Author Topic: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk  (Read 10888 times)

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« on: 27 February 2015, 02:10:28 »
When I use to play B-tech with my friends in my youth the Battle Hawk (often proxy modeled by an Imperial Guardsman) was a mech I used a lot of times.  For a 30 tonne light it was tough and was simple to use with its armament of three Medium Pulse lasers and a SSRM-2 with an AMS to shield it, and it had double heat sinks (huzzah!).

Sure it wasn't fast for a light (5/8) and no jump jets but it was a tough little trooper with a (short ranged) bite for its size. 

Has anyone else used this machine or its updated variant (light engine, ER Mediums and a SSRM-6)?  And if so, what did you think of this little brawler, worth using or when offered one, did you hiss at it and bat at it with your hand?
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

wesharrisb

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 920
  • 8-Bit Battletech
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #1 on: 27 February 2015, 08:28:59 »
The battlehawk had JJs, 5 of them to be exact, and the XL engine sort of decreased survivability, but aside from that, it was nice enough.

martian

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8321
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #2 on: 27 February 2015, 08:38:43 »
Sure it wasn't fast for a light (5/8) and no jump jets but it was a tough little trooper with a (short ranged) bite for its size. 

Has anyone else used this machine or its updated variant (light engine, ER Mediums and a SSRM-6)?  And if so, what did you think of this little brawler, worth using or when offered one, did you hiss at it and bat at it with your hand?
1) BH-K305 is equipped with Jump Jets, so it moves 5/8/5
2) The upgraded BH-K306 is not equipped with Streak SRM-6, but with smaller Streak SRM-4

Personally, I prefer BH-K306 since those ER Medium Lasers do not force me to get so close to the enemy. Plus, that Light engine makes it more durable.
« Last Edit: 27 February 2015, 08:41:18 by martian »

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21731
  • Third time this week!
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #3 on: 27 February 2015, 09:05:26 »
Can't disagree with any of the above. The K306 is a nasty customer for mid-range fighting- makes a great LRM boat bodyguard. Spiders and Harassers and the like that show up to pick at your Longbows and Archers don't really react well to a Battle Hawk or two on-hand.

The K305 is trickier due to the abysmal range on those pulse lasers- best use I've ever heard for it is to go Elemental-hunting.
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Savage Coyote

  • CamoSpecs
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2899
  • 저는 미술 선생님 입니다.
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #4 on: 27 February 2015, 10:51:28 »
I've used both extensively as they are relatively cheap BV-wise and form a roll that some of the other "crappy" light 'mechs from 3055, 3058, and 3060 do quite well, and thats "escort."  When I say escort, I really mean the lesser of two evils when it comes to target priority.  When you have a Battle Hawk 30Doesn't Matter and a Falconer prancing about, in my experience the Falconer will have more shots directed at it.  While there is always a poster that will respond with, "I'd go for the Battle Hawk because it has less armor," I've rarely if every seen that play out when all things (To-hit mods, terrain, range) are equal.

At any rate, I'm comfortable putting something like a Battle Hawk into a cavalry lance and it tends to fill a roll of ankle biter; it's there to be annoying and add firepower to larger, more frightening units.  I won't mourn it's loss if it goes down, and if it does and you are that person that targets the "easier to kill" units, then thank you for not shooting at my scary stuff :)

I would never though put it at the head of a recon or pursuit lance by choice.  It has enough firepower to garner some attention and will be dead as quick as the enemy can make it happen.

Prince of Darkness

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1533
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #5 on: 27 February 2015, 11:02:54 »
I love the look of the Battle Hawk! It's odd enough to look cool!

The base version really does well as a bodyguard, but it's short range really hurts. The upgrade is far better obviously- but I do actually think the loss of AMS hurts a little. I really wish there was another upgrade focused around even more defense for missile carriers- VSPLs are typically good choices.

Cowdragon:
I'm going to type up your response, print it, fold it in half, and look at it like a I would a centerfold. THAT's how sexy your answer was.

martian

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8321
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #6 on: 27 February 2015, 11:38:04 »
I love the look of the Battle Hawk! It's odd enough to look cool!

The base version really does well as a bodyguard, but it's short range really hurts. The upgrade is far better obviously- but I do actually think the loss of AMS hurts a little. I really wish there was another upgrade focused around even more defense for missile carriers- VSPLs are typically good choices.
Actually, the upgraded model keeps its AMS.

Arkansas Warrior

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9210
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #7 on: 27 February 2015, 12:02:59 »
I've always had a soft spot for the Battle Hawk, probably because I like slow lights in general (even while acknowledging their limited utility).  The original strikes me as best when you keep it away from the front lines.  With an energy-heavy armament and streaks it can function as a raider, especially if the enemy is using low-quality assets to protect outposts while the good gear is sent to the line.  It's also a good trainer, with the TRO entry rightly noting that pulse lasers are very forgiving for newer warriors.  I could see these filling out Training Battalions and lighter academy Training Cadres.  The garrison forces a lot of them were shipped to is, luckily enough, another good place for them.  If the combat you're most likely to see is scumbag pirates in old mechs, the Battle Hawk is quite functional.  It's a particularly adept bug hunter, being scarcely slower and able to rapidly punch through their weak armor, with the pulse bonus negating any TMM advantage they might have hope to gain via jumping.  It's good against light vehicles as well.  Because of it's bad reputation, particularly with the LCAF, you might be able to pick some up relatively cheap too.  I like the -K306 even better, with its far greater range on the MLs, more durable engine, and overall (slightly) greater firepower, though I probably would've gone for a TC in lieu of extra missile tubes, because the pulse bonus is the one thing I really miss from the -K305.  I'd be interested to see one that replaces the AMS with an electronics package of some sort, either BAP to increase its utility as a scout or GECM to help it survive and befuddle enemy scouts it's hunting.

All in all, it's a great little mech if the only opposition you're worried about is fairly light and/or outmoded, though it does lack AI capability, now that streak-2s can't fire infernos anymore.  It would be a very good mech for low-end mercenary units that specialize in low-danger garrison and/or cadre contracts, or as the "heavy support" for a mercenary group that's dominated by infantry or light armor (think of the utility a group like Stalwart Support would get out of a company of Battle Hawks!).  just don't take it up against modern heavy or assault mechs unless you've got plenty of buddies.
« Last Edit: 27 February 2015, 12:05:05 by Arkansas Warrior »
Sunrise is Coming.

All Hail First Prince Melissa Davion, the Patron Saint of the Regimental Combat Team, who cowed Dainmar Liao, created the Model Army, and rescued Robinson!  May her light ever guide the sons of the Suns, May our daughters ever endeavour to emulate her!

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21731
  • Third time this week!
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #8 on: 27 February 2015, 12:07:11 »
Side note- this earns big props with me for being possibly the single most improved miniature in the Battletech line, from just awful to really cool (the Fireball shares this distinction). Looking forward to doing another resculpt sometime.


"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Grey

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 534
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #9 on: 27 February 2015, 12:38:25 »
I've used it, and while I love the 306, the 305 is almost perversely durable given it's weaknesses. Part of this is because since it's slow, fragile, and has limited range it gets ignored for a few turns, but for some reason my rolls tend to favour it too.

Either version is a nice little trooper though with just enough flexibility to backstop a faster, stronger force of lights and mediums.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #10 on: 27 February 2015, 21:51:35 »
When I say escort, I really mean the lesser of two evils when it comes to target priority.  When you have a Battle Hawk 30Doesn't Matter and a Falconer prancing about, in my experience the Falconer will have more shots directed at it.  While there is always a poster that will respond with, "I'd go for the Battle Hawk because it has less armor," I've rarely if every seen that play out when all things (To-hit mods, terrain, range) are equal.

Very much this. Despite what many people will say, I too have found that a slow light will often last a surprisingly long time if you simply give people something scarier to shoot at with equal or slightly better numbers. Heck, even simply running a heavy 'mech a couple hexes ahead of the light will do the trick. It's how I keep things like Falcon Hawks, Hammers, and Hellbringers alive long enough to dish out surprising amounts of damage. 8)

While I haven't actually used the Battle Hawk in any form yet, my initial impressions certainly fit in with many others. Use the -305 as an escort to discourage close attacks from hovertanks and other fast backstabbers, and make the -306 the close-quarters finisher of a cavalry or striker lance.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Nahuris

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #11 on: 27 February 2015, 22:33:03 »
Very much this. Despite what many people will say, I too have found that a slow light will often last a surprisingly long time if you simply give people something scarier to shoot at with equal or slightly better numbers. Heck, even simply running a heavy 'mech a couple hexes ahead of the light will do the trick. It's how I keep things like Falcon Hawks, Hammers, and Hellbringers alive long enough to dish out surprising amounts of damage. 8)

While I haven't actually used the Battle Hawk in any form yet, my initial impressions certainly fit in with many others. Use the -305 as an escort to discourage close attacks from hovertanks and other fast backstabbers, and make the -306 the close-quarters finisher of a cavalry or striker lance.


I have found the exact same, with my use of this mech. I also have to agree that the resculpt is a definite improvement.  One thing I have noticed, as I do have an opponent that does know my affection for escort type mechs, and will target them, is that this mech can actually take a bit of damage to put down. The last time I used one, which was a 305, it absorbed a Gauss to the arm (sadly, the one with the lasers), and 2 ER PPC's........ inner sphere, but one to each side torso, resulting in a single crit on each side, one engine, and one heat sink...... However, it not only survived the fight, but the SSRM2 got a lucky crit, later, and took down a medium mech, via ammo..... but really, the best thing it did, that whole battle, was absorb 35 points of damage that could have gone to a more powerful mech, and could have even downed a heavy mech, and forced a different outcome of the battle..... For that reason, alone, I see a strong value in escort type designs, and always consider them, whenever I field a force.
And because this is a Marik design, I feel you should NEVER see a Hercules on the field, without one of these to escort it.

Nahuris
"A friend will calm you down when you are angry, but a BEST friend will skip along beside you with a baseball bat singing "someone's gonna get it."

"If we are ever in a situation, where I am the voice of reason, we are in a very bad situation."

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #12 on: 28 February 2015, 00:01:21 »
Actually, it's a FedCom 'mech, not Leaguer. Trust me, if the Mariks got these, I'd be running Battle Hawk/Hammer lances on a regular basis. 3 Hammers to wreak havoc with their missiles, and a Battle Hawk-305(and the Hammers' own lasers) to make anyone regret closing...now that'd be a light support lance! O0
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Scotty

  • Alpha Strike Guru by appointment to the FWLM
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13699
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #13 on: 28 February 2015, 01:18:53 »
Actually, it's a FedCom 'mech, not Leaguer. Trust me, if the Mariks got these, I'd be running Battle Hawk/Hammer lances on a regular basis. 3 Hammers to wreak havoc with their missiles, and a Battle Hawk-305(and the Hammers' own lasers) to make anyone regret closing...now that'd be a light support lance! O0

It's just natural to assume that a good slow Light is a Marik 'Mech.
Catalyst Demo Agent #679

Kansas City players, or people who are just passing through the area, come join us at the Geekery just off Shawnee Mission Parkway for BattleTech!  Current days are Tuesdays in the afternoon and evening.  I can't make every single week, but odds are pretty good that somebody will be there.

Nahuris

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #14 on: 28 February 2015, 02:00:20 »
I could have sworn I read it was Free Worlds League....  but as a Fedcom design, I can pair it with so many serious designs.... that just opens more worlds of evil on my opponents.

Thank You
Nahuris
"A friend will calm you down when you are angry, but a BEST friend will skip along beside you with a baseball bat singing "someone's gonna get it."

"If we are ever in a situation, where I am the voice of reason, we are in a very bad situation."

martian

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8321
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #15 on: 28 February 2015, 02:14:17 »
I could have sworn I read it was Free Worlds League....  but as a Fedcom design, I can pair it with so many serious designs.... that just opens more worlds of evil on my opponents.

Thank You
Nahuris
Probably you are confusing the Battle Hawk (FedCom) with the Falcon Hawk (FWL). Both are similar slow light 'Mechs.

Nahuris

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #16 on: 28 February 2015, 02:23:05 »
Probably you are confusing the Battle Hawk (FedCom) with the Falcon Hawk (FWL). Both are similar slow light 'Mechs.

Likely.... but that doesn't lessen the Battlehawk, it just means my forces either bought, or salvaged one.....LOL

Actually, most of my opponents think I am odd, anyways.... I field things like slow lights, and Jagermechs by choice......... Seriously, the Panther is a viable solid design, all the way through the Dark Ages, and I don't yet see a reason for anything past the 3025 version.

Now, the Battlehawk 306 is intriguing. I haven't used one..... yet...... but those ER Mediums do open possibilities.... although they do raise the target profile of the design.

Nahuris
"A friend will calm you down when you are angry, but a BEST friend will skip along beside you with a baseball bat singing "someone's gonna get it."

"If we are ever in a situation, where I am the voice of reason, we are in a very bad situation."

Savage Coyote

  • CamoSpecs
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2899
  • 저는 미술 선생님 입니다.
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #17 on: 28 February 2015, 09:03:20 »

Now, the Battlehawk 306 is intriguing. I haven't used one..... yet...... but those ER Mediums do open possibilities.... although they do raise the target profile of the design.

Nahuris

Still a Battle Hawk in people's minds  :D

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21731
  • Third time this week!
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #18 on: 28 February 2015, 09:17:10 »
Still a Battle Hawk in people's minds  :D

Isn't it great when that happens? It's no big deal, just a _______, OH GOD I FORGOT ABOUT THAT VERSION!

(This exact scenario is how I discovered the very existence of the MML version of the Longbow- "at this body-punching range, he's harmless and I can deal with his friends while he tries to back away from- wait, what do you mean SRMs?")
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #19 on: 28 February 2015, 10:08:27 »


(This exact scenario is how I discovered the very existence of the MML version of the Longbow- "at this body-punching range, he's harmless and I can deal with his friends while he tries to back away from- wait, what do you mean SRMs?")

This got a nice sensible chuckle from me :)
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Savage Coyote

  • CamoSpecs
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2899
  • 저는 미술 선생님 입니다.
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #20 on: 28 February 2015, 14:38:24 »
Isn't it great when that happens? It's no big deal, just a _______, OH GOD I FORGOT ABOUT THAT VERSION!

(This exact scenario is how I discovered the very existence of the MML version of the Longbow- "at this body-punching range, he's harmless and I can deal with his friends while he tries to back away from- wait, what do you mean SRMs?")

Haha, yeah.

"Wait, it has WHAT?"

"Yeah, sorry, forgot to mention that when i was shooting early.  Or, I just didn't shoot that weapon to mess with your head or, well, honestly, it's your fault for not asking"  ;D

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 24991
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #21 on: 28 February 2015, 16:37:11 »
I like it, the original variant is good for if you don't have a good pilot, helps them keep up with more season pilots in terms of gunnery skills making them slightly more usable in campaign.   XL can make thing cost more, but frankly i don't mind that if you get something out of it.
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25783
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #22 on: 28 February 2015, 17:28:44 »
Isn't it great when that happens? It's no big deal, just a _______, OH GOD I FORGOT ABOUT THAT VERSION!

(This exact scenario is how I discovered the very existence of the MML version of the Longbow- "at this body-punching range, he's harmless and I can deal with his friends while he tries to back away from- wait, what do you mean SRMs?")

That reminds me of the time that I introduced my friends to the HBK-6S Hunchback.  Which has a 6/9 movement profile.  >:D

Now regarding the Battle Hawk, it's definitely a fun light mech.  One of my favorite uses for it is actually when I'm training beginning players- I give them a decent but not spectacular medium mech, and fact them using a BH.  The Hawk is powerful enough that it's not a one-sided scenario, but at the same time it's not going to just stomp them barring extraordinary circumstances, creating a good challenge without much risk of excess frustration.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #23 on: 28 February 2015, 21:19:13 »
That reminds me of the time that I introduced my friends to the HBK-6S Hunchback.  Which has a 6/9 movement profile.  >:D

I did that with infantry once. It may take forever to get a Maniple of jump troops across a map using only foot movement, but when they finally get there and someone thinks they're safe on the other side of a small hill...it's totally worth it. }:)
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25783
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #24 on: 28 February 2015, 21:24:19 »
Yeah, my friend had thought he'd moved his Awesome far enough back to avoid getting flanked. >:D
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

blackjack

  • When you're a professional pirate ...
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1008
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #25 on: 28 February 2015, 22:12:07 »
Do have to say it does have a Marik feel to it. Agree 110% with Weirdo about the Hammer Battlehawk lance. Its a great mech for citytech. Good movement & damage for profile knife fighting in the city.
#704

Nikas_Zekeval

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1624
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #26 on: 28 February 2015, 22:27:46 »
Frankly I find it too specialized, and several important questions weren't answered in the design for me to like this mech.

What is this mech's purpose?  It's speed says 'cheep harasser'.  Save it has an armament loadout of an infighter.  The armament says infighter, save in an era where mechs two and a half times it's mass can move just as fast it is unlikely to be able to close easily or control the range.

I'm not against using an XL engine, but they do induce a weakness in the design.  As long as the payout in speed, firepower, or protection covers for that then we are good.  Save this only saves three tons, and the speed was anemic for it's size even before the Clans showed up.  And they specifically beefed the protection up for the Clan front!  Given the 11th heat sink is superfluous outside of external heat or engine damage?  Dumping a MPL or the SSRM-2 can easily get you to standard engine.  Hell just pitching that extra DHS frees up enough mass to push the design to a more reasonable 6/9/6.

Frankly this mech looks like it was thrown together with no one paying attention to how the parts were going to function as a whole.  Really in terms of role this feels like the Battlehawk, not the Fireball, should have been the anti-BA expert.  Against Elementals the AMS to blunt the missile pack salvos, and Streaks plus triple MPLs can whittle down the points quickly.  Even the excess cooling fits, for inferno missiles if clearing out Salamander points.
« Last Edit: 28 February 2015, 22:29:39 by Nikas_Zekeval »

glitterboy2098

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12023
    • The Temple Grounds - My Roleplaying and History website
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #27 on: 28 February 2015, 22:43:07 »
keep in mind it dates to 3053. very early in the clan war period. pretty much right as the invasion ended. odds are the base chassis design predated the clans arriving, and like a lot of mechs, they quickly refit the weapons loads using data from the fights with the clans before going to production.

and anti-elemental might well have been on their minds.. certainly raiding was, since the MPL+streak loadout means greatly reduced reliance on logistics in the field. the slower speed isn't as big of an issue if it's being used as an escort for a heavier design as well.. and to be honest, a lot of clan lights are fairly slow themselves.

actually, i wonder what the original idea was.. it's weapons fraction and speed suggests something vaguely Pantherish.. the original mech might even have been intended as a 'Panther killer'
« Last Edit: 28 February 2015, 22:54:20 by glitterboy2098 »

Col.Hengist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9189
  • Konrad ' Hengist " Littman Highlander 732b
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #28 on: 28 February 2015, 23:53:18 »
Original idea? Upgraded commando. Battle hawk commando lances are good too.
Lyran Commonwealth,6th Donegal Guards-Nightstar
Marian Hegemony, II Legio-Cataphract
Clan Hell's Horses, Gamma Galaxy-Summoner
Clan Grinch goat- gamma goat.

Hellraiser

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13066
  • Cry Havoc and Unleash the Gods of Fiat.
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #29 on: 04 March 2015, 14:57:04 »
It's how I keep things like Falcon Hawks, Hammers, and Hellbringers alive long enough to dish out surprising amounts of damage. 8)
Ditto, so very Ditto.

Quote
While I haven't actually used the Battle Hawk in any form yet, my initial impressions certainly fit in with many others. Use the -305 as an escort to discourage close attacks from hovertanks and other fast backstabbers, and make the -306 the close-quarters finisher of a cavalry or striker lance.
I've had them on the battlefield all of 1-2x in 20 years.  Its just not a unit I pick.  But I've seen others do it.  If you keep it protected it has the accuracy to be a decent bodyguard and with 5JJ it should never be on anyone's "Easiest Target #'s" list.
3041: General Lance Hawkins: The Equalizers
3053: Star Colonel Rexor Kerensky: The Silver Wolves

"I don't shoot Urbanmechs, I walk up, stomp on their foot, wait for the head to pop open & drop in a hand grenade (or Elemental)" - Joel47
Against mechs, infantry have two options: Run screaming from Godzilla, or giggle under your breath as the arrogant fools blunder into your trap. - Weirdo

Orin J.

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2785
  • I am to feared! Aw, come on guys...
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #30 on: 05 March 2015, 01:50:48 »
i personally like the idea of using the little brawlers as low-priority guards for fire support. they're tough enough to stand up to most backstabbers and carry enough firepower to keep 'em at arm's length with just enough movement to intercept.

also they're fluffed with the full-head ejection cockpit thing, which is a valuable safeguard when you're the sort of player that the gamemaster takes personally.
The Grey Death Legion? Dead? Gotcha, wake me when it's back.....
--------------------------
Every once in a while things make sense.


Don't let these moments alarm you. They pass.

cold1

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4881
  • Goon
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #31 on: 05 March 2015, 08:15:05 »
Isn't it great when that happens? It's no big deal, just a _______, OH GOD I FORGOT ABOUT THAT VERSION!


Hey when I came back to the game I got MegaMek and just started playing a star of my clan favorites versus random IS companies.  Started at equal BV2 then 150% etc.
I had a lot of those moments.  Hello Rifleman meet my Night Gyr prime!  Wait, he fired what at me? A RAC5... oh 2 RAC5's, dang!  Um, why is there a pile of parts where my Night Gyr was... Ooooh, crap.

That and one of the newer IS quads (I don't know which one, too many dang mechs) that killed a Mad Dog and Summoner in pretty short order.  It finally died when my Executioner (which it also chewed on pretty good) Alpha'd it to death at 4 or 5 hexes. 

I like when bad mechs get good updates.  Good enough to become very useable but not impress enough to attract attention.


To the patient go the spoils

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #32 on: 05 March 2015, 08:28:29 »
Yeah, had that happen myself a little while back. ;D These days, I like to test out the forces I build for my weekly in-store games by throwing them at 3-4 bots in similar-BVed random forces in a big free-for-all(basically mimicking the in-store games). Recently had a bot spend a while wandering in a corner after defeating the token stuff that deployed near it, then come after me. No real problems, but it was quite a rude surprise when it got close, and who the hell put an Ultra-20 on a Paladin!? >:(
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

WarGod

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1279
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #33 on: 05 March 2015, 16:58:12 »
I actually like it as a light trooper.  tough enough to take a bit of a beating, carries just enough fire power in a small package to be a surprise.  I only used it once though, and it was a escort to keep my heavies, or LRM boats from being flanked.
A knight in shining armor is a man who has never had his metal truly tested
You're falling through the air in a Grenadier. Style went out the window long before you did.

GreekFire

  • Aeternus Ignis
  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3881
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #34 on: 05 March 2015, 17:22:25 »
Man I completely forgot about the very existence of this thing
Tu habites au Québec? Tu veux jouer au BattleTech? Envoie-moi un message!

DoctorMonkey

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2583
  • user briefly known as Khan of Clan Sex Panther
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #35 on: 05 March 2015, 18:09:58 »
I'd see it as a perfect close range support/escort for long ranged units like a Longbow or basic Awesome (standard PPCs and a Small Laser Of Victory) or even the mammoth multi-Gauss Thunderhawk


In a campaign setting, units of these might be good for running recon for slow moving convoys against ambush and using 'Mech sensors to look for mines and things
Avatar stollen from spacebattles.com motivational posters thread

ChanMan: "Capellan Ingenuity: The ability to lose battles to Davion forces in new and implausible ways"

Ian Sharpe

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2143
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #36 on: 09 March 2015, 20:16:14 »
I like it mostly as a BA hunter.  For mech combat its not that its slow, its average speed/mobility and short-ranged, which has made for some frustrating games.  The 305 mixes in kinda nicely with Hollanders and Wolfhounds in all light games.  The 306's ERMLs do a nice job of making it more a threat. 

Redshirt

  • Iron Banner Addict
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 843
  • Please wait while I make my Perception Roll
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #37 on: 10 March 2015, 19:24:40 »
I think either version of the Battlehawk would serve as a great complement to the other predominant 5/8/5 Mech in the AFFS arsenal, the Valkyrie. Have it serve (as several others have suggested) as a close escort in a Medium/Light Fire lance with a pair of the Valkyries and a Dervish...
I am one with the Force, and the Force is with me.

This is a Sham! This is a Mockery! This is a... a... TRAVISHAMOCKERY!!!!!!

Wrong. Utterly and completely wrong. Wrong wrong wrong. You're wrong. You couldn't be more wrong. You're the creamy filling of wrongness in the middle of the wrong donut with brightly colored sprinkles of wrongness on top. You're wrong.

Black_Knyght

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1897
  • Nisi mors certum est in bello
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #38 on: 24 February 2016, 22:52:24 »
Side note- this earns big props with me for being possibly the single most improved miniature in the Battletech line, from just awful to really cool (the Fireball shares this distinction). Looking forward to doing another resculpt sometime.




THAT really is a jaw-dropping improvement! I wish they'd do something similar with the Gunslinger, and fix those spindly arms! Maybe into something more like the arms on the MAD-5L miniature.

« Last Edit: 24 February 2016, 23:11:30 by Black_Knyght »

Black_Knyght

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1897
  • Nisi mors certum est in bello
Re: Lets talk about...the Battle Hawk
« Reply #39 on: 26 February 2016, 18:08:49 »
Here's my feeble attempt to improve the Battle Hawk. Not the best of solutions maybe, but it's a tough design to fix.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=51368.0

 

Register