BattleTech - The Board Game of Armored Combat

BattleTech Miniatures and Terrain => Iron Wind Metals News and Announcements => Topic started by: Col.Hengist on 27 March 2011, 20:08:27

Title: clint IIc
Post by: Col.Hengist on 27 March 2011, 20:08:27
 I needed some for the Clan BloodSpirits trinary I'm building. Straight out of the blister i found this mini well crafted, and nicely detailed. The mold lines were almost non-existent. All in all it was a really well made mini. I know it's an old mini but these are the first ones I've ever bought.

 Just thought i would say something nice .
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Daishi411 on 27 March 2011, 20:14:04
gasp. could this be the new IWM quality control they have tried to implement (why it wasn't there to begin with boggles my mind). the last mini i got was the night wolf and i was beyond surprised to see that it was sculpted in a way that didn't make me want to throw it at a wall and hope to make improvements to it.

what i'm trying to say is that it looks like things may be looking up for the quality if btech minis
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Sawbones12 on 27 March 2011, 23:05:57
Wow, thanks Daishi411 for the truly backhanded compliment... With such accolades, the doorways at IWM will have to be widened to accommodate their swollen heads.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Daishi411 on 27 March 2011, 23:19:47
Wow, thanks Daishi411 for the truly backhanded compliment... With such accolades, the doorways at IWM will have to be widened to accommodate their swollen heads.

i tend to get this kind of response to my comments regarding IWM, and quite frankly i don;t deserve them, mostly because the people that make have not had the experience with IWM that i have. the reality is that for a long time now the quality has been poor (and that's a generous evaluation IMO), and you admitted it yourself in your thread. i'm personally surprised that there wasn't better quality control before, it's slightly shocking, and the fact that you don't seem to think so is odd. I have to contact them to replace or send  missing or poorly molded parts almost on an orderly basis, i find that unacceptable, since that has never happened to me when i buy minis from other companies, and i firmly believe that if there was competition between companies when it comes to btech minis, IWM would have bee flushed out long ago.

the fact is people can go on making excuses for IWM, and they may even believe them, however i don't, and it's my right to express them and not be condemned for my perfectly fair, and in my experience warranted views, it really isn't my problem if you don't like them, really.

I have shown token support for IWM in the past in the form of funding (though small amounts usually), and i did say that i have noticed an increase in quality.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Sawbones12 on 28 March 2011, 10:15:01
Okay.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Daishi411 on 28 March 2011, 10:16:33
Okay.

that's all i wanted to hear
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JadeHellbringer on 28 March 2011, 10:39:52
I only have one Clint IIC... well, one and a half ;)

I got one as part of the old Ghost Bear Medium Star set, but it had a badly deformed right arm. Had it been the left, I might have ignored it and modified the shoulder to show the arm having been shot away, but... well, the right arm has the gun! Melissa at IWM sent over a new arm, but it was on the sprue with another left arm and a head.

The new arm is on the Clint IIC, which like the rest of it's star is painted light blue. The other two bits though... the spare left arm is now clutched in the hand of a resculpt-style Atlas, while the head is laying on the base, about to be crushed under the Atlas' foot.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: ShockaTime on 28 March 2011, 11:29:14
i should get a clint IIC at some point. it's always been one of those minis that i'll get next time.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JPArbiter on 28 March 2011, 12:02:06
ahhh the Clint IIC, one of those mechs that made me ask "why is there a seperate mini for that?" and when I saw it I said "oh, thats why"

I started using IICs as standard clints, they look that pretty. maybe I should do that for Urbanmechs too... }:)
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JadeHellbringer on 28 March 2011, 12:31:34
ahhh the Clint IIC, one of those mechs that made me ask "why is there a seperate mini for that?" and when I saw it I said "oh, thats why"

I started using IICs as standard clints, they look that pretty. maybe I should do that for Urbanmechs too... }:)

I still don't own a regular Clint for that very reason- the IIC is good enough for me, and frankly I never use Clints anyway in games for the most part. Agree on the Urbie- the regular is a decent enough mini, but the IIC is a lot more fun to me.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Col.Hengist on 28 March 2011, 13:32:55
Picked up a pair of battle cobras at the same time. Same thing, nice sculpt, few mold lines and the only thing i wanted to do to it was pin the arms.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: MoneyLovinOgre4Hire on 28 March 2011, 14:32:25
the fact is people can go on making excuses for IWM, and they may even believe them, however i don't, and it's my right to express them and not be condemned for my perfectly fair, and in my experience warranted views, it really isn't my problem if you don't like them, really.

No, but if you put your opinions in a public forum, you shouldn't be surprised when people comment on them, especially when you're giving a backhanded insult.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Daishi411 on 28 March 2011, 14:36:45
No, but if you put your opinions in a public forum, you shouldn't be surprised when people comment on them, especially when you're giving a backhanded insult.

not an insult, it was a compliment. i'm really not going to have this conversation, trust me i already know your views, and if i were you i'd drop it before this gets locked. that particular issue has clearly been dealt with, and there's clearly no reason to beat that dead horse, considering i know what you and other would say.

i think we're done with that, back to regular scheduled program
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JadeHellbringer on 28 March 2011, 17:51:47
You're right, you're not going to have this conversation here.

Knock it off.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Ian Sharpe on 28 March 2011, 19:02:21
I have a Clint IIC.  I think its still unassembled.  A lance or so of actual Clints meant I never subbed it for anything else, and the stats are just bizarre.  Nice enough looking mini, tho.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JadeHellbringer on 28 March 2011, 19:32:58
I have a Clint IIC.  I think its still unassembled.  A lance or so of actual Clints meant I never subbed it for anything else, and the stats are just bizarre.  Nice enough looking mini, tho.

It really is an oddball- single heat sinks, FOUR TONS of ammo for the LB... very strange Mech. On the bright side, it's nice to be able to take a shot needing a 12, and not feel like you're wasting valuable ammo!  ;D
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: Psycho on 29 March 2011, 08:08:26
It's funny, I looked at that little thing, wanted to repose it out of it's stock-still pose, fought with it, gave up, and threw it back in the drawer (hopefully) never to be seen again. I haven't painted a standard Clint either.
Title: Re: clint IIc
Post by: JPArbiter on 29 March 2011, 08:31:18
It really is an oddball- single heat sinks, FOUR TONS of ammo for the LB... very strange Mech. On the bright side, it's nice to be able to take a shot needing a 12, and not feel like you're wasting valuable ammo!  ;D

I like to think of the Clint IIC as being used for extended deployments in outback areas.