Author Topic: Technical Readout: 3075  (Read 24477 times)

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Technical Readout: 3075
« on: 16 May 2011, 22:59:15 »
This thread is for all issues and problems with Technical Readout: 3075.

Product Link: http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=technical-readout-3075

Current errata version is 2.0, found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/p72gr90a97f6qoe/Errata%20-%20Technical%20Readout%203075%20v2.0.pdf?dl=0

Please remember to follow the errata report template when reporting issues.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: 28 March 2017, 09:53:40 by Xotl »
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Moonsword

  • Acutus Gladius
  • Global Moderator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16580
  • You interrupted me reading TROs for this?
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #1 on: 30 June 2011, 13:45:31 »
PDF Copyright 2008, page 202

First column, third paragraph: "Dieron District" is an anachronism in the 2600s.  Dieron isn't added to the Combine until the end of the 28th century.

EDIT: Looked at the PDF file's page number, not the book's.
« Last Edit: 30 June 2011, 19:00:20 by Moonsword »

Moonsword

  • Acutus Gladius
  • Global Moderator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16580
  • You interrupted me reading TROs for this?
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #2 on: 30 June 2011, 18:56:11 »
PDF Copyright 2008, page 203

Problem
Engine mass is 9.5 tons.  While that's correct for a 215 SFE, convention on vehicles is to include the engine shielding tonnage with the engine figure.  (See the Merkava Mk. VII on page 175 or Daimyo HQ 67-K on page 205 for examples.)  The vehicle's design is correct and includes the 5 tons of shielding by my math.

Solution
Change listed engine mass to 14.5 tons.

Akalabeth

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #3 on: 07 July 2011, 04:08:20 »
Problem:
The Merkava is missing 6 points of armour from its allocation
It's listed as having 10 tons totally 160 points yet the armor locations only sum to 154
« Last Edit: 07 July 2011, 04:41:30 by Akalabeth »

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #4 on: 16 August 2011, 01:56:25 »
Repost of errata dated February 20th.

Please excuse the inconvenience of this being offline in the intermediate time; also please note that the following only addresses issues that have a direct impact on gameplay. (Some issues like direct-fire ammo or various layout, etc, are beyond the scope of this post and will be addressed in the future.)


AP Weapons (or "Infantry Weapons" as named in some entries)

remove various eclectic references from the "Notes:" of the stat blocks of the following units: Nighthawk Mk. XXI (p. 13), Tornado (p. 15), Se'irim (p. 25), Void (p. 29), Tengu (p. 33), Aerie (p. 117), (Fast Attack) Golem (p. 127). The rules have changed, the AP weapon no longer counts towards the suit's total weight; replace with "None." for those entries that have nothing else in the notes section.


Weapon slots

extra (AToW-relevant) ammo for direct-fire weapons does not, in fact, add another slot. Please refer to TM, p. 170. The following need changing:

  • Se'irim (Anti-Infantry) - Flamer 1 slot (despite +10 shots)
  • Grenadier (Standard) - SL 1 slot (+0 shots), Flamer 1 slot (+20 shots), LRR 2 slots (+0 shots), TAG 1 slot (+180 shots, yes, really)
  • Afreet (Standard) - LRR 2 slots (+20 shots), (JF) - AP Gauss 2 slots (+20 shots), (HH) - Bearhunter 2 slots (+20 shots)


Nighthawk (p. 13)

Mk. XXII - change Grenade Launcher at 100 kg for a Micro Grenade Launcher at 75 kg [explanation: in line with TM, p. 297]


Trinity (p. 27)

change slots of Ying Long MWM from 1 to 1 (2), change slots of Asterion/Theseus MWMs from 1 to 1 (3)
Theseus (RL) - change 3 RL 1 to (1) RL 3
add 40 kg to MRR variant/s of Trinity (to add another 20 shots); add 20 kg to LRR


Void (p. 29)

DCA - Left Arm Manipulator is a Heavy Battle Claw [per text, p. 28]


Tengu (p. 33)

change slots of Standard and Support variant MWMs from 1 to 1 (2)


Grenadier (p. 35)

add Modular Weapon Mount - Body - 1(4) - 10 kg on both variants. Correct missile sizes are 4 slots for both variants (520 kg for standard, 500 kg for HK variant).

Nephilim (p. 39)

change slots of Seeker variant MWM from 1 to 1 (1), change slots of Standard and Capture Team variant MWMs from 1 to 1 (2)


Edit: corrected the Grenadier; dev-level as usual
« Last Edit: 11 July 2012, 04:07:41 by jymset »
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #5 on: 16 August 2011, 02:30:10 »
As the above is a straight repost, I would like to take the irregular step of replying to the post directly. Your effort warrants the attention and in the spirit of cooperation, I would like offer the following as helpful elaborations. Xotl, I realise this is unorthodox but hopefully within bounds; if not, please remove or relocate.

Quote
Errata on the errata:

Trinity Medium Battle Armor (p. 27)
        Under "Weapons and Equipment" Rocket Launcher Variant, change "3 Rocket Launcher 1 - Body - 3 - 75 kg" to "3 Rocket Launcher 1 - RA - 3 - 75 kg."

Arm's can not have more than 1 AP and 1 AT, or 2 AT weapons (Table on p170 of TM).  In addition, these systems are 2 slots (TM347).  This design is basically illegal, as there is simply no room for the 3 RL plus the modular mount and LRR.  I would recommend changing it from "3 Rocket Launcher 1 - Body - 3 - 75 kg" to "1 Rocket Launcher 3 - RA - 3  - 75 kg", which makes the design legal.  Alternatively one RL could be a RL 2 in 1 arm, and the other a RL 1 in the other arm.

Absolutely! Thanks again :)


Quote
Corona:
Under "Swarm/Leg Attack/Mechanized/AP", change "Yes/Yes/Yes/No" to "Yes/Yes/Yes/Yes".

As a heavy battle armor, it cannot do swarm/leg attacks, and should be "No/No/Yes/Yes".  This was incorrect in my printing, but found correct in a PDF

Yes - unfortunately, the errata is a bit out of date (on top of indeed simply being wrong on that account).


Quote
Non errata errata:

TRO:3075, Page 19, Kobold   
   Add a note that the Small Laser and Small Pulse Laser cannot both be carried at the same time, it puts the design overweight.

That is absolutely correct, but will hopefully also be covered by the RS (in the undefined future, once BA are released).


Quote
TRO3075, Page 25, Se'irim   
   Add note for "Yes" to AP for the Anti-Infantry version, or add a note to the kg AP weapon it can carry.

This is noted (incorrectly, as per errata above - but it is noted :D ) in the current Second Printing PDF. Thanks!


Quote
TRO3075, Page 33, Tengu   
   The Small Variable-Speed variant, the laser should be 375kg, not 380kg (500kg * .75 = 375kg)

Unfortunately, 3075 was not yet uniform on noting direct-fire ammo. The SVSP variant does, in fact, carry an extra ammo clip (battery pack?).


Quote
TRO3075, Page 35, Grenadier   
   The SRM 5 (4) Shots on the hunter-killer variant should be 500kg, not 510kg, and the slots should be 3, not 5.
   Add a note that there is no AP weapons on the Hunter-Killer version.

Absolutely correct on weight and change of AP ability. I had missed noting these in the errata above, so again sorry for the inconvenience and thank you very much for pointing this out.

Please note that the SRM5 (4 shots) actually occupies 4 slots due to the added ammo.


Quote
TRO3075, Page 39, Nephilim   
   Narc Version - The Support PPC is 187.5kg, not 195kg.  The NARC is 170kg, not 180 kg (150kg + 10kg per *TWO* shots).

The Support PPC would be 190 kg, as DWPs round up to the nearest 5 kg. However, the PPC carries an additional two clips for 45 shots total.

TM requires errata there, it should be 10 kg per shot (as shown on the IS table, not the Clan table). I will make a note to fully clear this up, thank you very much for the indirect reminder.


Quote
TRO3075, Page 41, Shedu   
   The Capture Team, change the slots on the 2 detachable weapon packs to 1.

No, each Taser is carried as a separate DWP, hence 2 slots. I agree with you that its annotation is on the far side of confusing.


Quote
   The standard version is 45kg overweight, because it calculated the clan HRR weight of 325kg when it should be 375kg.

As per the other threads, the current TM errata clarifies that the HRR does in fact have a weight of 325 kg.


Quote
TRO3075, Page 117, Aerie   
   Add note that Salvage Aerie can make no anti-mech attacks.
   Remove the notes for the stealth armor, no other design has it.

As above, I forgot to note the Anti-Mech, again sorry. But please note that the Salvage Aerie may also not deploy via the Mechanized BA rules.

Stealth Armor notation falls into the realm of editing, rather than actual rule/unit errata. TRO Prototypes does note Stealth Armor, so it is possible the annotation may change in the future.


Quote
TRO3075, Page 119, Afreet   
   Hell's Horses Variant.  The Bear Hunter is 151.5kg, not 180kg (150kg + 1.5kg per 20 shot clip, skipping first)
   Standard Variant.  The LRR is 176kg, not 195kg.  The weapon is 175kg + 1kg per 20 shot clip, skipping first)
   Jade Falcon Variant.  The AP Gauss Rifle is 201.25kg, not 225kg.  The weapon is 200kg + 1.25kg per 20 shot clip, skipping first)

Again, the weight noted in TM is that of a single shot, while the number in brackets shows the standard clip size; thus the two values multiplied give the final weight of an extra clip. The weights are therefore correct.


Thank you for your in-depth feedback. BA (of all releases) have had particularly detailed reviews performed within the last half year in an attempt to address some of the standardisation issues that obviously plagued the 3075 release; hopefully, there will be less confusion in the future.

Because of this, though, it would be great if future Battle Armor queries could be brought to attention in the General Errata thread first.

Thanks again!! :)
« Last Edit: 26 November 2015, 19:55:26 by Xotl »
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Adgar76

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 207
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #6 on: 21 August 2011, 07:22:53 »
PDF Copyright 2008, page 127

Problem:
Rock Golem
The Rock Golem's DWP-mounted Heavy Recoilless Rifles are listed at 245 kg.
75% of 375 kg, rounded up to the nearest 5 tons, should be 285 kgs. This makes the Rock Golem 80 kgs overweight.

Suggestion:
Under "Rock Golem", change both Heavy Recoilless Rifle (Detachable Weapon Pack) weight to 245 kg.
I think the easiest way to find the missing 80 kgs is to change the armor from Fire Resistant to Standard.

TigerShark

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5042
    • MekWars: Dominion
Firebee FRB-1E
« Reply #7 on: 03 September 2011, 12:46:57 »
Problem
Firebee is 4 tons underweight at 4/6 movement profile.

Fix
Change fluff and record sheet to reflect the 5/8 movement profile.
  W W W . M E K W A R S - D O M I N I O N . C O M

  "You will fight to the last soldier, and when you die, I will call upon your damned soul to speak horrible curses at the enemy."
     - Orders of Emperor Stefan Amaris to his troops

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #8 on: 13 January 2012, 10:55:39 »
Pariah, p. 138

Change CT (front) armour from 22 to 23. (Per RS unabridged, for the full armour value of 172)
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #9 on: 15 January 2012, 13:28:21 »
Procyon, p. 156

change "Power Plant:" from 45 Fusion to 40 Fusion
change "Cruising Speed:" from 64 to 54 kph
change "Maximum Speed:" from 97 to 86 kph


Procyon, p. 157

change Engine rating from 45 to 40, per the errata-ed speed (5/8) - no engine weight change
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #10 on: 17 January 2012, 05:35:05 »
Dev-level errata:

Kiso, p. 210
relabel the rear leg searchlight entries from "RLL" and "RRL" to "RRL (R)" and "RLL (R)"
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #11 on: 18 January 2012, 05:35:21 »
Dev-level errata:

Lumberjack, p. 282
replace Dumper locations "RT" and "LT" with "RT (R)" and "LT (R)"
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #12 on: 20 February 2012, 21:20:47 »
PDF, 1st printing

Page 45, Heat Sinks listed as 0 for a fusion engine.
Page 47, Heat Sinks listed as 0 for a fusion engine.
« Last Edit: 10 April 2012, 22:42:06 by Xotl »
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #13 on: 07 March 2012, 03:45:18 »
TRO 3075 (corrected 2nd printing), p. 54 - Condor Hover Tank (Upgrade)

Variants: remove "a ton of armor,"

reasoning - the variant described has weight savings of 3 tons (ERLL + 2 SHS instead of LB 5-X AC + 2 tons ammo) yet the AMS (1.5 tons), ECM (1.5 tons) and Armor (1 ton) add up to 4 tons. The RS (3075, p. 23) show that the armor reference is erroneous.
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #14 on: 27 March 2012, 20:13:30 »
PDF, Second Printing Corrected, FRB-2E Firebee (p. 242)

Under Primary Factory, change "Exedor" to "Boardwalk;" Exedor had not yet been settled at the time the WAM/FRB was introduced.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #15 on: 27 March 2012, 21:10:22 »
PDF, Second Printing Corrected, Korvin Tank, p. 238

Under notable pilots, Yuri Karpov is noted as having three Battlemech kills, and as already having an experienced tank crew when the Korvin was introduced.  The Korvin was introduced in the early 24th century, making it over 100 years older than the BattleMech.  One of the fact about Yuri is incorrect.

Correction:
The references to the 24th century should be changed to 25th century.  The new model was introduced in 2530 and the reference to the 25th century in the Deployment section should be changed to the 26th.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #16 on: 14 April 2012, 15:58:37 »
Dev-level errata:
Merkava, p. 174, Variants
remove "and SRM-2 rack"
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #17 on: 11 July 2012, 04:10:53 »
Dev-level errata:

Gladiator, p. 206
Capabilities - change "newly installed on the -4R," to "newly installed on the -3R,"



also updated the BA errata above, to correct the Grenadier entry. Boo yah.
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #18 on: 15 July 2012, 07:12:12 »
Dev-level errata:

Tengu, p. 32
middle column, 4th line from the bottom - change "twin torso-mounted five-tube rocket launchers" to "twin torso-mounted four-tube rocket launchers"
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

northwind

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #19 on: 31 August 2012, 17:07:39 »
PDF,

Seraph p.91

Infernus configuration: Anti-missile System : weight 0.5 t and not 1.5 t


Archangel p.93

Infernus configuration : Location LT

Only one Double Heat Sink in Left Torso (As indicated in Record Sheets Unabridged 3075 p. 92)
Tonnage is 1 ton, not 2 tons
Sorry for my poor English, but you know what ? I'm an awful French

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #20 on: 08 October 2012, 22:56:51 »
I've attached the current errata version to the first post.  As far as I know, all the changes detailed therein were corrected in the second printing of TR 3075 (and the current PDF).

If you spot any changes that weren't in fact corrected, please report them here.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Moonsword

  • Acutus Gladius
  • Global Moderator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16580
  • You interrupted me reading TROs for this?
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #21 on: 13 March 2013, 11:04:42 »
CGL PDF, p. 266

Present: "The Eagle as it exists today is an extra-atmospheric interceptor and interdiction fighter introduced by ImStar Aerospace of Atreus in 2601."

Change 2601 to 2501 per http://masterunitlist.info/Unit/Details/4110recent MUL change.

sillybrit

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3939
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #22 on: 19 March 2013, 23:59:40 »
PDF, Colossus p198:

The end of the 3rd paragraph reads "Despite being upgraded over the years, all but a handful were lost during the Amaris Coup, and the SLDF chose to replace them with the smaller (and less expensive) Excalibur-class."

According to the MUL and TRO3057R, the Excalibur wasn't introduced until 2786, two years after Kerensky and the SLDF left the Inner Sphere.

Suggested fix:

"Despite being upgraded over the years, all but a handful were lost during the Amaris Coup, and the SLDF planned to replace them with the smaller (and less expensive) Excalibur-class."

With this wording, nothing else needs to change, the SLDF's plans were simply overtaken overtaken by events.

Hammer

  • Numerorum Malleo
  • Global Moderator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4101
    • MegaMek Website
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #23 on: 08 February 2014, 17:30:13 »
Sorry to drag up an old thread.

I'm using the 2nd Printing Corrected.

Pg 21- Kobold Battle Armor
I noticed that the Small Laser list in the Right Arm shows a weight of 200kg.

But the Small Pulse Laser in the Left Arm shows 200kg but according to TM they are 400kg.

If TM is correct then the Kobold with the Small Pulse laser would be overweight by Approximately 175kg.



MegaMek Projects Wiki
Bug Trackers
MegaMek Tracker
MekHQ Tracker
MegaMekLab Tracker
New Units and RAT's aren't added until after the 2 month release moratorium is passed.
Join the official MegaMek Discord

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #24 on: 08 February 2014, 19:09:18 »
Sorry to drag up an old thread.

I'm using the 2nd Printing Corrected.

Pg 21- Kobold Battle Armor
I noticed that the Small Laser list in the Right Arm shows a weight of 200kg.

But the Small Pulse Laser in the Left Arm shows 200kg but according to TM they are 400kg.

If TM is correct then the Kobold with the Small Pulse laser would be overweight by Approximately 175kg.

The SPL is mounted in a Squad Support Weapon Mount. It means the stated mass is correct (though only Trooper #1 actually carries it). Note that the SL + SPL combo is indeed impossible as that would bring the Kobold's total weight over the 750 kg limit by 110 kg.
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #25 on: 18 July 2015, 04:11:48 »
dev-level:

Hammerhands, p. 226:
replace "...Achernar debuted the Federated Suns’ second exclusive design, the Hammerhands, in 2475." with "...Achernar debuted the the Hammerhands in 2475."

Korvin, p. 238:
replace "Wu Industries introduced a new model in 2430 to revitalize sales." with "Wu Industries introduced a new model in 2530 to revitalize sales."
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #26 on: 12 August 2015, 12:41:23 »
p. 260, Icarus II, Variants:
For the description of the -2S, replace the mention of endo-steel with ferro-fibrous armour.
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #27 on: 16 January 2017, 05:31:30 »
dev-level:

DemolitionMech, p. 248:
In manufacturing data, replace "GM 140 Fuel Cell" with "GM 105 Fuel Cell" and "StarSlab/Commercial" with "StarSlab Industrial".
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Cache

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3126
    • Lords of the Battlefield
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #28 on: 04 February 2017, 00:34:51 »
PDF, Second Printing, Corrected.

Page 26, Trinity Medium Battle Armor, 3rd column, Notable Troopers: Shia-ben-bing Ming Thompson, 3rd line...

Change Swfitwind to Swiftwind.

Alfaryn

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 331
Re: Technical Readout: 3075
« Reply #29 on: 23 February 2018, 19:12:43 »
2008 Second Printing, Corrected, print edition

p. 71 WGT-1 LAW/SC Wight

In R/L Arm line of the stat block change the number of Internal Structure points from 3 to 6.

p. 87 DFN-3S Defiance

Problem: The 'Mech lacks Triple-Strength Myomer under Weapons and Ammo. 'Mechs description on p. 86, it's movement stats on p. 87 and Record Sheets 3075 (2010, print edition) agree, that the 'Mech is equipped with one.

Solution: Based on the 'Mech's Record Sheet from Record Sheets 3075, under Weapons and Ammo add the following equipment - [Name] Triple-Strength Myomer [Location] LT/LL/RL [Critical] 4/1/1 [Tonnage] 0.

p. 143 Balius

Problem 1: In the Weapons and Ammo column of Alternate Configuration A the ammo bins for HAG 20 are described as "Ammo (HAG20) 18" (with no space between "HAG" and "20").

Solution 1: Change the above entry to "Ammo (HAG 20) 18" or just "Ammo (HAG) 18" (preferably the latter, since the 'Mech is equipped only one HAG model in this configuration, and in such situations ammo entries are usually abbreviated like that in TROs).

Problem 2: In the Weapons and Ammo column of Alternate Configuration C the ammo bins for ATM 9s are described as "Ammo (ATM 9)" (lacking information about number of shots in each location).

Solution 2: Change the above entries to "Ammo (ATM 9) 14" or just "Ammo (ATM) 14" (preferably the latter, by the same logic as in solution to the Problem 1 on the same page).
« Last Edit: 17 June 2020, 13:04:10 by Alfaryn »