Author Topic: Star Trek Discovery  (Read 164058 times)

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #540 on: 06 November 2017, 12:28:32 »
rules of the game, Kentares-Prequels and reboots are flat easier for modern hollywood, and it's more or less in fashion at the moment.  witness: Gotham, as a prime example.

Lazyness, lack of imagination and a quicker grab of money are the rules...
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

skiltao

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1218
    • SkilTao's Gaming Blog
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #541 on: 06 November 2017, 13:15:16 »
I dont want easier episodes to watch. I want big overarching stories (hence DS9 is my favorite Star Trek show).

When I say "easy" I mean that the episode is interesting and engaging. I like big overarching stories too, there's just something about DS9's that's losing value for me on this rewatch.

Quote
Discovery is set 10 years before TOS. Im talking about that specifically. I dont want anymore stories about Star Trek past (which is what Discovery is doing). I want stories set much after VOY/DS9 (not that Enterprise time-travel and timeline-hopping nonsense).

So basically, put more focus on the Federation's political situation than on sci-fi novelty or technological futurism? Or would Discovery's plot so far be fine if they just changed the dates and replaced the Klingons with, say, the Cardassians or Jem'Hadar?
Blog: currently working on BattleMech manufacturing rates. (Faction Intros project will resume eventually.)
History of BattleTech: Handy chart for returning players. (last updated end of 2012)

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #542 on: 06 November 2017, 17:35:11 »
So basically, put more focus on the Federation's political situation than on sci-fi novelty or technological futurism? Or would Discovery's plot so far be fine if they just changed the dates and replaced the Klingons with, say, the Cardassians or Jem'Hadar?

Neither (or in a way both). A couple of examples that COULD be interesting (with a small or big timeline jump - pick your flavour depending on whats already canon by past series):

- What are the XXX doing now? (insert your favorite alien former (still?) "enemy" race (i.e. Borg, Jem'Hadar/Dominion, Breen, Species 8472)
- Whats the fallout (if any) of the Dominion War in Federation space (social, political, etc... - timeline jump dependent)?
- What new races/dangers/tech (spore drive anyone?) exist?
- Star Trek split the Milky Way in 4 quadrants. Is nothing more to discover about it? Isnt there anything else beyond?
- Civil War? (not serious but... - only took our own FedCom Civil war idea)
- New danger from beyond the galaxy?
- Explore neighbour galaxy with newly invented spore drive?
- Did past time jumps made by some characters payed off on the long run? (thinking of Janeway in the last VOY episode for example if someone cares about that of course)
- Search for Kirk? (im joking)

Some random general thoughts. If you want I could expand on those or try to come up with more but I guess you get the idea. Im also lazy but at least I dont have to earn my income writing Star Trek episodes.

Damn it. I bet that if we here in this topic join our ideas we can come up with a couple of cool concepts for a Star Trek series that doesnt suck big time and doesnt do past mistakes and doesnt redo canon as we know it.

All can boil down to what style one aims when doing a Star Trek series (storywise I mean).
« Last Edit: 06 November 2017, 17:48:19 by Kentares »
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

skiltao

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1218
    • SkilTao's Gaming Blog
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #543 on: 07 November 2017, 10:41:30 »
Huh, so your priority really is that you don't want existing material to be touched. That's understandable.

Damn it. I bet that if we here in this topic join our ideas we can come up with a couple of cool concepts for a Star Trek series that doesnt suck big time and doesnt do past mistakes and doesnt redo canon as we know it.

All can boil down to what style one aims when doing a Star Trek series (storywise I mean).

Well, after my last watch-through of TOS, I wrote this up. It'd be easy enough to scratch the serial numbers off and put it in a newer era.
Blog: currently working on BattleMech manufacturing rates. (Faction Intros project will resume eventually.)
History of BattleTech: Handy chart for returning players. (last updated end of 2012)

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #544 on: 07 November 2017, 13:07:46 »
Huh, so your priority really is that you don't want existing material to be touched. That's understandable.

Thought I was clear enough since my first or second post about this show. I want the future. NOT a rehash of the past.

Quote
Well, after my last watch-through of TOS, I wrote this up. It'd be easy enough to scratch the serial numbers off and put it in a newer era.

No because its done. A couple of good writers could come up with new stuff (could be inspired in previous stories or other sources instead of mangling old ones).
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

skiltao

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1218
    • SkilTao's Gaming Blog
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #545 on: 07 November 2017, 15:35:45 »
Thought I was clear enough since my first or second post about this show. I want the future. NOT a rehash of the past.

There are many reasons why a person would say they "want the future, not a rehash of the past." Not all of those reasons are straightforward.

Quote
No because its done. A couple of good writers could come up with new stuff (could be inspired in previous stories or other sources instead of mangling old ones).

When I say "file the serial numbers off" I mean to have new characters patterned on these old ones, the way Jadzia was patterned on the Trill from that single episode of TNG.
Blog: currently working on BattleMech manufacturing rates. (Faction Intros project will resume eventually.)
History of BattleTech: Handy chart for returning players. (last updated end of 2012)

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #546 on: 07 November 2017, 19:09:52 »
When I say "file the serial numbers off" I mean to have new characters patterned on these old ones, the way Jadzia was patterned on the Trill from that single episode of TNG.

Misunderstood you. Sorry. Yes. That is an example (a very simple one).
« Last Edit: 07 November 2017, 19:49:41 by Kentares »
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

I am Belch II

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10148
  • It's a gator with a nuke, whats the problem.
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #547 on: 07 November 2017, 19:49:35 »
So the Discovery went to Pandora from Avatar! That's all I was thinking about that planet.
Walking the fine line between sarcasm and being a smart-ass

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #548 on: 07 November 2017, 19:53:17 »
When I say "file the serial numbers off" I mean to have new characters patterned on these old ones, the way Jadzia was patterned on the Trill from that single episode of TNG.

See, that's the kind of thing that amuses me, because between TNG and DS9 they changed the look of the Trills, the way the symbiont interacted with the host, and that a host could live after the symbiont was removed.  Compared to that, Discovery is a paragon of canonicity.
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

(SMD)MadCow

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 834
  • 1st Earl of the Bixby Duchy
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #549 on: 07 November 2017, 20:11:37 »
See, that's the kind of thing that amuses me, because between TNG and DS9 they changed the look of the Trills, the way the symbiont interacted with the host, and that a host could live after the symbiont was removed.  Compared to that, Discovery is a paragon of canonicity.

Which is way more acceptable than if Enterprise or Discovery made it so Trills had tribal tatoos instead of spots and changed hosts by chest bursting.

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25783
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #550 on: 07 November 2017, 21:06:00 »
See, that's the kind of thing that amuses me, because between TNG and DS9 they changed the look of the Trills, the way the symbiont interacted with the host, and that a host could live after the symbiont was removed.  Compared to that, Discovery is a paragon of canonicity.

The difference is that the stuff about Trills in TNG was from a single, minor episode.  It can be handwaved as early installment weirdness from before the canon was set.  Sort of like the way the Dire Wolf was referred to as a dropship in the Blood of Kerensky trilogy instead of a warship.  Discovery is changing things that have been established in canon by many many episodes across multiple series.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Blackhorse 6

  • Night Stalker Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • Uh huh...
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #551 on: 07 November 2017, 22:18:22 »
Neither (or in a way both). A couple of examples that COULD be interesting (with a small or big timeline jump - pick your flavour depending on whats already canon by past series):

- What are the XXX doing now? (insert your favorite alien former (still?) "enemy" race (i.e. Borg, Jem'Hadar/Dominion, Breen, Species 8472)
- Whats the fallout (if any) of the Dominion War in Federation space (social, political, etc... - timeline jump dependent)?
- What new races/dangers/tech (spore drive anyone?) exist?
- Star Trek split the Milky Way in 4 quadrants. Is nothing more to discover about it? Isnt there anything else beyond?
- Civil War? (not serious but... - only took our own FedCom Civil war idea)
- New danger from beyond the galaxy?
- Explore neighbour galaxy with newly invented spore drive?
- Did past time jumps made by some characters payed off on the long run? (thinking of Janeway in the last VOY episode for example if someone cares about that of course)
- Search for Kirk? (im joking)

Some random general thoughts. If you want I could expand on those or try to come up with more but I guess you get the idea. Im also lazy but at least I dont have to earn my income writing Star Trek episodes.

Damn it. I bet that if we here in this topic join our ideas we can come up with a couple of cool concepts for a Star Trek series that doesnt suck big time and doesnt do past mistakes and doesnt redo canon as we know it.

All can boil down to what style one aims when doing a Star Trek series (storywise I mean).


Star Trek Online has the answer to most of your questions. ;)

Blackhorse 6

  • Night Stalker Moderator
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1455
  • Uh huh...
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #552 on: 07 November 2017, 22:20:51 »
It wouldn't be Trek without a top bridge, exploding consoles and throwing people around.

That's why the Andorians questioned Earth design stylings.

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #553 on: 08 November 2017, 02:40:26 »
Discovery is changing things that have been established in canon by many many episodes across multiple series.

The only things Discovery has changed is visuals.  The actual important content all fits into canon.
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #554 on: 08 November 2017, 06:16:33 »
The only things Discovery has changed is visuals.  The actual important content all fits into canon.

Here we go again. The "actual important content" doesnt fit canon in anyway. Read my and others posts in this topic about all that.
« Last Edit: 08 November 2017, 06:20:10 by Kentares »
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #555 on: 08 November 2017, 14:13:29 »
Here we go again. The "actual important content" doesnt fit canon in anyway. Read my and others posts in this topic about all that.

I have, every point is either conjecture, incorrect, unaware of other canon sources that corroborate Discovery, or makes assumptions that have yet to be borne out as correct.
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #556 on: 08 November 2017, 14:30:20 »
I have, every point is either conjecture, incorrect, unaware of other canon sources that corroborate Discovery, or makes assumptions that have yet to be borne out as correct.

Ahahah. Ok. Klingon drag queens fits into which one? Mudd being a psycho? Sarek having an adopted human and no one ever mentioned her? Radically changing ships looks? Starfleet uniforms change once again...

Anyone feel free to add.

Lorcan you need to say it loud: "Im a fanboy and whatever they do Im going to like it... whatever it is!"
« Last Edit: 08 November 2017, 14:40:30 by Kentares »
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

Maingunnery

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7179
  • Pirates and C3 masters are on the hitlist
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #557 on: 08 November 2017, 14:33:49 »
I have, every point is either conjecture, incorrect, unaware of other canon sources that corroborate Discovery, or makes assumptions that have yet to be borne out as correct.
Sorry Lorcan, a lot of people including myself disagree. I know that you like the show, but I think that your post just sounds like a mantra to many of us. 
Herb: "Well, now I guess we'll HAVE to print it. Sounds almost like the apocalypse I've been working for...."

The Society:Fan XTRO & Field Manual
Nebula California: HyperTube Xtreme
Nebula Confederation Ships

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #558 on: 08 November 2017, 14:37:20 »
Ahahah. Ok. For example Klingon drag queens fits into which one?

No male Klingon has been wearing women's clothes as a humorous impersonation.

Sorry Lorcan, a lot of people including myself disagree. I know that you like the show, but I think that your post just sounds like a mantra to many of us. 

And it doesn't stop it being true.  If you don't like the show, that's one thing, and that's fine.  But to claim that it's bad because it breaks canon because of X, Y and Z - but they're not actually breaking canon, that's intellectually dishonest.  And if you think it's bad because it looks different?  That's OK, but to claim it's breaking canon because it looks different, then every Trek breaks canon because they all changed the way things looked without explanation, and therefore it's an invalid complaint.
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #559 on: 08 November 2017, 14:42:27 »
And it doesn't stop it being true.  If you don't like the show, that's one thing, and that's fine.  But to claim that it's bad because it breaks canon because of X, Y and Z - but they're not actually breaking canon, that's intellectually dishonest.  And if you think it's bad because it looks different?  That's OK, but to claim it's breaking canon because it looks different, then every Trek breaks canon because they all changed the way things looked without explanation, and therefore it's an invalid complaint.

Now youre being dishonest. They broke canon since episode 1 but you dont want to see it. Thats ok. Just move on.
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #560 on: 08 November 2017, 14:43:42 »
Now youre being dishonest. They broke canon since episode 1 but you dont want to see it. Thats ok. Just move on.

I'll bite, how did they break canon in episode 1?
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

Kentares

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 628
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #561 on: 08 November 2017, 14:55:52 »
I'll bite, how did they break canon in episode 1?

For what? Whatever I write youre going to reply with your favorite phrase "either conjecture, incorrect, unaware of other canon sources that corroborate Discovery, or makes assumptions that have yet to be borne out as correct... oh and visuals doesnt count" so no point to keep this going. Enjoy Discovery.
Star Wars ST and Star Trek current shows are crap.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #562 on: 08 November 2017, 14:57:28 »
Okay, EVERYBODY needs to step back, take a few hundred deep breaths, and calm the hell down. [copper]
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

pensiveswetness

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1039
  • Delete this account, please?
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #563 on: 09 November 2017, 01:00:11 »
*eats Popcorn* So when is the Pillow fight?

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 24991
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #564 on: 09 November 2017, 07:48:34 »
*eats Popcorn* So when is the Pillow fight?
*points to the Self-Destruct codes being activated.*  I think we may have a big bang of a finale.



All silliness aside, were all going to be disagreeing with this. Star Trek is very core of science fiction fandom.
Some changes happen, some people will like it and some won't.  At least there passion for it despite changes made people may and may not like.

For me I'm just waiting it out see how this does.  I wasn't crazy about alot things with Discovery. I thought Klingon ships were downright strange from what I've seen of the battle scenes from the pilot.  One them look like flying church steeple i think was Klingon Bird of prey-ish ship.
« Last Edit: 09 November 2017, 22:34:22 by Wrangler »
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10401
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #565 on: 09 November 2017, 09:31:11 »
*eats Popcorn* So when is the Pillow fight?

Klingons are doing pillow fights now? My how the mighty have fallen....
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40818
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #566 on: 09 November 2017, 09:39:17 »
Don't be so sure. Pillows can be badass...
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Foxx Ital

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3180
  • Still Clanilicious
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #567 on: 09 November 2017, 10:23:05 »
Iv been enjoying the show. The klingons arent very klingy to me, but i remember my biological dad complaining about the ng klingons.
 Im cool with all the changes, especially since if you made a TOS bridge style, it would come off as cheesy. Remaking visuals is par for the course when the previous series have been off air for years. Plus "canon" seems to shift in the wind depending on which show and whos writing.
 Plus, i like hearing spocks dad had a not talked about adopted daughter who he enda up sacrificing for spocks career, only to have that all blow up in his face. My only complaint is there needs to be more mudd and space pew pew battles.
 
Clan Ghost Bear:  We may not like you, but you're not bothering us, so you may exist.
 If your BA tactics can't be described as shenanigans, you're probably doing it wrong. ^-^ -Weirdo
 <Kojak> Yeah, there's definitely a learning curve with BA, But once you learn how to use 'em well they're addictive,heck, just look at what happened to Foxx ;-)
<Steve_Restless> its YOU who I shouldn't underestimate. I could give you a broom handle and I'd find you sitting on top of the enemy stormcrow, smug surat grin on your face

Lorcan Nagle

  • 75 tons of heavy metal mayhem
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12138
  • We're back, baby!
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #568 on: 09 November 2017, 14:22:20 »
Klingons are doing pillow fights now? My how the mighty have fallen....

It's a more practical weapon than the Bat'leth
The moderator formerly known as the user formerly known as nenechan

YingJanshi

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4511
  • Switch Friend Code: SW-4326-4622-8514
Re: Star Trek Discovery
« Reply #569 on: 09 November 2017, 15:38:39 »
*eats Popcorn* So when is the Pillow fight?


Initiate of the Order of Valhalla

(HBS: Backer #4,960)
(Clan Invasion: Backer #314)
(Mercenaries: Backer #6,017)

 

Register