Register Register

Author Topic: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads  (Read 135787 times)

Daryk

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16235
  • The Double Deuce II/II-σ
Heh... I would expect no less of the CGL Rule Ninja Corps!  :D

monbvol

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10434
  • Flogging will continue until morale improves
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #991 on: 05 June 2020, 20:19:46 »
And I already have a question.

The pdfs are marked fourth printing but since they are new products shouldn't they be first printing again?

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9253
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #992 on: 05 June 2020, 21:27:09 »
It's still Tactical Operations, so no.  It's the same content, just split in two.

(Also, it should be the third printing: the previous release was supposed to be the third printing, but was never released in print, so this is the third.  This borks the errata document numbering, so I'll need to jigger things around a bit).
3028-3050 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info and Quirk lists.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

monbvol

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10434
  • Flogging will continue until morale improves
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #993 on: 05 June 2020, 21:53:43 »
Just trying to figure out what I need to notate when submitting errata as I am still rather inclined to submit official errata for that word salad at the end of the third paragraph of Patchwork Armor.

I do not envy you your task, especially as people will just notate it as the fourth printing because that is what the pdfs list them as.

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9253
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #994 on: 05 June 2020, 22:18:57 »
Yeah, I've held off doing anything for TacOps for the past six months since this was coming and I wanted to have everything moved over to the new version. 

For notations in general, all TO references should now use the new two-volume version.  But yes, please do submit errata for it.
3028-3050 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info and Quirk lists.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Xotl

  • Dominus Erratorum
  • Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9253
  • Professor of Errata
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #995 on: 06 June 2020, 14:28:50 »
Errata for the year is out, though it's only a handful of new rulings in three products.

Over the next while if I can find the time I'm going to try for an inaugural release for the two TacOps books, collecting whatever has generated since December.  But if there's not a lot then it just might wait until next year's June release instead.
3028-3050 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info and Quirk lists.

http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

Daryk

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 16235
  • The Double Deuce II/II-σ
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #996 on: 06 June 2020, 14:35:23 »
Hopefully you saw my PM...

Dies Irae

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 672
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #997 on: 08 June 2020, 03:36:04 »
A bit of pedantry, but since there's no real way to submit errata for a novel?


BattleTech: Divided We Fall Novel

Print-on-Demand Edition
Page 120, Dominator Class BattleMech entry:

Power Plant: 225 XL Fusion (with Supercharger)

Possible typo as considering the 'Mechs speed is listed as a base 54 kph, would the Engine not be a 325 XL rather than a 225 XL?


Maelwys

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4625
Re: Errata Discussion Thread - Questions HERE, not in Errata Threads
« Reply #998 on: 11 June 2020, 22:39:31 »
Its also listed as a Biped OmniMech, despite it apparently being a standard mech (assuming the actuators aren't messed up).

I was sort of wondering for Shrapnel, since the sniper weapons have some some issues, like missing the Dark Age Equipment rating, and for some odd reason the Star League sniper rifle isn't available in the Star League era...

 

Register