I've found that my ability to enjoy a show or movie improves dramatically if I don't read what people are saying about it online beforehand.
Yeah, I tend to ignore stuff like that myself, I just ran across it randomly. I just think it's a shame that a lot of modern fandom seems devoted to talking about how shows they haven't watched are bad and bringing up the no true scottsman fallacy.
I'm not really bothered by the reuse of DISCO-era ships, it's a Star Trek tradition. Leaving aside the Excelsiors, Oberths and Mirandas all over the 90s Trek productions, there was a Constitution refit in TNG,after all. There's also a TOS-era Romulan Bird of Prey in one of the Picard trailers so there might be a diegetic reason for old ships being pressed back into service or retained for a century or so.
But Short Treks are clearly done on a tight budget and are going to cut corners where they can in order to maintain the DISCO-level production values - tiny casts, minimal extras, few unique effects shots. It's a hell of a lot cheaper to populate your effects shots with existing CG assets when you need to produce a couple of elaborate sequences.
Also, a friend of mine has seen the first three episodes, but is under embargo so he can't even say if he liked them.
Yeah, I get that, just added some confusion. I do know reuse is a thing that happens all of the time, Star Trek is ESPECIALLY good at that, I just wonder why there aren't any stock assets from Picard to use.
Speaking of, though, it would have been cool to see a couple more Short treks tied to Picard. The first season of Short treks did a great job setting up Disco season 2, and even had some plot relevance. Something like a vignette of the daily life of a former captain would have made a nice additional tie in with the new Series.