02:26

Hi guys,

I have taken version 1.11 and started to update it with info from WoR, are there any other sources that I need to look into and if so, when can they be used?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 13 October 2013, 11:49:23
Recent books to look at:

Wars of Reaving
FM: SLDF
liberation of Terra 1 and 2
FM: 3145
Reunification War
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 28 November 2013, 09:16:50
I've always loved the canon warship list here. I'm starting to wonder though if maybe it should be basically moved over to sarna somehow, not as an excel spreadsheet, as a sarna wiki page. I know lists of named warships are popping up there in bits and pieces it just can't be regarded as a "complete" list yet, and some of the canon warship list I don't see over there. The potential advantage being another subcategory that somehow breaks it down by era AND faction. A lot of the new additions are going to be historicals.

Some of it can be found there, but usually under an individual warship class's page. I'd love to see a sarna page of just "named warships" as a category style listing, linking you to the ship class page in many cases.

Food for thought.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 28 November 2013, 09:32:17
Now we have Field Report 2765 series, with start of lost WarShip designs being added to them.

New Question: Who now keeper of the ye olde list?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 28 November 2013, 12:39:36
I've always loved the canon warship list here. I'm starting to wonder though if maybe it should be basically moved over to sarna somehow, not as an excel spreadsheet, as a sarna wiki page. I know lists of named warships are popping up there in bits and pieces it just can't be regarded as a "complete" list yet, and some of the canon warship list I don't see over there. The potential advantage being another subcategory that somehow breaks it down by era AND faction. A lot of the new additions are going to be historicals.

Some of it can be found there, but usually under an individual warship class's page. I'd love to see a sarna page of just "named warships" as a category style listing, linking you to the ship class page in many cases.

Food for thought.
Getting the individual WarShips, JumpShips and DropShips listed as individual unit pages (in the style of Wookiepedia for Star Wars) has been a project for Frabby and me on Sarna for the last six months or so. The results so far are summarised on category pages here:

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Category:Individual_WarShips - WarShips (625 so far)

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Category:Individual_JumpShips - JumpShips (133 so far)

http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Category:Individual_DropShips - DropShips (153 so far)

Work on it is limited by the time available, the books available and the fact that there are only a few of us working on it. There are also some resources that nobody on Sarna seems to have, like the full version of the picture I think Weirdo mentioned showing loads named SLDF WarShips (including the first appearance of the Zughoffer Weir), and if I can't find a citation for a ship, I can't write the article for it.

Each of those main categories includes subcategories showing the ships against each class, and for WarShips the ships are also categorised by weight/role (Cruiser, destroyer, transport, battleship, etc).

The problem with trying to track ships by era and category is that Sarna isn't really set up for things that change a lot, like affiliations. It also makes things pretty complicated because for a lot of ships we simply wouldn't be able to provide a categorical list - and someone would need to define the various eras. You also get stuck with lists and articles simply not being updated because there isn't anyone around watching them - there are orphan pages like that dotted around everywhere on Sarna.

I have been trying to make the history section of each ship article as coprehensive as I can, though - some books, like Wars of Reaving, have a stupidly delightful amount of ship information in.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 29 November 2013, 10:25:26
Cool, thanks for those links!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kommando on 05 March 2014, 00:13:29
Doing a bit of research for a Warship timeline, the writers LOVE the Whirlwind.
Started as Davion I's, those that survived Reunification were turned into Whirlwinds. Of those all 22 went to Clanspace, then came back, captured in Serpent/Bulldog etc.
FIREFANG featured a lot.
As of 3100: CJF has 1, CSR/Raven Allince has 1+, CSV Snake in the Grass flew off into deep space due to Society HPG Virus. (3075), 1 is part of Wolverine exodus.

These ships can be upwards of 590 years old! What a sordid history.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 15 March 2014, 11:41:43
Any idea what happened to the FWLS Galahad? The Eagle-class Frigate survived the Jihad and was in the service of Oriente as of Field Report: FWLM. But by 3142 its gone.

I can't help but wonder if that might be an errata mistake, because the same block of text confuses the Santorini and the Delos.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 15 March 2014, 16:51:22
It's be worth posing an Ask the Writers question - it may have been lost in some random skirmish, but if it survived the Blakist attacks at the back end of the Jihad, then it may have been lost in the battle that saw Oriente capture the Delos from the Regulans.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 15 March 2014, 17:06:51
Died in inter-ImtheCaptainGeneralnoIam! fighting in the ensuring period. Oriente, Marik-Stewart, Regulus and Andurien has not been at peace at all from 3085 to 3140, all missing Oritene and Regulus ships have died in combat in that period.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 15 March 2014, 18:14:50
I recall reading something about a yard in the former FWL that can still produce WarShips after the Jihad? Possibly the corvette? am I mistaken or has it since been destroyed?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 15 March 2014, 18:24:32
Per Field Report: FWLM page 6, in 3079 the WarShip yard at Ionus in the Marik Commonwealth was the last yard held by a Successor State capable of manufacturing WarShip engine and K-F drive components, although trading such components was considered impossible and estimates at the time suggested that the Commonwealth lacked the economic oomph to produce a new WarShip fleet itself.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 15 March 2014, 19:00:48
It's be worth posing an Ask the Writers question - it may have been lost in some random skirmish, but if it survived the Blakist attacks at the back end of the Jihad, then it may have been lost in the battle that saw Oriente capture the Delos from the Regulans.

Now did Oriente capture the Delos or did the writers just get them mixed up? I think I assumed that the Delos died elsewhere and that the Santorini is still over Oriente with a crippled drive (per Field Report: FWLM).

That would be an odd coincidence for the Santorini to be lost, only to be replaced in the same system with another Thera with the same crippled drive problem.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 15 March 2014, 21:19:49
Per Field Report: FWLM page 6, in 3079 the WarShip yard at Ionus in the Marik Commonwealth was the last yard held by a Successor State capable of manufacturing WarShip engine and K-F drive components, although trading such components was considered impossible and estimates at the time suggested that the Commonwealth lacked the economic oomph to produce a new WarShip fleet itself.

Thought so
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 16 March 2014, 00:40:49
Now did Oriente capture the Delos or did the writers just get them mixed up? I think I assumed that the Delos died elsewhere and that the Santorini is still over Oriente with a crippled drive (per Field Report: FWLM).

That would be an odd coincidence for the Santorini to be lost, only to be replaced in the same system with another Thera with the same crippled drive problem.

It's an error. The file the author got very clearly said the Delos was Regulan. The Santorini is gone, leaving Oriente with two WarShips, and Regulus with only the Thera-class.

Øystein
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 17 March 2014, 00:34:11
Per Field Report: FWLM page 6, in 3079 the WarShip yard at Ionus in the Marik Commonwealth was the last yard held by a Successor State capable of manufacturing WarShip engine and K-F drive components, although trading such components was considered impossible and estimates at the time suggested that the Commonwealth lacked the economic oomph to produce a new WarShip fleet itself.

Now that the League is reformed, that could change...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 17 March 2014, 00:36:47
Per Field Report: FWLM page 6, in 3079 the WarShip yard at Ionus in the Marik Commonwealth was the last yard held by a Successor State capable of manufacturing WarShip engine and K-F drive components, although trading such components was considered impossible and estimates at the time suggested that the Commonwealth lacked the economic oomph to produce a new WarShip fleet itself.

Wait a second... is Ionus in the region of the MSCommonwealth taken by the wolves? Could the empire have a yard?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 17 March 2014, 02:46:35
Now that the League is reformed, that could change...
The reformed Free Worlds League is larger than the Marik-Stewart Commonwealth was, but not as big as the old League was. The Lyrans don't seem to be a threat, but the Regulans and Wolf Empire are still around and antagonistic, and the League is also missing Andurien's economic input. Anything's possible, but I suspect that military spending decisions in the new League are a bit like a knife fight in a broom cupboard - someone would have to decide to pour money into reactivating the shipyards and getting them producing rather than producing 'Mechs/Fighters/DropShips. Unless the writers have a specific reason for wanting to see WarShip production start again at Ionus, I'm guessing it probably won't - and starting WarShip production there would seem to make the site an immediate high-priority target for neighbourly belligerence.

Wait a second... is Ionus in the region of the MSCommonwealth taken by the wolves? Could the empire have a yard?
Ionus isn't a Wolf Empire world according to my notes, but I don't have my copy of the book at work.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: roosterboy on 17 March 2014, 04:23:31
Ionus sits right between Atreus and the Wolf Empire.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 17 March 2014, 16:11:55
Ionus sits right between Atreus and the Wolf Empire.

Could the wolves negotiate for use to repair their ships? Unlikely, but I guess anything is possible...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Cyc on 17 March 2014, 19:36:34
Seems more likely the Wolves in true Clan style would try to take rather than negotiate, of course that would probably not result in a happy ending as far as Ionus' WarShip slips are concerned.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 17 March 2014, 21:24:08
Givin the level of irrisponbility of canon commanders in 3145, Ionis will be lucky survives not being scattered into space debris.  From all we've seen there absoletely no love for WarShips, least for for Battletech future.

We still have FR2765 thankfully, but new/old/variant ships are part 1 of the big good bye them being made for us.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 18 March 2014, 10:51:38
I'm pretty certain Ionis days are numbered. The writers will definatly take this chance to kill another shipyard.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 18 March 2014, 11:59:23
I'm pretty certain Ionis days are numbered. The writers will definatly take this chance to kill another shipyard.

Shipyards are like faeries. Every time someone doesn't believe they'll exist another one dies.

Ionus is a fairly good prize, so if it's days are numbered I expect a serious confrontation before the debris leaves the system.   
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 16 August 2014, 15:44:29
I'm not sure if anyone has noticed this, but in the 2765 FWL Field Report, the FWLS Olympic is listed as the flagship of Second Fleet.

The FWLS Olympic in the 3050s is a salvaged Aegis Heavy Cruiser by the same name found drifting in I think the Tania Borealis system. FM: FWL talks about how she gets repaired and added to the FWL's "Secret Fleet".

Assuming they are the same ship, why wasn't Second Fleet's flagship one of the Atreus Battleships? Each fleet had 4 Atreus and 1 Aegis and 2 League Destroyers as the standard Fleet complement. Thoughts?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 16 August 2014, 16:01:17
I figure Olympic had a battle history that made it the more prestigious ship.

Remember, flagships do not need to be the biggest one in the fleet. Look at Clan Wolf, who used a heavy cruiser for their flag, despite the presence of multiple battleships and battlecruisers.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 16 August 2014, 16:15:43
I figure Olympic had a battle history that made it the more prestigious ship.

Remember, flagships do not need to be the biggest one in the fleet. Look at Clan Wolf, who used a heavy cruiser for their flag, despite the presence of multiple battleships and battlecruisers.

I seem to recall reading about the order of battle in one of the battles in the Pacific theater during WW2. One of the American fleets involved in this particular battle had a couple battleships in it, but as I recall, the admiral in command of that particular portion flew his flag on a cruiser...

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Trace Coburn on 19 August 2014, 23:33:17
I seem to recall reading about the order of battle in one of the battles in the Pacific theater during WW2. One of the American fleets involved in this particular battle had a couple battleships in it, but as I recall, the admiral in command of that particular portion flew his flag on a cruiser...

Ruger
  Admiral Spruance commanded Fifth Fleet from USS Indianapolis (CA-35) for much of the war.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 26 November 2014, 14:09:19
Yes he did, there is a memorial here in the city on the Canal walk to both.

And every so often I can see one of the survivors from the ship at one of the locations he sets up, but lately I think he is passing on in the years. Nice guy too. I think he is in his mid-80's or so.

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 26 November 2014, 17:32:52
Remember, flagships do not need to be the biggest one in the fleet. Look at Clan Wolf, who used a heavy cruiser for their flag, despite the presence of multiple battleships and battlecruisers.
As a real historic example, take Vice Admiral Takeo Kurita. He had the two biggest battleships ever in his squadron (Yamato and Musashi), yet his flagship initially was the cruiser Atago which had less than a sixth of the tonnage of either of the battleships.

Kurita transferred his flag to the Yamato after the Atago was sunk in a submarine attack (forcing him to swim for his life).
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 18 January 2015, 01:44:57
The first thing I would like to add is that BT size names of this type are hardly accurate, just because one vessel is a heavy cruiser and the other a battleship doesn't mean the battleship is bigger.

Secondly during WW2 fleet commander seem to have preferred faster ships, likely so they personally could be moved around easier to different parts of the fleet.

Thirdly some ships might be equipped with a Flag Bridge (Unlike bridge becoming CIC there doesn't seem to have been a name happen here, in fact I think use of the term post-dates ships switching to conning towers and CIC's), which is a physically separate location from a ships bridge or auxiliary control (Back up bridge) and there are very good reasons for this to be.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 18 January 2015, 18:30:20
USS Des Moines 18,991 long tons
USS South Carolina 16,000 long tons

Things change. There is 350 years from Dreadnought to McKenna.

Flag Bridges are a reaction to there not being enough space for an admiral to command a ship as found during WWI.
Conning towers date to the mid 1800s. Arguably you can't fight a ship from there. Please don't start the argument.
CICs start somewhere around WWII.

Admirals need space. Which is why they used to be found on capital ships. Also why you get things like flotilla leaders for destroyers. Some capital ships didn't have that space. See South Dakotas dropping 5" for admiral space. And as smaller ships got bigger they often had that space.
Once you have the space its a matter of where the admiral thinks they can best command from. Battened down in a battleship under fire is not the best place.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 08 February 2015, 21:37:23
I was aboard the USS New Jersey early last year and Halsey's Admiral quarters were directly behind one of the 16' Guns and there was a dedicated space for the Admiral and his staff in a section under the bridge itself. From what I read his staff was quartered with the rest of the officers and they didn't have a whole lot of room at all. Most walk in closets have more room than the ship officers had.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 25 April 2015, 11:15:49
I just take a look at the fleet assets listed in the "The Falcon and the Wolf" sourcebook. It seems like most of them are not mentioned after that source anymore. Is there any Explanation around that ? Any inplay reason why this list seems incorrect ?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 18 May 2015, 06:55:58
It looks like a lot of the "New" Clan Wolf ships were renamed. For example the new Wolves had 2 Vincents by other names. by the time of FM: CC they had 2 Vincents, just with different names. Same thing with at least one Congress class.

Some of the Jade Falcon vessels listed are actually Snow Raven vessels contracted to the Falcons and appear on Snow Raven rosters by the Field Manuals.

That's it, in a cursory glance of the Clan rosters at the end of the book all other ships check out.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Øystein on 18 May 2015, 11:40:32
"The Wolf and the Falcon" is extremely low on the list of canon. Around the Cartoon levels and such. The book contains so much oddity that can't be explained that it's never consulted with it comes to unit names and such. No ships from it would be considered canon unless they are confirmed elsewhere.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 20 May 2015, 07:21:23
I stumbled over that discrepancies in "The Wolf and the Falcon" when i tried to track down the available Wolf and Falcon ships in time of Operation Revival. I remembered that book having detailed list of Units. Just then realizing that this list are not comparable to other sources. But ok, then i skip that SB from my list of valid sources.
So how can i find a list of Warships that took part in Revival for the Wolves and Falcons? For the later the hired Raven ships would also be interesting.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Alan Grant on 22 May 2015, 08:05:19
The original Jade Falcon sourcebook lists warships that were attached to specific ground units during Revival. A number of the vessels listed turn out to be Snow Raven vessels when you compare their names to the Snow Raven warships in FM: WC.

The original Clan Wolf sourcebook does not do this, only the Dire Wolf gets mentioned anywhere. But it's not unrealistic to conclude that there were Clan Wolf warships out there, they just weren't deeply involved in frontline combat operations. More than likely they were supporting the supply chain, seeing as the Wolves did a better job of logistics during Revival.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 22 May 2015, 08:58:12
It's spelled out in a canonical source (though I'd have to dig up the reference) that Clan Wolf fielded the smallest number of WarShips in the invasion (2), while the Jade Falcons fielded the largest number (28). On average, each invading Clan fielded 18 WarShips.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 27 May 2015, 13:04:47
Only 2 warships for Clan Wolf in that time operating in the IS ? Or only 2 warships were involved in active combat in Operation Revival ? Sounds like the same, but has a huge difference as the first would open up chances to see warships on escort Service.
Has someone already extracted the list of Raven warships that participated in Operation Revival ?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: SCC on 22 June 2015, 04:21:43
Has someone already extracted the list of Raven warships that participated in Operation Revival ?
All of them? Or at least all of them in service at the time, really there's no reason to have them in service expect for something like that
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 26 June 2015, 16:27:13
All Clans had warships active even while they didn't participate in Operation Revival. As it is only mentioned for Snow Ravens that they have lend their ships to the Falcons, i think that is something Special. And i don't believe the Ravens would give all their ships to the Falcons while the remaining Clans with their warships prey around them ...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 26 June 2015, 18:01:10
I wonder if those two ships used in the Red Corsair campaign in 3050s, do you think those were Raven ships?  It was bit strange affair.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 02 September 2015, 09:40:38
I had little time today, was reading Handbook: House Kurita.   Page 38, mentions (it was mentioned in the past.) that two Battleships Kumamoto and Shizuoka defected to General Kerensky's army during the liberation of Terra campaign years.   I wonder if we'll ever find out what of battleship the book was talking about.  The back door into new/old design as far I know is closed, Field Report 2765: DCMS mentions only two classes were ever produced by the Combine.  I'd only imagine that two ships were either Narukami-class Destroyers being called "Battleships" verse calling them WarShips or these were old ship designs from Terran Hegemony they hidden away until Star League Civil War open hostilities with SLDF.

Personally, love to see the Kuritans getting their hands something bigger than cruiser.  I'm not holding my breath.  :P
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 02 September 2015, 11:34:47
I had little time today, was reading Handbook: House Kurita.   Page 38, mentions (it was mentioned in the past.) that two Battleships Kumamoto and Shizuoka defected to General Kerensky's army during the liberation of Terra campaign years.   I wonder if we'll ever find out what of battleship the book was talking about.  The back door into new/old design as far I know is closed, Field Report 2765: DCMS mentions only two classes were ever produced by the Combine.  I'd only imagine that two ships were either Narukami-class Destroyers being called "Battleships" verse calling them WarShips or these were old ship designs from Terran Hegemony they hidden away until Star League Civil War open hostilities with SLDF.

Personally, love to see the Kuritans getting their hands something bigger than cruiser.  I'm not holding my breath.  :P
Battleship classes are somewhat rare, based on the detail published so far.  Of the Dreadnoughts, four survived into the Star League era, and three of those were scrapped or given to museums. The text for the Farragut says that the last was decomissioned and scheduled for dismantling in 2766, although at least one Farragut survived long enough to become a Blakist WarShip, and another is visible in art from the Exodus. There's no sign of the SLDF selling on either McKenna or Texas class ships, and the last Monsoon was decomissioned in 2668, although Field Report: Periphery 2765 has seven Monsoons in the RWR navy. So, maybe the Capellans sold the Combine some Du Shi Wangs, or the Free Worlds League sold them some Atreus class ships, but my money would be on the two Combine ships being a pair of Monsoons they'd bought and mothballed, and restored to working order after 2765. Given that the sourcebooks have been steadily closing out all the named but unstatted classes, I think it's unlikely the Combine had a battleship class lurking around out there that's never been named before.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Medron Pryde on 02 September 2015, 12:43:49
But that would give the Combine a homegrown battleship class of their own...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 02 September 2015, 15:48:56
But that would give the Combine a homegrown battleship class of their own...

And you would think the Combine would build itself a battleship, wouldn't you?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Medron Pryde on 02 September 2015, 19:59:03
I think EVERY realm would build itself a battleship...with the exceptions of the Magistracy and Outworlds which just didn't have big WarShip fleets.

Granted, their battleships would be in the 1 kton range versus the Star League 1.5+ kton range, but I think that every nation with a true fleet would build itself some kind of battleship/flagship because BattleTech style fleets depend on them for heavy combat.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 02 September 2015, 20:17:07
I think EVERY realm would build itself a battleship...
If only that were true...

Remember, we were told flat-out by Herb that we wouldn't get any more SL-era(or older) WarShips once the 2765 Field Reports all came out. All of them are out, and we only have three non-Terran battleships, one from a Periphery nation.

I'm hoping for the surplus Monsoon theory to pan out, myself. Those ships are just dripping with character, and we need more of them.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mikecj on 02 September 2015, 21:01:27
It'd be interesting to see where WoB's Farragut came from.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 02 September 2015, 21:24:57
Probably the same salvage the rest of their SLDF-era fleet came from.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 02 September 2015, 22:15:53
Could the various Houses possibly have built copy's of Hegemony warships? I could see the Kurita Family commissioning a copy of a Farragut. Probably change the lines a bit to make it look different but all in all one with the same stats.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 02 September 2015, 22:30:56
Dice, I hope not. I'm all for the Houses copying older plans, but please not the Farragut, it's the most boring battleship in space. Even the Du Shi Wang would be a more interesting choice.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 03 September 2015, 03:46:12
I think it's unlikely that the Combine would get to produce copies of extant Hegemony designs, given that where such things have happened (Congress/Congress-D, and Bonaventures being produced by the RWR) it's been noteworthy enough to attract on-page detail. Also, allowing the Combine to do that in this instance would open a can of worms as every aerospace fan for every faction immediately starts threads and arguments over how [insert faction name here] could clearly have been producing [insert WarShip class here] during and after the Amaris Civil War because the Combine got to produce copies of [insert battleship class]. Just... no.

The TROs don't make any mention of the Farragut or Monsoon being sold off, but my comment about the Monsoons was based on Field Report: Periphery including them in the RWR navy; the RWR had special-friend status with the Hegemony compared to the Combine, which always appears to have been antagonistic towards the Star League. I think it's more likely that the Combine would get Monsoons than Farraguts given that the Monsoons are older and the Monsoon seems to have been the biggest class of ship the Republic managed to acquire from the Hegemony. I can't see the Republic getting Monsoons and the Combine the newer Farragut.

Field Report: Draconis Combine 2765 also talks about how WarShip production in the Combine was hampered by a lack of infrastructure, with the Combine mothballing much of its navy after the Reunification War because it didn't have the facilities to support it, and the new production focusing on lighter WarShips because the Combine's limited production capabilities have it lagging behind the WarShip programmes of the other nations. I can't see a nation that seems to have always had problems producing WarShips in numbers and at higher weights suddenly producing copies of Hegemony WarShips - particularly second or third-generation WarShips. Ok, the Farragut isn't as advanced as the McKenna, but given that it followed both the Dreadnought and the Monsoon, it's presumably more challenging than trying to produce either of those earlier designs.

I would, however, find it hilarious if the two ships were salvaged Dreadnoughts, just because.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 03 September 2015, 06:01:14
Like said, unless something happens to be in Succession Wars books, i doubt there will be anymore for the Inner Spher.e

I could see a couple ships being built per faction up, but it really doesn't explain the Combine.  Those two ships existed while the Liberation was going on, the Field Report 2765 pretty much the Combine in a no-win corner of their stuck with these two type of ships  (Destroyer & Carrier) and that that.

TRO: Golden Century, that may give us tangible.  Sorry bring this up again. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Medron Pryde on 03 September 2015, 12:09:03
In one of the German BattleTech books, the Dracs had a Farragut.

Non-canon by modern standards but very interesting.  :)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Knightmare on 03 September 2015, 15:26:38
TRO: Golden Century, that may give us tangible.  Sorry bring this up again.

Nope, nothing in there for the Combine navy. Sorry.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 03 September 2015, 15:40:30
Nope, nothing in there for the Combine navy. Sorry.
Thats not what i mean't.  :P  Just new designs for Warships.

I gave up hoping for additional designs for the Inner Sphere.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Blacknova on 03 September 2015, 22:53:32
Possibly they had a couple of old Hegemony hulks they had taken in battle during the Age of War.  They partly spruce them up to be just across the line from completely nonoperational, give them to Kerensky and say, "There, we did are bit for you, now piss off."
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 04 September 2015, 09:04:48
If only that were true...

Remember, we were told flat-out by Herb that we wouldn't get any more SL-era(or older) WarShips once the 2765 Field Reports all came out. All of them are out, and we only have three non-Terran battleships, one from a Periphery nation.

I'm hoping for the surplus Monsoon theory to pan out, myself. Those ships are just dripping with character, and we need more of them.

We do have a First Succession War document coming out soon-ish.  Technically it isn't the Star League era. . . ;)

A man can dream, anyway. . .
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 12 September 2015, 21:32:34
Could one of the hulls be an old Defender-class?

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 13 September 2015, 07:47:41
Thats not what i mean't.  #P  Just new designs for Warships.

I gave up hoping for additional designs for the Inner Sphere.

I hope more designs come out. Clan, IS, SL, I dont care.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 13 September 2015, 13:58:23
Could one of the hulls be an old Defender-class?

TT
I seriously doubt it.  Those ships were unique and high-up on national pride. The Kuritans, depending on their mentality of the era, would soon rather scrap them before using them or Davions would have blown them up before they could be captured or after. The Robinson-Class Transports weren't so high on priority list I'd imagine, they were mass-production ships like the Davion IIs as Warships go. 

Two Kuritian battleships sadly likely slip of the tongue by the author.  I would definitely love if the House Kurita had some Battleships of their own, but even modern 3067 era they were sabotaged by fiat.   
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 13 September 2015, 15:11:28
Two Kuritian battleships sadly likely slip of the tongue by the author.  I would definitely love if the House Kurita had some Battleships of their own, but even modern 3067 era they were sabotaged by fiat.
Could they have been refits of an existing class (trading cargo space and thrust for weaponry)?   
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 15 September 2015, 08:18:56
Unless there are a couple slips involved, battleship has appeared in both the Amaris War sourcebook and the Kurita Housebook.  With two references, I am figuring the word was not chosen facetiously.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 25 October 2015, 13:35:41
Now certain new ship has arrived, i wonder if the Canon WarShip List will revive. ;)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: bronzite on 26 October 2015, 08:11:58
It is unclear to me from the text if the XTRO:Republic III entry represents new construction, or an upgrade package to the only surviving member of the class.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 26 October 2015, 08:33:51
New construction, no question.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 26 October 2015, 08:45:09
New construction, no question.

The Ghost Bears have a very effective design, there going to build a few more. Anyone else think they have partly learned from what little they know of what happened in the Homeworlds?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 26 October 2015, 08:50:11
The Ghost Bears have a very effective design, there going to build a few more. Anyone else think they have partly learned from what little they know of what happened in the Homeworlds?
Few? If they have a chance, we don't know if first one has even launched yet.  It took them what, began work in super secret in 3132 and reportively by XTRO: Republic 3 as of 3146, possibly done by 3150??  They'll be lucky if they can put production into more than one at that pace.  Not saying I don't want more.....

My hopes that the population needy Snow Ravens are able to produce a smaller escort ship for the Bears.  Maybe get one additional Lev III for themselves, while saving on man power to crew their remaining mothballed ships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 26 October 2015, 09:46:12
Few? If they have a chance, we don't know if first one has even launched yet.  It took them what, began work in super secret in 3132 and reportively by XTRO: Republic 3 as of 3146, possibly done by 3150??  They'll be lucky if they can put production into more than one at that pace.  Not saying I don't want more.....

My hopes that the population needy Snow Ravens are able to produce a smaller escort ship for the Bears.  Maybe get one additional Lev III for themselves, while saving on man power to crew their remaining mothballed ships.

They did build a escort design for the Leviathans before. The Conqueror-class ships. And building more should be within the Ravens capability's I think.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 26 October 2015, 09:49:34
They did build a escort design for the Leviathans before. The Conqueror-class ships. And building more should be within the Ravens capability's I think.
Only problem with that is that those weren't new builds, they were converted older Pursuit Ships.  They would have build them from scratch which isn't quite a easy feat to do, though they still have managed to maintain and keep their two Conqueror-class operational to be recommissioned.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 26 October 2015, 14:38:54
Only problem with that is that those weren't new builds, they were converted older Pursuit Ships.  They would have build them from scratch which isn't quite a easy feat to do, though they still have managed to maintain and keep their two Conqueror-class operational to be recommissioned.

True, but it is possible and the design was originally for Leviathan escorts. And if nothing else the Raven's could do the same with other warships, converting them into custom made escort vessels for the Leviathans.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 26 October 2015, 15:16:24
True, but it is possible and the design was originally for Leviathan escorts. And if nothing else the Raven's could do the same with other warships, converting them into custom made escort vessels for the Leviathans.
Very true.  Being the usually XTRO entries (barring unique unit once in a while, exception of the Republic sub-series) are usually variants of existing unit, that includes Leviathan and Leviathan II.  They could make a Conqueror II, but naval guy in me would more want a original new design for a new age verses new built variant.  Beggars can be choosers these days, we just had miracle of a new built WarShip in late Dark Age!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 26 October 2015, 16:25:02
Very true.  Being the usually XTRO entries (barring unique unit once in a while, exception of the Republic sub-series) are usually variants of existing unit, that includes Leviathan and Leviathan II.  They could make a Conqueror II, but naval guy in me would more want a original new design for a new age verses new built variant.  Beggars can be choosers these days, we just had miracle of a new built WarShip in late Dark Age!

Oh yes, a new built ship and also a variant. I am just hoping it sparks a naval race.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 07 November 2015, 14:31:18
They should be building Carracks armed with a good amount of support dropships, hell each one of those has what, 60K+ in cargo capacity? Make a few of these bad boys and use them as system defense.

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 07 November 2015, 22:12:19
It's hard to say.  Frankly without any mention anywhere, as far we know there only the single Leviathan III being/have been built.  Likeliness to me of a second design being produced is properly highly remote for a second WarShip Class or even variant.    I can see the Ravens given enough resources and encouragement that they could upgrade their existing Conqueror-Class ships.  But canonically we don't know.

The only design i know we have not seen are the ones the Sea Foxes use as their mobile habitats, but there not true warships anymore, just frame work of them.

Talk of should be making Carracks ships, is i don't think possibility either.  Waste resources building a thin-armored ships, even upgraded to support DropShips when you can build cheaper large JumpShips in their place.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 08 November 2015, 03:21:46
When I read over the Leviathan III entry I was under the impression a second one might be built at Quattre Belle.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Vition2 on 08 November 2015, 07:40:58
While possible I'd rather see a new, different, warship classes being put together at Quatre Belle.  Too many Lev III's will turn space combat into a joke.  The Ravens are also much more resource poor than the Dominion, so if it's taken them 12+ years to put one together, then it's probably gonna take the Ravens longer.

I suspect we'll see something completely new, but in the vein of the Lev III, probably something along these design parameters:
- Decently sized, maybe as high as a million tons, unlikely to be more, but probably smaller than that, I'm expecting "battlecruiser" sized.
- Good anti-fighter, capital missile, and PWS defenses - probably using a large number of NLs and AMS.
- Large number of DS collars compared to its size, maybe even maxed out.  With low numbers of warships in the universe, something capable of standing alone against large numbers of PWS is likely to be considered.  And what better way to counter PWS than with your own PWS?  ARTS SC bays are likely to remain a thing too.
- Integral ASF attachment is likely to be smallish, no more than the 60 the Lev III carries and likely closer to 30 or 40.

Once the prototype is produced, and the production kinks are out of the way, I could see a new one of these rolling off the line about once every 3ish years (and a Lev III once every 5ish).

Edit: Okay, that's really optimistic, but a guy can wish can't he. xD
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 08 November 2015, 10:36:51
With all the fluff from FM:3145 and Era Report: 3145.  I get the impression that Raven Alliance's Clan warrior caste isn't sufficient enough to maintain their current surviving fleet they had in mothballs due.  They're are enough of people man a another Lev III unless they plan only to man that one ship and perhaps another one.  They'll cut their fleet down a bit.  I'm not against them having another WarShip, i don't think they can handle it and their current fleet.   I'd imagine they could be building it for the Bear's per contract, or they could do a "harvest" Trials for personal from Dominion.   Again, this speculation.

If i were ask for new design, I'd be asking for a large Frigate instead, which could double as a battle transport.  I rather have more numbers of ships, than one honking ship with bunch of escort DropShips and fighters.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: The Eagle on 08 November 2015, 16:22:16
If the Ravens are back into the ship-building game, I'd like to see the League get back into it, too.  After all, they control one of the few remaining WarShip production-capable yards in the Successor States, and they're the closest thing the Spheroid powers ever had to "naval/aerospace-specialist" faction.  Likely to happen?  I give the odds as "slim to none."  But with the Sharkfoxes helping Atreus out, it's not impossible.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 09 November 2015, 12:57:28
I just want the FedSuns to find that missing Avalon cruiser. They need warships support!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 09 November 2015, 17:54:49
I'm with The Eagle, more Marik ships.

Maybe a Block III League using LGR in and ER weapons, better AMS point protection and all that.

Possible supporting craft:
Lyonesse-M1
Merlin
Merlin-R1
Hamical
Gorgon

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 12 February 2016, 08:25:29
I'm going to do a "State of Warships" for my Der Tag AU.

I know I've seen a list of active warships at the end of the Jihad, but where is it? Anyone help me out? I Thought for sure FM 3085, but the only warships I found were listed under the Republic Navy.

Thanks for your time.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mrbooth on 12 February 2016, 09:46:19
Fm 3145 for the most current and the field report series for before fm 3085
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 12 February 2016, 13:05:03
Is there some part in 3085 that has what I need, that I am just missing?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 12 February 2016, 15:26:50
Fm 3145 for the most current and the field report series for before fm 3085

That came out as an almost perfect reference!

Now, where can I get a full list of WOB ships at the start of the Jihad and thos unaccounted for at the end?

In addition; I knew we were missing two Smoke Jaguar Warships and I know that at least some Sierra-Jays joined up with Stone...did those ships ever get accounted for as well?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 12 February 2016, 15:35:54
Now, where can I get a full list of WOB ships at the start of the Jihad and thos unaccounted for at the end?
Jihad: Final Reckoning, page 128.
In addition; I knew we were missing two Smoke Jaguar Warships and I know that at least some Sierra-Jays joined up with Stone...did those ships ever get accounted for as well?
The fates of the Smoke Jaguar ships Osis' Pride and Streaking Mist are covered in Wars of Reaving. The Smoke Jaguars who ended up with Stone didn't come with any WarShips, but were given a WarShip during the Dark Age by the Republic. That's covered in Field Manul: 3145.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 12 February 2016, 15:58:43
Jihad: Final Reckoning, page 128.The fates of the Smoke Jaguar ships Osis' Pride and Streaking Mist are covered in Wars of Reaving. The Smoke Jaguars who ended up with Stone didn't come with any WarShips, but were given a WarShip during the Dark Age by the Republic. That's covered in Field Manul: 3145.

Awesome! Thanks! This is everything i need.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 20 February 2016, 00:06:38
Am I correct in understanding that we have no real way to know what went into/came out of the Clan Naval Caches?

There is not compiled list of mothballed ships in the homeworlds, as of, say; 3060ish?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Vition2 on 20 February 2016, 06:26:52
Am I correct in understanding that we have no real way to know what went into/came out of the Clan Naval Caches?

You are correct.

Quote
There is not compiled list of mothballed ships in the homeworlds, as of, say; 3060ish?

Nope.

We really don't have very hard numbers regarding the homeworld's warship caches.  Post Pentagon-Civil War, 260 warships remain of the 403 that accompanied the Exodus fleet.  We know a fair few warships were built, but specific numbers are unknown.  It would not be difficult to believe that the clans, as a whole (including the WiE) have access to a total of around 300 warships around the date you are looking at - this would include those ships mothballed in the naval caches.  I'll also mention that looking at all the fleets given in FM: Updates, we can account for around 256 active warships.  In addition, 5 Kimagures survived through the Amaris Civil War, so there could be as many as 3 left in the naval caches (though some could have been destroyed during the pentagon civil war).
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 20 February 2016, 06:38:29
Even the actual number of WarShips (and JumpShips) on the Exodus is a bit fuzzy around the edges.

Does the number refer to the ships at New Samarkand only (which is inferred given that the IS knows the number from DCMS reports), or the supposed actual total number?
Not all Exodus ships jumped away with the main fleet. We do know, for example, from the example of the SLS Manassas, that there were rear-guard elements, with the possibility that Schwartz was one secondary rallying point for other, late Exodus fleet elements. The short story When the Bears Left strongly infers that some units were lagging behind the main Exodus fleet, as the protagonists of that story could not realistically have reached the rallying point in time to join the main fleet before they left.
(Note, I do assume that there was one single Exodus fleet formed shortly afterwards. But there is sufficient evidence plus the proven single case of the Manassas to say that not all Exodus ships jumped out into the periphery from the same rallying point, or at the same time.)

We do not know if the numbers given are the actual (supposed) numbers of vessels or only those counted by the DCMS observers.
Further, we do not know the definitions that were used in the context - neither Kerensky nor the DCMS were bound by the BT rulebooks.
How do we know if the Newgrange, Potemkin, and Carrack class vessels in the Exodus fleet were counted among the WarShips when they could also have been considered JumpShips (being essentially non-combattants) or even a third, unmentioned group of auxiliary vessels?
How do we know if the Bug-Eye class vessels in the fleet weren't completely overlooked? And if they weren't, were they counted as WarShips, JumpShips, auxiliary ships, or mistaken for DropShips? (Same about any Nightwing or Tracker vessels, if any survived to accompany the Exodus.)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: beachhead1985 on 20 February 2016, 06:45:27
So, if I was to say; empty the naval caches in about 3060-3063ish, it wouldn't be unreasonable of me to use the RAT in the back of FM: SLDF or make one myself?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Vition2 on 20 February 2016, 08:12:14
I'm not seeing RATs for warships in FM: SLDF - but I could be overlooking something.  If there isn't one, making your own wouldn't be too difficult, though you'd still want to read into some of the fluff, one of the classes from the SLDF era occurs in the clans with greater numbers than those which left with them on the exodus, and a number of the warships have been so heavily redesigned that they've been designated with a new class name.  One is more likely to find SLDF versions and more of those ships which the Clans don't find useful.  Here's a list of the warships that exist when combining Jaguar ships to those listed in FM: Updates:

33   Lola III
32   Aegis
32   Carrack
28   Potemkin
19   Vincent Mk. 42
13   Fredasa*
13   Sovetskii Soyuz
13   York+
12   Congress
12   Essex
11   Cameron
10   Black Lion
10   Volga
8   Nightlord*
6   McKenna
6   Whirlwind
5   Liberator+
5   Texas
2   Conqueror+
2   Leviathan*

* = entirely new designs
+ = new classes based on old classes
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 20 February 2016, 18:44:19
Wars of Reaving adds a few other ships from caches, IIRC - both amongst those activated by the Society and pulled out of caches by the Clans either during the war or afterwards. One clan (Cloud Cobras?) dug out a pair of Sovetskii Soyuz; the Diamond Sharks went back and retrieved an Essex. The Society managed to activate or were in the process of activating a trio of Makos, a Davion and (I think) two Barons.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: DarthRads on 10 March 2016, 22:24:25
I reckon Samarkand class is also mentioned.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 11 March 2016, 15:42:14
I reckon Samarkand class is also mentioned.
The Diamond Sharks dug a Samarkand out of a cache during the Wars of Reaving - the Deal Breaker - but lost it when the Coyotes attacked Vinton.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 27 September 2016, 16:37:41
Question: Has someone gone through the 1st Succession War book and compiled all the warships in that document yet?  I thought I heard that there was a full list somewhere, but I certainly don't seem to be able to find one in my copy.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 27 September 2016, 18:46:42
Vinton, you need at a 4 Leviathan (WarShips).  The transport one, the Heavy Battleship one, Steel Viper version and the Leviathan II version.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BrokenMnemonic on 28 September 2016, 01:07:35
Question: Has someone gone through the 1st Succession War book and compiled all the warships in that document yet?  I thought I heard that there was a full list somewhere, but I certainly don't seem to be able to find one in my copy.
I did a run through looking for names when I first read it, and added it to my to-do list on Sarna: http://www.sarna.net/wiki/User_talk:BrokenMnemonic#Ships_to_Write_Up - I don't know if that helps? I need to do a second run-through to see if I missed any, but as the book's still under moratorium I haven't done that yet.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Frabby on 28 September 2016, 03:42:25
Vinton, you need at a 4 Leviathan (WarShips).  The transport one, the Heavy Battleship one, Steel Viper version and the Leviathan II version.
To be hair-splittingly precise, you've got

1. the original specs (no such ship ever built)

2.  the transporters (two unfinished hulks from original specs changed into this during construction)

3. the battleships, often referred to as "Leviathan II" (different from original specs; the two transports were re-upgraded into this, and a third was built)

4. the Leviathan Prime (the Steel Viper ship, based on the original specs but with more modern tech; no stats known)

5. the Leviathan III (rumored to be under construction in the Dark Age)
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Vition2 on 28 September 2016, 11:58:03
Vinton, you need at a 4 Leviathan (WarShips).  The transport one, the Heavy Battleship one, Steel Viper version and the Leviathan II version.

The list I made isn't intended as a comprehensive list throughout all eras, it was focused on what is likely in existence in the 3060s.  The CSJ ships are only included because they existed at the beginning of the time period.  I technically could have included 1 Leviathan II as the Rasalhague did exist in 3068, but I chose to cut things off prior to the Jihad era. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Bergie on 30 September 2016, 09:31:41
I did a run through looking for names when I first read it, and added it to my to-do list on Sarna: http://www.sarna.net/wiki/User_talk:BrokenMnemonic#Ships_to_Write_Up - I don't know if that helps? I need to do a second run-through to see if I missed any, but as the book's still under moratorium I haven't done that yet.

Works for me in the meantime!  Thanks
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 26 October 2016, 20:56:06
So I just went back a few pages from the latest but is there a most current version of this?  Last one I had is a few years old.

Thanks
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 27 October 2016, 05:39:48
I'm not seeing RATs for warships in FM: SLDF - but I could be overlooking something.  If there isn't one, making your own wouldn't be too difficult, though you'd still want to read into some of the fluff, one of the classes from the SLDF era occurs in the clans with greater numbers than those which left with them on the exodus, and a number of the warships have been so heavily redesigned that they've been designated with a new class name.  One is more likely to find SLDF versions and more of those ships which the Clans don't find useful.  Here's a list of the warships that exist when combining Jaguar ships to those listed in FM: Updates:

33   Lola III
32   Aegis
32   Carrack
28   Potemkin
19   Vincent Mk. 42
13   Fredasa*
13   Sovetskii Soyuz
13   York+
12   Congress
12   Essex
11   Cameron
10   Black Lion
10   Volga
8   Nightlord*
6   McKenna
6   Whirlwind
5   Liberator+
5   Texas
2   Conqueror+
2   Leviathan*

* = entirely new designs
+ = new classes based on old classes

Thats a neat list. Im sure there are some other hulls floating around in various state of disarray.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Vition2 on 29 October 2016, 09:46:33
Thats a neat list. Im sure there are some other hulls floating around in various state of disarray.


Thanks, and as of Wars of Reaving, we now know that there were some warships in the various naval caches during the time period the list was made for.  I still suspect that the total number in naval caches during this time period was around 50; 100 would probably be pushing beyond what I would consider likely, but not entirely wishful thinking - though many of these would likely be smaller or less effective/prestigious classes.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 29 October 2016, 11:49:33
Thanks, and as of Wars of Reaving, we now know that there were some warships in the various naval caches...

...many of these would likely be smaller or less effective/prestigious classes.

Not necessarily: some of the ships may be 'drydock damsels' that require either too much maintenance or manpower (relatively speaking), either through design or age when mothballed.

Such ships may be relatively large, extremely effective (in combat), and prestigious... but impractical for active use.

Other possibilities are ships that are simply too hard to bring out of mothballs; for example, ships that suffered extensive combat damage during the final days of the Star League, during the Pentagon Civil War/Operation: Klondike, or during clan trials.

Another possibility is that the ship was damaged during or after mothballing; being stripped of key components to keep other ships active, or suffering post-mothball collisions with asteroids/comets/other ships. These ships might even include mighty McKenna, Texas, or Black Lion classes, that would need not just a lot of work, but skilled crews... in a MOS that is pretty much ignored by most clans, and the few clans that do pay attention to the capital aero field already have the ships they want/need.

Granted, these would be a minimal part of the caches, but might still be counted.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 29 October 2016, 15:20:59

The WoR did cause the naval caches to be emptied out, however many of the ships ended up as unnamed outbound wrecks or debris fields.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 29 October 2016, 17:17:20
The WoR did cause the naval caches to be emptied out, however many of the ships ended up as unnamed outbound wrecks or debris fields.
I do wonder about that; as I read it, it was not entirely clear is all the cached had been emptied, or only those of the mentioned clans.

The other issue is jumpships; might there still be caches of standard-core jumpships? or even large space-only dropships along the lines of Behemoths?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 29 October 2016, 17:51:52
I do wonder about that; as I read it, it was not entirely clear is all the cached had been emptied, or only those of the mentioned clans.
I think that they stopped caring at that point.

Quote
The other issue is jumpships; might there still be caches of standard-core jumpships? or even large space-only dropships along the lines of Behemoths?
I think that those wouldn't have been cached, many of those would be needed just to keep the Clan economy going.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: cavingjan on 30 October 2016, 08:25:05
It was implied that they were all cleared but vague enough to not be all in the event the writers need something later. Kudos to Ben for doing that so adeptly.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 30 October 2016, 12:55:02
I want to be on the record as saying, WHY do we need to know about new-tech in older-tech machines?

What I mean is why do most people assume that the clans just used Broadsword - Leopard, Union-C, Overlord-C and such...

What happen to older designs such as Jumbo, Drost IIA, Lion and Confederate class dropships?

While the clans did use the Titan / Titan-C, they offered the Carrier and Miraborg as well.

Also can we get some stats for this: Scout-class dropship.
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Scout_(DropShip_class) (http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Scout_(DropShip_class))

I understand the concept of optimizing a design and adherent to waste, but if you had an older design... would you scrap it and recover maybe half back in resources or upkeep?

Just saying...

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Takiro on 30 October 2016, 18:34:53
Well the Miraborg is kind of new to the Clans being introduced just after the Truce of Tukayyid.

I could see second line forces using older transports in much the same way that they get the short end of the stick on equipment (Omni stuff, Battlearmor, etc.) but some may not even have integral transport. By their very nature most are static garrison forces who don't leave planet and before the invasion there is even less of a reason to give these lesser troops any kind of ride.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 08 November 2016, 20:18:58
Does anyone have the latest warship list I have an old one but I can't find it anymore.  Please help.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 10 November 2016, 08:27:40
Second-line status, yes but for front-liners? When did the switch come about? Because FASA said so, or is there a better meaning? I can see swapping older models to lower echelons and such, but why give up something? If the weapons suck, upgrade them. AC/5 -> UAC/5, LL -> ERLL, MG (PD) -> AMS.

Big clans like Falcon, Bear and Wolf should use the resources to expand while Nova Cat, Mandrill and Hellion should have less newer designs because of resources. Now all should have a few examples, but the majority should not drop all a sudden to a new design when tons of older ones are better. Cargo wise or other. Also while secondline might be good at something, who defends when you when they aren't there?

TT
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Gaiiten on 24 December 2016, 08:09:11
It was implied that they were all cleared but vague enough to not be all in the event the writers need something later. Kudos to Ben for doing that so adeptly.
When the Sharks did their last visit on the Homeworlds in 3075 they reactivated an Essex-class destroyer from their naval cache in Babylon system. Other ships of this cache could not be reactivated due they did not have the time to do.

We were told that the Adders do not have any naval cache left. But we do not know what about the other Clans.

Furthermore we do not know if the Homeclans are capable to repair a number of disabled warships. I do not believe that all ships disabled in the WoR have been total losses.
 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 24 December 2016, 11:47:23
. I do not believe that all ships disabled in the WoR have been total losses.
Indeed, however some of them ended up in outbound trajectories, so they will be hard to find again.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 24 December 2016, 14:37:09
Indeed, however some of them ended up in outbound trajectories, so they will be hard to find again.

Particulary for what passes for salvage ships in the Battletech Universe. Jumpships really lack the engines to chase after a hulk, long haul for dropships to catch up, and sending a warship on salvage missions is easily overkill!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 25 December 2016, 10:09:20
Particulary for what passes for salvage ships in the Battletech Universe. Jumpships really lack the engines to chase after a hulk, long haul for dropships to catch up, and sending a warship on salvage missions is easily overkill!

I am not so sure; a station-keeping drive can push out 0.2 thrust, while the wreck is just coasting, with enough fuel and a good bearing, a jumpship can easily catch up with a coasting warship.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 25 December 2016, 18:13:42
I am not so sure; a station-keeping drive can push out 0.2 thrust, while the wreck is just coasting, with enough fuel and a good bearing, a jumpship can easily catch up with a coasting warship.

It counts on how the ship was destroyed. If it had been under thrust or had a big explosion the wreck will be moving at a certain speed. A speed a jumpship won't be able to follow. A dropship would but it would take time. Another issue would be timeframe. If salvage operations were immediate it shouldn't be a issue but if several months or even years go by the wreck will have drifted well out of any recovery.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 25 December 2016, 20:54:10
It counts on how the ship was destroyed. If it had been under thrust or had a big explosion the wreck will be moving at a certain speed. A speed a jumpship won't be able to follow. A dropship would but it would take time. Another issue would be timeframe. If salvage operations were immediate it shouldn't be a issue but if several months or even years go by the wreck will have drifted well out of any recovery.

The current velocity of Voyager 1 is 62,140 km/h, or 1,036 km/min, which translates to an Aerospace velocity of 57 space hexes per turn.

57 hexes/turn would be generally much more velocity than a warship would be expected to have even during combat maneuvers (I am not talking about fast passes; that is a different beast that even a full-on warship would have difficulty catching).

You underestimate the power of a station-keeping drive; that 0.2 thrust will move a ship that it at a relative standstill to a velocity of 1 hex per turn after five minutes of burn; that is 18 km/min, or 1,080 km/hr... without burning additional fuel.

By keeping the afterburners on, it will take a jumpship (or a space station) little under five hours of burn to reach a velocity of 57 hexes/turn. Ten hours yields double that, and 24 hours five times that velocity, which will make short work of even months of drift from the target warship.

A dropship capable of at least a 1/2 thrust rating would theoretically be able to go after Voyager 1, catch up to it, and bring it back, even after a thousand years of travel... in a few weeks.

The key is having an accurate trajectory, and I mean dead-accurate; once you know this trajectory, you can calculate how far the target has drifted, taking into account the gravity of any major objects in the system. 

Heck, considering that a trust of 2 is the equivalent of 1g, you could build a dropship with a 2/3 engine, two years of fuel stores, and 6 1/2 years of supplies... and you can get to Proxima Centauri without jumping in about, well, 6 1/2 years.

How? Accelerate at 1g for a year, which will get to close to 99% of the speed of light, switch off the engine, coast for the 4.243 light-years of distance, then end-over, and decelerate for a year at 1g.

Distance is not an obstacle; the only real issue is trajectory.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 28 December 2016, 18:59:26
The current velocity of Voyager 1 is 62,140 km/h, or 1,036 km/min, which translates to an Aerospace velocity of 57 space hexes per turn.

57 hexes/turn would be generally much more velocity than a warship would be expected to have even during combat maneuvers (I am not talking about fast passes; that is a different beast that even a full-on warship would have difficulty catching).

You underestimate the power of a station-keeping drive; that 0.2 thrust will move a ship that it at a relative standstill to a velocity of 1 hex per turn after five minutes of burn; that is 18 km/min, or 1,080 km/hr... without burning additional fuel.

By keeping the afterburners on, it will take a jumpship (or a space station) little under five hours of burn to reach a velocity of 57 hexes/turn. Ten hours yields double that, and 24 hours five times that velocity, which will make short work of even months of drift from the target warship.

A dropship capable of at least a 1/2 thrust rating would theoretically be able to go after Voyager 1, catch up to it, and bring it back, even after a thousand years of travel... in a few weeks.

The key is having an accurate trajectory, and I mean dead-accurate; once you know this trajectory, you can calculate how far the target has drifted, taking into account the gravity of any major objects in the system. 

Heck, considering that a trust of 2 is the equivalent of 1g, you could build a dropship with a 2/3 engine, two years of fuel stores, and 6 1/2 years of supplies... and you can get to Proxima Centauri without jumping in about, well, 6 1/2 years.

How? Accelerate at 1g for a year, which will get to close to 99% of the speed of light, switch off the engine, coast for the 4.243 light-years of distance, then end-over, and decelerate for a year at 1g.

Distance is not an obstacle; the only real issue is trajectory.

Wow, you really thought this out! For me its the cost of going after a giant moving wreck that is the issue. For one your not going to be slowing it down fast and you will then have to enter stationkeeping with the giant moving object that was once a warship. And then move gear, supplies, and personnel across while you try to repair said moving wreck. All very unpleasant things. Wrecks in relatively stable orbit or that were wrecked while not moving are generally the ones that get salvaged.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Fireangel on 28 December 2016, 21:10:43
Wow, you really thought this out! For me its the cost of going after a giant moving wreck that is the issue. For one your not going to be slowing it down fast and you will then have to enter stationkeeping with the giant moving object that was once a warship. And then move gear, supplies, and personnel across while you try to repair said moving wreck. All very unpleasant things. Wrecks in relatively stable orbit or that were wrecked while not moving are generally the ones that get salvaged.

Slowing down the hulk is not an issue; you reach it with a prize/salvage crew to determine if it is salvageable at all. You continue with it at its current velocity and heading, no need for station-keeping.

If it is not salvageable, the prize crew will recover any intelligence-worthy material (if an enemy ship) or ensure its removal/destruction (if it is their own); they will also remove any useful material, refuel their own salvage ship, maybe even restock their larder. After this, they will either scuttle the ship (i.e. blow it up GOOD!), or they will make careful notation of its trajectory for later recovery.

If it IS salvageable, the salvage crew must determine if it can be brought under control using resources at hand or if it needs additional resources; if it can be brought under control, it will be, then it will be either directed to a resource or a resource will be directed to it. If it cannot be brought under control, they can leave a prize crew to continue repairs until relieved by a better equipped ship OR it can be left to drift (maybe with minor course corrections induced by nudging it with the salvage ship, in order to alter its vector so that others may not find it by following the last known trajectory) until the needed resources are made available.

Why do it? Depends on how badly you need that asset and how easily you can replace it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 29 December 2016, 05:54:48
They better use a good tug dropship, as the Warship could have quite a bit of spin.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: victor_shaw on 27 January 2018, 07:17:40
I believe there is one more factor that is being missed.
While it is correct that speed is limited only by the universal speed limit of 300,000 kilometers per second (186,000 miles per second).
One has to take into account the acceleration limit placed on a ship by its living crew.
This can make the burn either to high for human tolerance or to slow to achieve the goal within a reasonable time.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: pheonixstorm on 29 January 2018, 00:52:03
A constant 1g burn won't bother the crew at all. Which is all you would need on a salvage op. A combat op OTOH would require between 1-6g bursts of acceleration which WOULD have an impact on the crew, even being strapped in. If your DS keeps making random turns at 4g the end result won't be pretty, especially the next morning.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Starfox1701 on 12 May 2018, 10:58:15
2 things one any body got an up to date list and two the value of the jump core alone would make. Any warship worth salvage.

Slowing down or changing the course of a wreck is also easy just time consuming. You don't need a lot of thrust just time of you are worried about the structure collapsing. Besides a micro gravity environment is definitely better the more damaged the wreck is.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 21 December 2018, 18:10:27
A little thread Necro but did we ever get a updated list going? Not sure if I wanna go through eighteen pages looking.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 22 December 2018, 00:29:31
I been using my own list, since Warship development is sadly dead.  Only Fandom is keeping it around.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 22 December 2018, 15:54:41
A shame, the old list just stops mid-Jihad.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 22 December 2018, 18:44:04
Given number warships left on the Inner Sphere side can be counted on two hands a list be mighty short. Clans have some.

The Field Reports 2765 and the Succession Wars source books.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Maingunnery on 22 December 2018, 19:01:13

I went through WOR with a haircomb, and frankly so much Naval combat was abstracted (no names of classes mentioned) that I couldn't make enough solid conclusions.
But we can at least assume that the Clan naval caches are empty.....
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 23 December 2018, 06:51:24
I went through WOR with a haircomb, and frankly so much Naval combat was abstracted (no names of classes mentioned) that I couldn't make enough solid conclusions.
But we can at least assume that the Clan naval caches are empty.....

At least at the end of the WoR sourcebook we got a summary of the surviving ships per clan. But yes, there are many activated and directly destroyed warships were we can just guess the shipclass. And many more were we got no hint of numbers or whatever ...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 23 December 2018, 11:45:35
At least at the end of the WoR sourcebook we got a summary of the surviving ships per clan. But yes, there are many activated and directly destroyed warships were we can just guess the shipclass. And many more were we got no hint of numbers or whatever ...

Can you give examples?  Because of the Field Manuals, the Clan Fleets are fairly nailed down class-wise. WoR gives a name, we should be able to get the class easily.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wotan on 23 December 2018, 15:48:50
In the chapter Founders Future starting at page 152 you get descriptions for all clans including their warship assets in the year 3087. For each clan you get a hint what happened to their fleets. Beside facts on each single warship you also get a good understanding of the state of clan yards and maintenance capabilities.
I don't give full copy here, just as a hint the cobras managed to activate 2 Soyuz lately - so it seems the caches are still not empty. And they tried to activate the Samarkand Block II Beijing, but failed.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: I am Belch II on 28 December 2018, 04:49:25
Always glad this list gets updated.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 31 December 2018, 15:43:05
The caches are never until the writers need them to be. And we still have several Mckenna's with unknown locations! Heck, we dont even know the names of all the Dreadnoughts yet!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: epic on 06 May 2019, 17:23:27
Does anyone have a good list of the warship fleets of the Houses, with a breakdown of classes, circa the start of the 1SW?  I have some ideas based on the FM 2765s (those are great for their pre-build up fleets, and quite detailed) and what is in the First Succession War book, as well as what was said in earlier pages of this thread.  However, there are large gaps still that I have to fill in.

Just curious if anyone has already done all the work, or if I have to do it myself...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 07 May 2019, 07:13:38
Does anyone have a good list of the warship fleets of the Houses, with a breakdown of classes, circa the start of the 1SW?  I have some ideas based on the FM 2765s (those are great for their pre-build up fleets, and quite detailed) and what is in the First Succession War book, as well as what was said in earlier pages of this thread.  However, there are large gaps still that I have to fill in.

Just curious if anyone has already done all the work, or if I have to do it myself...
I could try put one together, all my stuff is old spread sheets.  Combat Equipment had a reasonable generic list of Equipment per faction at the start Succession War Era, but it did not include the lost ships introduced in FR 2765 and Liberation of Terra.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Onion2112 on 17 June 2019, 20:11:32
Hi Epic,

I have attempted to come up with a realistic list of ship classes to make up the 150ish ship increase for each house from 2765 to 2786.
Ive looked through the various TROs and sourcebooks and come up with some notes (various spreadsheets & documents) - still a work in progress.
The numbers of these classes could be anyones guess really, but anything larger than a Destroyer would be rare (perhaps with the exception of the Lyrans).

My thoughts/notes for the fleet expansion are as follows:

1/ Each house would likely have a sizable mothball fleet composed mostly of ex Terran Hegemony or Star League discards.
2/ Each House did pre war production  - probably a few specific classes
3/ Civil War salvage or heavily damaged ships sold pre exodus
4/ Purchased Production from Terran Hegemony yards - surely they didn’t sit idle after Terra was retaken, or after the exodus.

Ex old Terran Hegemony Classes that were active 2765 or in mothballs are:
Aegis-2372 (Cruiser) : 30 were sold/given to houses before they were upgraded - each house seems to have kept these - probably 6 each - most of these seemed to be extant in 2765 (if not active I'd suggest in mothballs)
Baron (Destroyer): Half the 2582 SLDF numbers of these were sold to houses; when decomissioned in SLDF fleet in 2720 these were sold.
Black Lion I (Battle Cruiser): a few survived to the start of the 1SW (Capellans have 1 listed)
Bonaventure (Corvette): I believe some DC examples were destroyed at Hesperus by Invincible in 2SW
Carson (Destroyer): Withdrawn by SLDF in 2722; but these were likely sold off (they do appear in 2765 lists)
Cruiser (Cruiser): Mothballed 2405 but several sold to houses - DC has some in 2765
Essex I (Destroyer): Decommissioned 2645 and sold to houses.
Lola I (Destroyer): Seems to be have sold to houses; Capellans have some in 2765
Vigilant (Corvette): Replaced in TH in 2400 (mothballed or sold to houses) - despite age they definitely served in 1 & 2 SW

Each house probably had a few of their unique designs in mothballs:
For example Capellans maybe some Du Shi Wang (less than 12 left at start of 1SW); Federated Suns is mentioned as having some Davion I's in mothballs there could perhaps be maybe 1 Defender were in mothballs in 2765

Possible House Production:
Capellan Confederation Production was Essex I and Vincent Mk 39, and probably Carrack
Draconis Combine production was Narukami II, and probably Samarkand II and Carrack, and possibly Vincent Mk 39
Federated Suns production was probably Davion II, Robinson II, Carrack and maybe some Vincent Mk 39
Free Worlds League Production was League II and probably Carrack (Carrier and Transport) and maybe Vincent Mk 39
Lyran Commonwealth production was Tharkad, Commonwealth II and Mako, and probably the Carrack

My thoughts on the universality of the Vincent's and Carrack's is that they seem to be commonly mentioned in the 1SW book, however given that the Capellans borrowing the Vincent design specs was regarded as being naughty maybe these Vincents were just Terran Hegemony yards purchases.

With Terran yard production or civil war salvage you could probably grab almost any class of ship - but most likely only the smaller classes would be in any numbers (Essex or Vincent); anything larger than a Destroyer would be very rare.

A Sovetskii Soyuz is mentioned in the Draconis Fleet in the 1SW book; The Capellans had a Congress in 1SW book too, plus there is the Potemkin used by the Lyrans in their attack on Luthien.
Plus the Soyal class; produced by Delhi Shipyards (Carver?) was purchased by the FWL and CC (mentioned in 1SW book for both)

I hope this is useful.

Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 18 June 2019, 08:18:03
Bear in mind that this thread is for the canon fleets only. If you want to post educated guesses and such, that's what the Non-Canon Units subforum is for.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Onion2112 on 18 June 2019, 19:33:28
Bear in mind that this thread is for the canon fleets only. If you want to post educated guesses and such, that's what the Non-Canon Units subforum is for.

Sorry to clarify all of those ship classes I mentioned above are from canon sources (those are not guesses) and were used by the inner sphere houses either in 2765 or the 1/2SWs. Which was the response to Epic’s question, I just got a bit carried away with my thoughts about the how/why/where of the fleet expansions.

My only guess work is where extra examples of listed classes from the FR:2765s may have been obtained or where non listed classes that appeared SW books could have been obtained.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 27 June 2019, 09:24:10
Field Report 2765:

Capellan Navy:
Du Shi Wang BB x5
Black Lion I BCx1
Soyal CA x10
Aegis CA x6
Baron DD x3
Carson DD x2
Lola I DD x2
Essex I DD x2
Vincent Mk 39 CR x3
Vigilant CR x3

Draconis Combine Admiralty:
Smarkand I CVE x2
Smarkand II CVE x6
Narukami I DD x6
Aegis CA x6
Baron DD x3
(lots more in mothballs along with Cruiser class CA's)

Federated Suns Navy:
Defender BC x2
New Syrtis CV x4
Aegis CA x6
Congress-D FF x6
Davion II DD x15
Baron DD x3
Robinson II CT x10
Vincent Mk39 CR x5

Free Worlds League Navy:
Atreus BS x 20
Soyal CA x7
Aegis CA x6
League II DD x10
Baron DD x3
Vincent Mk39 x1

(more ships but numbers and class not known at this time)

Lyran Commonwealth Navy:
Tharkad BC x11
Aegis CA x3
Commonwealth II CL x7 (2 from FR 2765 4 from 1SW B)
Lola I DD x4
Essex I DD x4
Baron DD x1
Vincent Mk 39 CR x5
Vigilant CR x4
Mako CR x27 (Plus another 58 - 78 possible new build)
(Listed that nee Tharkad, Commonwelath and Mako class ships are under construction)

Magistracy of Canopus Navy:
Athena CA x1
Concordant FF x1
Pinto CR x20

Outworlds Alliance Navy:
Pinto CR x15

Taurian Concordant Navy:
Dart CL x1
Wagon Wheel FF x1
Concordant FF x6
Lola II DD x4
Vincent Mk39 CR x1
Pinto CR x18

Rim Worlds Navy:
Stefen Amaris BB x3 (2 more under construction)
Monsoon BB x7
Dart CL x7
Riga I FF x65
Carson DD x18
Essex I DD x40
Lola I DD x21
Bonadventure CR x32
Vigilant CR x30
Mako CR x5
Pinto CR x52
Tracker SV x1

The House navies I will flush out with the Succession Wars books as soon as I read them over again.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 27 June 2019, 09:58:36
Be careful about the Tharkad Class Battlecruisers, production continued yearly if you read the fluff for the ship verses what the 2765 says. I don't have my books handy at the moment, but there info in the Field Manual : SLDF about the House navy strengths.  They will increase, including number of Tharkads.

Also, the Mako-Class Corvettes where also sold to Rim World Republic's navy, like 50 of them if memory servers right, along with 50 to the SLDF.  It's in the fluff for the Mako in TRO:3057 Revised.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 27 June 2019, 15:38:06
ok I just read up the list.  it says over 100 constructed.  I do know some were sold to the SLDF as couriers but not many.  said a handful.  I'll say no more than 10 sense its specific with the RWR numbers at 5.  I will update my numbers. thanks for the tip.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 27 June 2019, 15:59:59
What is confusing is that the last Mako was lost over "Caledonia", but the Second Succession War book says it was New Caledonia.  Unfortunately, the Mako that was lost is never mentioned or even a warship was lost!
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 27 June 2019, 16:47:17
Yeah you see a lot of inconsistencies throughout the cannon data.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 27 June 2019, 18:25:05
Much of it is thirty years old. More importantly, the writers are not actually gods pulling this from a fully functional parallel universe. Those who do not temper their expectations accordingly help nobody except blood pressure drug manufacturers.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 29 June 2019, 09:58:48
Canon Warships missing numbers are like TPTB having Alzheimer...

Meaning while a cure is near, it's just outta reach.

TT

No offense meant... :bow:
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Jellico on 01 July 2019, 22:30:43
More importantly, the writers are not actually gods pulling this from a fully functional parallel universe.

Speak for yourself. That said we might not all use the same parallel universe.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kit deSummersville on 02 July 2019, 08:43:31
Speak for yourself. That said we might not all use the same parallel universe.

I use a perpendicular universe.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Ruger on 02 July 2019, 08:52:31
I use a perpendicular universe.

Personally, I prefer an elliptical universe. Not everyone likes it, but they all come around in the end.

Ruger
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: victor_shaw on 18 February 2020, 04:46:00
Field Report 2765:


Draconis Combine Admiralty:
Smarkand I CVE x2
Smarkand II CVE x6
Narukami I DD x6
Aegis CA x6
Baron DD x3
(lots more in mothballs along with Cruiser class CA's)


The House navies I will flush out with the Succession Wars books as soon as I read them over again.

There was a errata post on the ships in the Draconis Combine Field Report 2765

"Many of these vessels are older Terran Hegemony designs, and includes five older Aegis-class and two Cruiser-class heavy cruisers, five Baron-class, five Essex I-class and five Lola I-class destroyers, and four Vincent Mk39-class corvettes."

So the correct list should read

Draconis Combine Admiralty:
Smarkand I  x 2
Smarkand II  x 6
Narukami I  x 6
Aegis  x 5
Baron x 5
Cruiser x 2
Essex I x 5
Lola I x 5
Vincent Mk39-class  x 4
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 21 July 2020, 08:48:46
Does anyone have the latest list?  I have one from a few years ago.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 22 July 2020, 21:33:23
There hasn't been many new entries of WarShips.  New list is likely needed to be made. If anything removal of active ships.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 23 July 2020, 05:53:53
Yeah I get it.  I'm still just looking for the last one.  Is it buried in this thread?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 23 July 2020, 06:37:39
This is what i could find for you Kasga.
This was one original lists so it's start (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1791.msg40178#msg40178) - 1st post in 2011, this oldest attached list.
There the Timeline  of the Warships (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1791.0;attach=5256) by Weirdo (2011)
Weirdo's Post of Individual WarShips (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1791.msg566026#msg566026) (2012)
This is the visual naval history SLDF (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1791.0;attach=5258) by Jellico (2011)
Warship Class list (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1791.0;attach=5259) by Moonsword (2011)
Warship Master list (https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=1791.0;attach=13723) by Blackace (2012)- this list is among my favorites he was one of the master Warship list makers.

So spread sheet wise posted publically, these lists are as update as we have.  i need get my butt in gear make new one.




Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 23 July 2020, 10:26:39
I made one before and posted it here I don't know what happened to it but it was post jihad. 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 23 July 2020, 22:30:48
I hope someone considers putting this stuff on sarna, spread out over the board all the info isn't of much use.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kit deSummersville on 29 July 2020, 14:10:55
I'd wait until after Friday to do it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 29 July 2020, 14:38:44
On Friday happens what?
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 29 July 2020, 16:08:17
On Friday happens what?
TRO: Golden Century - It has new/old WarShips in it.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: BigDuke66 on 29 July 2020, 18:04:29
Great, looking forward to.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mrbooth on 31 July 2020, 16:39:42
Nice new goodies out today intrested to see what everyone thinks.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 31 July 2020, 18:46:36
Oh yeah all sub 300kton but still nice to see them finally.  Some nice ASF too I think.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: mrbooth on 31 July 2020, 19:21:20
ASF looks good but I cant help but look at the warships and think why aren't the Wolves and the Falcon's producing these things for convoy escort and the such during the invasion and have that many more ships for later.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Kasaga on 31 July 2020, 19:37:14
ASF looks good but I cant help but look at the warships and think why aren't the Wolves and the Falcon's producing these things for convoy escort and the such during the invasion and have that many more ships for later.

I know right
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Weirdo on 31 July 2020, 19:51:45
Probably because they were busy building those huge ground armies that made then some of the top-tier Clans.

WarShips are awesome, but in Clan space, 90% of power flows from the footprint of a mech.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 31 July 2020, 23:45:52
Probably because they were busy building those huge ground armies that made then some of the top-tier Clans.

WarShips are awesome, but in Clan space, 90% of power flows from the footprint of a mech.
It's disappointing but logical.  They were trial based civilization that kept the combat to minimum, especially in big aerospace terms.  You can't hold realistate with a warship.

Interesting enough the Wolves corvette was not unlike the Fox, but they didn't have the right mentality for it. At least fluff wise.

I have to say having being johnny come lately for the Blackpantslegion youtube/blog casts, i found his vid on the Tripitz Affair very interesting when comes to things about WarShips in the setting.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Trajan Helmer on 15 November 2020, 00:20:41
Based on Children of Kerensky, we have an Emerald Talon II being built.  What are the odds that she will be a new Nightlord or a different class of ship? Is it possible we may end up with Leviathan Prime-type situation?


Wait a moment, is Geneva safe with this thing being around? 
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 15 November 2020, 12:51:55
Based on Children of Kerensky, we have an Emerald Talon II being built.  What are the odds that she will be a new Nightlord or a different class of ship? Is it possible we may end up with Leviathan Prime-type situation?


Wait a moment, is Geneva safe with this thing being around?

Counts. Has the RoTS put the shipyards in Sol to use and built warships of there own? We do have mention of a Warspite...
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 15 November 2020, 14:26:49
Counts. Has the RoTS put the shipyards in Sol to use and built warships of there own? We do have mention of a Warspite...
Childrens mentions at least eight. However, there was bunch of confusion about them being actual WarShips or Pocket Warships.  They're also bad Battle Stations as well in used capital weapons.  Warspite was lost off scene.  Two of the Stations were also damaged or loss due to the Pile Driver Pocket-Warship/Dropships which rammed them.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 15 November 2020, 19:26:07
Childrens mentions at least eight. However, there was bunch of confusion about them being actual WarShips or Pocket Warships.  They're also Battle Stations as well in use which use capital weapons.  Warspite was lost off scene.  Two of the Stations were also damaged or loss due to the Pile Driver Pocket-Warship/Dropships which rammed them.
Childrens mentions at least eight. However, there was bunch of confusion about them being actual WarShips or Pocket Warships.  They're also Battle Stations as well in use which use capital weapons.  Warspite was lost off scene.  Two of the Stations were also damaged or loss due to the Pile Driver Pocket-Warship/Dropships which rammed them.

Damn, I just started Rock of the Republic so thats news to me.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 16 November 2020, 07:18:11
Damn, I just started Rock of the Republic so that's news to me.
Sorry to spoil that for you. I did use spoiler blocker thing. I found what happened disappointing way to handle aerospace combat. God sakes, give us actual BATTLE.  That's properly not as bad as when they killed the majority of the Kell Hounds off screen.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Stormlion1 on 16 November 2020, 16:31:34
Sorry to spoil that for you. I did use spoiler blocker thing. I found what happened disappointing way to handle aerospace combat. God sakes, give us actual BATTLE.  That's properly not as bad as when they killed the majority of the Kell Hounds off screen.

Agreed. Spoilers usually dont bother me but your right. Wish they had done the warship battle in orbit.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: ShroudedSciuridae on 18 January 2022, 07:40:19
Is there a list of known Succession War era WarShips ala WarShip Master List? We know there were 910 Great House WarShips in 2786 before the fighting started, and most of those aren't specified classes let alone names. However, between 1SW and 2SW sourcebooks we have visibility on maybe a quarter of those which is still impressive.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: Wrangler on 18 January 2022, 07:46:21
Currently, there are not. We only have old lists.
Title: Re: Canon Warship List
Post by: truetanker on 19 January 2022, 22:00:08
You'll have to scout the WoB jihad books, FM: Free World League for ComStar / Early WoB and the 2750 for the Reunification War...

Should be easier....

TT