These are unique works. They are inspired by the originals, but are new art. You are allowed to be inspired by other art - almost everything is.
And of course they are designed to be the new unseen - the original artwork can't be used. That does not make them unoriginal. These are designed quite clearly to not be the unseen while capturing the spirit of them - and HG has no copyright on spirit.
If you want to go by their tack - how about the Bushwacker? The Hector? Any of the primitives? The Bombadier, the Hammerhands? The MadCat?
If HG has their way, it's anything defined as "Giant Robot Warrior" that they own if it has any elements of the Macross in it. They need to be shut down on this matter.
- Shane
IMR/CGL are not being sued for the Bushwacker, Hector, or Hammerhands.
While it is easy for us to perceive Harmony Gold as a despicable villains I find myself actually somewhat agreeing with JenniferinaMAD.
There have been many years where we had the Project Phoenix Art and from what I can see none of that is being contested by Harmony Gold.
So end of the day while we may not like Harmony Gold and there seem to be many ready and willing to sensationalize them into villains, it doesn't mean that they are in the wrong to bring this case or that there is not some merit to the idea that maybe IMR/CGL did poke the bear with the new Classics art.
Which is what Harmony Gold is contesting. That the new Classic art is too close to the old Macross art.
If I am objective about it I can see IMR/CGL does have some cause for concern because while I can see sufficient differences doesn't mean a judge and jury won't.
So don't get me wrong. I hope Harmony Gold loses and loses hard. It is just that the available evidence does suggest this whole mess could have been avoided in the first place if people could have let go of the old Macross art for Battletech and accepted something completely different. Which is a possible outcome of this situation(that we have to accept new art that is clearly different).