The Unseen miniatures are the ones that came in an earlier edition box set (Archer, Rifleman, Wasp, Marauder, etc), and the corresponding artwork is the stuff that used to be at the back of the BTech novels, is that correct?
Correct.
The Reseen are the versions of those 'Mechs that are now available from IWM and that I see on CSO, etc. These are re-imagined versions of those earlier 'Mechs to avoid legal issues. OK so far?
The writers tried to bring them back with a new appearance by 'upgrading' them later in the timeline. The fluff used to explain it was that they were designed at different factories.
So they took the 'original' unseen Warhammer and created a new version later in the timeline that looks like
thisThe one from 3025 still looks like it always did- to avoid a 'retcon' of the originals and older artwork...and in an attempt to keep everyone happy (which, of course, there were people unhappy from both camps...).
In any case, that left the problem of the original 'mechs still being referenced in sourcebooks, and appearing on RATs and the like. New players wouldn't have any real information about them, though, aside from a record sheet at best.
So, they were added back into the TROs...but because the artwork for the original models still isn't usable due to legal issues, silhouettes were used instead of artwork.
My real confusion is that the silhouettes in my RS 3039 seem to be of the Reseen, or at least my understanding of that term. Why are these images silhouetted? Surely it should be OK to display images of the newer models.
D
So what people are discussing here is whether they can replace the silhouettes with new artwork, that would be different from the originals, and not the 'reseens'- as they are intended to look different after being upgraded.
Essentially, it's an artwork 'retcon'. The original Warhammer looks like 'this', and the older books which depict it as looking the same as Robotech's 'Tomahawk' would no longer be correct.