Author Topic: Introductory Products Page - Eras  (Read 1921 times)

DarkISI

  • Praedonum Dominus
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7178
  • https://amzn.to/3Dm3bvj
    • My Author Website
Introductory Products Page - Eras
« on: 05 August 2011, 06:28:14 »
The eras as listed on the page are a bit outdated.

Jihad should be 3067 - 3080
Republic (Dark Age) [Dark Age (Republic)?] should be 3081 - 3131 [This (sub-)era was introduced relatively recently and is missing completely]
Dark Age should be 3132+

Wasn't sure where to report it, but since it is a website issue, I went here.

See http://www.masterunitlist.info/Home/GettingStarted as an example.
German novelist and part time Battletech writer.


HPG Station - German Battletech News

"if they didn't want to be stomped to death by a psychotic gang of battlemechs, they shouldn't have fallen down" - Liam's Ghost

keisukekun

  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 477
  • A Love Suicide
Re: Introductory Products Page - Eras
« Reply #1 on: 05 August 2011, 06:42:37 »
I believe you would post it in errata

roosterboy

  • Site Maintenance
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5704
  • J'accuse!
Re: Introductory Products Page - Eras
« Reply #2 on: 05 August 2011, 11:42:51 »
They're not going to change. The sub-eras used for the MUL and other such projects are a different thing from the Eras used on products.

DarkISI

  • Praedonum Dominus
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7178
  • https://amzn.to/3Dm3bvj
    • My Author Website
Re: Introductory Products Page - Eras
« Reply #3 on: 05 August 2011, 12:13:23 »
Well, at least the 3132+ date for Dark Age could be fixed, because that is definitely wrong, even for product eras.
German novelist and part time Battletech writer.


HPG Station - German Battletech News

"if they didn't want to be stomped to death by a psychotic gang of battlemechs, they shouldn't have fallen down" - Liam's Ghost

Øystein

  • BattleTech Volunteer
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3053
Re: Introductory Products Page - Eras
« Reply #4 on: 06 August 2011, 06:23:36 »
Well, at least the 3132+ date for Dark Age could be fixed, because that is definitely wrong, even for product eras.

The HPG grid collapsed in 3132, which is when the Dark Age starts.

That the Republican sub-era for MUL goes backwards is of no consequence, just as the "Age of War" era for Star League goes backwards.

All this was considered when the Eras were made and they were made, on purpose, the way they are on that page.


 

Register