Author Topic: Fortress-class as a combat vessel  (Read 3515 times)

Alan Grant

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2251
Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« on: 10 January 2015, 15:44:28 »
I was recently reviewing some info on the Medusans and couldn't help but notice that the Fortress-class dropship seems to be a popular combat dropship in that command. Aside from a single modified Excalibur, the Fortresses are the command heavy elements.

Do you think that's typical in the Great House fleets? Do you think Fortresses are assigned to attack or assault dropship flotillas or squadrons?

I guess I'm talking about the eras in which the Fortress-class is less rare. I know at one point it was threatened with extinction.

Archangel

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5618
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #1 on: 10 January 2015, 17:10:05 »
The Lyran Commonwealth was the only state that deployed Fortresses in any significant numbers being as they were the only state to continue manufacturing the Fortress throughout the Succession Wars.  The other states had few, if any, Fortresses.  IMO only the most prestigious units were assigned Fortresses as a command DropShip.  The rest were likely held in reserve for critical offensives or counter-offensives for which a few "special" flotillas/squadrons may be formed.  As far as I am aware, only the Lyrans had enough to form an entire assault group out of Fortress-class DropShips.
Detect evil first, smite second and ask questions later.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #2 on: 10 January 2015, 17:28:59 »
That's during the Succession Wars. I would guess that they become more common afterwards.

As a combat ship, I think it was mostly a case of using what they could get ahold of. The Fortress's firepower is decent enough in the forwards arcs for anti-fighter work, but not gonna crush DropShips in a single blow or anything, and it's hardly particularly tough or fast enough to be noticeable in either category.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6128
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #3 on: 10 January 2015, 17:56:25 »
Its a function of its real world age.

The Fortress is in the Assault Ships section of DropShips & JumpShips alongside the Avenger, Intruder, and Achilles.

From DropShips & JumpShips

Quote
The Fortress Class DropShip is the best-armed and armored DropShip still in operation

Quote
Originally designed as a heavy troop transport, the ship's tremendous firepower makes it among the deadliest of the assault DropShips.

It is still classified as an assault ship in TRO3057.
« Last Edit: 10 January 2015, 18:14:15 by Jellico »

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #4 on: 10 January 2015, 18:15:20 »
Yeah, alongside those ships, it's got the guns to rumble. Keep it the hell away from PWSes, though.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

pheonixstorm

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5548
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #5 on: 11 January 2015, 02:13:39 »
Unless you do as one posted did in one of the forums and refit the Fortress to use a LOT of Long Tom Cannons. Then its boom boom bye-bye

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #6 on: 11 January 2015, 10:46:07 »
Bye-bye to the Fortress, you mean. Replacing the conventional guns with artillery makes it useless as a space combatant. It would be unable to fire anything in space, making it only a little more useful in combat than a conventional JumpShip. You *could* use it as an assault craft what with those infantry bays, but it's not fast enough to get them onto anything but stationary targets, or maybe a Behemoth.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Giovanni Blasini

  • Lieutenant Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 7256
  • And I think it's gonna be a long, long time...
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #7 on: 11 January 2015, 12:17:43 »
Artillery cannons, which can fire in space, not artillery pieces, which can't.  See the Transit 13G from TR:Prototypes for an example.
« Last Edit: 11 January 2015, 12:21:00 by Giovanni Blasini »
"Does anyone know where the love of God goes / When the waves turn the minutes to hours?"
-- Gordon Lightfoot, "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald"

Archangel

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5618
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #8 on: 11 January 2015, 15:39:31 »
Per 3057r, the Long Tom III Cannon can only be fired when the DropShip is grounded.  In addition, by 3057, the increasing rarity of the Fortress curtailed its use so that it would generally only operate from secured landing zones.
Detect evil first, smite second and ask questions later.

Col Toda

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2984
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #9 on: 12 January 2015, 07:58:03 »
Lacks a little armor and lacks aerospace fighters .  That makes the Fortress less than Ideal for an offensive .  Had the same problems as the Excaliber I had .  Managed to get one fortress and use it to cart around my training cadre .

pheonixstorm

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5548
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #10 on: 13 January 2015, 00:37:33 »
Per the rules Long Tom CANNONS are direct fire while the Long Tom ARTILLERY are indirect. There is a difference.

See TacOps pg 284 construction rules (first I could find)
Quote
All of the Artillery Cannons presented here may be installed on their respective Available Unit types in accordance with the unit’s standard construction
rules (for aerospace units, Artillery Cannons are classified as autocannons and may be mounted as part of an autocannon bay).

LT Cannons can also be mounted on space stations, warships, etc.

While normally LT Artillery are stuck firing from grounded units. Though would small craft be able to fire a normal artillery piece while flying or only grounded... I know VTOLs and I believe Conventional Aircraft can..

You are now informed :) Please Long Tom responsibly.

serack

  • Lieutenant
  • *
  • Posts: 808
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #11 on: 13 January 2015, 05:13:05 »
the only artillery that can be fired while not grounded is the Arrow IV whether its on VTOL ,Aero, Conventional, or Small craft/ Dropship :)

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #12 on: 13 January 2015, 08:00:19 »
Apologies, I thought you were referring to the artillery piece. Though going with an all-LTC load seems pretty inefficient to me. You'd be better off going with normal guns and winding up with far more raw punch.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll

Wrangler

  • Colonel
  • *
  • Posts: 25163
  • Dang it!
    • Battletech Fanon Wiki
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #13 on: 14 January 2015, 07:07:01 »
Am I crazy to think the designation of "assault" meant something different in early early books? Like designation what used, such as planetary assault.  Takes a beating going in, Lands in the contested hot zone where it holds out using its artillery type of "assault" verse like large big gunned ship meant to fight biggest units in the field and bully the rest?
"Men, fetch the Urbanmechs.  We have an interrogation to attend to." - jklantern
"How do you defeat a Dragau? Shoot the damn thing. Lots." - Jellico 
"No, it's a "Most Awesome Blues Brothers scene Reenactment EVER" waiting to happen." VotW Destrier - Weirdo  
"It's 200 LY to Sian, we got a full load of shells, a half a platoon of Grenadiers, it's exploding outside, and we're wearing flak jackets." VoTW Destrier - Misterpants
-Editor on Battletech Fanon Wiki

Alan Grant

  • Captain
  • *
  • Posts: 2251
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #14 on: 14 January 2015, 08:44:15 »
Well the Avenger, Intruder and Achilles were definitely all intended for combat in space. Whether that meant a gun fight or marine boarding or both.

It sounds like the Fortress was sort of the "combat lander" among them. It has more firepower than the larger Overlord. I think it was designed to be able to fight it's way to the surface, tearing up space attackers as it flew past them and then land and potentially fight some more to support its troops. It's not stellar at that role because it's somewhat thin-skinned, but that seems to be a problem with all the early dropships (and many warships).

It typically doesn't get used that way from the Succession Wars on because it is fluffed as being rarer. But I think that kind of operation was what the designers had envisioned. They were picturing Fortresses headed for atmo, guns blazing with fighters and combat droppers and even warships on both sides duking it out at the same time.

pheonixstorm

  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 5548
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #15 on: 14 January 2015, 12:48:21 »
When I brought up the Long Tom Cannons I was making a reference to this thread Pocket Warship, 3025 style.

I think that the LTC will also cause AE damage to all units in the hex though I am not positive. So in some regards a much better choice that regular guns as Weirdo pointed out.

Jellico

  • Spatium Magister
  • Freelance Writer
  • Major
  • *
  • Posts: 6128
  • BattleMechs are the lords of the battlefield
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #16 on: 14 January 2015, 14:35:38 »
Well the Avenger, Intruder and Achilles were definitely all intended for combat in space. Whether that meant a gun fight or marine boarding or both.

It sounds like the Fortress was sort of the "combat lander" among them. It has more firepower than the larger Overlord. I think it was designed to be able to fight it's way to the surface, tearing up space attackers as it flew past them and then land and potentially fight some more to support its troops. It's not stellar at that role because it's somewhat thin-skinned, but that seems to be a problem with all the early dropships (and many warships).

It typically doesn't get used that way from the Succession Wars on because it is fluffed as being rarer. But I think that kind of operation was what the designers had envisioned. They were picturing Fortresses headed for atmo, guns blazing with fighters and combat droppers and even warships on both sides duking it out at the same time.

It didn't get used that way before the Succession Wars, as the fluff in DS&JS makes clear. It was a heavily armed troopy that was thrown into the assault role when all the WarShips went away because it had guns and armour when other ships didn't.

Weirdo

  • Painter of Borth the Magic Puma
  • Catalyst Demo Team
  • Major General
  • *
  • Posts: 40909
  • We can do it. We have to.
    • Christina Dickinson Writes
Re: Fortress-class as a combat vessel
« Reply #17 on: 14 January 2015, 19:40:23 »
I think that the LTC will also cause AE damage to all units in the hex though I am not positive.

Nothing will.
My wife writes books
"Thanks to Megamek, I can finally play BattleTech the way it was meant to be played--pantsless!"   -Neko Bijin
"...finally, giant space panties don't seem so strange." - Whistler
"Damn you, Weirdo... Damn you for being right!" - Paul
"...I was this many years old when I found out that licking a touchscreen in excitement is a bad idea." - JadeHellbringer
"We are the tribal elders. Weirdo is the mushroom specialist." - Worktroll