Author Topic: UnSchrek Type Alpha  (Read 747 times)

Goose

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1393
  • … the Laws on his tail, burning for home …
    • Home of HeavyMetal Pro
UnSchrek Type Alpha
« on: 11 February 2023, 02:59:01 »
Code: [Select]
          BattleTech Vehicle Technical Readout
                      VALIDATED

Type/Model:    UnSchrek Type Alpha
Tech:          Inner Sphere / 3067
Config:        Tracked Vehicle
Rules:         Level 3, Standard design

Mass:          79 tons
Power Plant:   240 Pitban Fusion
Cruise Speed:  32.4 km/h
Maximum Speed: 54.0 km/h
Armor Type:    Standard
Armament:     
  3 Large Pulse Lasers
Manufacturer:  (Unknown)
  Location:    (Unknown)
Communications System:  (Unknown)
Targeting & Tracking System:  (Unknown)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==Capabilities:==
Anti-Aircraft Targeting 4

Oversized -2

--------------------------------------------------------
Type/Model:    UnSchrek Type Alpha
Mass:          79 tons
Construction Options:  Fractional Accounting

Equipment:                                 Items    Mass
Int. Struct.:  40 pts Standard               0      7.90
Engine:        240 Fusion                    0     11.50
Shielding & Transmission Equipment:          0      5.75
    Cruise MP:   3
     Flank MP:   5
Heat Sinks:     30 Single                    0     20.00
Cockpit & Controls:                          0      3.95
Crew: 6 Members                              0       .00
Turret Equipment:                            0      2.10
Armor Factor:  108 pts Standard              0      6.75

                          Internal    Armor
                          Structure   Value
   Front:                     8         32
   Left / Right Sides:        8      22/22
   Rear:                      8         14
   Turret:                    8         18

Weapons and Equipment    Loc  Heat  Ammo   Items    Mass
--------------------------------------------------------
3 Large Pulse Lasers     Turret  30          3     21.00
--------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS:                          30          3     78.95
Items & Tons Left:                          17       .05

Calculated Factors:
Total Cost:        3,625,645 C-Bills
Battle Value 2:    753 (old BV = 480)
Cost per BV:       4,814.93
Weapon Value:      536 / 536 (Ratio = .71 / .71)
Damage Factors:    SRDmg = 26;  MRDmg = 8;  LRDmg = 0
BattleForce2:      MP: 3T,  Armor/Structure: 0 / 5
                   Damage PB/M/L: 3/3/-,  Overheat: 0
                   Class: GH;  Point Value: 8
… Can't just pick any building to ambush from. :laughing_skull:
Goose
The Ancient Egyptian God of Fractional AccountingAnimare Tai-sa Shikishima
I'm always ready to learn, although I do not always like being taught.

ANS Kamas P81

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13253
  • Reimu sees what you have done.
Re: UnSchrek Type Alpha
« Reply #1 on: 11 February 2023, 03:05:42 »
I don't care where you get them from, three LPLs from anyone for 750 BV is mean.  Naturally, love it.  Makes a great companion for regular Schrecks, since you wouldn't tell them apart visually.
Der Hölle Rache kocht in meinem Herzen,
Tod und Verzweiflung flammet um mich her!
Fühlt nicht durch dich Jadefalke Todesschmerzen,
So bist du meine Tochter nimmermehr!

Argus1348

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: UnSchrek Type Alpha
« Reply #2 on: 23 February 2023, 11:37:27 »
I also like that idea. But "Level 3 Rules"? Isn´t that a bit outdated? And apparently you used "Fractional Accounting", but apparently still correct with actual Advanced Rules (see Tactical Operations - Advanced Units & Equipment page 188).

But can anyone help me with the word "Schrek"? I know a construction thread might not be the correct place for the question, but the word isn't english and in german it would be "Schreck" (scare). Is this just a old translation mistake or is that for some reason?

Daryk

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 37640
  • The Double Deuce II/II-σ
Re: UnSchrek Type Alpha
« Reply #3 on: 25 February 2023, 07:36:43 »
According to Sarna, the (mis)spelling was original, but at least it was corrected in German language products.