I see this has yet to receive a reply, so I will clarify and expand on why I asked it here.
With the broad scope of the questions, it seemed this rather than the Ask the Writers forum was the best place to put it, especially seeing it involved a conflict between print and .pdf products.
I have received PMs from posters who own the .pdf copy that the sources are identical, confirmed by Ruger and the text of the Rommel/Patton in TR: 3039.
However, the poster claiming otherwise is a fact-checker and claims they have a corrected version of the text placing the Rommel in production at Perdition in the products section, and that there are other (as yet unreleased?) products supporting this
here and
here.
Which is correct?