Okay, a bit of a thread necro here, but wanted to share a couple of things.
Firstly, from what I've been able to gather, the show wasn't axed because of it's poor ratings (which relatively weren't bad at all), but because FOX got into a disagreement with WB over profits from distribution rights.
And secondly, it seems like "Almost Human" may become a second "Star Trek". There is currently an online petition going on to try to get another network to pick it up (supposedly NetFlix is tentatively interested). Can read about it here:
Fox's cancelled Almost Human is seeing the Star Trek effect with online campaign.
So if you really loved the series I'd suggest signing the petition (it's linked to in the above story).
I came upon an interesting quote the other day. By Bjo Trimble about her efforts to save Star Trek from being cancelled:
NBC was also convinced that Star Trek was watched only by drooling idiot 12-year olds with no buying power. They managed to ignore the fact that people such as Isaac Asimov, a multiple PhD, and a multitude of other intellectuals enjoyed the show. So, of course, the Suits were always looking for reasons to cancel shows they didn’t trust to be raging successes. They used faulty Neilson Rating numbers to “prove” that Star Trek was failing badly, and decided to cancel it. Fans decided to take action, and we did it very well, thank you very much! So well that NBC came on, in prime time, and made a voice-over announcement that Star Trek was not canceled… so please stop writing letters.
It's interesting, but it seems like that is the exact same attitude the major networks still have about sci-fi shows.
(If you don't know who Bjo Trimble is, you should most certainly read the rest of the interview
here.