There are no previously defined definitions, I am not redefining anything. Why do you keep declaring what my stance is or say that I am doing something or won't do something? I gave you what I thought was a fair explanation of what I consider victory, I included several references and examples. I provided what I thought to be a decent insight into my perception of the conflicts and their results so that discussion could be had. You have thus far not reciprocated in discussing in any manner. Can you reciprocate and tell me what you consider to be victories in Battletech and why?
From Wikipedia (I know, string me up for using Wikipedia as a source

but it's simpler than teasing the definition out of several obscure sources)
A strategic victory is a victory that brings long-term advantage to the victor and disturbs the enemy's ability to wage a war.
This is the definition of "Victory" that I use, specifically it's the common definition when dealing with the question of who "won" a war. A defeat
A list of victories and defeats for Battletech
4th Succession War - Victory for FedSuns and Draconis Combine(due to Rasalhague independence)
War of 3039 - Victory for Draconis Combine
Clan Invasion - Defeat for all parties involved, If you want to debate this, fair enough but I think you'd have a hard time finding a victor and not a survivor
Capellan-St.Ives War - Victory for Capellan Confederation
FedCom Civil War - Defeat for Both parties involved, the people who win Civil wars are the neighboring states so in this case the Victors were everybody not in the FedCom
Jihad - Victory for Stone and Loss for everyone else
Andurien Secession - Victory for Capellan Confederation