Author Topic: WarShip of the Week: Defender  (Read 57936 times)

ArkRoyalRavager

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3673
  • Ravaging the enemies of House Davion
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #120 on: 27 May 2014, 06:29:38 »
Are you sure about that?  They had ferro-carbide, yes, but lamellor was used sparingly even by the Terran Hegemony--only on two ship classes (Kimagure and Texas), both made by the same manufacturer IIRC.  The FSN of the post-Clan Invasion has lamellor, yes (used magnificently on the Avalon).

I do agree the Defender could have received an armour upgrade (even IFA would make a substantial difference), but the other things would've required structural changes on the order of turning the 2372 Aegis into the SLDF/Clan Aegis (ha ha).

It still boggles my mind why the FSN kept this clearly obsolete ship in service for so long, as flagships no less.

cheers,

Gabe

Oops you are right Gabe. They had ferro-carbide during that time. Still an improvement over IFA or standard though.

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #121 on: 27 May 2014, 10:19:05 »
If retiring them was no guarantee that you'd be able to obtain replacement hulls that you wouldn't have otherwise, would you?

It's not just keeping the ships themselves in service, but the Dropshuttles too, when everyone else has gone to standard Dropships and docking collars (and all the other ship classes in your fleet use those), and the need to keep around maintenance facilities just for those idiosyncracies, and to keep training maintenance crews to service those features no other ship retains, and the need to be able to manufacture obsolete parts...etc., etc.  Shipyards just wouldn't consider it worth the expense and headache...kind of like that story Cray used to tell about the backup diesel engines on American subs.

So, despite the fact that Defenders may have had a prestige attached to them in the FSN much like that attached to Monsoons by the Terran/SLDF navy, at some point the FS admiralty should've come to realize that the supply and maintenance chain needed to keep those ships serviceable just wasn't worth it.

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40835
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #122 on: 27 May 2014, 10:20:52 »
They did. Remember, the Defender's description says they spent most of their time in mothballs, only brought out when they were truly needed.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

nerd

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2321
  • Nunc Partus-Ready Now
    • Traveller Adventures
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #123 on: 28 May 2014, 00:12:53 »
It's not just keeping the ships themselves in service, but the Dropshuttles too, when everyone else has gone to standard Dropships and docking collars (and all the other ship classes in your fleet use those), and the need to keep around maintenance facilities just for those idiosyncracies, and to keep training maintenance crews to service those features no other ship retains, and the need to be able to manufacture obsolete parts...etc., etc.  Shipyards just wouldn't consider it worth the expense and headache...kind of like that story Cray used to tell about the backup diesel engines on American subs.
You mean the Fairbanks-Morse ND 38 8-1/8, opposed piston two stroke diesel generator? That old thing, but the Auxiliary Division guys who ran it swore by it (or at it).
M. T. Thompson
Don of the Starslayer Mafia
Member of the AFFS High Command

Diablo48

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4684
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #124 on: 28 May 2014, 20:43:27 »
It still boggles my mind why the FSN kept this clearly obsolete ship in service for so long, as flagships no less.

Honestly, if you are going to press a large, obsolete ship into service, a flagship is a good use for it because it gives your commander a nice ride to keep him safe while freeing up your capitol ships to engage as needed without risking fleet cohesion.


View my design musings or request your own custom ride here.

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #125 on: 28 May 2014, 23:13:42 »
Honestly, if you are going to press a large, obsolete ship into service, a flagship is a good use for it because it gives your commander a nice ride to keep him safe while freeing up your capitol ships to engage as needed without risking fleet cohesion.

A nice safe ride for the commander, eh?  Well I think I'd want something a bit more durable than a Defender for that purpose.
And as for freeing up capital assets, the Defender, despite its great age, was still the heaviest class in the FSN when the 1st SW broke out, was it not?

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

FedSunsBorn

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2362
  • Avatar by ShadowRaven.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #126 on: 29 May 2014, 00:18:54 »
I don't mind that they kept bringing them back into service but why not make a Block II version somewhere down the line of hundreds of years of use? They did it for the Davion class Destroyer so why not this ship?
Made by HikageMaru

Arvanna

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 481
  • Bayonets foreward Boys...CHARGE!!!!!!
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #127 on: 29 May 2014, 00:20:14 »
Considering how quickly it was rendered obsolete you would have expected them to have worked up a Block II version rather then simply sit by while the other Houses fielded newer , big ships. I mean they retired the Block I Davions and replaced them with the Block IIs as well as fielding other new classes. Just getting by with Terran left overs for heavies is stupid, building your own capital ships then was a matter of national pride and with the Capellans fielding their own battleship I can't see the Suns not fielding at least a modernized battle cruiser to offset that.

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #128 on: 29 May 2014, 04:05:39 »
Considering how quickly it was rendered obsolete you would have expected them to have worked up a Block II version rather then simply sit by while the other Houses fielded newer , big ships. I mean they retired the Block I Davions and replaced them with the Block IIs as well as fielding other new classes. Just getting by with Terran left overs for heavies is stupid, building your own capital ships then was a matter of national pride and with the Capellans fielding their own battleship I can't see the Suns not fielding at least a modernized battle cruiser to offset that.

Technically they did.  It's called a New Syrtis.  ;)  Seriously, basing a new class off of the New Syrtis, dropping all the fighters and small craft for other things (extra guns, armour, drop collars) would've been a quick way to come up with a new battlecruiser rather than keep an obsolete hangar queen like the Defender around.  But, such a ship wouldn't be able to dogfight (in Warship terms) the way a Defender can.  It would be much more conventional, like a Black Lion (II) or Tharkad.

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

Welshman

  • Mostly Retired Has Been
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10509
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #129 on: 29 May 2014, 09:46:12 »
I don't mind that they kept bringing them back into service but why not make a Block II version somewhere down the line of hundreds of years of use? They did it for the Davion class Destroyer so why not this ship?

As has been discussed in this thread before, making a Block II of pre-Drop Collar WarShips is not very practical. Since one of the first things someone would want to do is change out the bays for collars. The most you could do is upgrade the weapons and maybe the armor.
-Joel BC-
Catalyst Freelancer (Inactive)

"Some closets will never contain Narnia, no matter how many times we open the door." - Weirdo, in relation to the power of hope.

Dragon Cat

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7832
  • Not Dead Until I Say So
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #130 on: 29 May 2014, 09:58:36 »
As has been discussed in this thread before, making a Block II of pre-Drop Collar WarShips is not very practical. Since one of the first things someone would want to do is change out the bays for collars. The most you could do is upgrade the weapons and maybe the armor.

I think what is meant by the Block II in this case is a ground up redesign using the technology as it progressed not a refit but new hulls

Now considering the FSN shipyards were pumping out Davion II, New Syrtis and Robinsons by that point maybe the admiralty didn't see the need to spend a mountain on what would effectively been a new design based around a hill that was considered to be a failure
My three main Alternate Timeline with Thanks fan-fiction threads are in the links below. I'm always open to suggestions or additions to be incorporated so if you feel you wish to add something feel free. There's non-canon units, equipment, people, events, erm... Solar Systems spread throughout so please enjoy

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,20515.0.html - Part 1

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,52013.0.html - Part 2

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,79196.0.html - Part 3

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #131 on: 29 May 2014, 23:31:31 »
As has been discussed in this thread before, making a Block II of pre-Drop Collar WarShips is not very practical. Since one of the first things someone would want to do is change out the bays for collars. The most you could do is upgrade the weapons and maybe the armor.

Curious...just how large, and how modern, a craft could the Dropshuttle bays accommodate?  Were they limited to Dropshuttles in use when the Defender was first built, or could they take on Dropships built at later times?  Aerodynes maybe, if not spheroids?

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

DarthRads

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Trust me...I'm the Doctor...
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #132 on: 30 May 2014, 00:16:38 »
How much do DropShuttle bays weigh? Is it the full 20 000t of the capacity or is it like 10% of the mass of the ship to be transported? Anone know?

Arvanna

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 481
  • Bayonets foreward Boys...CHARGE!!!!!!
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #133 on: 30 May 2014, 00:36:46 »
No clue but after imputing everything else in I had 9,038.5 tons left over for the four bays if that tells us anything?

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6126
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #134 on: 30 May 2014, 08:52:23 »
I think what is meant by the Block II in this case is a ground up redesign using the technology as it progressed not a refit but new hulls

Now considering the FSN shipyards were pumping out Davion II, New Syrtis and Robinsons by that point maybe the admiralty didn't see the need to spend a mountain on what would effectively been a new design based around a hill that was considered to be a failure

Or a new design at all.

Davion IIs, Congresses, Robinsons and New Syrtis. Just where is the need for a battle cruiser again?

Arvanna

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 481
  • Bayonets foreward Boys...CHARGE!!!!!!
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #135 on: 30 May 2014, 09:05:02 »
The Hegemony already had the Texas why the need to design and build the McKenna?

BrokenMnemonic

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1447
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #136 on: 30 May 2014, 09:25:01 »
Because the Hegemony was driven by the desire to utterly dominate everybody else when it came to WarShip actions. Why else did the Star League have a WarShip fleet 40 times the size of their next nearest competitor?

For all we know, the FedSuns was concentrating on ships up to Congress class because the Defender was outclassed so quickly, making large ships unpalatable, or maybe they were more concerned about the threat from the Draconis Combine - with their carriers and high-powered fast destroyers - than they were either the handful of heavy Capellan ships or the odds of the SLDF going to war with them.

It's more interesting than optimal, and therefore better. O0 - Weirdo

Welshman

  • Mostly Retired Has Been
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10509
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #137 on: 30 May 2014, 10:48:26 »
Curious...just how large, and how modern, a craft could the Dropshuttle bays accommodate?  Were they limited to Dropshuttles in use when the Defender was first built, or could they take on Dropships built at later times?  Aerodynes maybe, if not spheroids?

Rules for Drop Shuttle bays will be in Interstellar Operations.

I'm not sure we've covered DropShips trying to use a DropShuttle bay. One thing for certain is Spheroids wouldn't be able to use them. Just not the right shape or maneuverability.
-Joel BC-
Catalyst Freelancer (Inactive)

"Some closets will never contain Narnia, no matter how many times we open the door." - Weirdo, in relation to the power of hope.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40835
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #138 on: 30 May 2014, 10:54:40 »
To my knowledge, no rules for DropShuttles or their bays have been published whatsoever.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Dragon Cat

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7832
  • Not Dead Until I Say So
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #139 on: 30 May 2014, 15:47:26 »
Or a new design at all.

Davion IIs, Congresses, Robinsons and New Syrtis. Just where is the need for a battle cruiser again?

Bingo, it failed once no need to waste the resources on more.  Instead build designs that are useful.  I'm guessing the only reason the Defenders were ever pressed back into service was because a) the FSN needed every hull and b) Admirals in the FSN had served on them and couldn't bear to see them be broken up
My three main Alternate Timeline with Thanks fan-fiction threads are in the links below. I'm always open to suggestions or additions to be incorporated so if you feel you wish to add something feel free. There's non-canon units, equipment, people, events, erm... Solar Systems spread throughout so please enjoy

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,20515.0.html - Part 1

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,52013.0.html - Part 2

https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,79196.0.html - Part 3

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 25027
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #140 on: 30 May 2014, 19:50:31 »
Bingo, it failed once no need to waste the resources on more.  Instead build designs that are useful.  I'm guessing the only reason the Defenders were ever pressed back into service was because a) the FSN needed every hull and b) Admirals in the FSN had served on them and couldn't bear to see them be broken up

As a side note, alot of the older 1st generation WarShips made for the Great Houses seem to been basis for later WarShips.  Making improved "Block IIs" or more importantly new designs using the 1st generation design as the basis.   The Defender seems to have been on the exceptions of being not being used as template for later designs.   Considering the ship is a chain saw against other ships with its speed and Naval autocannons, I'd hope they would have made least better vessel based on it. 
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #141 on: 31 May 2014, 09:14:26 »
I'm not sure we've covered DropShips trying to use a DropShuttle bay. One thing for certain is Spheroids wouldn't be able to use them. Just not the right shape or maneuverability.

Let me be a bit more clear:  there is a particular Dropship I'm thinking of, one known to be used by the AFFS in an aerospace deployment role...

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #142 on: 02 June 2014, 23:05:01 »
Let me be a bit more clear:  there is a particular Dropship I'm thinking of, one known to be used by the AFFS in an aerospace deployment role...


Alright, I see need to be pretty direct here.

Is it possible, even in theory, for a Defender to accommodate a Vengeance in one of its Dropshuttle bays?

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40835
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #143 on: 02 June 2014, 23:16:41 »
To be equally direct:

We don't know, and cannot know until DropShuttle bays are published.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Arvanna

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 481
  • Bayonets foreward Boys...CHARGE!!!!!!
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #144 on: 03 June 2014, 00:07:47 »
Yep they haven't put out the rules yet, though the bays on the Defender are rated as 20k bays. It would be neat if you could pack 8 Vengeance s into those 4 bays or a lot of Achilles and  Avengers  >:D

gyedid

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2582
  • Always brighter on the other side of the mirror.
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #145 on: 03 June 2014, 00:39:58 »
Yep they haven't put out the rules yet, though the bays on the Defender are rated as 20k bays. It would be neat if you could pack 8 Vengeance s into those 4 bays or a lot of Achilles and  Avengers  >:D

And if you can, then suddenly the FSN's decision to keep the Defenders around suddenly seems like the most remarkable foresight :P

cheers,

Gabe
So, now I'm imagining people boxing up Overlords for loading as cargo.  "Nope, totally not a DropShip.  Everyone knows you can't fit a DropShip in a WarShip!  It's...a ten thousand ton box of marshmallows!  Yeah.  For the Heavy Guards big annual smores party."
--Arkansas Warrior, on the possibility of carrying Dropships as cargo in Warship cargo bays.

TERRAN SUPREMACY DEFENSE FORCE.  For when you want to send the SLDF, but couldn't afford the whole kit and kaboodle.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40835
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #146 on: 03 June 2014, 08:24:56 »
Yep they haven't put out the rules yet, though the bays on the Defender are rated as 20k bays. It would be neat if you could pack 8 Vengeance s into those 4 bays or a lot of Achilles and  Avengers  >:D

Or it could be that each bay can only hold a single ship ever, and each of those bays can handle ships up to 20 kilotons, kinda like vehicle bays. We just don't know.

And if you can, then suddenly the FSN's decision to keep the Defenders around suddenly seems like the most remarkable foresight :P

Yeah, on top of the numerous other extremely good reasons! O0
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Scotty

  • Alpha Strike Guru by appointment to the FWLM
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 13700
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #147 on: 03 June 2014, 10:17:58 »
New quirk: Compact Dropship. ^-^
Catalyst Demo Agent #679

Kansas City players, or people who are just passing through the area, come join us at the Geekery just off Shawnee Mission Parkway for BattleTech!  Current days are Tuesdays in the afternoon and evening.  I can't make every single week, but odds are pretty good that somebody will be there.

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 25027
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #148 on: 03 June 2014, 10:59:07 »
If the DropShip is less than 5k, it should fit without problem if you go by what little we know about Dropshuttle bays.
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

DarthRads

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2184
  • Trust me...I'm the Doctor...
Re: WarShip of the Week: Defender
« Reply #149 on: 03 June 2014, 17:26:40 »
Yep they haven't put out the rules yet, though the bays on the Defender are rated as 20k bays. It would be neat if you could pack 8 Vengeance s into those 4 bays or a lot of Achilles and  Avengers  >:D

If they can, that would be...nasty!

 

Register