Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
So as a design program I use megamek which as far as i know doesn't have structures rules where would i find the structure rules. Second the turrets are considered to be deployed permanently around the base before battle being covered in concrete effectively a reinforced building over it.

The ones deployed in just dirt were intended for the hole to be excavated by a engineering vehicle with bulldozer backhoe and lift hoist to get the job done.
The building structure construction rules are in tac ops.  I have the old tac ops, so its page 128 there.  If you have the new/split books the page number will likely be different.  Its pretty easy.  You select a CF, add armor which is like extra CF to destroy, and you get 1 ton of equipment/armor per CF.  A gun emplacement is 1 hex of 1 level in height, can have a turret, armor up to the CF, and takes half damage from attacks for being reinforced (and deals 2x damage to a unit crashing into it, again cause its reinforced).  So a Light gun emplacement with CF 15 can have 15 points of armor, leaving 14 tons for equipment.  At CF 15, it will take 60 damage to destroy, 30 for the armor (cause damage/2 for military weapon emplacements compared to civilian buildings) and 30 for the CF (cause damage /2).

So, instead of the dual ac10 turret trailer, you could have a 40 CF weapon emplacement, leaving enough tonnage to fit it all inside.  (2.5 tons for 40 armor, 2.5 tons for a turret, 32 tons for the ac10s and ammo, .5 tons for the recon camera, no power/heatsinks needed cause no energy weapons).  It would take 80 damage to bust the emplacement's 40 armor, and 80 damage for the CF structure (though hits to CF can cause crits)

Like I mentioned above, I dont think the original trailer turret can be made hull down in the rules.  The engineering vehicle, like engineering infantry, can make fortifications with a bulldozer for infantry and vehicles, but the turret trailer you made cant spend 2 MP to go hull down in it.  And, if it could, the half level/hull down rules still dont protect from the rear, so its not exactly burying the turret.  Finally, the rules are pretty terribly balanced to begin with, as the engineering fortification terrain can be destroyed, but they forgot to make CF ranges for half levels and fortified engineering hex modifications that I can find... but its STILL easier to demolish the entire 200 cf hex then shoot the trailer with 200 armor.  That makes a 30 meter wide 1 level hole, where your trailer would fall into... and thats pretty gross overkill to destroy some sandbags and dirt embankments covering a few meters of a trailer's hull, erected in 10-30 seconds with a bulldozer, because they forgot to give the fortified terrain feature a CF like they did with ice, woods, snow, ect.
2
No, the consequence of the Great Tech Paint Rebellion ...
4
I'm planning a slightly non-canon - either another cluster, or a "2nd Falcon Sentinels" trinary. Olive green with dark yellow trim, with yellow beak & falcon eyes, and no feathers.
5
Well, not too long (relatively speaking) after this article came out, the Warg (Reflective) was released.  Anyone have experience with the variant?  Worth it or not?
6
I'm planning a Cluster that's built entirely out of what's in active production on Sudeten and the most difficult part was trimming it did to "just" a Cluster.

I've been ruminating on this as well:


7
Looks like there will be no Calisto approach for Juno.  ::Valhalla impact noise intensifies::
8
RS already happened I think . . .

Only for the Urbanmech lance pack that was released last year, as far as I'm aware.
9
I can't remember where I read it, but I swear I once saw something saying SLDF mechwarriors put rank insignia on the backs of their machines.

thoughtful of them to let people know who to shoot to turn a retreat into a rout :)
10


Now as a few have pointed out, the 4th SW was rife with treachery and power grabs. St-Ives, the Tikovox Free Republic...but also the Northwind Highlanders, now that was one huge chunk. The gutting the CC suffered would, it is rather safe to assume, leave all powers save that of dear pugnacious Romano in a state of shock. Hence, after the 4th SW, CC inner politics are rather...tame.

But before Romano's time, things were far more interesting. Maximilian's rise to power of course, around which much "higher up" blood was shed and many of the higher offices changed hands. But in a broader sense, it is quite clear the few main branches of the state (Chancellor, CCAF, Warrior House, Death Commandos, Maskirovka, Prefecture and House of Scions) all had a knife at each others throats. Check and balance the Capellan way, if you will.

Of course, the CCAF stands out with Pavel Ridzik (whom WOULD make a power grab as it turned out), but there must hjave been much friction elsewhere. The maskirovka was lead by an ambitious woman who longed for the bygone days where her family held much sway over the fortunes of the capellan state and she had one of her agents posted as the "closest thing to a friend" to Maximilian.

Said "closest thing to a friend" (also known as Dolman Kavajk) was portrayed as constantly seeking to weaken House Master Karl Yadi, whom obviously believes he should be ready to militarly oppose Maximilian if such an opportunity arises.

Then there is the prefecture. While the chancellor sits at that office, he is more or less openly opposed (if we look at 3025) by at least 2 of the other members of this small body. We know how Candace was at odds with her father, at the very least in the economical sphere, and then there is Lord Hargreaves who even dared to oppose Maximilian taking the chancellorship from his father. Some of those meetings must've been explosive.

And of course the house of scions. While their temopral power is limited, being there (aside for budgetary concerns) mainly to point out things for the prefectorate and the chancellor to take notice, around 3025 there was at least Lord Hargreaves creating some turmoil, and we know that in the past the house of scions has had a lot of weight in policy making...weren't they responsible for the appointment of Kalvin Liao or another of those less palatable chancellor's?

which is intreasting, sadly this has been forgotten as the capcon has been flanderingized into a boring dull "chinese facism" state, with no real internal issues
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10