BattleTech - The Board Game of Armored Combat

Catalyst Game Labs => BattleTech Game Errata => Topic started by: Xotl on 16 May 2011, 18:35:54

Title: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: Xotl on 16 May 2011, 18:35:54
This thread is for all issues and problems with Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech.

Product Link: http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=experimental-technical-readout-retrotech

Please remember to follow the errata report template (http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php/topic,2412.msg171290.html#msg171290) when reporting issues.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: Neufeld on 17 May 2011, 06:39:50
XTRO: RetroTech: (pdf)
Page 6: NH-1B Rook-X
The model id NH-1B is already used by another mech, see HN1-B Rook on page 126 in Record Sheets 3085: Unabridged.

Suggested correction: Rename to NH-1C.


Errata Coordinator: The names are not the same.  The RS3085 volume has a Rook NH-1B, while Retrotech has a Rook-X NH-1B.  Thanks.
Title: Re: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: Moonsword on 11 July 2011, 14:50:53
PDF Copyright 2011
Page 9, HW1 Hwacha

Problem 1
The turret tonnage is wrong.  There are 21 tons in the turret, requiring a 2.5 ton turret, not a 1.5 ton turret as laid out.  The simplest place to pull a ton from is the ammo.  Doing this will require recalculating the BV.  Both a change to ammo and BV will also need to be noted on the record sheet on page 22.

Problem 2
Tech base is listed as Inner Sphere (Advanced).  There are no advanced construction options or equipment on the vehicle, so it should be Inner Sphere (Tournament Legal).

Problem 3
Overall tech rating is listed as TR D.  Per developer errata to TechManual modifying advanced fire control to be TR C, the overall tech rating should be TR C.  At that point, the note at the bottom about tech ratings for armor, chassis, and engine is redundant.



p. 14, S-2 Star Dagger:

Engine weight for a 220-rated engine should be 10 tons, not 11.5 tons.
Title: Re: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: mbear on 02 March 2012, 15:49:58
Page 12, second paragraph, third sentence:
Quote
They were also difficult to kill; though four tons of armor is not a lot of protection, forty long-range and eight short-rang torpedo tubes

Replace short-rang with short-range.
Title: Re: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: lrose on 13 April 2012, 20:35:47
P.14
In the stat block the 220 rated engine should only mass 10 tons.

Title: Re: Experimental Technical Readout: RetroTech
Post by: Xotl on 13 April 2012, 20:39:06
p. 13, SPR-DH Sparrowhawk:

Armour should be referred to as "Primitive" in game stat block.