Author Topic: Character study- Ezra Payne, honorable merc or naive would-be commander?  (Read 2663 times)

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 28983
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Was Ezra Payne wrong?  Naïve?

Re-reading Embers of War again and while Ezra Payne is a well developed character a couple of things bother me.  Like Julian Davion he does not realize he is being groomed to command, but oddly he has more & yet less reason to suspect.  Payne had three officers between him and leadership of the Stealthy Tigers, one dying in the assault on McNally’s position . . . which may have been set up by the sibling Majors, its never clear.  And while he commands the seed of the 3rd battalion he seems not to have realized that his company would end up becoming 3rd BN when enough mechs were rebuilt.  Part of this is also Colonel R’s (not spelling out that name, lol) fault for establishing a chain of command BEFORE the XO died to say who was stepping into those shoes.  Kirsten honestly seemed to be the one doing a lot of the XO’s job but Mason was getting leadership roles- except for the plum assignment as liaison with the Dismal Ds.
Payne is also the leader of the Raiders, the elite society/cadre inside the Tigers, after the death of the regiment’s XO in battle.  This is another problem, he knows the unit’s informal rules/customs that the commander comes from among the Raiders but does not recognize that makes him most likely to be next in line.  Leading the Raiders gives him access to all sorts of informal knowledge the Raiders accumulate that would not end up in official reports- like where their payment comes from and other intel/counter-intel gems.
Which brings me to my biggest question . . . Ezra was brought up in the mercenary unit, and not one that always operated in the MRBC or Comstar’s previous version.  While the Tigers were a older unit with a established reputation, their command staff still IMO should have been looking for the knife in the back on each job.  Colonel R shows some understanding when he says the mystery backer of the attackers want unrest on the world but seems unwilling to consider the next step in that chain of logic.  While any mercenary has to follow the contract, or be out of the business, Ezra seems unwilling or just too naïve to consider that while the Tigers may have continued acting in good faith his employer & their backer was not.

After the attack on Ezra & the Dismal Ds while escorting Burton, would it have been a breach to inform the Dismal Ds that Baranov was bankrolled by the Word?  Or lay out that the Tiger’s loyalty to the contract was to the person who signed rather than to who was the ultimate source of the money?
Or does staying loyal to the contract mean they could not tell where Baranov’s money came from?
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

klarg1

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2432
Honestly, the command structure for the Tigers never made a whole lot of sense to me. I was never sufficiently convinced as to why the two Markohas (sp?) were placed in command, given the opinion the rest of the commanders and Raiders seemed to have of them. It also seemed a bit surprising that an orchestrated whisper campaign against the leadership would be so effective so quickly in such a small organization.

Given the size, everyone in the unit should have been well acquainted with at least 3 or 4 raiders on a personal level. That it worked so well suggests that the whole unit was pretty dysfunctional at the outset. Personally, I lay most of the blame at the feet of Colonel R. for letting all of that develop. I guess that places me in the "Naive" camp for Payne.

beachhead1985

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4075
  • 1st SOG; SLDF. "McKenna's Marauders"
    • Kilroy's Wall
Honestly, the command structure for the Tigers never made a whole lot of sense to me. I was never sufficiently convinced as to why the two Markohas (sp?) were placed in command, given the opinion the rest of the commanders and Raiders seemed to have of them. It also seemed a bit surprising that an orchestrated whisper campaign against the leadership would be so effective so quickly in such a small organization.

Given the size, everyone in the unit should have been well acquainted with at least 3 or 4 raiders on a personal level. That it worked so well suggests that the whole unit was pretty dysfunctional at the outset. Personally, I lay most of the blame at the feet of Colonel R. for letting all of that develop. I guess that places me in the "Naive" camp for Payne.

 As a guy who loved the book, the unit and even Payne, as a character, the whisper campaign I really got.

As described, the Raiders were very much a clique/boys club and those can go very, very wrong in a military unit. I've *seen* it first hand.

The M. Sibs made no sense to me in the context of the raiders, because; why were they so trusted? How did they get promoted so far, so fast.

However, as described; the Raiders were a built-in glass ceiling, with select command positions and information reserved for their members only. How's that make you feel as an outsider? Add in some folks who got promoted *despite* not being in the special club and conditions are ripe to be exploited just as seen here.
Epitaph on an Army of Mercenaries

These, in the day when heaven was falling,      Their shoulders held the sky suspended;
The hour when earth's foundations fled,         They stood, and earth's foundations stay;
Followed their mercenary calling,               What God abandoned, these defended,
And took their wages, and are dead.             And saved the sum of things for pay.
     
A.E. Housman

 

Register