Y'all keep assuming that money is the biggest limiter on what CGL can produce. ;D
I wonder how many more times I'm going to have to explain that.
If a company like CGL is fully committed resource-wise already, then no pile of cash can produce more product, without stopping doing work already in progress.
Right. I'm saying: butter, bread.
I take no offense at being ignored or repeatedly told 'no' by TPB. Hopefully my 'persistance' doesn't annoy them too much though, because I'm not willing to let the CM's die yet!
Speaking only for myself, I've got nothing against the CMs specifically. My name is in both of them and I put a lot of heart and soul into standardizing some of the presentation and terminology. I've got love.
What I
do have something against is products that are unprofitable OR which do not grow the customer base. Meaning, top-of-the-funnel products that boost overall revenue for the line and, long-term, actually make the bottom of the funnel projects more feasible.
This includes products that may be successful
on their own terms, but which hoover up production resources and create a critically damaging opportunity cost. It's possible that KS or some other mechanism could improve the CM profit picture to where they're feasible to resume producing. But if the writing, art, layout, editing, and development time spent to produce them causes delays or cancellations of product critical to sustaining the line, then a KS for the CMs or whatever other bottom-funnel wish-list project could be a tactical success and a strategic blunder, so to speak.
What I'm trying to say, several times now, is that there are real bandwidth limitations among the production staff. Funding does not guarantee success.