Register Register

Author Topic: Technical Readout: 3067  (Read 3436 times)

Moonsword

  • Global Moderator
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 14244
Technical Readout: 3067
« on: 07 May 2012, 19:22:46 »
This thread is for all issues and problems with the current Catalyst printing of Technical Readout: 3067.  Reports must be from the Catalyst version only: errors found in earlier, non-Catalyst printings should not be reported.

Product Link: http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=technical-readout-3067

There is no compiled errata for this product at this time.

Please remember to follow the errata report template when reporting issues.  Thanks.
« Last Edit: 18 June 2015, 14:57:06 by Xotl »

LastChanceCav

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2215
  • Repossessing the dispossessed ...
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #1 on: 07 May 2012, 21:33:41 »
TRO 3067 (Corrected Fourth Printing, First Printing by Catalyst Game Labs 2012)

P. 106
"Most Solitaire pilots break from their lance early ..." should be changed to "Most Solitaire pilots break from their star early ..." since the Clans don't use lances.

P. 110
There's a typo for the Spirit, change "The heart of the Spirit is a 240-rated XL fusion power plant" to "The heart of the Spirit is a 245-rated XL fusion power plant".

Cheers,
LCC
Last Chance Engineering - Bespoke Battlemechs for the refined gentleman.

LastChanceCav

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2215
  • Repossessing the dispossessed ...
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #2 on: 11 May 2012, 09:43:55 »
TRO 3067 (Corrected Fourth Printing, First Printing by Catalyst Game Labs 2012)

P. 184 Conquistador drop ship

The first autocannon bay in the LW/RW is listed as:
"2 Gauss Rifles (80 rounds), 6 (50) 5 (50) 3 (30) 3 (30) Autocannon
Rotary AC/5 (240 rounds)"

Change to:
"2 Gauss Rifles (80 rounds), 5 (50) 5 (50) 3 (30) 3 (30) Autocannon
Rotary AC/5 (240 rounds)"

Cheers,
LCC
Last Chance Engineering - Bespoke Battlemechs for the refined gentleman.

Tai Dai Cultist

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6964
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #3 on: 07 July 2013, 05:35:06 »
Print, 2012 edition

page 146, ON-1 Oni fluff
"The need to quckly field advanced equipment prompted the DCMS to favor an upgrade program, but the Combine also produced new designs."

"The Lyran transport was eventually driven off by the DCMS, with its visa for future trade missions suspended pending an investigation."

DCMS in these instances should be replaced with DCA.

Other mentions of DCMS on the page can arguably be inferred to actually mean DCMS.

Page 150, MIK-O Tatsu fluff
"Though the release of the Sai was likely done as a boost to the morale of the DCMS."

Suggest replacing DCMS with DCA, as it would make more sense than to try to boost the DCMS's morale via DCA loaned equipment.

Page 198,  Inazuma fluff
"At the current time, the DCS fields the following Inazuma-class vessels.."

Replace DCS with DCA


Page 194, Warship section fluff

"Additional programs such as the DCMS' Yamato-"

replace DCMS' with DCA's
« Last Edit: 07 July 2013, 06:20:27 by Tai Dai Cultist »

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4236
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #4 on: 25 October 2014, 07:41:38 »
2012 edition
P220

Arcs for Conqueror should be.

FL/FR (501 Heat)
3 NL 55, 3 NL 45 30 30 30 30 Capital Laser
3 LB 20-X AC (30 rounds) 4 (36) 4 (36) — — LB-X
3 LB 10-X AC (30 rounds) 2 (18) 2 (18) — — LB-X
6 ER Small Lasers 2 (18) — — — Laser

AL/AR (501 Heat)
3 NL 55, 3 NL 45 30 30 30 30 Capital Laser
3 LB 20-X AC (30 rounds) 4 (36) 4 (36) — — LB-X
3 LB 10-X AC (30 rounds) 2 (18) 2 (18) — — LB-X
6 ER Small Lasers 2 (18) — — — Laser

The heat values confirm it. Don't know where they were getting 54 damage for the LB-x for. Maybe 36+18?

sillybrit

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3923
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #5 on: 04 June 2015, 23:05:13 »
TRO 3067 (Corrected Fourth Printing, First Printing by Catalyst Game Labs 2012) PDF

Union-X p176:

1) 8 points of armor are unallocated.

38.5t of ferro-aluminum @ 17.92 points/t = 689 points (rounded down). Plus the 12 free points per facing due to the SI, gives 737 points total
The Union-X armor layout is currently 190 (nose), 180 (sides), 179 (aft), totaling 729 points.

Suggested fix: allocate 2 extra points per facing.

2) 51t mass unallocated.

Engine: 721.5
SI 12: 89
Fuel (incl. pumps): 204
Bridge: 28
Armor: 38.5
HS: 0 (70 free HS in engine)
2 Gauss (with 80 shots total): 40
6 LRM20 (with Art IV & 180 shots total): 96
4 UAC5 (with 400 shots total): 56
6 ERPPC: 42
10 ERLL: 50
14 ERML: 14
3 Officers: 30
5 Crew: 35
7 Gunners: 49
5 Escape Pods: 35
4 ASF bays: 600
8 Mech bays: 1200
5 IS Battle Armor squad bays: 40
Cargo: 281

721.5+89+204+28+38.5+40+96+56+42+50+14+30+35+49+35+600+1200+40+281=3649

Suggested fix: Increase cargo space to 332t

Joe

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #6 on: 10 September 2016, 10:11:43 »
2012 edition
P220

Arcs for Conqueror should be.

...

The heat values confirm it. Don't know where they were getting 54 damage for the LB-x for. Maybe 36+18?

It's because all the weapons are calculated as inner Sphere Instead of Clan, though the armor isn't, so all the non-Naval grade weapon stats need to be updated...

Alfaryn

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 180
Re: Technical Readout: 3067
« Reply #7 on: 07 June 2018, 08:00:58 »
The following report is something I'm only about 90% certain, as it deals with Aerospace construction rules, which I'm not very familiar with, since I've read, but never used them, and I could have missed something. I asked for conformation of my interpretation of relevant rules in the rules questions forum a few moths ago (here: https://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=60082.0), but since I haven't gotten any answer since then, I decided to post this errata without confirmation. If I get any answer there, or otherwise learn that I'm wrong, I'll delete or modify this post as needed.

Just keep in mind, that this report may be incorrect.


Technical Readout 3067 (Corrected Fourth Printing, First Printing by Catalyst Game Labs, 2012 print edition)
Pp. 138, 141, 144, 150, 152, 154, 156.

Problem: All OmniFighters in the TRO seem to list only 3 Free Spaces in the Aft section. In all cases there should be 5 spaces free.

Solution: Change the number of Free Spaces in the Aft section on all pages listed above from 3 to 5.

Edit: Errata confirmed in the thread linked above.
« Last Edit: 25 November 2018, 23:07:21 by Alfaryn »

 

Register