Author Topic: Trueborn VS Freeborn  (Read 6606 times)

Mad Monkey

  • Recruit
  • *
  • Posts: 7
Trueborn VS Freeborn
« on: 29 January 2017, 14:03:28 »
Now after reading several articles about the Clans , I can understand why Kerensky wanted more people . But by doing so Kerensky created a caste system that may have negative results some time in the future . I can see the Freeborn revolting against the Trueborn and splitting the Clans .  If it was Kerensky dream to return the Star League to the planets then he and his off springs such of ( my thoughts ) used the idea of one supreme leader and kept to the original Star League military structure .

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 29067
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #1 on: 29 January 2017, 17:46:30 »
Couple things . . . the caste system came about before the iron wombs.  Kerensky was wanting to abolish all traces of the old societies for his re-ordering.

As far as Freeborn vs Trueborn . . . they exercise a special method of control to separate the wolves from the freebirth sheep.  Those with aggression are recruited into the freebirth warrior programs, where they either wash out, die in training or become part of the system.  Depending on the Clan they have a limited career path.

But several times you have had Clan forces massacre uppity lower castemen who question them too much or show hints of rebellion.  Most recently the Falcon's slaughter of their scientists in the IS.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

Fireangel

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3402
  • 7397 posts right down the toilet...
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #2 on: 29 January 2017, 20:22:21 »
And do not forget that trueborns who wash out of the warrior programs do join the lower castes, and are part of the lower caste breeding programs.

Deadborder

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7887
  • Technical Victory!
    • Elmer Studios Blog
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #3 on: 29 January 2017, 22:13:21 »
There was a Freeborn revolt; the Society uprising. That ended well for all involved.
Author of BattleCorps stories Grand Theft Agro and Zero Signal



How to Draw MegaMek Icons the Deadborder Way. Over 9000 so far. Determination or madness?

Fireangel

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3402
  • 7397 posts right down the toilet...
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #4 on: 30 January 2017, 15:51:48 »
There was a Freeborn revolt; the Society uprising. That ended well for all involved.

I would not call it a “Freeborn revolt”, particularly with the large number of trueborn scientists involved.

Sjhernan3060

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1836
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #5 on: 23 March 2017, 08:49:23 »
Silly question but do Trueborns have belly buttons? I mean they are vat grown so would they have had umbilical cords?

Jaim Magnus

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7814
  • Assisting you and your enemies equally.
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #6 on: 23 March 2017, 09:12:48 »
Nutrients have to enter the body somewhere. So they probably do.
BattleCorps - Righteous Fury, Sorrow of Eden, Lady of Steel, I Was Lost, Forsaken : Legacy - The Forgotten Places : Shrapnel - Scavenger's Blood : ELH Chronicles - View from the Ground : Shrapnel - It Ends in Fire, Picking the Bones

Achtung Minen!

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 109
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #7 on: 23 March 2017, 11:53:40 »
Caste systems are actually notoriously resilient, historically speaking. But anyway, it's worth keeping in mind that Clan society is not just caste-based, but more importantly socialist. There is no private property and there is no currency. Everyone is paid the same way, in work credits, and get resources according to their needs (so a labourer will get many more calories of foodstuffs than an accountant). You cannot hoard money (because it doesn't exist), you do not inherit, and success in the society is based on merit.

Those are significant factors for reducing the incidents of social unrest.
« Last Edit: 23 March 2017, 11:55:57 by Achtung Minen! »

Orwell84

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 889
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #8 on: 27 March 2017, 02:20:49 »
Silly question but do Trueborns have belly buttons? I mean they are vat grown so would they have had umbilical cords?

Judging by this image from the Jade Falcon sourcebook, it looks like there's multiple cords of some kind used.

Caste systems are actually notoriously resilient, historically speaking. But anyway, it's worth keeping in mind that Clan society is not just caste-based, but more importantly socialist. There is no private property and there is no currency. Everyone is paid the same way, in work credits, and get resources according to their needs (so a labourer will get many more calories of foodstuffs than an accountant). You cannot hoard money (because it doesn't exist), you do not inherit, and success in the society is based on merit.

Merit plus having the right ancestors, at least as far as the warrior caste is concerned. Phelan Kell noted that one of the ironies of this system is that Kerensky's intended meritocracy turned into a lineage-based rulership in each Clan.

The mistake the Clans collectively made here, IMHO, was in blindly exalting youthful trueborn superiority rather than acknowledging the advantages experience and freeborn 'randomness' could bring if added to the mix. In somebody's alternate universe Andery Kerensky creates a Trial of Propagation or such where non-800 worthies could establish their own bloodname and bloodhouse (Ethan Moreau being the first). An outlet like that for gifted freeborns could add fresh genetic material and motivate both types into performing better on the battlefield.

As to Clan civilians, perhaps Kerensky would have done better to promote his warriors as 'first among equals' and tiebreakers rather than supreme lords over all, and given scientists, merchants, etc some real decision-making power. A government like the post-Blackout Rasalhague Dominion has a stable mix of trueborn and freeborn warriors plus civilians, whereas the Clan Homeworlds had freeborn revolts of one kind or another every time disaster rocked the delicate socialist economy and the warriors reacted poorly to civilian concerns.
All Clan totems are equal but some are more equal than others.

"The Succession Wars solved no problem. Their effects, both immediate and indirect, were either negative or disastrous. Morally subversive, economically destructive, socially degrading, confused in their causes, devious in their course, futile in their results, they are the outstanding example in Spheroid history of meaningless conflict."
The Third Star League's view of the Succession Wars, plagiarised from an ancient Terran historian's judgement of the Thirty Years War.

truetanker

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 9977
  • Clan Hells Horses 666th Mech. Assualt Cluster
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #9 on: 28 March 2017, 22:45:53 »
Silly question but do Trueborns have belly buttons? I mean they are vat grown so would they have had umbilical cords?

Hey Trothkin! You an Inny or an Outty, quiaff?

TT
Khan, Clan Iron Dolphin
Azeroth Pocketverse
That is, if true tanker doesn't beat me to it. He makes truly evil units.Col.Hengist on 31 May 2013
TT, we know you are the master of nasty  O0 ~ Fletch on 22 June 2013
If I'm attacking you, conventional wisom says to bring 3x your force.  I want extra insurance, so I'll bring 4 for every 1 of what you have :D ~ Tai Dai Cultist on 21 April 2016
Me: Would you rather fight my Epithymía Thanátou from the Whispers of Blake?
Nav_Alpha: That THING... that is horrid
~ Nav_Alpha on 10 October 2016

Decoy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2706
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #10 on: 30 March 2017, 18:40:13 »
I think Cray answered this one and the answer he gave was that why mess with perfectly fine engineering? Yes, clans have belly buttons. Why change the umbilical cord set up for no real gain?
"I invented (the drink) PPCs in a time before the internet showed me the depth of human stupidity."-Michael Stackpole.

marauder648

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 8158
    • Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #11 on: 01 April 2017, 02:45:00 »
Don't forget that the Clans also put artificial constraints on themselves.  The Iron Wombs would allow the Clans to have a massive population, and if they had allowed themselves to explore they could have no doubt found more worlds to support themselves rather than seeming to want to temper themselves of a crucible of harsh worlds in the Pentagon and Kerensky cluster.  I can't remember what thread it was but someone wrote out a brilliant (and if I recall IC) post about the Clans and what Kerensky intended for the SLDF, that it was in essence a death sentence, that he had struck off to the north with no plan and no destination in mind and that basically the idea was that the SLDF would die off.  If was written as a conspiracy theory but it was superb :)
Ghost Bears: Cute and cuddly. Until you remember its a BLOODY BEAR!

Project Zhukov Fan AU TRO's and PDFs - https://thezhukovau.wordpress.com/

Phantom000

  • Corporal
  • *
  • Posts: 66
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #12 on: 24 April 2021, 09:06:26 »
One question I have is what is the ratio of treueborn to freeborn in the clans? I guess it would vary from clan to clan but I thought the trueborn were actually a minority among the clans. The idea that the clans are primarily trueborn is a misconception because the first clanners to enter the IS were mostly trueborn. I imagined that even for Smoke Jaguar, most of their civilians were freeborn with a handful of trueborns who failed their trial of position.

Is that true or am i just crazy?

AlphaMirage

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #13 on: 24 April 2021, 09:38:29 »
While we are unlikely to ever get numbers I would say prior to the invasion the Freeborn population was likely 85% at any given time. Post invasion it's likely 97-98% for the Sphere clans due to the immense populations of their occupied zones in relation to the homeworlds. Even in the homeworlds post WoR it probably went to 92% after the Society wiped out many warriors with their bioweapons

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 29067
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #14 on: 26 April 2021, 09:57:29 »
One question I have is what is the ratio of treueborn to freeborn in the clans? I guess it would vary from clan to clan but I thought the trueborn were actually a minority among the clans. The idea that the clans are primarily trueborn is a misconception because the first clanners to enter the IS were mostly trueborn. I imagined that even for Smoke Jaguar, most of their civilians were freeborn with a handful of trueborns who failed their trial of position.

Is that true or am i just crazy?

Thing is, it is not a handful who are re-assigned . . . it is a handful of warriors who finish the training program.  Even accounting for casualties, IMO at least half of each sibko washes out especially when you consider the program is from birth to Trial of Position.  I would suggest that by age 7, 10-20% have already washed out, another 30% or more by 12 when the more intensive training begins like operating the equipment for real rather than just military training.  So by the time they actually start putting sibkos in mechs, VTOL or CF, vehicles, or Battle Armor they have already weeded out those who were not aggressive, competitive, intelligent/cunning, or physically coordinated enough (you go through a bad clumsy stage?  well . . . ) to be expected to perform.

I know we have had sibko graduation requirements where numbers were tossed about- IIRC one was something like 5k warriors a year, mostly Elementals.  Now consider at best that is 10% of each overall sibko graduating . . . and that means at lowest you have 20k new civilians a year- IF we are assuming 50% of each sibko are training deaths.  Not just things like killed in live fire training, hand to hand training, or other combat specific tasks but sibkos would also lose say 10 year olds to exposure during survival or landnav training.  Maybe the sibko lost Johnnie because he ran into a Smoke Jaguar on Huntress during land nav training in the jungle.  Or Jill fell from the top of the obstacle course and broke her neck.  Considering that at most a sibko probably loses 10-30% of it's grouping to actual training deaths, and you end up with a higher number of new civies created each year . . . though THEIR children will be freeborns.
« Last Edit: 26 April 2021, 09:59:53 by Colt Ward »
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

RifleMech

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4507
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #15 on: 27 April 2021, 13:03:56 »
I think the Iron Wombs were; to not only increase the size of the Warrior Cast quickly but selective breeding on a mass scale and to to keep warriors from having to go on maternity leave.  The alternative was to turn the female warriors into broodmares which would cause all kinds of problems.

Also I believe the Trueborn being superior to Freeborn thing developed over time. I don't think it was there originally.

Metallgewitter

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #16 on: 28 April 2021, 01:59:16 »
Thing is, it is not a handful who are re-assigned . . . it is a handful of warriors who finish the training program.  Even accounting for casualties, IMO at least half of each sibko washes out especially when you consider the program is from birth to Trial of Position.  I would suggest that by age 7, 10-20% have already washed out, another 30% or more by 12 when the more intensive training begins like operating the equipment for real rather than just military training.  So by the time they actually start putting sibkos in mechs, VTOL or CF, vehicles, or Battle Armor they have already weeded out those who were not aggressive, competitive, intelligent/cunning, or physically coordinated enough (you go through a bad clumsy stage?  well . . . ) to be expected to perform.

I know we have had sibko graduation requirements where numbers were tossed about- IIRC one was something like 5k warriors a year, mostly Elementals.  Now consider at best that is 10% of each overall sibko graduating . . . and that means at lowest you have 20k new civilians a year- IF we are assuming 50% of each sibko are training deaths.  Not just things like killed in live fire training, hand to hand training, or other combat specific tasks but sibkos would also lose say 10 year olds to exposure during survival or landnav training.  Maybe the sibko lost Johnnie because he ran into a Smoke Jaguar on Huntress during land nav training in the jungle.  Or Jill fell from the top of the obstacle course and broke her neck.  Considering that at most a sibko probably loses 10-30% of it's grouping to actual training deaths, and you end up with a higher number of new civies created each year . . . though THEIR children will be freeborns.

There is also to consider that this varies from Clan to Clan. For example Clan Blood Spirit and Clan Steel Viper can have sibkos where NONE of the children graduate to become warriors. And the Horses allow their "failures" to take a second test to still be part of the warrior caste but in a "lesser" position i.e. driver in a tank or simple infantry.

And the divide certainly came way after Nicolas death. The sourcebook for Operation Klondike states in a scientific report that not all vat grown babies survived in the iron womb. It took time to be perfected and later they used those same technology to "purify" the genes (removing illnesses and making the born babies tougher). War of Reaving hints that trueborn warriors are basically immune to common illness unless you push them to the breaking point like the Hellions did with their attack on the Falcon OZ.

Intermittent_Coherence

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #17 on: 28 April 2021, 06:04:36 »
Now after reading several articles about the Clans , I can understand why Kerensky wanted more people .
Like anybody who ever thought up a caste system it's not about having more people so much as having more of the right people. People of the right lineage and training/indoctrination.
Judging by this image from the Jade Falcon sourcebook, it looks like there's multiple cords of some kind used.

Merit plus having the right ancestors, at least as far as the warrior caste is concerned. Phelan Kell noted that one of the ironies of this system is that Kerensky's intended meritocracy turned into a lineage-based rulership in each Clan.

The mistake the Clans collectively made here, IMHO, was in blindly exalting youthful trueborn superiority rather than acknowledging the advantages experience and freeborn 'randomness' could bring if added to the mix. In somebody's alternate universe Andery Kerensky creates a Trial of Propagation or such where non-800 worthies could establish their own bloodname and bloodhouse (Ethan Moreau being the first). An outlet like that for gifted freeborns could add fresh genetic material and motivate both types into performing better on the battlefield.

As to Clan civilians, perhaps Kerensky would have done better to promote his warriors as 'first among equals' and tiebreakers rather than supreme lords over all, and given scientists, merchants, etc some real decision-making power. A government like the post-Blackout Rasalhague Dominion has a stable mix of trueborn and freeborn warriors plus civilians, whereas the Clan Homeworlds had freeborn revolts of one kind or another every time disaster rocked the delicate socialist economy and the warriors reacted poorly to civilian concerns.
That presumes Kerensky was about anything other than him and those loyal to him and all their descendants staying on top. He wasn't. The entire point of a caste system is to perpetuate the rule of a select few. His idea of meritocracy only extended towards vertical advancement along the professions possible within one's own caste. By creating a trueborn warrior caste his society will always have at its head one with the correct lineage...

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 29067
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #18 on: 28 April 2021, 09:34:05 »
The entire point of a caste system is to perpetuate the rule of a select few. His idea of meritocracy only extended towards vertical advancement along the professions possible within one's own caste. By creating a trueborn warrior caste his society will always have at its head one with the correct lineage...

Which is true of most systems, and especially 'established' systems- let's not pretend it is unique to this one instance.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

Intermittent_Coherence

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #19 on: 28 April 2021, 22:17:03 »
Which is true of most systems, and especially 'established' systems- let's not pretend it is unique to this one instance.
Simply pointing out that the presence of one colors any claims that Nicky K was out to establish a meritocracy. He might well have been, but only within the strictures of the caste system.

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 26172
  • Need a hand?
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #20 on: 04 May 2021, 12:12:59 »
Caste systems are actually notoriously resilient, historically speaking. But anyway, it's worth keeping in mind that Clan society is not just caste-based, but more importantly socialist. There is no private property and there is no currency. Everyone is paid the same way, in work credits, and get resources according to their needs (so a labourer will get many more calories of foodstuffs than an accountant). You cannot hoard money (because it doesn't exist), you do not inherit, and success in the society is based on merit.

Those are significant factors for reducing the incidents of social unrest.

I realize that this is an old post, but the Clans are not socialist.  They're closer to communism due to having a planned economy run by the government, but ultimately the fact that the Clans have a rigid caste system means that they can't be either.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Metallgewitter

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #21 on: 05 May 2021, 03:34:13 »
I realize that this is an old post, but the Clans are not socialist.  They're closer to communism due to having a planned economy run by the government, but ultimately the fact that the Clans have a rigid caste system means that they can't be either.

Imho the Clans come closer to socialism then communism. They don't have a planned economy per se since they usually produce what they need in the needed quantity. Planned economy is more like a fixed plan without adjustments. The Foxes / Sharks are the exception since they produce more with which to bargain for other resources. But in essence the Clans are very socialistic since the collective is more important then the individual (here the exception are the Blood Spirits who allow their Clan members a great deal of individuality). And the general exception could be those Trueborn who earn a blood name who then serve as a kind of paragon to which the masses can aspire to. 

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 26172
  • Need a hand?
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #22 on: 05 May 2021, 08:58:37 »
In multiple sourcebooks and novels, it's shown that the Clans regularly give production quotas that the labor caste is expected to meet, regardless of circumstances.  Planned economy.

Secondly, the Clans still operate on a caste system that places warriors at the top, followed by scientists, technicians, merchants, and laborers.  A few Clans give better status to the lower castes than the norm, but there's still a caste system.  Not compatible with communism or socialism.

And the trueborn with a bloodname is not a paragon that the masses can aspire to be, since most of the people in the Clan are freeborn who won't be allowed to become warriors and even if they do, won't be allowed to compete for a bloodname barring very, very exceptional circumstances.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

AlphaMirage

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #23 on: 05 May 2021, 09:20:57 »
It is very much a Diarchy Authoritarian dictatorship (Khan, SaKhan) with a supporting Stratocracy (of Warrior caste in all forms). The lower caste Factors (Senior Laborer, Scientist-General, etc...) are merely there to transfer the orders of the leadership to the masses and report on shortages that the Warriors then Trial for. More Sparta then Stalin with the same amount of brutality inherent in the system.

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 26172
  • Need a hand?
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #24 on: 05 May 2021, 09:59:50 »
Well put.
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Cannonshop

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 10764
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #25 on: 07 May 2021, 13:41:43 »
Imho the Clans come closer to socialism then communism. They don't have a planned economy per se since they usually produce what they need in the needed quantity. Planned economy is more like a fixed plan without adjustments. The Foxes / Sharks are the exception since they produce more with which to bargain for other resources. But in essence the Clans are very socialistic since the collective is more important then the individual (here the exception are the Blood Spirits who allow their Clan members a great deal of individuality). And the general exception could be those Trueborn who earn a blood name who then serve as a kind of paragon to which the masses can aspire to.

Not really.  The problem with 'on demand' production is when you need something you can't just shit out on demand-like foodstuffs. (See: Londerholm).  The Clans are absolutely a command-based, central-planning economy-but thanks to space-magic and the FANTASY nature of Battletech, they didn't do what REAL systems configured like theirs have historically done (Starve to death and ossify after the first few years due to a lack of free market to parasitize off of). 

They're NOT a Meritocracy, as your 'merit' is determined by your birth among the Clans, and even in the liberal ones, if you're not both a Trueborn, AND a warrior, you're a second class subject at the best of times.  (citizens are allowed to take care of themselves, Subjects are ruled and cared for as the livestock they really are.)

the Clans are a caste-based SLAVE society, in which human beings are owned and traded like any other resource, the only modification being that in the case of the Clans, the ownership is collective as opposed to individual-the serfs are owned by the State, and traded as any other piece of the real-estate such as buildings or equipment, bought and sold, used as currency in gambling and so on.

Essentially the worst features of Feudalism and Socialism wrapped up in fancy sounding terminology integrated with Serfdom as practiced in the pre-revolutionary Russian Empire and integrated with 19th century ideas on Eugenics (that have subsequently been disproven in the real world).

That said, the closest model to the Clan system is Maoist communism as practiced by Pol Pot, but integrating the economics of Stalin and the ethics of that austrian painter who won some elections in Germany in the 1930s, but with a prettier sounding public relations campaign.

In short, not a place any sane person would actually WANT to live.
"If you have to ask permission, then it's no longer a Right, it has been turned into a Privilege-something that can be and will be taken from you when convenient."

Decoy

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2706
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #26 on: 11 May 2021, 10:02:47 »
So, still better than the Capellan Confederation and the Draconis Combine, eh?

No. I am not joking. Any fault you find with the Clans you find in spades with those two nations. I would say the only reason they haven't had artificial procreation yet is because they hadn't thought of it and had access to the numbers needed to make it a moot point.
« Last Edit: 11 May 2021, 10:25:46 by Decoy »
"I invented (the drink) PPCs in a time before the internet showed me the depth of human stupidity."-Michael Stackpole.

SteveRestless

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #27 on: 16 May 2021, 22:31:17 »
I think the Iron Wombs were; to not only increase the size of the Warrior Cast quickly but selective breeding on a mass scale and to to keep warriors from having to go on maternity leave.  The alternative was to turn the female warriors into broodmares which would cause all kinds of problems.

Also I believe the Trueborn being superior to Freeborn thing developed over time. I don't think it was there originally.

Originally, the intent was for the non-warrior castes to never have to experience the horrors of war, by mass producing warriors who would not have family to be heartbroken at their loss, and for whom death would not be an end, but a natural part of their new process of procreation. Warrior supremacy is a corruption of this.
Шонхорын хурдаар хурцлан давшъя, Чонын зоригоор асан дүрэлзэье, Тэнхээт морьдын туурайгаар нүргэе, Тамгат Чингисийн ухаанаар даръя | Let’s go faster than a falcon, Let’s burn with the wolf’s courage, Let’s roar with the hooves of strong horses, Let’s go with the wisdom of Tamgat Genghis - The Hu, Wolf Totem

MoneyLovinOgre4Hire

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 26172
  • Need a hand?
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #28 on: 16 May 2021, 22:53:33 »
Where was that stated?
Warning: this post may contain sarcasm.

"I think I've just had another near-Rincewind experience," Death, The Color of Magic

"When in doubt, C4." Jamie Hyneman

Colt Ward

  • Lieutenant General
  • *
  • Posts: 29067
  • Gott Mit Uns
    • Merc Periphery Guide- Bakunin
Re: Trueborn VS Freeborn
« Reply #29 on: 16 May 2021, 23:19:16 »
Uh, that is not why trueborns were created . . . the Trial system was supposed to prevent the horrors of war from touching the lower caste- you know cities being fought through, civvies getting hit by stray weapons fire, homes & businesses being turned to rubble, etc.

But the only hint you get about why the trueborn program was pushed was to break down old familial bonds, just as they were breaking down the old 'tribe' of the Houses for the new of Clans.
Colt Ward
Clan Invasion Backer #149, Leviathans #104

"We come in peace, please ignore the bloodstains."

"Greetings, Mechwarrior. You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Daoshen and the Capellan armada."

 

Register