Author Topic: MotW: Kingfisher  (Read 64266 times)

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #120 on: 25 March 2018, 10:34:20 »
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

The Eagle

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2308
  • This is what peak performance looks like!
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #121 on: 26 March 2018, 09:16:09 »
Bushwacker, Lineholder, Spartan, Piranha, Night Gyr, T Hawk, Devastator, Pillager...and those are just the good looking ones I can think of off the top of my head.
RIP Dan Schulz, 09 November 2009.  May the Albatross ever fly high.

Hit me up for BattleTech in the WV Panhandle!

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8157
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #122 on: 26 March 2018, 10:47:03 »
I'd not even say those :s The Emperor's AC's are so wide bore that it looks like its had mech scale party poppers strapped to its arms instead of cannons.  It is really a case of re-do the lot.
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #123 on: 26 March 2018, 12:28:02 »

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #124 on: 31 July 2019, 09:22:15 »
My intern just 3D Printed a great re sculpt of the C variant. Is it ok to post pics?

Empyrus

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9121
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #125 on: 31 July 2019, 09:24:56 »
My intern just 3D Printed a great re sculpt of the C variant. Is it ok to post pics?
You better ask mods or admins about that.
See the rule 10 thing:
https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=5.0

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21733
  • Third time this week!
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #126 on: 31 July 2019, 10:08:19 »
I'll make it easy.

Nope.

Nothing personal, but we exist at the whims of lawyers, and our rules reflect THEIR rules. I'm sure it's an awesome miniature, but it can't get posted here.
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #127 on: 31 July 2019, 10:28:10 »
I'll make it easy.

Nope.

Nothing personal, but we exist at the whims of lawyers, and our rules reflect THEIR rules. I'm sure it's an awesome miniature, but it can't get posted here.

No worries I thought it best to ask first

Tyler Jorgensson

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2877
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #128 on: 31 July 2019, 15:18:43 »
Not to get off topic but I love the fact that you have an intern that enjoys Battletech.

‘Hey Intern: Fridays your review day: bring your minis for a Trial of Position at this company. Selya!”

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 24998
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #129 on: 31 July 2019, 17:51:32 »
Not to get off topic but I love the fact that you have an intern that enjoys Battletech.

‘Hey Intern: Fridays your review day: bring your minis for a Trial of Position at this company. Selya!”
Lol.  You should have trialed it with Kingfishers. See who last man standing.
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #130 on: 31 July 2019, 20:10:42 »
Not to get off topic but I love the fact that you have an intern that enjoys Battletech.

‘Hey Intern: Fridays your review day: bring your minis for a Trial of Position at this company. Selya!”

Lol I noticed he had 3D printed Pokémon and I asked if he could help me out

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1816
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #131 on: 08 August 2019, 10:15:09 »
Because it’s such a solid dump truck of a mech did the fisher see a spike in production during and right after the WOR?

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25794
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #132 on: 08 August 2019, 10:17:29 »
No.

As a matter of fact, I believe the Kingfisher's production line was destroyed.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

mbear

  • Stood Far Back When The Gravitas Was Handed Out
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4498
    • Tower of Jade
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #133 on: 09 August 2019, 06:39:30 »
No.

As a matter of fact, I believe the Kingfisher's production line was destroyed.

I think you're mistaken.
Found it. In the WoR Supplemental, pg 16, bottom of the left column, the Stone Lions sought out and won factories for the Kignfisher. It should be considered the core the Lions' assault OmniMechs going forward. At least that's what I was thinking win I did the 3085 RATs for WoR Supplemental. That said, the Lions took 'Mechs whenever and wherever they could, so initially they'd have a mix of most anything, even things on the Discarded Tools of War list.
Be the Loremaster:

Battletech transport rules take a very feline approach to moving troops in a combat zone: If they fits, they ships.

You bought the box set and are ready to expand your BT experience. Now what? (Thanks Sartis!)

Hellraiser

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13070
  • Cry Havoc and Unleash the Gods of Fiat.
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #134 on: 11 August 2019, 18:34:23 »
I'll make it easy.

Nope.

Nothing personal, but we exist at the whims of lawyers, and our rules reflect THEIR rules. I'm sure it's an awesome miniature, but it can't get posted here.

I gotta ask since this seems to contradict other things I've seen.

But when someone makes there own Warhammer from greenstuff & spare parts, & post pics in the minis section, or posts pics of their art drawings, how is that different than posting a 3D print out?

Advertising to sell them I could see, but if you are just posting your home crafted artistic creations, how is that one wrong?
3041: General Lance Hawkins: The Equalizers
3053: Star Colonel Rexor Kerensky: The Silver Wolves

"I don't shoot Urbanmechs, I walk up, stomp on their foot, wait for the head to pop open & drop in a hand grenade (or Elemental)" - Joel47
Against mechs, infantry have two options: Run screaming from Godzilla, or giggle under your breath as the arrogant fools blunder into your trap. - Weirdo

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40820
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #135 on: 11 August 2019, 20:02:27 »
Simple: You haven't been specifically told not to post greenstuff Warhammers. You have been specifically told not to post printed minis.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Greatclub

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3060
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #136 on: 12 August 2019, 03:10:02 »
I gotta ask since this seems to contradict other things I've seen.

But when someone makes there own Warhammer from greenstuff & spare parts, & post pics in the minis section, or posts pics of their art drawings, how is that different than posting a 3D print out?

Advertising to sell them I could see, but if you are just posting your home crafted artistic creations, how is that one wrong?

IANAL. Take this with a grain of salt.

1) The battletech IP is split. Topps owns one half, Microsoft the other. As they are both huge companies, neither wants to poke the other.

2) Nobody unauthorized is allowed to make money off the IP. Since it can't (easily) be proven that no money changed hands in the production of that print, WHACK

3) MWO prints are directly derived from MWO (Read: Microsoft) IP. Given the process, it's much harder to say the same about green stuff sculpts.

4) A lawyer said so because lawyer reasons and the definitions of "fair use". Go to law school to figure them out.
« Last Edit: 12 August 2019, 14:59:37 by Greatclub »

wantec

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3875
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #137 on: 12 August 2019, 06:48:05 »
I think you're mistaken.
And as a follow on to this, the Lions would keep the factory in production as long as needed. If they hit a stockpile of resources that made other production a better choice they might switch. Or if they created their own design, etc.
BEN ROME YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD, I READ YOUR BOOK!


Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 24998
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #138 on: 12 August 2019, 07:12:53 »
And as a follow on to this, the Lions would keep the factory in production as long as needed. If they hit a stockpile of resources that made other production a better choice they might switch. Or if they created their own design, etc.
Maybe a hybrid of this one called the LionKing. (runs)
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25794
  • It's just my goth phase
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #139 on: 12 August 2019, 10:38:22 »
I think you're mistaken.

So I am.  Must have been thinking about new production being unavailable to the IS Clans or something.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

wantec

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3875
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #140 on: 12 August 2019, 14:54:12 »
Maybe a hybrid of this one called the LionKing. (runs)
It'd be a quad inspired by the Kingfisher
BEN ROME YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD, I READ YOUR BOOK!


Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #141 on: 13 August 2019, 02:10:25 »
And as a follow on to this, the Lions would keep the factory in production as long as needed. If they hit a stockpile of resources that made other production a better choice they might switch. Or if they created their own design, etc.

As I always say in these situations, why build a 200 year old Mech when you can build a 1 year old Mech? Battletech abstracts a lot of things. Even if the old Mech is functionally the same in the game board there will be lots of little improvements made over the preceding years e.g. ease of maintenance, ergonomics, monomer material, that makes the new Mech better.

Greatclub

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3060
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #142 on: 13 August 2019, 02:19:21 »
As I always say in these situations, why build a 200 year old Mech when you can build a 1 year old Mech? Battletech abstracts a lot of things. Even if the old Mech is functionally the same in the game board there will be lots of little improvements made over the preceding years e.g. ease of maintenance, ergonomics, monomer material, that makes the new Mech better.

Wasn't that the case with the Stormcrow? One of the three or four most brutal mechs in tro 3050, and we later learn that it was being phased out as a relic with bad ergonomics.

Why not just give the basic frame a working over as with the vulture/vulture II is my question.

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21733
  • Third time this week!
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #143 on: 13 August 2019, 08:00:08 »
That holds particularly true in the case of a big lunk like this thing, with almost everything on it being basic entry-level equipment. There's only so long one can patch machinery up before it just doesn't run right anymore (something that, as noted above, Battletech doesn't really care about- which is fine), so when a Kingfisher wears out I would think it would be pretty reasonable to just build a fresh one (or a fresh design!) than to keep fixing up something that is designed to get shot to pieces over and over, as this design in particular is prone to being.
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10401
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #144 on: 16 August 2019, 13:03:33 »
1) The battletech IP is split. Topps owns one half, Microsoft the other. As they are both huge companies, neither wants to poke the other.


If only it were so simple. VWE also has a portion of the IP.
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Starfury

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 787
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #145 on: 18 August 2019, 21:43:55 »
My favorite Clan assault mech. I used it in a campaign back during the early 90s after it was released in Mechforce, and it did great against most Clan and IS units.  Of course that was back when only 3055, 2750, 3050 and 3026 the only TROs available, so...The

Kingfisher forms the anvil for many of my Ghost Bear or Blood Spirit Assault Stars, with faster or better armed units acting as the hammer for the rest of the Star.  They work well in conjunction with any Clan or IS assault/heavy Star/lance, except a fast cavalry unit, and that can always be fixed with a Supercharger.  I still have yet to use in the post Clan Invasion era, but it should hold up well even against monsters like the Hellstar or the Targe...

Caedis Animus

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2129
  • How can a bird be sultry? Very carefully.
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #146 on: 25 August 2019, 01:44:53 »
Why not just give the basic frame a working over as with the vulture/vulture II is my question.
Because that makes sense, and making sense is not the Clan way.

This goes for the Stormcrow and the Kingfisher.

Firesprocket

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2956
  • 3601 S Broad St. Phila. PA 19148
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #147 on: 25 August 2019, 16:31:54 »
Because that makes sense, and making sense is not the Clan way.

This goes for the Stormcrow and the Kingfisher.
What exactly needs to be changed on either design?  If isn't broken, why try and fix it? 

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6124
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #148 on: 26 August 2019, 03:07:23 »
It is hard to make a better Kingfisher. Any useful weight saving technology reduces the survivability that makes it unique. Alternatively improved armours cut too deeply into the limited pod space.

Caedis Animus

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2129
  • How can a bird be sultry? Very carefully.
Re: MotW: Kingfisher
« Reply #149 on: 26 August 2019, 05:09:36 »
What exactly needs to be changed on either design?  If isn't broken, why try and fix it?
The Stormcrow's bad ergonomics and the aging chassis of the Kingfisher.

It's less of a "This mech is awful! And needs a reboot to get better!" problem, and more of a "This mech is great, but would be way better if we updated it without sacrificing what it was known for." sort of issue.

Like, the Blood Asp is great and all, but... It's so far removed from what made the Kingfisher great, to the point of where it's not really the same role anymore, but instead an out-of-left-field change.
« Last Edit: 26 August 2019, 05:12:14 by Caedis Animus »