Author Topic: Battle Standards  (Read 4809 times)

Adam Vagus

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • Wearing my tightest pants, because it's midnite!
Battle Standards
« on: 20 June 2012, 11:35:20 »
While posting in anther thread a question came to mind. According to FM:FS one of the Crucis Lancers units were allowed to carry the Davion standard into battle. Also the ELH is shown to have had a standard in one of the early source books. This begs the question: Did battlemechs charge into battle holding standards like in early battles of history? Flags waving and standard bearers falling only for another man to drop his weapon and pick up the standard to rally his men. It seems kinda weird if this is the case but it appears to be if I'm correctly remembering the fluff for that one Crucis Lancers regiment.

Maelwys

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4884
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #1 on: 20 June 2012, 11:48:21 »
Well, it would certainly fight with the "knightly-ideal" that Battletech had, especially in the earlier days. However, I would think that for the most part, actual standards would be restricted to say, parade duty, while during combat a painted icon on a `Mech would be used instead.

monty

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1249
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #2 on: 20 June 2012, 12:11:24 »
The FWLM award Allisons chain as a decoration to the unit that demonstrates the greatest valour under fire each year. This 3 strand (gold,silver,platinum) chain is traditionally wrapped around the command lances regimental standard. Tradition holds that this has never fallen to the enemy which I would take to mean that the standard is carried into battle as otherwise its not much of a tradition to boast about.The chain was held by the Orloff Grenadiers in 3025, the 4th Free Worlds Legionnaires in 3059 & the Ducal Guard of the Fusilliers of Oriente in 3067.

Until Thomas Mariks reforms Oriente forces used the rank of Banner & Andurien those of Banner & Master Banner. These were a senior grade of Sergeant (Serjeant in Andurien) superior to a Sergeant-Major who along with their regular duties had the responsibility of bearing regimental or other flags into battle. This rank was given only to enlisted men of great loyalty & long service & in Andurien forces had greater authority than Lieutenants who technically outranked them.

Qui desiderat pacem praeparet bellum.
Let him who desires peace prepare for war. (Vegetius)

Adam Vagus

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • Wearing my tightest pants, because it's midnite!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #3 on: 20 June 2012, 12:36:53 »
So there are actually 'Mechs running around waving ginormous flags/standards in battle. ORSM [rockon]

Nav_Alpha

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3679
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #4 on: 20 June 2012, 20:35:03 »
I would think it would be more akin to what modern armies do with battle standards: it would be kept with the headquarters company.
So, yes, it would come with the unit when they invaded a planet but it would be more likely found hung up inside the unit's Mobile HQ vehicle or in the command tent.

My cav unit was one of the most decorated in the Australian Army and our colours would be assigned to certain people attached to the headquarters unit.

This way, the colours do actually come on campaign and can potentially be taken by the enemy - but they're not in the way, fluttering into your cockpit's view port as you line up a shot!  :D


"Hold your position, conserve ammo... and wait for the Dragoons to go Feral"
- last words of unknown merc, Harlech, 3067

Marveryn

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1101
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #5 on: 20 June 2012, 20:58:04 »
I would think it would be more akin to what modern armies do with battle standards: it would be kept with the headquarters company.
So, yes, it would come with the unit when they invaded a planet but it would be more likely found hung up inside the unit's Mobile HQ vehicle or in the command tent.

My cav unit was one of the most decorated in the Australian Army and our colours would be assigned to certain people attached to the headquarters unit.

This way, the colours do actually come on campaign and can potentially be taken by the enemy - but they're not in the way, fluttering into your cockpit's view port as you line up a shot!  :D


i wouldn't be suprrise if certain units or mech group are award standards and they painted there mechs to symbolize that they posses it.  Like a red star  on the company mech to signafied that they won such and such award.. nothing comes to mind right now but it a passing thought as i think about it.

Nav_Alpha

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3679
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #6 on: 20 June 2012, 23:45:30 »

i wouldn't be suprrise if certain units or mech group are award standards and they painted there mechs to symbolize that they posses it.  Like a red star  on the company mech to signafied that they won such and such award.. nothing comes to mind right now but it a passing thought as i think about it.

"Smith's lance, Bravo company, 2nd battalion, were permitted to paint lower arms of their mechs a deep blood red in honor of their heroic stand on Misery in 2999. Future members were also permitted to paint their mechs in a similar fashion after serving one year with the lance."


"Hold your position, conserve ammo... and wait for the Dragoons to go Feral"
- last words of unknown merc, Harlech, 3067

Maelwys

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 4884
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #7 on: 21 June 2012, 00:11:52 »
The FWLM award Allisons chain as a decoration to the unit that demonstrates the greatest valour under fire each year. This 3 strand (gold,silver,platinum) chain is traditionally wrapped around the command lances regimental standard. Tradition holds that this has never fallen to the enemy which I would take to mean that the standard is carried into battle as otherwise its not much of a tradition to boast about.The chain was held by the Orloff Grenadiers in 3025, the 4th Free Worlds Legionnaires in 3059 & the Ducal Guard of the Fusilliers of Oriente in 3067.

You can risk a regimental standard falling into battle without having a `Mech carrying a giant pole with a flag on it. A mobile HQ could be overrun, a base lost, a DropShip captured/destroyed. Then the standard would have been lost in battle without having been actually carried into battle.

Stormlion1

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 15233
  • Apparently Im a rare survivor of the 1st!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #8 on: 22 June 2012, 18:24:55 »
Good money on that the standard has a man assaigned to it to keep it from capture as well. Probably with orders to run with it if there losing or to destroy it if capture is a near.
I don't set an example for others. I make examples of them.

Lysenko

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 1405
  • 15th Dracon: A Proud Tradition of Service
    • Polar Bear Dreams & Stranger Things
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #9 on: 22 June 2012, 19:07:21 »
Actually, people, look on pg 36 of Total Warfare. A Cyclops of the Davion Guards is shown with a "back banner" standard.

EDIT: And looking on CamoSpecs, I found the 'mech from TW:



« Last Edit: 22 June 2012, 19:09:58 by Lysenko »

Stormlion1

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 15233
  • Apparently Im a rare survivor of the 1st!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #10 on: 22 June 2012, 21:20:27 »
Also don't forget the cover of Era Report: 2750...
I don't set an example for others. I make examples of them.

Redfaction

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 159
  • CRAB BATTLE
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #11 on: 25 June 2012, 12:07:08 »
Plus there are pictures in Field Manual 3085 of a Combine Urban Mech with the Kurita standard on its back, indicating this practice was kept up even if the Jihad era. The Marian Hegemony also has Aquifiers, the men/machines responsible for carrying the units standard into battle. I should the other states of the IS (especially those chivalric ones) often do have banners that they would carry. Plus, just how bad ass is it to have your army bannered out :p 40k got that right!

fltadm

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #12 on: 25 June 2012, 15:10:41 »
Here is a thought , would it be the actual Colours, Guidons, ect going in to battle or would they be camp flages. Colours being realy important camp flags no near as much


Guidon


Camp Flag
No Matter where you go,there you are

,,,,gotta lov "Space Cougers"

Redfaction

  • Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 159
  • CRAB BATTLE
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #13 on: 25 June 2012, 19:14:27 »
I suppose it depends on the nation or the unit? One might say that in the case of banners that are said never to have been captured, its a good chance its the real deal, or possibly a copy? I dont think there is any real canon on that subject to my knowledge of reading through awards.

BTW fltadam, as a Canadian I respect the choice of flag to use there  O0

fltadm

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 1938
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #14 on: 26 June 2012, 01:54:04 »
Thats only because wiki did not have the LdSH(RC)
No Matter where you go,there you are

,,,,gotta lov "Space Cougers"

Adam Vagus

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • Wearing my tightest pants, because it's midnite!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #15 on: 26 June 2012, 05:40:19 »
So they are carried into battle then given what was just said. ORSM  O0

Marwynn

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 3984
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #16 on: 26 June 2012, 08:33:24 »
There's also the Hatamoto series from the DCMS. They must be called "banner bearers" for a reason...

Stormlion1

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 15233
  • Apparently Im a rare survivor of the 1st!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #17 on: 26 June 2012, 10:28:22 »
I wonder if the back banner actually would change the weight of a mech or require the removal of some of the back armor to allow it to be added on?
I don't set an example for others. I make examples of them.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #18 on: 26 June 2012, 10:37:18 »
I wonder if the back banner actually would change the weight of a mech or require the removal of some of the back armor to allow it to be added on?

Nah. Per the Solaris VII MapPack(which hasn't been superceded yet I think), cosmetic changes such as false weapons or intimidating visual alterations take up zero mass and zero crits. I'd say a huge DCMS back banner or FedSuns flag would qualify for those rules.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Stormlion1

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 15233
  • Apparently Im a rare survivor of the 1st!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #19 on: 26 June 2012, 10:39:57 »
Nah. Per the Solaris VII MapPack(which hasn't been superceded yet I think), cosmetic changes such as false weapons or intimidating visual alterations take up zero mass and zero crits. I'd say a huge DCMS back banner or FedSuns flag would qualify for those rules.

Thanks, been a while since I've looked through that.
I don't set an example for others. I make examples of them.

Charlie Tango

  • Moderator Emeritus
  • Global Moderator
  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 6499
  • I'm feeling a little sketchy...
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #20 on: 26 June 2012, 11:23:23 »

There's also this one on Camospecs:

http://camospecs.com/Miniature.asp?ID=4340
"This is a war universe. War all the time. That is its nature.
There may be other universes based on all sorts of other principles, but ours seems to be based on war and games."
  
-- William S. Burroughs

Adam Vagus

  • Master Sergeant
  • *
  • Posts: 331
  • Wearing my tightest pants, because it's midnite!
Re: Battle Standards
« Reply #21 on: 27 June 2012, 13:18:01 »
Niiiiiiice  O0