Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
21
So how many of you who bought the Urbie LAM pack are going to paint them in the colors of your favorite Macross Valkyrie?

Mine's currently slated to be the Robot Prince of Auchtertool. :cool:
22
BattleMechs / Re: Enforcer III ENF-7NAIS
« Last post by Isokrates on Today at 16:18:29 »
no crits and no tonnage left
23
Aerospace Combat / Re: FC Naval Command Decision
« Last post by Hellraiser on Today at 16:17:13 »
I disagree to an extent, the Fox isn't so much a 'Starter ship' as it is a platonic example of an armed transport ship for a ground military.

......

Their logical next step, is a step down from the Fox-at least, in tonnage, something that can be produced in larger quantities and fill patrol, intelligence, convoy
escort/interdiction, and training roles.

1.  Honestly, having your Starter be something that is an "Armed Transport" isn't entirely a bad thing.
It can be handed over to the Army & used exactly as planned.
It's also not a bad "Taskforce" ship in the 3050/60's when most Taskforces are a Warship surrounded by Jump/Dropships.

2.  In an ideal world I don't disagree that a "proper" corvette is a must have v/s an "Army Transport".
But at the same time, I'm looking to work w/ what we have in canon or planned for in canon.
The Suns have never had a Corvette & the Durendal is something that was planned for & they have a history as a Destroyer Navy with the Davion-I/II.


I'm still pro Destroyer, a ship optimized for destroying Fighters, Dropships, and Missiles would be best as those are still going to be the main threats for any Fleet. Something more like the Baron but better. With fewer but more powerful lasers and a pair of dropships to make it a more versatile space combatant that doesn't need the deep bunkers of capital missiles an Avalon requires and can threaten a Thera Task Force or Clan Cruiser if necessary.
Agreed on Destroy, not on the Baron.
As I mentioned above, I'm more thinking a Davion-II/York type vessel, possibly with some Monolith thrown it since the FC seems to have a thing for Docking Collars these days.
I wouldn't be opposed to it being a smaller Destroyer since the Monolith idea originally came to me in a "using 3025 JS yards" post Jihad.
Something the size of a Vincent/Monolith that can be made at a JS sized shipyard isn't a bad idea for resources.
24
Duplicate post. Sorry!
25
So how many of you who bought the Urbie LAM pack are going to paint them in the colors of your favorite Macross Valkyrie?
I'm holding off on ordering the Urbie pack. I ordered the Star League pack instead. The two 40th anniversary boxes are my next priority, then I'll worry about the flying urbz.

I will be buying all the UrbanMechs. I've got heaps of Marlboro Miles and S&H Green Stamps that I've been saving for a special occasion.
Dude, I remember back in the 70's, my grandma bought a TV with Green Stamps.  :grin:
26
[I think] They will send you a code to use that you input on check out and that will activate the credit.  If you do not use it all then the rest remains on your account.

I do not think we can put it in on just our account settings.  Although you could find a $0 item (.pdf), put in the code, get a cool .pdf and then get the funds put into the system.

It didn't have a code attached to it. I'm in no hurry so I'll probably just wait until after the kickstarter has shipped to everyone. I figure they'll have their hands full from right now til everyone on the globe has their packages in hand. And probably after that!
27
BattleMechs / Re: Enforcer III ENF-7NAIS
« Last post by Daryk on Today at 15:49:39 »
Not bad... did you consider a Small Pulse and another DHS?  Or are there not enough crits for that?
28
BattleMechs / Re: Filling in the Syberian AutoMechs (Open Thread)
« Last post by Daryk on Today at 15:47:47 »
Maybe make the ammo "hand held"? ;D
29
I assume crits are the limit? ???
30
So how many of you who bought the Urbie LAM pack are going to paint them in the colors of your favorite Macross Valkyrie?
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10