Author Topic: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier  (Read 11999 times)

Empyrus

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9121
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #30 on: 07 April 2015, 15:01:49 »
Strangely, nearly all the variants of this RAF missile boat play nicely with the Republic's Quirinus Battle Armor and that handy built-in TAG.
The Thunderbolt variant has one thing going in its favor that no other missile carrier has, the 10 point grouping on an indirect shot. That might not be a winner by itself, but the ability to open holes in armor without being hit in return can be a big advantage. Especially if you have BA/infantry spotters who are in a position to crit seek as a follow up.

I wonder.... *goes read the BAotW for Quirinus*

There ain't that many units that utilize the T-Bolts as primary weapon, are there? Even as secondaries, they're not terribly common. Definitively a more unique variant, that T-Bolt Jessie.

SteelRaven

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9597
  • Fight for something or Die for nothing
    • The Steel-Raven at DeviantArt
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #31 on: 07 April 2015, 15:31:58 »
Team it up with a Marksman tank and go to town O0
Battletech Art and Commissions
http://steel-raven.deviantart.com

Empyrus

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9121
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #32 on: 07 April 2015, 15:40:40 »
Team it up with a Marksman tank and go to town O0
Does the Republic have any home grown Omnimechs for carrying the Quirinus around? Can't remember...
Homegrown for the sake of flavor. No doubt they have other Omnis, but since the Marksman, Quirinus and JES III are Republic units...

Scotty

  • Alpha Strike Guru by appointment to the FWLM
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13702
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #33 on: 07 April 2015, 16:28:35 »
Does the Republic have any home grown Omnimechs for carrying the Quirinus around? Can't remember...
Homegrown for the sake of flavor. No doubt they have other Omnis, but since the Marksman, Quirinus and JES III are Republic units...

You mean besides the Doloire, arguably one of the best Assault OmniMechs ever designed?
Catalyst Demo Agent #679

Kansas City players, or people who are just passing through the area, come join us at the Geekery just off Shawnee Mission Parkway for BattleTech!  Current days are Tuesdays in the afternoon and evening.  I can't make every single week, but odds are pretty good that somebody will be there.

SteelRaven

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9597
  • Fight for something or Die for nothing
    • The Steel-Raven at DeviantArt
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #34 on: 07 April 2015, 16:43:14 »
Believe the Republic are also buying Savage Wolves and Mad Dog IVs from Clan Sea Fox.
Battletech Art and Commissions
http://steel-raven.deviantart.com

Pa Weasley

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5523
  • I am not this cute
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #35 on: 07 April 2015, 16:53:38 »
Or Centurion OmniMechs. Or Scapha, R10, or Bolla OmniVehicles. That isn't even scratching the surface of the fantastic dedicated transports.


But that is quite the digression from discussion of the JES III the Quirinus are supporting ...

worktroll

  • Ombudsman
  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 25653
  • 504th "Gateway" Division
    • There are Monsters in my Sky!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #36 on: 07 April 2015, 18:39:02 »
Just struck by something. The jerrycans on the back sides. Fusion XL engine.

So they're not carrying diesel ...  I suppose they could be carrying water for crossing the desert, but I prefer to believe it's ethyl alcohol. "For cleaning the ammunition feeds."

Yes. Definitely.
* No, FASA wasn't big on errata - ColBosch
* The Housebook series is from the 80's and is the foundation of Btech, the 80's heart wrapped in heavy metal that beats to this day - Sigma
* To sum it up: FASAnomics: By Cthulhu, for Cthulhu - Moonsword
* Because Battletech is a conspiracy by Habsburg & Bourbon pretenders - MadCapellan
* The Hellbringer is cool, either way. It's not cool because it's bad, it's cool because it's bad with balls - Nightsky
* It was a glorious time for people who felt that we didn't have enough Marauder variants - HABeas2, re "Empires Aflame"

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21744
  • Third time this week!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #37 on: 07 April 2015, 19:02:26 »
Keep thinking of a Arrow IV variant, just because.

That's an intriguing thought, for sure. Particularly in the combined-arms-heavy Dark Age, anything that allows for area-effect damage is a good thing, as is anything that allows you to light up someone with BA-carried TAG. We have better Arrow-haulers available on the market in this era, but not always available to every faction- with this serving in every military out there in respectable numbers, it wouldn't be surprising if someone made such a refit.

I say it every time we do an LRM-heavy unit, but a mortar-hauling version would be intriguing as well.

Just struck by something. The jerrycans on the back sides. Fusion XL engine.

So they're not carrying diesel ...  I suppose they could be carrying water for crossing the desert, but I prefer to believe it's ethyl alcohol. "For cleaning the ammunition feeds."

Yes. Definitely.

Why should Alacorn crews have all the maintenance-related hijinks, after all?
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

JPArbiter

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3139
  • Podcasting Monkey
    • Arbitration Studios, your last word in battletech talk
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #38 on: 07 April 2015, 19:15:04 »
I am genuinely surprised there's not a version with quad mml 9 racks inthe turret. For a support vehicle the stupid levels of ambush capability combined with still respectable fire support is a boon

Unlike the author i am ambivalent on the turret, tactical benefits aside i would have seen about a larger engine inexchange for the net turret mass
Host of Arbitration, your last word in Battletech Talk

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21744
  • Third time this week!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #39 on: 07 April 2015, 19:20:32 »
I am genuinely surprised there's not a version with quad mml 9 racks inthe turret. For a support vehicle the stupid levels of ambush capability combined with still respectable fire support is a boon

Unlike the author i am ambivalent on the turret, tactical benefits aside i would have seen about a larger engine inexchange for the net turret mass

Er... about that MML carrier... actually, there IS such a version. I covered it in the article.  ^-^
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Khymerion

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2500
    • The Iron Hack
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #40 on: 07 April 2015, 19:26:42 »
As for the comment on there being better A4 launchers out there, there are not many A4 launchers geared towards supporting and keeping up with mechanized and motorized infantry in terms of speed.   Most launchers as faster than the units they would be supporting, good I guess but when you are playing with a infantry heavy force, speed tends to fall by the wayside quickly so having a JES III A4 variant, nice slow and plodding like the units they are supporting does not sound that bad.

Then again, I have gotten used to the idea of speed 3/5 as not being that detrimental when played intelligently.
"Any sufficiently rigorously defined magic is indistinguishable from technology."  - Larry Niven... far too appropriate at times here.

...but sometimes making sure you turn their ace into red paste is more important than friends.

Do not offend the chair leg of truth.  It is wise and terrible.

The GM is only right for as long as the facts back him up.

wantec

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3876
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #41 on: 07 April 2015, 20:09:16 »
Er... about that MML carrier... actually, there IS such a version. I covered it in the article.  ^-^
I'm surprised we didn't see one with extended LRMs. The slow speed doesn't matter as much then, it'll practically be a mini artillery variant.
BEN ROME YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD, I READ YOUR BOOK!


JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21744
  • Third time this week!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #42 on: 07 April 2015, 20:48:49 »
I'm surprised we didn't see one with extended LRMs. The slow speed doesn't matter as much then, it'll practically be a mini artillery variant.

That hadn't occurred, but... I don't have the books handy, but I think one can make twin ELRM-20s work without any trouble. Interesting, but needs SERIOUS protection- anyone got a spare old Demolisher around?
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

wantec

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3876
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #43 on: 07 April 2015, 21:57:00 »
Twin 20s will be a bit much, 18 tons per rack, but 15s are only 12 tons a rack. So switching to those frees up 4 tons, and keeping the ammo the same gives you 18 rounds per rack. Still, range brackets of 12/22/38 are nothing to sneeze at.
BEN ROME YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD, I READ YOUR BOOK!


Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 25040
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #44 on: 08 April 2015, 06:30:30 »
This is a fairly new unit, perhaps there will be spot for one more variant in a update record sheet book.  Having ERLRMs or even N-LRMs would be nice for something like this.
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #45 on: 08 April 2015, 07:10:39 »
OK, what am I missing on the MML-Variant?
The Launchers are a ton lighter each, so there should be some space to go around.
Sarna mentions twin medium lasers, but it also mentions 2 less tons of ammo, so that doesn't lead anywhere. Standard engine?  ???
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

Hussar2

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 295
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #46 on: 08 April 2015, 07:42:53 »
OK, what am I missing on the MML-Variant?
The Launchers are a ton lighter each, so there should be some space to go around.
Sarna mentions twin medium lasers, but it also mentions 2 less tons of ammo, so that doesn't lead anywhere. Standard engine?  ???

The 4 tons are used for 2 ER medium lasers in the turret and another 2 tons of ammo.
What I can't figure out though is the speed variant.  This variant removes 2 machine guns and 0.5 ton of ammo (1.5 tons combined)
to increase the engine from160XL to 220XL but this should increase the engine weight by 3 tons (4.5 to 7.5).
What am I missing here?

Pa Weasley

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5523
  • I am not this cute
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #47 on: 08 April 2015, 08:20:19 »
The speed variant mounts an XXL engine. I don't have my books in front of me but I believe CASE makes up the remaining weight difference.

Hussar2

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 295
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #48 on: 08 April 2015, 08:47:39 »
The speed variant mounts an XXL engine. I don't have my books in front of me but I believe CASE makes up the remaining weight difference.

Thanks this adds up.
Since the CASE and the XXL engine don't appear in the RS I will post it in the errata forum.

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1529
  • the one and only
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #49 on: 08 April 2015, 09:12:15 »
No! The speed variant uses HFF armor... which is never noted on current vee RS.
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40841
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #50 on: 08 April 2015, 09:36:01 »
Discussion in the Lamprey thread has led  me to wonder: Given a ton or two of frag missiles, how effective would a JESsie be as a weedeater? :)
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21744
  • Third time this week!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #51 on: 08 April 2015, 09:38:57 »
Feeling a little better about the article now- I couldn't fathom why I missed some of the details on those variants, but the record sheets indeed don't show it- so I didn't mention it. Whew! This one's not my fault! I'll update the main article shortly.

(I still should have done the math, but it honestly didn't occur to me!)
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Khymerion

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2500
    • The Iron Hack
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #52 on: 08 April 2015, 09:46:53 »
This is why I don't trust record sheet only variants.   You don't get all the details that went into them when trying to reverse engineer or understand how they worked.
"Any sufficiently rigorously defined magic is indistinguishable from technology."  - Larry Niven... far too appropriate at times here.

...but sometimes making sure you turn their ace into red paste is more important than friends.

Do not offend the chair leg of truth.  It is wise and terrible.

The GM is only right for as long as the facts back him up.

Pa Weasley

  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5523
  • I am not this cute
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #53 on: 08 April 2015, 13:45:54 »
Feeling a little better about the article now- I couldn't fathom why I missed some of the details on those variants, but the record sheets indeed don't show it- so I didn't mention it. Whew! This one's not my fault! I'll update the main article shortly.

(I still should have done the math, but it honestly didn't occur to me!)
Nope, entirely the fault of my early senility. Well, maybe not that early.

Hussar2

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 295
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #54 on: 08 April 2015, 14:55:39 »
Sorry JadeHellbringer but it seems you need to edit the speed variant again.
According to jymset the 1.5 missing tons come from HFF armor and not XL engine so the RS is surprisingly correct.
Again sorry for the inconvenience.

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 28994
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #55 on: 10 April 2015, 10:57:08 »
Well, having established that it's redundant then, let's move on to other discussions. Stories of use, ideas for upgrades, etc.. The deceased equine has been flogged a-plenty.

I think going with Stealth Armor on a Liao variant could be interesting, set it in support of the Pixiu.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

JadeHellbringer

  • Easily Bribed Forum Administrator
  • Administrator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 21744
  • Third time this week!
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #56 on: 10 April 2015, 11:07:42 »
I think going with Stealth Armor on a Liao variant could be interesting, set it in support of the Pixiu.

Simple, too. Not to bring up my favorite change here again, but get rid of those silly MGs and their ammo, there's a ton and a half for Guardian, replace armor with stealth plating, keep the rest as-is, begin making Davion miserable.

I like it. Looks like that comes out pretty cheap, too, compared to a lot of stealth fire-support platforms.
"There's a difference between the soldier and his fight,
But the warrior knows the true meaning of his life."
+Larry and his Flask, 'Blood Drunk'+

"You know, basically war is just, like, a bunch of people playing pranks on each other, but at the end they all die."
+Crow T. Robot+

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 28994
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #57 on: 10 April 2015, 20:33:00 »
Hmm, what about ER or Enhanced LRMs?  Do we have too many carriers that use them?
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

UnLimiTeD

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2039
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #58 on: 11 April 2015, 04:18:00 »
Switch MMLs 2 for 1 for ELRM15s, and you got enough ammo to kite them all the way to the bank. Well, maybe combine it with more speed.
All in all, a very solid vehicle with a lot of field refit options.  O:-)
Savannah Masters are the Pringles of Battletech.
Ooo! OOOOOOO! That was a bad one!...and I liked it.

God and Davion

  • Excelencia Steiner
  • Administrator
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5972
  • This place for rent
Re: VotW: JES III Strategic Missile Carrier
« Reply #59 on: 11 April 2015, 12:22:58 »
We tested a JES III Thunderbolt. It is very cheap and a big glasshammer. It ripped of one Catapult with 4 Thunderbolts in the Center Torso. It died in 2 turns of not so much concentrated fire. It is not a line MBT. We believe that it it better to keep it in the back and only bring it into a good position after the main short range engagement has began. Not the best tank of the world but a cheap ugly way to kill things.
We are back again... but we never forget Albatross

 

Register