BattleTech - The Board Game of Armored Combat
Catalyst Game Labs => BattleTech Game Errata => Topic started by: Xotl on 18 October 2012, 01:30:23
-
This thread is for all issues and problems with the Dossiers series of products.
Current releases are:
Bounty Hunter (http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=dossiers-the-bounty-hunter)
Jason Zaklan (http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=battletech-dossiers-jason-zaklan)
Lamenkov’s Liability (http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=lance-pack-dossiers-lamenkovs-liability)
Salazar Tsakalotos (http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=battletech-dossiers-salazar-tsakalotos)
Youling Zhanshi (http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=lance-pack-dossiers-youling-zhanshi)
Please remember to follow the errata report template (http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,2412.msg171290.html#msg171290) when reporting issues, and be sure to specify which Dossier contains the problem you're reporting. Thanks.
-
Bounty Hunter Dossier
Original PDF Release
Pages 9 and 10.
Robert "Bob" Farrell should be the pilot of the Shadowhawk as stated in Page 7 of Blake Documents. The model should be a modified 1R, not a 2H (though possibly an early run 2H with the 1R armor configuration as mentioned in XTRO Primitives Vol 1 pdf?).
Farrell should have been born on Quentin not Claybrooke (Blake Docs p. 7) had service with the 3rd Dieron Regulars and not FWL anything (Blake Docs p. 7).
This has a chain effect throughout the whole document including record sheets.
Since Walt is the Bounty Hunter in 3072 in Blake Documents and his only companion then was Bob, there may be some leeway in the first part.
-
The Bounty Hunter, p. 16:
The Bounty Hunter has a TP 2 for his Marksman SPA. This is an error: the Marksman SPA does not have a variable level.
-
Only PDF release of Dossiers: Bounty Hunter that I'm aware of:
Pg 9: Alexander Romanov's Shadow Hawk is referred to as the SHD-2H (Romanov)
Pg 24: The record sheet refers to the same mech as the SHD-5H Sandy
The MUL designates it the SHD-5D (Sandy)
Which is correct?
-
Jason Zaklan, p. 1
Youling Zhanshi, pp. 1, 4-8, 10-11
"Capellan Reserve Cavalry"
Issue: No such a unit
Correction: Replace with "Confederation Reserve Cavalry"