Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
It would be interesting if he just handed them all off to Anastasia to form the core of the new SLDF.  They know her, she knows them, they're probably going to do better than Alaric's Wolves in terms of integrating with former RotS/other IS personnel who might also join up with the SLDF...
2
It really did, one or two of those things was fine but by the end of the FCCW it had gotten to the point of absurd
4
Extinct production, sure, but they at least "exist" in 3025... :)
5
Hello
I have just arrive to the Inner Sphere and as i was looking to the conventional fighters with Fusion engines at my militia base i realize that they need Fuel... Why?
We have very powerful electric engines and compressors as well as high bypass or even Scramjets. We fly in a compressible fluid and got a electric & heat generator aboard this machines why do they need fuel if not for Postcombustor for the extra push or to climb to the limit and see the space

PS: i suppose it's do the game mechanics but if I'm wrong please tell me (Do LAM needs fuel once in atmo?)

Game balance.  The game developers didn't want to open the can of worms of explaining why fusion turbines on conventional fighters didn't need reaction mass or fuel, but aerospace fighters and LAMs did.  Same reason why conventional fighters powered by fission engines still need fuel, even if TacOps lets them get 160 fuel points/ton (TacOps, pg 307).

6
Off Topic / Re: Naval Pictures X: Underway on Nuclear Power
« Last post by Daryk on Today at 18:09:55 »
Nice comparison there!  I've driven USS ENTERPRISE (CVN-65, as conning officer)... her advantage was speed over those civilian ships... ;)
7
Aerospace Combat / Re: Coventional Fighter with Fusion - Why Fuel?
« Last post by Daryk on Today at 18:07:41 »
You can do that to a degree (which is basically what LAMs in AeroMech mode do), but beyond a certain point, as Cannonshop pointed out, you need additional reaction mass too.
8
BT's normal heat sink systems also involve concentrating heat into material, the difference is that the canonical heat sinks pump it into fluid coolant which goes to a radiator system (SHS using heavy but space-efficient graphite radiators and DHS using lighter but space-intensive polymer radiators), while this version pumps it into molten droplet medium to be temporarily ejected out the ship. It pretty much has to be since radiation is so inefficient at low temperatures (radiation emission power scales with T^4).
But forcing higher temperatures requires additional energy and it also sounds like a complete nightmare for maintenance. 


Quote
No, tiny droplets are one of if not the most efficient (in terms of per unit mass) method to increase heat dissipation via increasing surface area.
But for optimal efficiency the droplet cloud should also be quite diffuse, which limits the total mass flow. It could be that the ship would be better off with traditional radiators.
9
Mostly, they depict the warriors as ignoring the non-warriors except when giving them orders.

which can also be said about the dracs and capellans for the most part.
10
exactly, as I said realisticly that doesn't happen. The Black Dragon's rise was, from a socio-political prespective, pretty logical. Any time political reform happens it will be inevitably be resisted because the current system works for someone.

the only explanation I would have is what Candace said to Sun-Tzu after she had killed his parents "In the confederation your word is the law". When you have a nation that has been indoctrinated into following it's leader without question you might get less backlash. But then we come again into the Mary Sue territory. Sun Tzu often felt like a Mary Sue in his actions. Like attacking a memberstate of the LEague and even having bio weapons deployed (yes that was his sister but come one. No repercussion beyond a "keep your sister in check?"). Or making the Taurian Concordat his puppet without so much of a "no thank you"?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10