Register Register

Author Topic: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?  (Read 3266 times)

Death by Lasers

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 297
The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« on: 14 April 2017, 17:16:49 »
  I could have sworn at some point you could buy this on the Ironwind store.  Is there anywhere you can get the new Warhammer miniature shown in Combat Manual Mercenaries or is not in production yet?
“I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”

J.R.R Tolikien, The Two Towers

Cache

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1635
    • Lords of the Battlefield
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #1 on: 14 April 2017, 20:45:27 »
Not in production, yet.

Feenix74

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2771
  • Lam's Phoenix Hawks
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #2 on: 14 April 2017, 21:25:05 »
As stated by Cache, not in production by IWM as yet. A couple of prototype 3D prints were displayed at Gencon 2015 by CGL (not IWM). No news/annoucements of when they will become available from IWM (or CGL).

Incoming fire has the right of way.

The only thing more accurate than incoming enemy fire is incoming friendly fire.

Always remember that your weapon was built by the lowest bidder.


                                   - excepts from Murphy's Laws of Combat

Burning Chrome

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • One of the Vocal Minority
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #3 on: 15 April 2017, 18:39:04 »
STILL not in production, AFTER NEARLY TWO YEARS.

FTFY
"Matchup of the century: desire to play vs. resentment"

Cache

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1635
    • Lords of the Battlefield
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #4 on: 15 April 2017, 19:35:40 »
FTFY
I don't consider that fixing anything. Folks have been waiting longer for other units from TROs 3085 and 3145, not to mention the decades some of us have waited for units that fan financing might cover. Currently there are three Warhammer and two Warhammer IIC minis available from IWM for use as proxies. So you want another Warhammer resculpt. I want a 3055 Upgrades Gunslinger and Berserker. It's going on 12 years that I've been waiting on them. At least the nuSeen Warhammer is a certainty.

Death by Lasers

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 297
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #5 on: 15 April 2017, 21:12:54 »
  Thanks, that clears things up.  I have a list as long as my arm of different Battletech miniatures I want so there is no hurry.
“I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”

J.R.R Tolikien, The Two Towers

Burning Chrome

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 799
  • One of the Vocal Minority
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #6 on: 16 April 2017, 12:36:23 »
I don't consider that fixing anything. Folks have been waiting longer for other units from TROs 3085 and 3145, not to mention the decades some of us have waited for units that fan financing might cover. Currently there are three Warhammer and two Warhammer IIC minis available from IWM for use as proxies. So you want another Warhammer resculpt. I want a 3055 Upgrades Gunslinger and Berserker. It's going on 12 years that I've been waiting on them. At least the nuSeen Warhammer is a certainty.

I do think it fixes it.

Like you, I too would like to see a Gunslinger resculpt, however there has never been any test sculpts of such a thing unlike the Warhammer.  The NuSeen art/sculpt generated a lot of buzz and (will, most likely) sales/revenue...and yet remains something unavailable for nearly two years?

I'm making no assumptions, so please spare me the "you don't know how hard it is to..." arguments.  I'd simply like to see supply meet demand while demand still exists.

I was looking forward to a NuSeen TRO (might exist someday) but since CGL chose to release a few mechs here and there, scattered throughout other products, I'm out.  I bought a few, initially excited, but then some were "meh", so I'm done.  I understand what CGL is doing, but I'm not willing to participate and spend any money.  I'll wait for the art/data to become available elsewhere, or have my the guys in my group lend me their latest sourcebook purchase when we next meet.  If/when a TRO is released, maybe I'll pick it up.

Same thing with minis.  If the NuSeen are going to be released a few at a time over the next several years, I think there is a significant risk of waning interest.

Nothing is certain.

Tough business to be in.

(fixed for some bizarre word errors)

« Last Edit: 17 April 2017, 10:09:57 by Burning Chrome »
"Matchup of the century: desire to play vs. resentment"

Death by Lasers

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 297
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #7 on: 16 April 2017, 23:13:16 »
  Actually, now that we are talking about the Nuseen how many are being made?  I know the Shadow Hawk is available are there any others?
“I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend.”

J.R.R Tolikien, The Two Towers

Sartris

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5254
  • Here for the Jokes
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #8 on: 16 April 2017, 23:23:57 »
wasp and ostscout. the valkyrie is next

pheonixstorm

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4635
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #9 on: 17 April 2017, 00:07:30 »
The next intro box was mentioned to have the classics in plastic. That was from Randall in one of the twitch streams iirc, but nothing officially announced.

Speck said that IWM is currently set for 12 of the classics (If memory serves...). No information on what they are licensed to produce, just the number that will be in metal for now.

Sartris

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5254
  • Here for the Jokes
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #10 on: 17 April 2017, 00:19:58 »
i have a feeling we're not going to get any real news about the classics box until the cake is almost ready to come out of the oven. the only thing worse than no news is indefinite delays.

Feenix74

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2771
  • Lam's Phoenix Hawks
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #11 on: 17 April 2017, 00:36:32 »
i have a feeling we're not going to get any real news about the classics box until the cake is almost ready to come out of the oven iced and decorated. the only thing worse than no news is indefinite delays.

Fixed for you  O0
Incoming fire has the right of way.

The only thing more accurate than incoming enemy fire is incoming friendly fire.

Always remember that your weapon was built by the lowest bidder.


                                   - excepts from Murphy's Laws of Combat

Sartris

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5254
  • Here for the Jokes
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #12 on: 17 April 2017, 00:43:39 »
urite

Domi1981

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 427
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #13 on: 17 April 2017, 12:35:26 »
I somehow have the feeling that the new box will be released when HBS´s Battletech game will be released to make use of the hype. But that would require some real marketing expert and that was always a problem with BTech.

nckestrel

  • Scientia Bellator
  • Freelance Writer
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7480
  • Painted by Mastergunz
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #14 on: 17 April 2017, 12:54:40 »
That would require a lot more control over the production process. 
Master Unit List website - where to find units, what factions use them, what's their BV?
http://www.masterunitlist.info
3025-3050 Random Assignment Tables -
Also contains faction deployment & rarity info and Quirk lists.
http://bg.battletech.com/forums/index.php?topic=1219.0

pheonixstorm

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4635
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #15 on: 17 April 2017, 15:18:08 »
And having the produce being produced right now. Which last Randall spoke on the subject seemed like a distant thing of end of year early next year maybe kinda thing.

Domi1981

  • Warrant Officer
  • *
  • Posts: 427
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #16 on: 17 April 2017, 16:24:19 »
Well, after all the gaming projects I supported and attended I can assure you that HBS product will take as long as that. I mean, look at the current holdup with the beta. This is totally the norm in the video gaming industry.

worktroll

  • Oldest and fatherless
  • Ombudsman
  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 19555
  • 504th "Gateway" Division
    • There are Monsters in my Sky!
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #17 on: 17 April 2017, 18:19:43 »
You know, it just hit me. The 'classic' Warhammer is nearly perfect to base an Anzu kitbash off ...
* No, FASA wasn't big on errata - ColBosch
* The Housebook series is from the 80's and is the foundation of Btech, the 80's heart wrapped in heavy metal that beats to this day - Sigma
* To sum it up: FASAnomics: By Cthulhu, for Cthulhu - Moonsword
* Because Battletech is a conspiracy by Habsburg & Bourbon pretenders - MadCapellan
* The Hellbringer is cool, either way. It's not cool because it's bad, it's cool because it's bad with balls - Nightsky
* It was a glorious time for people who felt that we didn't have enough Marauder variants - HABeas2, re "Empires Aflame"

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 30979
  • That which has been seen can NEVER be unseen...
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #18 on: 17 April 2017, 22:01:58 »
I wonder if the reverse will be true.
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"It's just that the Hegemony had one answer to every naval problem. 'I kills it with my battleships.'" - Liam's Ghost
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"The BT universe is startlingly deficient in both wisdom and hindsight." - Cray
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
Battleforce Space is too bulky. I vote we start calling it BattleFace.

IAMCLANWOLF

  • Freelance Artist
  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 3028
  • Battletech>Eat>Sleep
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #19 on: 18 April 2017, 10:55:05 »
I wonder if the reverse will be true.

Legs 'n hips are quite reminiscent of the unseen. Torso could work, with mods.
Problem is; the Anzu's not on IWMs radar at present. 

Empyrus

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3921
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #20 on: 18 April 2017, 11:12:27 »
Isn't the Lament's torso quite Warhammer-like?
« Last Edit: 18 April 2017, 11:16:56 by Empyrus »

Colt Ward

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12813
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #21 on: 02 May 2017, 22:27:20 »
Yeah, the Lament and Prim TBolt both have some options that way
Colt Ward

Beware the vengeance of a patient man.

TS_Hawk

  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6332
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #22 on: 21 March 2018, 23:43:33 »
This will save me trouble. With the 2 new box sets coming out any idea about the warhammer and marauder being released by either iwm or CGL later this year?

Thank you Hikage
Agent 694 N. Idaho

Colt Ward

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12813
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #23 on: 22 March 2018, 00:11:40 »
No word . . . but I will point out that the 2nd & 3rd quarters only have 3 mechs each where they usually have 4 . . . and we do not have the 4th quarter at all.
Colt Ward

Beware the vengeance of a patient man.

Feenix74

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2771
  • Lam's Phoenix Hawks
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #24 on: 22 March 2018, 00:25:22 »
Noting that both the Warhammer and the Marauder feature in HG's legal paperwork to the currently running court case, I believe we will should not expect see either of those minis until the court case is resolved one way or the other.
Incoming fire has the right of way.

The only thing more accurate than incoming enemy fire is incoming friendly fire.

Always remember that your weapon was built by the lowest bidder.


                                   - excepts from Murphy's Laws of Combat

Colt Ward

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 12813
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #25 on: 22 March 2018, 00:45:29 »
Sorry, yeah . . . I was thinking of the box set stuff . . . its why I went back to my kitbashing plans of a couple of years ago for some -6D and -3Rs.
Colt Ward

Beware the vengeance of a patient man.

TS_Hawk

  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6332
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #26 on: 22 March 2018, 12:14:24 »
I thought the court case ended

Thank you Hikage
Agent 694 N. Idaho

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 30979
  • That which has been seen can NEVER be unseen...
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #27 on: 22 March 2018, 12:26:58 »
Nope, still going. Check the Harmony Gold thread up in General for the latest updates.
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"It's just that the Hegemony had one answer to every naval problem. 'I kills it with my battleships.'" - Liam's Ghost
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"The BT universe is startlingly deficient in both wisdom and hindsight." - Cray
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
Battleforce Space is too bulky. I vote we start calling it BattleFace.

TS_Hawk

  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6332
Re: The Warhammer from CM:Mercenaries?
« Reply #28 on: 22 March 2018, 23:03:39 »
Thanks weirdo

Thank you Hikage
Agent 694 N. Idaho