Author Topic: The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.  (Read 1284 times)

Korzon77

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2441
The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.
« on: 06 March 2018, 02:59:34 »
For an AU in which the Samarkand class is used as the base hull for a series of variants, because someone discovered that no, building new hulls for every different mission does not make your logistics easier.

(actual fluff to come later).

First of all, all models must have the same structural integrity (73), thrust (4/6) and tonnage 350k as the Block II Samarkand. Save for the troop transport model, all models carry 4 dropships. All ships will have LF batteries.

1. Light destroyer.  A warship that gives up most or all fighters in return for a heavier armament, mostly NLs, oriented around anti-dropship and anti-fighter actions. 

2.  Troop/PWS transport.  A Samarkand that carries 7 dropships as well as support their activities, whether as a raiding force or small invasion force. the weapons fit is designed mainly for self protection, relying on escorts to provide screening activities.

3. Carrier. A Samarkend built around the same design as the Block II, only with 96 fighters instead of 72, and a modern weapons fit focused around self defense/anti-dropship.

4. Gunship.  As heavily armed as possible, giving up fighters for heavy weapons.  NPPCs or NL's should allow at least a limited ability to strike out at extreme range, but the primary striking power will come from the more efficient NACs or SCC batteries, intended to allow the ship to run down enemies and eviscerate them.

No design should include capital missile launchers, as those will be deployed on escorting dropships.

So, anyone feel willing to give it a try?

Cryhavok101

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1840
Re: The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.
« Reply #1 on: 06 March 2018, 12:19:30 »
Quote
NPPCs or NL's should allow at least a limited ability to strike out at extreme range, but the primary striking power will come from the more efficient NACs or SCC batteries

What tech is available for these? SCCs are pretty new, post civil war, but the samarkand is pretty old if I remember right, so what tech/era is available to people making these?

Korzon77

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2441
Re: The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.
« Reply #2 on: 06 March 2018, 14:58:41 »
This is an AU where SCC's and other subcaps came before full up capitol weapons systems. I should have mentioned that.  But assume subcaps are available at the same time as regular capital weapons systems.

Alsadius

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 926
Re: The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.
« Reply #3 on: 06 March 2018, 15:02:27 »
What about things like LAMS, screen launchers, naval C3, and assorted Mech-sized defensive weapons?

Korzon77

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2441
Re: The Samarkand Flight III Help me with my stats.
« Reply #4 on: 06 March 2018, 19:12:59 »
What about things like LAMS, screen launchers, naval C3, and assorted Mech-sized defensive weapons?

Other than sub-caps, pretty much anything that was available to the star league, circa 2690 is a go--with the exception of drones or casper style units.