Author Topic: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions  (Read 7233 times)

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 11642
  • Professor of Errata
Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« on: 20 November 2012, 00:08:19 »
This thread is for all issues and problems with Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions.

Product Link: http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=interstellar-expeditions-interstellar-players-3

There is no compiled errata for this product at this time.

Please remember to follow the errata report template when reporting issues.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: 30 November 2012, 21:48:17 by Xotl »
3028-3057 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Kit deSummersville

  • Precentor of Lies
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10397
  • The epicness continues!
    • Insights and Complaints on Twitter
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #1 on: 20 November 2012, 08:42:48 »
PDF, First printing.

Page 3, Writing

"Ken Horner" should be

"Ken' Horner"
Looking for an official answer? Check the Catalyst Interaction Forums.

Freelancer for hire, not an official CGL or IMR representative.

Everyone else's job is easy, so tell them how to do it, everyone loves that!

Millard Fillmore's favorite BattleTech writer.

Cyc

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2721
    • CycKath at DeviantArt
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #2 on: 20 November 2012, 19:35:39 »
PDF, First Printing

Table of Contents page D/4

Rimward Wonders - The Canopian Ruins

"Gamemaster sECTION" should be "Gamemaster Section" or "Gamemaster's Section" to match the other instances.


Liam's Ghost

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7856
  • Miss Chitty finds your honor rules quaint.
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #3 on: 21 November 2012, 00:23:38 »
PDF, First Printing

Page 119, Bugeye Record Sheet

The bugeye is incorrectly listed as massing 61,000 tons.

Fix: Change to 6100 tons to align with the earlier entry (page 114)
Good news is the lab boys say the symptoms of asbestos poisoning show an immediate latency of 44.6 years. So if you're thirty or over you're laughing. Worst case scenario you miss out on a few rounds of canasta, plus you've forwarded the cause of science by three centuries. I punch those numbers into my calculator, it makes a happy face.

(indirect accessory to the) Slayer of Monitors!

Cyc

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2721
    • CycKath at DeviantArt
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #4 on: 21 November 2012, 02:26:28 »
PDF First Printing

Page 24 - Hunting the Word - Other Blakist Bases - Columbus

"its Caisson satellites" should be "its Cassion satellites" as per the Blankenburg Cassion Payload Satellite entry in TRO:VA

Neufeld

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2539
  • Raven, Lyran, Horse, Capellan, Canopian, Bear
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #5 on: 21 November 2012, 03:14:09 »
ISP3: IE, PDF, First Printing:

Page 106, Escorpion Imperio RAT:

Column heavy, row 4, contains: RFL-1N Rifleman [50] (XTRP3)
The source in this case is incorrect, since the recently published XTRO:Primitives III does not contain the RFL-1N.

Suggested solution:
Change it to either
RFL-1N Rifleman [50] (XTRP4)
or
RFL-1N Rifleman [50] (XTRP5)
depending on which XTRO will cover the Rifleman.

"Real men and women do not need Terra"
-- Grendel Roberts
"
We will be used to subdue the Capellan Confederation. We will be used to bring the Free Worlds League to heel. We will be used to
hunt bandits and support corrupt rulers and to reinforce the evils of the Inner Sphere that drove our ancestors from it so long ago."
-- Elias Crichell

mbear

  • Stood Far Back When The Gravitas Was Handed Out
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4497
    • Tower of Jade
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #6 on: 21 November 2012, 09:57:38 »
ISP3: 1E PDF First release:

Page 111, QR243 entry, first paragraph, second sentence: Replace invadering with invading.

Context:
Quote
With every invadering Clan wanting at least
Be the Loremaster:

Battletech transport rules take a very feline approach to moving troops in a combat zone: If they fits, they ships.

You bought the box set and are ready to expand your BT experience. Now what? (Thanks Sartis!)

mbear

  • Stood Far Back When The Gravitas Was Handed Out
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4497
    • Tower of Jade
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #7 on: 21 November 2012, 09:59:58 »
ISP3: 1E PDF First release:

Page 104, Spark Beetle section, First paragraph, second sentence: Remove "|" character from after the period closing this sentence.

Quote
...but they are most known for their peculiar attraction to electricity.l
Be the Loremaster:

Battletech transport rules take a very feline approach to moving troops in a combat zone: If they fits, they ships.

You bought the box set and are ready to expand your BT experience. Now what? (Thanks Sartis!)

jymset

  • Infinita Navitas & RecGuide Developer
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1528
  • the one and only
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #8 on: 22 November 2012, 17:19:25 »
Dev-level errata:

Messerschmitt galore

p. 109, Reptar: change "Design Quirks" to "Design Quirk" and remove ", Poor Sealing"
(as the Reptar is literally unsealed, the poor sealing quirk does not apply)

p. 110, Arana: as above
On CGL writing: Caught between a writer's block and a Herb place. (cray)

Nicest writing compliment ever: I know [redacted] doesn't like continuity porn, but I do, and you sir, write some great continuity porn! (MadCapellan)

3055 rocks! Did so when I was a n00b, does so now.

WeaponX

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 662
  • Ghost Bear Maniac
    • Ghost Bear Mania
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #9 on: 24 November 2012, 19:11:34 »
PDF version page 44, 1st paragraph of the 2nd column,

When talking about The Havens it says:

"ensuring both planets of the Elysian Fields can communicate with each other".  As far as I know Santander V, which is the other planet of The Havens, was never a part of the Elysian Fields.
"Do you not understand the nature of the Bear?  For months he sleeps in hibernation, but do not dare disturb him.  The Bear's anger is unforgiving once provoked."

-Mechwarrior Zane
  Clan Nova Cat

Arcologist

  • Private
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #10 on: 25 November 2012, 14:41:46 »
PDF Version, pg. 119 ("pg.121 of 122" on the reader display).  Bug-Eye record sheet typo error.


"1 Lookdown Rader" in the Nose should be "1 Lookdown Radar" (same location).


rebs

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 15655
  • Et tu, Brute?
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #11 on: 30 November 2012, 02:45:22 »
PDF version.

On page 50 the text speaks of the wreckage of a Jumbo class dropship uncovered in a remote part of the Vela Association.  The Vela Association is shown on none of the maps, and also not mentioned elsewhere in the text. 

(it is also noted that the Vela Nebula and Vela Sheet are in the Spinward section of the fluff, as well as on the spinward map, and technically on the Coreward edge, whereas the contents of page 50 is regarding the Anti-Spinward areas of the Orion Spur.  Is the mentioning of the Vela Association on page 50 out of place perhaps?)
« Last Edit: 10 January 2013, 19:32:29 by rebs »
Playing Guitar On My YouTube Channel:
Current cover tune: "The Wind Cries Mary" (by Jimi Hendrix)
https://youtu.be/m6a8wZiCsjM?si=0w7tVOgk7yylNv6a

"Thou shalt not create a machine in the image of the human mind." ~ The Orange Catholic Bible, Dune, Frank Herbert

Dark_Falcon

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 498
  • Over, under, or through.
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #12 on: 03 December 2012, 08:02:32 »
PDF Version, pg 39 (40 on the reader display): The SLS Pioneer attached to the Star League Expeditionary Brigade is described as a Vigilant-class corvette.  However, on pg 55 of Era Report: 2750 the SLS Pioneer is described as an Avatar-class cruiser.
To the utmost!

roosterboy

  • Site Maintenance
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5704
  • J'accuse!
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #13 on: 28 December 2012, 14:09:11 »
Interstellar Expeditions
PDF version


pp58-62: inconsistent naming of the primary planet of the St Andreas system.

St Timalin in three places on p58
St Tomalin in three places on p62

suggested correction: change one of the pages to match the other

BaldDen

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 177
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #14 on: 10 January 2013, 11:43:42 »
PDF version

On maps placed on pages 62 and 76, "Star Cluster 1108" are noted. One of them is wrong.

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #15 on: 01 November 2013, 05:18:16 »
PDF, 1st Printing
Page 35, "Idrmarch"

The text on page 35 consistently refers to the name of the planet as Idrmarch. This is inconsistent with maps in other sources such as Field Manual: 3085, which show the name of the planet as Idrmach. Øystein kindly confirmed that correct spelling is Idrmach. ISP3:IE therefore needs to be amended to use the correct spelling.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

GermanSumo

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 188
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #16 on: 01 August 2017, 13:34:49 »
PDF-Version

Far Reach Entry Page 40: "the ancient Capital-class space station at the system’s zenith point remained intact"

Is this maybe an old "capitol"?

(lol i had to errata my own question twice :D )
« Last Edit: 01 August 2017, 13:47:16 by GermanSumo »

assaultdoor

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 104
Re: Interstellar Players 3: Interstellar Expeditions
« Reply #17 on: 11 April 2020, 22:10:29 »
PDF Version p. 38

The atmospheric pressure of Vannes is given as "Standard (Thin)", which doesn't make sense. Should it be "Standard (Breathable)", "Thin (Breathable)", or something else?